Hello,
On 24 January 2012 22:20, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Keeping the staging-merge going would be about five people
committing to 50€ a month. That is, of course, not enough for me to
live on. It merely means that taking on this
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:10:16AM +, James wrote:
Initialized empty Git repository in
/home/james/Desktop/patchy/lilypond-autobuild/.git/
fatal: attempt to fetch/clone from a shallow repository
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
It wants to have a full
git clone
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
However when I run patchy I am getting
--snip--
james@jameslilydev2:~/Desktop/patchy$ ./run-lilypond-staging.sh
remote: Counting objects: 83, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (57/57), done.
remote: Total 57 (delta 45), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking
Hello. This error did not break the build process and I don't know
exactly what consequences it has.
While make doc:
...
cd ./out-www; texi2pdf -I ./out-www -I
/home/fravd/source/lilypond/Documentation/out -I
/home/fravd/source/lilypond/Documentation -I
/home/fravd/source/lilypond/Documentation
Moving to devel:
I think this bounty slush fund needs to happen soon-ish - there's been
two rounds of talking about it, which is great, but it will remain talk
unless someone does something. I also understand that David is in the
position of not wanting to do a full court press for
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:01:50AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
1) Create an e-mail address contrib...@lilypond.org (this I can't
do - can someone please do this).
Can't do.
Seems simple, effective, and startable in the next two weeks. I'm
sure it is not perfect, but LilyPond is not
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:24:40 +, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:01:50AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
1) Create an e-mail address contrib...@lilypond.org (this I can't
do - can someone please do this).
Can't do.
Seems simple, effective, and startable in the next
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:38:21AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:24:40 +, Graham Percival wrote:
Check your email archives for our discussion on 2011 Dec 2 for all
the reasons I think this is a bad idea.
Given that several users have already expressed the
2012/1/25 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Check your email archives for our discussion on 2011 Dec 2 for all
the reasons I think this is a bad idea.
Sorry, but i'm searching for 10 minutes and haven't found relevant
thread. Can you be more specific?
Janek
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Nice suggestions, Mike!
2) Create a PayPal account for said address with one and only one
person, the € czar, who has access to it. This should be someone
responsible and respectable.
Hmm. This actually means that PayPal is involved two times,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/25 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
Check your email archives for our discussion on 2011 Dec 2 for all
the reasons I think this is a bad idea.
Sorry, but i'm searching for 10 minutes and haven't found relevant
Can someone do a survey how other free software projects handle this?
We could also set up a Pledgie campaign, however, this also cuts off
3% (or more) of the money.
97% of something is more than 100% of nothing.
Indeed.
What about setting up a whole bunch of lilypond crowdfunding
Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 8019ff784cd3aa6cc43b8eb8f29a621bc5800f5c
Merged staging, now at: f1b7a60cdb4c2f1d41329a1b3a6a01f4306f6467
Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure
Success:../configure --disable-optimising
Success:
lilypond.patchy.gra...@gmail.com writes:
Begin LilyPond compile, commit: 8019ff784cd3aa6cc43b8eb8f29a621bc5800f5c
Merged staging, now at: f1b7a60cdb4c2f1d41329a1b3a6a01f4306f6467
Success:./autogen.sh --noconfigure
Success:../configure
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
*** FAILED BUILD ***
nice make doc -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
Previous good commit: 8019ff784cd3aa6cc43b8eb8f29a621bc5800f5c
Current broken commit: f1b7a60cdb4c2f1d41329a1b3a6a01f4306f6467
That would be the 2240 work. I did a full make check and
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
*** FAILED BUILD ***
nice make doc -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
Previous good commit: 8019ff784cd3aa6cc43b8eb8f29a621bc5800f5c
Current broken commit: f1b7a60cdb4c2f1d41329a1b3a6a01f4306f6467
That would be the 2240
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:29:51PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
That would be the 2240 work. I did a full make check and a build of the
info documentation which in my experience is pretty much the same as a
make doc but somewhat faster.
If it wasn't a build from scratch, it doesn't count.
2012/1/25 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Sorry again for the problem, but I am actually at a loss what to do if
my guess about the translations is correct: do I copy over the relevant
@lilypond passages and keep everything else the same (namely unupdated,
and do I leave the @example code passages
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
I do share Graham's concerns which have been previously hashed out
in private discussions: an official money channel for LilyPond is
not something easy to set up.
There are already existing free software umbrella organizations that
do this: one is
2012/1/25 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
2012/1/25 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Sorry again for the problem, but I am actually at a loss what to do if
my guess about the translations is correct: do I copy over the relevant
@lilypond passages and keep everything else the same (namely
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:09:25PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
There are already existing free software umbrella organizations that
do this: one is SPI[1], another SFC[2].
Yes, I've considered suggesting (after Valentin suggested it to
me) that we might want to approach SFC, but it hasn't been
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:29:51PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
That would be the 2240 work. I did a full make check and a build of the
info documentation which in my experience is pretty much the same as a
make doc but somewhat faster.
If it
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
WTF? That's definitely something in the changes file. I checked this
and it compiled and I had code that made sure it compiled. With all the
rebasing to make this fit better I must have displaced the relevant
commit that
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Seems like I really got mixed up with my builds. Turns out that my
changes.tely entry depends on the patch in
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2247 so I
pushed that as well as it is reasonably simple and well-contained.
No idea how this
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
WTF? That's definitely something in the changes file. I checked this
and it compiled and I had code that made sure it compiled. With all the
rebasing to make this fit better I
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
WTF? That's definitely something in the changes file. I checked this
and it compiled and I had code that made sure it compiled. With all the
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
I'll try doing this without messing up again. 15 minutes or so at
least.
Go ahead. No diff to last staging regarding the result, but the fix
commit has been pulled into the side branch.
James was so kind to check the
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5564043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm not certain if 2 days is a good number. Phil, after examining the
specific issues, would you say that 95% of real bug reports are handled
within 2 days? or should we make that 3 or 4 days instead?
http://codereview.appspot.com/5575047/
___
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:29:28PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
I would want to avoid
the situation where I have money on my hand I can't spend in good
conscience.
In that case, only accept transfers which you feel cover existing
work (provided the sender realizes this), or transfers which are
- Original Message -
From: gra...@percival-music.ca
To: janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Cc: re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: change bugreports expected response time (issue 5575047)
I'm not certain if 2 days
2012/1/24 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Xavier, may i ask you an unusual question? Feel free to ignore it.
Why could you want to become bounty hunter (i.e. person that
organizes bounties and sponsorship)?
This topic is not that easy, as expresses the numerous replies showing
the
On 25/01/2012 5:21 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello. This error did not break the build process and I don't know
exactly what consequences it has.
While make doc:
...
cd ./out-www; texi2pdf -I ./out-www -I
/home/fravd/source/lilypond/Documentation/out -I
34 matches
Mail list logo
