Graham Percival writes:
+1
Automatic indentation *does* solve real problems.
My point exactly: use Emacs.
Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
contributor?
/sarcasm
This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance. The first thing
I notice is
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:23:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
contributor?
/sarcasm
This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance.
Yes.
It should suffice to say: please fix
David Kastrup writes:
The main problem is that it is catastrophic with regard to rebasing, and
still rather disruptive with regard to merging.
+1
Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
real problems.
+1
Also, I'm not going to start the C++ indentation
I've added make it work like emacs to the proposal.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_10.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
Let’s pick one of the existing solutions, and let a computer deal
with this. Humans should not waste their time,
2011/9/21 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:20:39AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
David Kastrup writes:
Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
real problems.
+1
Automatic indentation *does* solve real problems. Take
I'd rather interpret no action as tacit approval. As your
electronics colleague once said, Just do it. :)
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:31 PM
Subject: GOP-PROP 10: scheme
On 15 Sep 2011 00:31, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
in a few months.
Why?
On 15/09/11 09:19, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'd rather interpret no action as tacit approval. As your
electronics colleague once said, Just do it. :)
Trevor
1+
Cheers,
Ian
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Am Thursday, 15. September 2011, 14:47:30 schrieb Ian Hulin:
On 15/09/11 09:19, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'd rather interpret no action as tacit approval. As your
electronics colleague once said, Just do it. :)
Trevor
1+
+1
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
in a few months.
Why?
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal
2011/9/15 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
in a few months.
That's strange, i had a vague feeling that the last status was a bit
of LGTMs and lots of
Am Thursday, 15. September 2011, 22:29:21 schrieben Sie:
2011/9/15 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Personally, I'd prefer it if we focused on solving rather than creating
real problems.
My experience from the C++ formatting run is that those whitespace changes are
really no big deal. Rebasing
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
in a few months.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_10.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a “solved problem”.
Let’s pick one of
On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
There's been no action on this for a few weeks. I'm starting to
wonder if we should abandon this proposal and try bringing it back
in a few months.
Why?
The only outstanding issue is that the else indentation is not the
I know that Neil had some concerns; it would be nice if those
could be resolved in the next few days so that we can keep this
moving forward.
I'm hoping to auto-indent all ‘.scm’ files in the git tree on
2011 Sep 16.
There's no particular rush for this, so I'm perfectly content to
delay that if
On 24 August 2011 22:26, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
No complaints from last time, with the possible exception of Neil
wanting a different behavior for (else...)
I haven't had time to test it thoroughly since my last comments, but
there are some other issues which will need
LGTM
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:53 AM
There seems to be general happiness with Carl's work; a few minor
tweaks here and there may still be necessary, but hopefully this
discussion will pretty much be rubber-stamping.
[snip]
** Implementation notes
The C++ change went
On 16/08/11 08:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:53 AM
There seems to be general happiness with Carl's work; a few minor
tweaks here and there may still be necessary, but hopefully this
discussion will pretty much be rubber-stamping.
[snip]
On 8/16/11 4:31 AM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
On 16/08/11 08:51, Trevor Daniels wrote:
LGTM
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:53 AM
There seems to be general happiness with Carl's work; a few minor
tweaks here and there may still be necessary, but hopefully
There seems to be general happiness with Carl's work; a few minor
tweaks here and there may still be necessary, but hopefully this
discussion will pretty much be rubber-stamping.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_10.html
** Proposal summary
Speaking academically, scheme code style is a
21 matches
Mail list logo
