Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 4:48 AM
In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
publicly available hosting sites using
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
On May 3, 2015, at 16:42 , David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Dan Eble d...@faithful.be writes:
Adding a wrapper context will have undesirable effects.
The question is what requirements or mechanisms we could employ in order
to remove the undesirable
k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
On 2015/05/03 20:25:22, dak wrote:
On 2015/05/03 16:42:02, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I find it awkward when \absolute c'' and \absolute g'' mean exactly
the same
thing. But it's not like I could not live with it. But I still
would
recommend
just using c to
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 5/3/15 8:33 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 10/04/15 09:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
So the question is whether Launchpad has a usable API, right? Joseph,
do you know more?c
Just to follow up on this, I exchanged a
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
URL:https://kallithea-scm.org/. It seems aligned to the Software
Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
does the job.
Kallithea doesn't seem to have a native issue
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 11:30 AM
Anyone evaluated/tested/whatever Kallithea?
URL:https://kallithea-scm.org/. It seems aligned to the Software
Freedom Convervancy, so maybe we could get Savannah to support it if it
does the job.
Reviewers: dak, Trevor Daniels, J_lowe,
Message:
Please review
Description:
Docstring and index entries added
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/232180043/
Affected files (+4, -0 lines):
M Documentation/notation/ancient.itely
M ly/property-init.ly
Index:
On 5/3/15 9:48 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
In searching around on Savannah's page, I found InDefero
http://www.indefero.net/ which claims to be an open-source lightweight
copy of Google Code. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that there are any
publicly available hosting sites
Reviewers: J_lowe,
Message:
I've pushed to staging branch.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=f758afb1497e9d95e564844363f23efa5a313321
Description:
Fix lilypond-invoke-editor's temp dir
To use environment variable TMP and TEMP is
Windows-only conventions.
The POSIX
2015-05-04 14:46 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
More hunting around on Savannah led me to Apache Allura, which is claimed
to be an open-source (Apache license) follow-on to the
proprietary-software SourceForge.
It uses git, has webhooks (
As promised, a starter list of requirements for the issue handling system,
to allow us to check potential replacements to Google code.
1. Allow creation of a new sequentially numbered issue, with
text describing the issue’s title and details
2. Allow tagging the issue with a range of
Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
Interesting!
https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
Allura (Apache License).
Launchpad provides also the hosting, while Allura should be deployed on
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Federico Bruni wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 2:53 PM
Interesting!
https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
I think that the main alternatives are Launchpad (Affero GPL) and Apache
Allura (Apache License).
Launchpad provides also
Sorry if this raises old stuff again.
For me many of your requirwments could be rather easily (and partially
automatically ) be handled with an integrated system of code, review and
issues, i.e. a system that provides something like pull requests.
In addition to many of your list items this
Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions.
As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
LilyDev.
I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of live-build and then
add the modifications you are suggesting.
2015-05-04 0:09 GMT+02:00 Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
getting this system adopted by
2015-05-04 18:32 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
LilyDev.
I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of live-build and then
add the modifications you are suggesting.
I have a question: does anybody
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 5:21 PM
Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
between the various versions and what that might mean for
- Original Message -
From: Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com
To: Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com
Cc: LilyPond Development Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: Improving the Contributors Guide and LilyDev
2015-05-04 18:32 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni
On 5/4/15 11:19 AM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd rather put a script to download the repository when the user logs
in
for the first time.
What do you think?
Isn't that the way it works right now? If not, it certainly should.
There should be a script that configures git
On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Wasn't Savannah's main system Savane a fork of SourceForge's proprietary
software version? Anybody have more of a clue about the relations
between the various versions and what that might mean for our chances of
getting this system adopted
On 5/4/15 10:16 AM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Ah, wait .. sourceforce have an importer from GoogleCode. I had to
register to see it, but that's easy. After that, it's here
https://sourceforge.net/p/import_project/google-code/
It says it will import Wiki pages, source code
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 5/4/15 10:21 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
If we have a really viable migration path out of non-Savannah hosting,
it seems like putting our eggs not in too many outsourced baskets
might save us from some future headaches like the Google code
Carl Sorensen
I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
I don't know, because I never used it.
Just as a reminder, we had a very helpful interchange with
the
On May 3, 2015, at 6:15 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
CG 3.3.4 Making Patches
git format-patch origin doesn't work if you type it in literally,
but gives ambiguous argument 'origin' message.
Shouldn't happen unless you managed to create either a local branch
named origin or a
Hi Federico,
On May 4, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions.
As Debian Jessie was released few days ago, I was thinking about a new
LilyDev.
Hey, that’s great timing!
I think I'll first upgrade to a more recent version of
Please review, thanks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly
File input/regression/stencil-scale.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly#newcode8
input/regression/stencil-scale.ly:8: its bounding box.)
Please use
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc
File lily/beaming-pattern.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc#newcode170
lily/beaming-pattern.cc:170: int start_dur =
On May 3, 2015, at 11:02 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I think that it would be great to have you prepare patches for the CG.
The CG is the least-reviewed manual in our set, so it's probably the
easiest manual for which to get patches approved.
Will do, once this discussion
Looks good! Thanks for posting it. A couple of comments included.
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly
File input/regression/stencil-scale.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/235090043/diff/1/input/regression/stencil-scale.ly#newcode8
Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
[snip]
You can see the progress here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
Update: (one ladder, two snakes)
1. I now see that
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc
File lily/beaming-pattern.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/diff/1/lily/beaming-pattern.cc#newcode170
lily/beaming-pattern.cc:170: int start_dur =
Reviewers: ,
Message:
I noticed these recently and it seemed appropriate to fix them this way.
Description:
silence C++ warnings
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/231370043/
Affected files (+2, -2 lines):
M lily/beaming-pattern.cc
M lily/page-breaking.cc
Index:
Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk writes:
On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
the use of
On 5/4/15 4:25 PM, Dan Eble d...@faithful.be wrote:
But anyways, the main point of this email is to point out that pushing
debian could cost you developers - I don't know how many people like me
there are out there, but if I have to use a debian-based system my
reaction is likely to be thanks
On 5/4/15 3:44 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 10:01 PM
OK, I've created a project on SourceForge and started
downloading the issues DB from GoogleCode.
[snip]
You can see the progress here:
But anyways, the main point of this email is to point out that pushing
debian could cost you developers - I don't know how many people like me
there are out there, but if I have to use a debian-based system my
reaction is likely to be thanks but no thanks. (That said, I think a
The data point
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, May 04, 2015 8:40 PM
So perhaps it would be a good idea to test Allura
on SourceForge, and see if we like it. If we do,
then we could let the Savannah people know, and
maybe they'd be willing to use it as their issue tracker.
OK, I've created a project on
On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
the use of LilyDev than we were when the CG was
On 5/4/15 1:16 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Carl Sorensen
I'm fine if we can get everything on Savannah, but it seems
to me that in the past, there was a feeling that Savane's
bug tracking was significantly inferior to Google Code.
I don't know, because I never used it.
On 04/05/15 22:01, Trevor Daniels wrote:
You can see the progress here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/tickets/
I'm getting
Error 403
Read access required
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 04/05/15 22:39, Wols Lists wrote:
On 04/05/15 04:02, Carl Sorensen wrote:
2. Compiling with LilyDev (2.3) and Compiling (4.x)
2.3 is about getting it set up with LilyDev. 4.x is about general work
whether with or without LilyDev. We are much stronger about recommending
the use of LilyDev
On May 4, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
They both have highlighting for c++, .css, and .py files,
gedit also has it for .scm, .itexi, .itely, and .make files,
but geany doesn’t have it for these.
(And neither has it for .ly files.)
This was from the default
44 matches
Mail list logo
