Hello,
On 17 November 2011 08:36, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
To /home/jlowe/lilypond-git
6381b50..0846249 test-master-lock - test-master-lock
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
Transferred the advanced test-master-lock to the main
Hello,
On 16 November 2011 17:09, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
James,
Patchy will now automatically push if the testing of staging works
well. If it fails, you should see a message, and you can always
check ~/lilypond-automatic-compile-results/ (or whatever that dir
is
Sorry... forgot one piece of information.
On 16 November 2011 17:09, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
James,
Patchy will now automatically push if the testing of staging works
well. If it fails, you should see a message, and you can always
check
MIke
On 14 November 2011 08:44, Mike Solomon mike...@ufl.edu wrote:
Hey all,
I'm getting this message when trying to pull to master and dev/staging:
fatal: Couldn't find remote ref refs/heads/dev/staging
Any ideas as to what may be up?
dev/staging is now renamed to just 'staging'.
--
Mike,
On 14 November 2011 10:18, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've answered a couple questions recently where unpure-pure-containers have
come in handy and think it'd be beneficial to have some text in the notation
manual about them. However, understanding
Mike
On 14 November 2011 10:40, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:34 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
This seems less well suited, as the use of unpure-pure-closures is not
really programming work but rather a tweak.
Sorry, unpure-pure-containers.
Hello,
On 14 November 2011 14:38, m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 14/11/11 10:18, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've answered a couple questions recently where
unpure-pure-containers have come in handy
Hello
--snip--
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/build/out/lybook-db/lilypond-multi-run-5.log]
job 5 terminated with signal: 11
fatal error: Children (5) exited with errors.
command failed:
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
...
Lots of logfile changes owing to file name changes - wasn't this fixed in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1529
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net wrote:
...
Lots of logfile changes owing to file name changes - wasn't this fixed in
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1529 ?
I seem to recall Reinhold saying something about one of the reg test
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:52 PM
Subject: Can't make doc on current master (13 Nov PM BST)
Hello
Strange
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com
To: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:52 PM
Subject: Can't make doc on current master (13 Nov PM BST)
Hello
Strange
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:35:29PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
If James uses patch from lilypond-extra
e52f265dd585050fe74250fd291d85886b7f653f
then AFAIK patchy is
David
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:35:29PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
If James uses patch from
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:58 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
At some point in the near future, I'll need to push a CG patch to
update the bug squad rota. My understanding is that this should now
be done to dev/staging rather than master.
Hello,
Sorry if I 'missed a memo' but when I look at
http://wiki.lilynet.net/
I get
MediaWiki 1.16.5
To complete the installation, move config/LocalSettings.php to the
parent directory.
and nothing else.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Mike,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
...
I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out into several
patches.
My only concern is that it will only get tested as an uber patch and
unless you are going to push it all at once
Mike,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Nov 11, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
Mike,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
...
I posted an uber-patch online that can be separated out
David,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #10 on issue 2018 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: parser.yy: allow
postevents in function arguments in general
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2018
Somebody updated master differently than with the
David,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:56:30PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Let's take the David, I tested dev/staging at commit 43214314xx,
and it's fine mail scenario.
David,
David,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:58 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
...
[Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
its own. Can you change that accordingly? It should quite simplify
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
Graham
I reported this problem back in August, but omitted to raise a proper bug
report:
It seems this is using KFM which is an Ajax thingy (I don't pretend to
understand it), so I am guessing that the link to
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 5:00 PM
Subject: make doc failure on fresh build tree
The below error was
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
On 11-11-07 12:46 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Neil Puttockn.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 November 2011 19:32, Graham Percivalgra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
Failing either of these, I
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
So I was googling for yaffut to see what I could learn about it, and I
found that ohloh has a rating system for the projects in its database.
I looked up LilyPond, and found it:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/lilypond
Adam,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:58 PM, adam.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I am now finished. The new patch series is available at
https://github.com/aspiers/lilypond/commits/jazz
IMHO there are now too many patches in the series to combine into a
single commit for review. To do so
Mikem
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:55 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
Hello,
While helping someone on the lists yesterday I noticed that a file
would not compile on 2.15.16 but was ok on 2.14.2.
Because of the error message
David/Carl
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Well, use whatever your tracking branch is called. What does
git branch -r
say?
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$ git branch -r
origin/HEAD - origin/master
origin
Hello,
While helping someone on the lists yesterday I noticed that a file
would not compile on 2.15.16 but was ok on 2.14.2.
Because of the error message it is I think something to do with the
new parsing changes and wanted to check because in the NR this command
is still listed as if it should
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below - the dots are differently placed depending on whether the notes
are in one voice or two:
\version 2.15.16
\relative c' {
d a d,4.
{ d } \\ { a d, }
}
Julien,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Hi,
Can somebody please push these to patches? They were accepted in a countdown
over a week ago (I think it was 20111023) but they initially caused some
conflicts when the time came to push them.
I can
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 01:32:13PM +, Peekay Ex wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Julien Rioux
jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Can somebody please push
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
I noticed that we already have \hideNotes
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
two 'similar' functions
\hideNote
\hideNotes
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
...
Please feel free to create a new issue to track this.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2002
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that is why I cannot push these patches to dev\staging
--snip--
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git$ git push origin
HEAD:refs/heads/dev/staging
To ssh://pkx1
David,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Yes and I suppose that is why I cannot push these patches to dev\staging
Carl,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 11/1/11 4:30 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
..
For single patches, this is reasonably simple. First do
git rebase origin/dev
Hello,
Now that Dymtro is standing down from his bug squad duties, I'll fill
in his slot.
However the Contributor Guide has
Sunday: Colin
Monday: Dmytro
Tuesday: James Bailey
Wednesday: Ralph
Thursday: Patrick
Friday: Urs
Saturday: Kieren
I know that Colin is still alive and kicking but am
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
Comment #19 on issue 1266 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Dots in chords can not
be moved
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1266
Hello, Yes I can do that - I need to get into
David,
Sorry for answering my own post ...
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
Comment #19 on issue 1266 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Dots in chords can
Hello,
I noticed that I have some files in my ../scm/.. dir that end in .orig
and appear to be older version of existing .scm files in the same dir.
I am sure they are probably not wanted/required but wondered if they
are an artefact of some misapplied patch during my patch testing days
or if
Hello,
Compare the two 'scores' - the only difference is the override
\version 2.15.15
\relative c'' {
\once \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'(0 2 4)
f4 d g, e
\stopStaff
f'4 d g, e
\startStaff
f'4 d g, e
}
\relative c'' {
f4 d g, e
\stopStaff
f'4 d g, e
Mike
I think 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf is the checkin that
breaks make doc.
I've done a hard reset to the checkin before and had no problems as
soon as I have this checkin in the tree make doc fails.
Sorry.
--
--
James
___
Graham,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 05:48:08AM +, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
This fails at the basic make stage
../configure ; make -j7
oops, I should have mentioned: run ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
first, then
Julien,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Julien Rioux julien.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
How did you apply the patch? Here I use
git cl patch 5276054
and I get this commit (notice the renames):
I right click on the 'download raw patch set' link in the Rietveld
issue so it comes down as
Ian,
I've just updated a few of the newer contributors to LilyPond and
added them to ..\Documentation\included\authors.itexi.
I saw that you are still listed on 'previous contributors' and assumed
you had git push access I haven't added you because of that but
thought you might like to put
hello,
I've been trying to work out what the values in the brackets actually
do in relation to each other and the ledger lines to be able to
clearly document them for the average user to understand.
I still don't really understand them, but while experimenting with
values if I use this example
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:03 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
...
Also, please give http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041/ a regtest run - I
think it may expose a problem buried deep in the code (an uninitialized
variable. perhaps), as it causes certain regtests to
Werner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I've always these errors when I 'make' for the first time (i.e. when I
have a fresh out of tree build).
I expect most of them have always been there, but I wondered if they
are problematic or not?
They are
Hello,
I've always these errors when I 'make' for the first time (i.e. when I
have a fresh out of tree build).
I expect most of them have always been there, but I wondered if they
are problematic or not?
--snip--
Internal Error in accidentals.flat.arrowdown: monotonic is both needed
and
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:01 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2011, at 6:53 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
Hey guys,
I can't complete test-baseline due to an assertion error running
mozart-hrn-3.ly. Here's the backtrace:
Drawing systems...lilypond:
Neil,
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 October 2011 18:19, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil what command do you run when you do a test-baseline so that I
might get something like you do?
I don't. :) I couldn't work out which file
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
Am Thursday, 29. September 2011, 23:30:20 schrieb pkx1...@gmail.com:
Passes make but fails make check
--snip--
job 4 terminated with signal: 6
job 3 terminated with signal: 6
fatal error: Children
Janek,
2011/9/30 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
i'm moving to a new flat - i cannot do any Lily work now. I should be
back no later than on 10.10.
Graham: please find someone to look after issues owned by me - i've
checked that every patch i know i'm mentoring is there.
Hello,
I am just wanting a clarification of the difference between the
\slashedGrace and \acciaccatura functions.
Is it just that \acciaccatura is always written with a slur and a
grace note (\slashedGrace) may or may not be?
I wanted to know the difference (musically and perhaps technically)
Hello,
Consider an unrealistic example
@lilypond[fragment,quote,relative=2]
\slashedGrace c16~ c2
\slashedGrace c16( c2)
c16~ c2
c16( c2)
@end lilypond
When using \slashedGrace the tie is up but the slur is down; without
\slashedGrace both tie and slur are down.
Is this expected?
--
New \slashedGrace function added to NR and Changes.
This is for Tracker issue 177
http://codereview.appspot.com/5133043/
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I don't see this proposal (really more of a set of musings)
going anywhere. There's been a bunch of ideas:
- tool X, tool Y
- make better use of our current tools
- do a survey of what other projects
Hello,
2011/9/24 Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com:
2011/9/23 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com
Hi Bertrand,
2011/9/23 Bertrand Bordage bordage.bertr...@gmail.com:
* making a system that allows to specify where a word is breakable (like
\-
in LaTeX);
I vote for this
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:55:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
I am somewhat surprised that the patch passed testing by someone else,
though. It would seem that doc builds are not part of that.
I think
Dave,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dave Plater dpla...@webafrica.org.za wrote:
On 09/23/2011 01:40 PM, Dave Plater wrote:
I am the sole maintainer and packager of openSUSE lilypond and I have a
build failure in factory builds that appears to be guile related,
unfortunately guile is new
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
David,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:37 AM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
James, could you put this through the ringer? It's on patch countdown
and I don't really trust my regtesting abilities all too much.
Thanks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
No problem, I'll update the tracker to
Hello,
I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
--snip--
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
\makeDefaultStringTunings #defaultStringTunings
]
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/property-init.ly]
Janek
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I know that Aleks uses Ubuntu Natty (not Lilydev).
I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
System - Administration - System Monitor click on the first tab : )
That's the GUI way.
You can also do some
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro mrossol...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro mrossol...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent build system would take that filename, grep it for
\sourcefilename, and tell us *that*
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@fam.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
fatal error: failed files: be/lily-48175def.ly
A decent
http://codereview.appspot.com/5075047/
This is for tracker issue 1801.
Explain as an example, that \repeat unfold 2 {music expression} is
not always the same as writing out the music expression twice - especially
in a \relative context
--
--
James
Hello,
2011/9/21 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com:
On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Aleksandr Andreev wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:01 AM, tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2011/09/21 08:43:09, Trevor Daniels wrote:
But if you leave the configure option in it should be
./configure.
Ah, that was a bit simplistic. In-tree and out-of-tree
builds are different wrt configure, I think.
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time - I
recently sent an e-mail to the list about a 1-line patch to fix kneed beams
that I needed to apply for other work.
So, and this
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:35 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
For what it's worth, I run into the same problem from time to time -
I recently sent
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Aleksandr Andreev
aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's in the above file? It'll probably contain 5-10 other
filename
Yes. All the different snippets seem to have something to do with percussion.
Aleks
Hello,
This is really just an experiment to see if it worked as I wanted but
also if it is something that is useful?
I couldn't workout the git command to rewind it all the way back to
the 'merge branch release/unstable' for 2.15.11-1 so I used gitk and
found that commit and simply right-click
http://codereview.appspot.com/5081048/
This is for Tracker 1905
Added sentence to add --disable-optimising for ./autogen.sh or ../configure
when doing regression testing
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Janek,
2011/9/18 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/18 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/16 Aleksandr Andreev aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com:
If I recall correctly, undocumented glyphs will break the build (see
Documentation/included/font-table.ly).
Neil is correct,
Hello,
I saw that Joe had put two commits in since last night (16th Sept) and
when I ran a make check against a snapshot of yesterday's tree and
this morning's tree, I got two 'significant' reg test differences.
See:
Mike,
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2011, at 11:07 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
LGTM.
BTW, I have a few queries about stem::length:
76 (let* ((d (ly:grob-property grob 'direction))
You don't use 'direction; is it still
Neil,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 September 2011 23:04, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/09/15 21:41:27, Neil Puttock wrote:
For some reason, your patch fails `make check' on my system.
Neil, I've just applied this patch - after seeing
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 September 2011 23:04, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/09/15 21:41:27, Neil Puttock wrote:
For some reason, your patch fails
Crist,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Crist Khachikian ckhachik...@gmail.com wrote:
Peekay,
Thanks but I still get the same error. I wonder if it's because I'm
using jEdit but the command to generate the PDF should be the same.
You know anything about this?
Thanks
Crist
No I know
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:49 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
The documentation is not really indexed all that well: new additions
often are made without indexing entries. Going through the source and
index and trying to make sure that interesting things can be found under
Janek,
2011/9/14 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
countdown for 22:00 MDT Wednesday
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
For 22:00 MDT Wednesday, September 14
Issue 1873: Added glyphs for Kievan Notation - R 4951062
This has been set back to review after some comments today.
Regards
--
--
James
Hello,
2011/9/13 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
For 22:00 MDT Wednesday, September 14
Issue 1873: Added glyphs for Kievan Notation - R 4951062
This has been set
forwarding because I forgot to cc dev.
Sorry David, that wasn't mean to be aimed at you specifically.
James
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Another frog job: pepper the documentation with indexing
Francisco,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
2011/9/6 Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com:
I need to make a new patch. It's because of a combination of things; I was
(and am still) waiting on Francisco to know if I can remove the old compound
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
VBox also allows you to share folders between the real and
virtual machines, but I believe that is only for local folders, not
networked
Correct. From the VBox help:
Shared folders must physically reside on the host
Hello,
Subject is self explanatory
--snip--
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/lilypond-git/build$ ../scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ../scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py, line 9, in module
import langdefs
ImportError: No module named langdefs
--snip--
If I cd up one
Hello,
I've had a brief conversation with Graham who agreed in principle and
asked me to send a mail to dev regarding 'going through' and 'cleaning
up' old tracker issues.
At the moment we have 580-something tracker issues of which some
haven't been 'touched' for a very long time, there are also
Hello,
With regard to
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1858
unexplained increase in profile reports
and keith's initial comment:
--snip--
The reported 'cells', in the profile output for the regression tests,
doubled for several tests between 2.15.8 and 2.15.9.
Janek
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:54 PM, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
James,
i see this patch is quite orphaned despite being very nice and
ready-to-go. Shall i push it for you?
cheers,
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/**4837050/http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/
Thanks for the
96 matches
Mail list logo
