ome doc updates and
translations if they are available, or make them known issues if not. As
Janek says, anything else goes into a branch.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
gt;
> Other possibly relevant software installed:
>
> texi2html: 1.82
> dblatex: 0.2.12
> texlive: 20110705
>
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
p://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-02/msg00287.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-02/msg00295.html
Thanks for summarising that, Xavier. I've created a new tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3174
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
t; Can someone confirm?
>>
>> -Harm
>>
>> I can't get the issue list, and from the Administer page, I get "Project
>> Hosting is currently READ-ONLY for network maintenance"
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>
> Thanks.
> Seems we have to wait.
>
> -Harm
Back up now.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
the train today...will let you know!
Could you let the bug squad know if you need a new tracker for this, Mike?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
dule hierarchy in scm directory
>> rather than a single flat directory".
>
> CC to bug-lilypond; maybe the guile V2 issues (#1055?) should then be
> marked as blocking that new item.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Johannes
New tracker created by Eluze.
http://cod
token free". When the next squad
member comes on shift, or if someone wants to do some extra, they send
an email saying "Bug squad token taken". This does not replace the
rota; we would still have allotted days.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
9-Nov-2012:
Mon - Colin H
Tue - Eluze
Wed - Marek
Thu - (vacant but will be Joe Wakeling soon)
Fri - Marek
Sat - Ralph
Sun - Colin H
> I would prefer Sunday, but Saturday can be ok.
I was thinking that Marek should get some relief as he has been doing
two days for a long time.
If you to
Hi,
Just received a report that Linux Audio is down, and so our downloads
are unavailable.
Is there someone we could or should notify?
Or just wait for it to come back up?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
ts.html
[3] https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/bug-squad
--
Colin Hall
Bug Meister
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
utor-big-page#mentors
In practice, ask the devs. Phil Holmes or David Kastrup should be able
to guide you. Although Graham is listed here as Project Manager, I
don't this is the case any longer.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/topdocs/A
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:21:05AM -0800, Eluze wrote:
> Colin Hall-3 wrote
> > OK, it looks like I have misunderstood the intention of your original
> > bug report, Eluze.
> >
> > Please specify the circumstances under which you would like to see a
> > warn
atCountVisibility"
> or if they could both share "repeatCountVisibility".
>
> Example of how it would work
> \relative c'' {
> \set countUnfoldRepeats = ##t
> \repeat unfold 4 { c1 }
> }
> End of example
>
> Thank you in advance.
&
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:29:50AM -0800, Eluze wrote:
> Colin Hall-3 wrote
> > As I understand it this is a request for a new feature in Lilypond
> > that warns the user if they use \set on a property which can also be
> > manipulated using \override and \revert.
>
correctly understood this and, if so, does it make sense to
accept this feature request?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-lilypond
- End forwarded message -----
--
Colin Hall
South Mains
West Linton
EH46 7AY
Scotland
Tel: 01968 661994
Mob: 07786 677582
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
d bug here that I can capture in a tracker.
If one of the devs could have a quick look and give me a moniker for
it, I'll raise a tracker.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:17:57AM +0100, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On 6 d?c. 2012, at 11:08, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm handling a feature request on bug-lilypond for some enhancements
> > to the fret diagram features.
> >
> >
f the devs advise me on whether to accept the
request, reject it, or press for further definition?
If you think a request for further definition is the correct response,
please be specific about what is missing.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lily
Hi,
Werner Lemberg reported an assertion failure on his own build of 2.17.6 here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-11/msg00047.html
I'm forwarding this to the devs in case it is of interest.
Cheers,
Colin.
- Forwarded message from Colin Hall -
Date: Thu, 2
d in a separate package? Did I
> fail to use any build options?
Thanks, Yannis. I'm not a developer so I've forwarded your email to
lilypond-devel.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
s://gist.github.com/3581128
>
> The output of the bash command `set` after `brew install`:
> https://gist.github.com/3588526
>
> The configuration of the package manager (`brew —config`):
> https://gist.github.com/3684007
Thanks for the report, Y
On 26 August 2012 02:16, Keith OHara wrote:
> Xavier Scheuer gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Dear LilyPond developers and users,
> > dear bug squad, could you add this feature request on the tracker?
> >
> > Here is a feature request made on the French users mailing list.
> >
> > It can be seen as a mi
Hi,
I notice that several of the developers have been helping out with
responding to bug reports recently.
I just wanted to say thank for the support.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
blems with them?
Does anyone have guidance that the bug squad can pass on to users who
experience interoperability problems in the future?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/ma
We should verify all the fixes tagged 2_15_43.
Cheers,
Colin.
On Aug 18, 2012 10:31 PM, "eluze" wrote:
> Graham Percival-3 wrote
> >
> > We are excited to announce the release of LilyPond 2.15.95. With
> > this release, development on version 2.15 is frozen for the
> > upcoming 2.16 stable relea
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Štěpán Němec wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > About the docs, can you say where you looked and failed to find the
> > correct guidance? It might help with preparation of a document
Karol Majewski gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dear LilyPond friends!I have to say something that keeps me awake at night:
Current LilyPond flags look bad! They look so bad that I have to use straight
flags instead. The big problem for me is that flags on a single note have
different shapes.
Thanks f
Hi Pavel,
As suggested here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2513#c12
I have added you to the membership of the Lilypond Google code project
using your gnu email address.
This allows you to be marked as "Owner" of an issue.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
t i use \bookOutputName and \bookOutputSuffix - they
> > may complicate things for you, but i think it's worth supporting them.
> > I grant you a permission to use this score for testing your pdf
> > attachment feature, including sending the results to LilyPond mailing
> &
t; > culprit.
> >
> > The behavior doesn't occur when I compile the same score with 2.14
> >
> > Have a look at the attached files.
I've created a tracker for this here
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2648
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
an excellent idea.
Anything that gets us away from typing at each other and towards human
contact is a good thing.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
Thanks very much to everyone who responded to the poll.
I have sent an acknowledgement to all respondents; if you sent a
response and have not received an acknowledgement please let me know.
I'll be sending the responses out shortly.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin
ork and
the bug or feature that you are working on won't be already fixed by
the incrowd when you do your next pull.
DevL
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:09:13AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> I have posted all the responses to the survey.
>
I've just received a late entry. Posting it now.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond
I have posted all the responses to the survey.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
onsidering his initial
thrashing around on the list, I think it is a testament to how
receptive our development group is. There can always be more
developers, but I don't think Lily is doing badly, considering how
much of a niche application it is.
DevK
countdown).
Cheers,
DevJ
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
x27;t get done). Hopefully, this should change with
GOP.
Finally, i think we lack a vision and common goal that would give us
motivation boost. I find it quite surprising that Janek's articles in
LilyPond Report #25 and #26 gathered little comments from experienced
developers
t not as involved as I used to be. I suspect those that
have truly left will simply not bother replying to Graham's request.
DevG
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
an email,
some kind soul probably will take care of it.
Writing this email probably took me as much time as it would take me
to produce a small patch following the new procedures, so I don't have
any good excuse.
DevF
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
opers
mailing list so I am around and available if needed. But I cannot do
any kind of extensive documentation maintenance. :(
DevE
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
or a project that is largely powered by people solving their own
particular problems.
For me, though, I have moved onto different things although at some
point in the future it would be nice to come back to it.
Cheers,
DevD
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypon
instead I've just been sending issue reports even though
I could easily fix them myself if I was motivated. I know that there
was good reasons for the whole staging and countdown thing, and it's
much nicer now that git master doesn't break, but this is another
reason I haven't been doing as much recently.
DevC
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
of the current regression tests which are run but not
verified), regressions introduced by a given commit would be more
efficiently detected.
DevB
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e.
FWIW, I think that efforts like Janek's benchmarks are useful for
overcoming this last point: a clear, well thought out specification of
what lilypond does wrong makes it easy for me to pick out a little
project to work on in my spare time.
creating a tracker for this. Moving the discussion to
lilypond-devel.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:01:04PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:47:28PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > I'm aware that libmpfr is a listed requirement for GUB and I have
> > apt-get installed it.
> >
> > However, I see that libmpfr is a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:15:33AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> I'm attempting GUB on 64-bit VM runing Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS
Build failed on odcctools with a claim that they require 32-bit libraries.
I'll look into this further when time permits.
Cheers,
Colin.
o
and there is no longer the warning.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
- End forwarded message -
--
Colin Hall
South Mains
West Linton
EH46 7AY
Scotland
p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=GUB
Cheers,
Colin
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> To: "Lilypond Dev"
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: GUB unofficial release still relevant?
>
>
> >On Sa
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > &
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:50:03PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >>- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Colin Hall"
> >>>On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
&g
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:38:31PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Colin Hall"
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >>
> >>Have you got the regtest comparison working?
> >
> >How ca
.tar.gz
gra...@lilypond.org:/var/www/lilypond/download/sources/v2.15
g
Er, did that just update the main website by any chance?
If so, I'm extremely sorry, I didn't realise the system was quite that "live"
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:35:06PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> Have you got the regtest comparison working?
> - Original Message - From: "Colin Hall"
>
> To: "Graham Percival"
> Cc: "Lilypond Dev"
> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 20
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested
> > uploading these to create an unofficial release.
> >
Graham,
I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested
uploading these to create an unofficial release.
Still of interest?
Cheers,
Colin.
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-05/msg00446.html
--
Colin
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:04:55PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > In the hope that it might help others, see attached diary of my
> > work building a Lilypond release with GUB
>
> I want to make sure
installers?
It seemed to error out during or after running the tests, I need to
investigate that further.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:04:08PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:23:18PM -0700, trandrusiii wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to move a file from mac osx to windows 7 however when I try to
> > paste text in the file maxes out. When I try opening the file
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:53:32AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > Yes. I followed this documentation:
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#lilydev
> > http://www.phil
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:44:20AM +0100, James wrote:
> On 16 May 2012, at 19:26, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> >
> > Just to report that GUB is working on a VM here:
> >
> > $ git clone git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git && cd gub
> > $ make bootstrap
>
The only problem was that broken URI for the 2.4.34 linux kernel distribution.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
for the chord symbol bug:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/. I still haven't found the
> time to tidy up the patch. But it works!
Thanks, Patrick. I'm going to move this conversation to bug-lilypond cc Martin
and respond in full the
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:37:12PM +0200, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30:36PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > Running download_url
> > ('http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.34.tar.bz2',
> > '/home/colin/gub/
Hi,
Using LilyDev on a VirtualBox VM I attempted GUB make bootstrap and found this:
---
colin@colin-laptop ~$ ( rm -rf gub && git clone
git://github.com/gperciva/gub.git && cd gub && make bootstrap )
(output elided)
colin@colin-laptop ~$ echo; tail -25 gub/log/gub.log | head
er of issue trackers relating to musicxml2ly but I see
no issue tracker for this bug, Martin.
I'd like to at least record the bug. We can create a tracker if you
supply these details:
1. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly and a specific lead sheet from Wikifonia
in MusicXML format that toge
n. Is this a
> limitation of the software?
Thanks for telling us about this, trandrusiii.
Can you send a copy of the mac osx file that is giving you this trouble?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https:
plemented as a basic option!?
Yes, this is a great idea.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've taken over the role of bug meister from Phil Holmes.
The bug squad have agreed the following rota:
Mon - Colin H
Tue - Eluze
Wed - Marek
Thu - Ralph
Fri - Marek
Sat - Matthias
Sun - Colin H
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-
that, but I'm not certain if the job is
> written down anywhere.
It is written, both here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-checklists
and here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-che
in.
[1] http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/meisters
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait :
> >On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> >>Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
> >>scali
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 07:30:50PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 02/04/2012 00:19, Colin Hall disait :
> >On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> >>Unfortunately, the rewriting of NR-4.1.2 Paper size and automatic
>
mean.
Could you submit a documentation suggestion, as set out here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/documentation-suggestions
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://l
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:35:15AM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 01/04/2012 00:23, Colin Hall disait :
> >
> >On Mar 31, 2012 at 07:47PM, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>My questioning is: Why a same macro could behave di
w which version and then I can raise an issue tracker for the
unexpected behaviour.
If you are working with unreleased code then I think I should allow the
developers to respond to your queries.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
No remaining issues to verify for the 2.15.34 release.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:50:41PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has been
> released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your respective
> platforms so that I can update the tabl
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:50:41PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond
> has been released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on
> your respective platforms so that I can update the table below.
> I'll
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:03:29PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2012, at 15:50, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> > You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has
> > been released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your
> >
to download the unstable version 2.15 with all of
> the warnings attached but have just done so and I've at least gotten
> the program up and running.
Good. I'm very pleased to hear that it's working for you now.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
__
| | |
|-+-++-+-+-|
I'll post updates as they come in.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> >>moving forward with 2.16 is the right thing to do.
> >
> > I totally agree.
> >
> > There is no reason to add a separate download for lilypad on 10.4-x86.
> >
> > Users of 10.4-x86 can upgrade software, or they can use any other text
> > edi
|
|-+-+|
| 10.4.x | ppc | Ole Schmidt|
| | | Valentin Villenave |
| | | James Worlton |
| | | Colin Hall
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e a
> release.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=7
That's a change to the build system and I wasn't confident that I could mark
that as verified.
Can one of the devs take a look, please?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
is also a difficult requirement to satisfy.
> In particular, I want
> squadders to label any issue they can't verify themselves with a
> label such as Needs_dev_to_verify or something like that.
Sounds good.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
_
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
- End forwarded message -
--
Colin Hall
South Mains
West Linton
EH46 7AY
Scotland
Tel: 01968 661994
Mob: 07786 677582
___
lilypond-deve
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:45:26PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:40:49PM +0000, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that they still all need to be tested. I'm travelling
> > from Saturday but I'll try to get through as many as I c
avelling from
Saturday but I'll try to get through as many as I can between now and then.
Graham, when are you aiming to release 2.16?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:11:38AM -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:06:53AM +0000, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > It seems that in "2.15.20" the arpeggio is part of the NoteColumn. (But
> > > not
> > > the DotColumn or the AccidentalPl
> 1.316178
> 1.316178
> 2.616182
>
>
> It seems that in "2.15.20" the arpeggio is part of the NoteColumn. (But not
> the DotColumn or the AccidentalPlacement)
> The IR 3.2.71 note-column-interface states only stems and noteheads.
I'm unable to determine i
pports what is
> actually asked by many users: bar numbering of alternatives should not
> be counted twice.
Thanks, Xavier. Added to the tracker as issue 2059:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2059
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
96 matches
Mail list logo