[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

On Jul 30, 2009, at 7:57 PM, David Pollak wrote: > > I wonder if one day > > we can kinda get Jersey to expose its own SiteMap (of sorts) into > > Lift's SiteMap? > > There's a way to dynamically create submenus based on a function in > SiteMap. We could wire that up to Jersey's mechanisms to ex

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:13 AM, James Strachan wrote: > > 2009/7/30 James Strachan : > > 2009/7/17 Timothy Perrett : > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> I've been taking a look at Jersey and how it operates with Lift by way > >> of the recent integration that cropped up on dev.java.net... > > > > Though it

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

2009/7/30 James Strachan : > 2009/7/17 Timothy Perrett : >> Hey guys, >> >> I've been taking a look at Jersey and how it operates with Lift by way >> of the recent integration that cropped up on dev.java.net... > > Though it did start here first! :) > http://www.nabble.com/using-Lift-templates-sta

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

2009/7/17 Timothy Perrett : > Hey guys, > > I've been taking a look at Jersey and how it operates with Lift by way > of the recent integration that cropped up on dev.java.net... Though it did start here first! :) http://www.nabble.com/using-Lift-templates-stand-alone-inside-other-frameworks-like-

Re: [scala] Re: [Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

David, Thanks for your query. Here's an example from Hinze and Jeuring's paper, the syntax is Haskell(ish), but it's also simple enough to transliterate to Scala. rhs = Abs "n" (If (App (App (Var "=") (Var "n")) (Var "0"))

Re: [scala] Re: [Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

Greg, This sounds interesting... but I'd like to see what the Scala code would look like that would manipulate the Zipper-based data structures. If you've got a pile of XML, what does it look like to map it to nested [case] classes? What does it look like to manipulate the XML? Thanks, David O

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

Greg, once again your musing are generally over my head but I follow your thoughts conceptually here. Sounds like your saying Jersey wasnt the best fit with lift from a functional perspective and you want to create something more monadic based on the zipper pattern? Like i said, Jersey is not p

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

Guys, After playing around with integrating Lift and Jersey before the Jersey guys did an 'official' integration and thinking hard about how i wanted to reference locations in data structures via URLs, i realized that zipper(cf. this explan

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

>>Wait a few days, and I think there'll be some very good news on this front. Tease! :) On Jul 17, 10:51 am, David Pollak wrote: > There are benefits to both approaches.  I prefer the partial function > composition, but annotations on Pojos have their place. > Wait a few days, and I think there

[Lift] Re: Jersey + Lift, whats the story?

There are benefits to both approaches. I prefer the partial function composition, but annotations on Pojos have their place. Wait a few days, and I think there'll be some very good news on this front. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I've been taking a lo