Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:22 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 1/11/20, 8:48 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Kieren MacMillan" > kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > Hi Marnen, > > > New version is now available at > > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 2:08 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:47 PM Kieren MacMillan < > kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > >> Hi Marnen, >> >> > New version is now available at >> > >>

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:32 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > New version is now available at > > https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64/download_file?file_path=lilypond-2.19.83.build20200111.1-darwin-64.tar.gz >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 10:47 PM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi Marnen, > > > New version is now available at > > > https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64/download_file?file_path=lilypond-2.19.83.build20200111.1-darwin-64.tar.gz > > (sha-256 >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 1/11/20, 8:48 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Kieren MacMillan" wrote: Hi Marnen, > New version is now available at > https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64/download_file?file_path=lilypond-2.19.83.build20200111.1-darwin-64.tar.gz > (sha-256

Re: macOS 64-bit

Hi Marnen, > New version is now available at > https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64/download_file?file_path=lilypond-2.19.83.build20200111.1-darwin-64.tar.gz > (sha-256 6f1300a64281273da22c53926b6f5cbfa41fe612df173b0aaa4da905ee6b2af7; > I switched to Bintray because Google Drive isn't

Re: macOS 64-bit

Works for me on Sierra (10.12). Thanks for your work on this, Marnen! Carl On 1/11/20, 12:32 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Marnen Laibow-Koser" wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:58 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:45 AM Dan Eble

Re: macOS 64-bit

Hi Marnen. Seems to work fine here (after necessary adjustments in System Preferences => Security & Privacy). MacBook Pro running macOS Catalina version 10.15.2. Erlend E. Aasland On 11 Jan 2020, at 20:31, Marnen Laibow-Koser mailto:mar...@marnen.org>> wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:58 AM

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:58 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:45 AM Dan Eble wrote: > >> On Jan 11, 2020, at 08:40, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> > Dammit, I did already fix this error! I wonder if I left the modified >> gs.reloc file out of the bundle by mistake,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:45 AM Dan Eble wrote: > On Jan 11, 2020, at 08:40, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Dammit, I did already fix this error! I wonder if I left the modified > gs.reloc file out of the bundle by mistake, or if something else is going > on. > > > > Would you post the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Jan 11, 2020, at 08:40, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Dammit, I did already fix this error! I wonder if I left the modified > gs.reloc file out of the bundle by mistake, or if something else is going on. > > > Would you post the contents of >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > > GUB has another gs.reloc which sets a few variables looking related... I know, and I already tweaked that file, which is why I’m surprised that these issues are still occurring. > > Jonas > -- Marnen Laibow-Koser

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:18 AM Dan Eble wrote: > On Jan 11, 2020, at 07:48, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > > Could you try it without renaming and see if you get the same results? > (Renaming shouldn’t actually matter, but I want to make sure I didn’t do > something stupid.) > > same result

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Samstag, den 11.01.2020, 08:18 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble: > On Jan 11, 2020, at 07:48, Marnen Laibow-Koser < > mar...@marnen.org > > wrote: > > Could you try it without renaming and see if you get the same results? > > (Renaming shouldn’t actually matter, but I want to make sure I didn’t do > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Jan 11, 2020, at 07:48, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Could you try it without renaming and see if you get the same results? > (Renaming shouldn’t actually matter, but I want to make sure I didn’t do > something stupid.) same result > There was the usual security problem with running

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 7:08 AM Dan Eble wrote: > On Jan 11, 2020, at 01:36, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > I'd really appreciate fellow Mac users testing the build and reporting > any > > issues you find. (Karlin? Carl?) You can download it at > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Jan 11, 2020, at 01:36, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > I'd really appreciate fellow Mac users testing the build and reporting any > issues you find. (Karlin? Carl?) You can download it at > https://drive.google.com/open?id=18b1nX5nJsBrzDBGqga9T753oCL8ilwqs ; it > should work on any recent

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:11 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:44 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:15 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: >> >>> Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 9,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:57 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:45 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: >> >>> Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 09:04 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: >>> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:45 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > >> Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 09:04 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: >> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld >> wrote: > > [...] > >> > > From my

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 09:04 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > > > From my experiments, this is where LilyPond's relocation kicks in. I > > > think you have to

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 09:04 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 01:07 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > > There is one

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:29 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 01:07 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > There is one lingering problem: when LilyPond calls Guile, Guile is > > > > not finding the

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Freitag, den 10.01.2020, 01:07 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > There is one lingering problem: when LilyPond calls Guile, Guile is > > > not finding the library files specified in load-extension > > > expressions, even

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> It seems you have to set LDTL_LIBRARY_PATH. Typo! I mean LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH/ > I saw that, of course, but I’m not sure what that variable even is. > In particular, I have no reason to believe that it affects Guile’s > load path...but I’ll try it and see. It's documented in the guile manual,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > There is one lingering problem: when LilyPond calls Guile, Guile is > > not finding the library files specified in load-extension > > expressions, even though they *should* be in the right place. > > Before I go too crazy searching,

Re: macOS 64-bit

> There is one lingering problem: when LilyPond calls Guile, Guile is > not finding the library files specified in load-extension > expressions, even though they *should* be in the right place. > Before I go too crazy searching, does anyone know what controls this > path choice? I'm assuming it

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:11 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:44 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:15 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: >> >>> Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 9,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:44 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:15 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld >> wrote: >> > [...] >> > > Running >> >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:15 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > [...] > > > Running > > > $ diff -ur root/usr/ installer/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ > > >

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

> On 9 Jan 2020, at 18:00, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >>> There is no guarantee that `FlexLexer.h` found during compilation >>> is the one that is used by a recent flex version. Unfortunately, >>> `FlexLexer.h` doesn't contain any version information, so it is >>> really impossible to protect

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

On Jan 9, 2020, at 07:00, Erlend Aasland wrote: > > Use flex 2.5.37, as the flex 2.6.* C++ lexer is broken (discussed on the Bison > lists): a stream pointer has been changed in the declaration to a reference > without doing it in the code. Reported some years ago on the flex list. I've been

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:16 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:55 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > [...] > > > Running > > > $ diff -ur root/usr/ installer/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ > > > in

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > [...] > > Running > > $ diff -ur root/usr/ installer/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ > > in target/darwin-x86 reveals many files that I cannot attribute to the

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

>> There is no guarantee that `FlexLexer.h` found during compilation >> is the one that is used by a recent flex version. Unfortunately, >> `FlexLexer.h` doesn't contain any version information, so it is >> really impossible to protect against this situation automatically. > > Akim Demaille made

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > Running > $ diff -ur root/usr/ installer/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ > in target/darwin-x86 reveals many files that I cannot attribute to the > mentioned blacklist. Hence there must be additional mechanism that > determine which

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:47 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > Running > $ diff -ur root/usr/ installer/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ > in target/darwin-x86 reveals many files that I cannot attribute to the > mentioned blacklist. Hence there must be additional mechanism that > determine which

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 16:32 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:59 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 14:23 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:12 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > [...] > > > > I

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

> On 9 Jan 2020, at 13:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> `configure` should warn or bail on incompatible flex versions. I >> suggest we add a version check in configure.ac to ensure that flex >> version is between 2.5.37 and 2.5.39 (given that 2.5.38 and 2.5.39 >> actually works). > > What you

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

Argh, yes, you are of course right. Thanks. Erlend > On 9 Jan 2020, at 13:34, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> `configure` should warn or bail on incompatible flex versions. I >> suggest we add a version check in configure.ac to ensure that flex >> version is between 2.5.37 and 2.5.39 (given

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

> `configure` should warn or bail on incompatible flex versions. I > suggest we add a version check in configure.ac to ensure that flex > version is between 2.5.37 and 2.5.39 (given that 2.5.38 and 2.5.39 > actually works). What you suggest wouldn't work as expected. There is no guarantee

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

(Sorry, 'bout incorrect quote level in previous email!) E > On 9 Jan 2020, at 13:00, Erlend Aasland wrote: > >> On 13 Feb 2019, at 20:16, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> I am using guile 1.8.8, gcc 7.4.0, and flex 2.6.4. Here's my configure line: >> >> On build, I get a long string of errors

Re: MacOS 64-bit build

> On 13 Feb 2019, at 20:16, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > I am using guile 1.8.8, gcc 7.4.0, and flex 2.6.4. Here's my configure line: > > On build, I get a long string of errors originating in > out/lexer.cc: > > out/lexer.cc:6272:46: error: cannot convert >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:59 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 14:23 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:12 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > > > > I think GUB just downloads a pre-built version of LilyPad, see the spec > > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 14:23 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:12 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 13:29 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser < > > > mar...@marnen.org > > > > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:12 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 13:29 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser < > > mar...@marnen.org > > > > > wrote: [...] > > > course doesn't contain the LilyPond binaries. Does anyone

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Mittwoch, den 08.01.2020, 13:29 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser < > mar...@marnen.org > > > wrote: > [...] > > > I plan to use LilyPad like the current Mac distributions do. I agree that > > Frescobaldi might be a better choice in the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: [...] > > I plan to use LilyPad like the current Mac distributions do. I agree that > Frescobaldi might be a better choice in the long run. > I got LilyPad to build 64-bit (and run on Mojave), with some modifications to the existing

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 7 Jan 2020, at 23:21, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > >>> Also, of course, the point is to do this in a way that doesn’t require >> the end users to have MacPorts. >> >> The Emacs.app seemed to be working when put in /Applications/ so it might >> be distributed independently. > > Right,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:58 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: [...] > Here's a discussion about how to create a MacOS app bundle for Gnu Octave > based on a MacPorts build similar to Hans's. > > I haven't worked through it, but I thought it might be a useful guide. In > particular, there is a shell

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 1/7/20, 3:22 PM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Marnen Laibow-Koser" wrote: On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:15 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > [...] > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:15 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > [...] > > > > FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is > emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:35, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond > development wrote: > > By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it > help to have a static executable? I experimented with such a setup for > Linux, and I eventually got it to build. Not sure

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:20, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > [...] > > FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is > emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in /Applications/MacPorts/, and it seems > working if copied

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:35 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: [...] > By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it > help to have a static executable? Maybe. If I understand correctly, though, .app bundles are *designed* to easily contain dylibs, frameworks, and other

Re: macOS 64-bit

Am Dienstag, den 07.01.2020, 15:52 -0500 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser < > mar...@marnen.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hans Åberg < > > haber...@telia.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30,

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 4:16 PM Hans Åberg wrote: [...] > > FYI, it is possible to build apps using MacPorts, for example, there is > emacs-app that installs Emacs.app in /Applications/MacPorts/, and it seems > working if copied out of that directory. Thanks, I looked for something like that

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 7 Jan 2020, at 21:52, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Some updates. For the time being, at least, I've changed approaches. > Since I couldn't understand much of GUB's OS detection logic, and no one > seemed able to help with that, I abandoned GUB entirely for my latest > attempt and used

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > >> >> >> > On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30, Marnen Laibow-Koser >> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:24 PM Hans Åberg wrote: >> > >> >> I made an installer into

Re: macOS 64-bit

> BTW, what I’ve done so far is at > https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/69 if anyone wants to take a > look. Looks good, thanks (I left one remark). Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 5:19 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:15 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser >> wrote: >> [...] >> >>> I may try it there at some point, but right now I’m focusing on GUB >>>

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:15 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > [...] > >> I may try it there at some point, but right now I’m focusing on GUB >> dependencies. I got Perl to build; right now I’m working with GNU file, >> which

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: [...] > I may try it there at some point, but right now I’m focusing on GUB > dependencies. I got Perl to build; right now I’m working with GNU file, > which isn’t finding libz1.2.3 in the right place. (Anyone know how to > massage

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 19 Oct 2019, at 17:30, Jahrme Risner wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 19:08, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > >> Awesome, thanks; I’ll try it when I get a chance. I still want to get an >> .app bundle built, but it’s good to know that the mdmg approach actually >> works as advertised. :)

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:30 AM Jahrme Risner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 19:08, Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > > Awesome, thanks; I’ll try it when I get a chance. I still want to get an > .app bundle built, but it’s good to know that the mdmg approach actually > works as advertised. :) >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 19:08, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Awesome, thanks; I’ll try it when I get a chance. I still want to get an .app > bundle built, but it’s good to know that the mdmg approach actually works as > advertised. :) If you would like to see for yourself how the MacPorts

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > > On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:24 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > >> I made an installer into /opt/lilypond/ on MacOS 10.15, which you might > >> try out. > > > > > > With port

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:30, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:24 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > >> I made an installer into /opt/lilypond/ on MacOS 10.15, which you might >> try out. > > > With port mdmg/mpkg, or some other way? Yes, see

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 6:24 PM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > On 17 Oct 2019, at 09:21, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > I have a 64bit Mac OS 10.7.5 machine at home; Thanks, but I tend to think that the build box shouldn’t be anyone’s personal machine if that’s possible. (Once I get the MacStadium

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 17 Oct 2019, at 09:21, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I have a 64bit Mac OS 10.7.5 machine at home; I made an installer into /opt/lilypond/ on MacOS 10.15, which you might try out. > theoretically, this > should do the compilation job too, right? It takes a very long time to do it as one has

Re: macOS 64-bit

> Not directly related, but a consideration this comment reminded me > of: to make these dylibs as portable as possible they must be built > using as early of an sdk as possible. While we could choose to > simply start supporting 64-bit at 10.15 (Catalina) and instruct > users on 10.14 and below

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:23 PM Jahrme Risner wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 06:36, Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:38 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > > [...] > > * A straight compilation, by itself, won’t produce a suitable result. This > is because LilyPond

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 06:36, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:38 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > > I’ve been playing around with the MacStadium environment and understanding > more about the build. Here’s what I think I know so far. Please correct > me if I’m wrong on

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:38 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > Update: with wedding stuff, I haven’t had time to devote to this, but with > Mac OS Catalina coming out this has become more urgent, as Catalina removes > 32-bit support altogether. I’m gonna try to spend some time on this in the >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:16 AM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:14 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> >> >> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >> >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >> >> `lilypond-devel' package. >>

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> [...] please send more generic questions to >> >> macports-us...@lists.macports.org ; >> >> the people on the list are quite responsive usually. > > Would it be better to email the “users” list about something like > setting the compiler as a build-phase dependency? From the > descriptions

Re: macOS 64-bit

> I'm the maintainer of the Portfile of `lilypond-devel'. Please send > patches to me. And please send more generic questions to > > macports-us...@lists.macports.org ; > > the people on the list are quite responsive usually. Would it be better to email the “users” list about something like

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> I think that the resulting bundle size of the `port mdmg' command >> can be greatly reduced if you improve the lilypond-devel package >> dependencies (i.e., adjusting the packages needed for building and >> running). Unfortunately, I don't have enough time right now to do >> it by myself;

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 08:14, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >>> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >>> `lilypond-devel' package. >> >> Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will >> probably be

Re: macOS 64-bit

Karlin High writes: > On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* >> do 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available >> info. > > > "Please

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:14 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, > >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the > >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, >> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the >> `lilypond-devel' package. > > Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will > probably be with port mdmg, but I want to see if I can do better.

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:58 AM Karlin High wrote: > On 7/8/2019 9:43 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable native > > 64-bit Mac build. > > I am very glad you are working on this. There hadn't been much > discussion on Mac builds

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:46 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable > > native 64-bit Mac build. > > You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, right? > Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 7/8/2019 9:43 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable native 64-bit Mac build. I am very glad you are working on this. There hadn't been much discussion on Mac builds lately, so I thought a quick review was in order. Sorry for any

Re: macOS 64-bit

> Right now, I personally am most worried about getting a usable > native 64-bit Mac build. You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed, right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the `lilypond-devel' package. Werner

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:38 AM Karlin High wrote: > On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* do > 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available info. > >

Re: macOS 64-bit

On 7/8/2019 8:30 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: I’ve also been reading about osxcross, which looks like it *might* do 64-bit builds now, though I can’t be sure from the available info. "Please ensure you have read and understood the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 7:02 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote: > >> >> Hmm. At this point I should probably stop speculating and set up a build >> environment. But I’m getting married in a month and am not committing to >> any big

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:19 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > Yes, I can believe that. The ideal end result of this, of course, is a > binary .app bundle with no external dependencies. > About that binary .app bundle: it looks like LilyPad is maintained and built separately? I found the

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:10 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Hi everyone! In working on 64-bit Mac builds of lilypond, I notice, > > to my surprise, that lilypond and lilypond-devel exist in MacPorts > > for 2.18.2 and 2.19.83 respectively. I'm experimenting with these > > builds (as well as

Re: macOS 64-bit

> Hi everyone! In working on 64-bit Mac builds of lilypond, I notice, > to my surprise, that lilypond and lilypond-devel exist in MacPorts > for 2.18.2 and 2.19.83 respectively. I'm experimenting with these > builds (as well as other approaches), but does anyone know anything > about them?

Re: macOS 64-bit

Hi everyone! In working on 64-bit Mac builds of lilypond, I notice, to my surprise, that lilypond and lilypond-devel exist in MacPorts for 2.18.2 and 2.19.83 respectively. I'm experimenting with these builds (as well as other approaches), but does anyone know anything about them? Any pitfalls I

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 8:43 AM Federico Bruni wrote: > The Github mirror was set up by two persons who stopped contributing to > LilyPond a few years ago. > You may ask them to add you as admin. > Unfortunately there appears to be no way of telling who the owners are from the GitHub UI. If you

Re: macOS 64-bit

Il giorno sab 18 mag 2019 alle 22:01, Marnen Laibow-Koser ha scritto: On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:55 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser mailto:mar...@marnen.org>> wrote: [...] There is already a GitHub mirror of the LilyPond source, so this should be no problem if I understand you correctly.

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:55 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: [...] > There is already a GitHub mirror of the LilyPond source, so this should be > no problem if I understand you correctly. > Hmm. Although there is a GitHub mirror as I stated ( http://github.com/lilypond/lilypond ), it is out of

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:18 AM David Kastrup wrote: > Carl Sorensen writes: > > > I'm pretty sure there are no Mac build instructions for Lilypond. > > > > The Linux build instructions are in the Contributor's Guide. > > > > GUB is a Linux build environment. > > The CG does not contain GUB

Re: macOS 64-bit

> On 18 May 2019, at 02:58, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I'm a Mac user and would love to get to 64 bit. It is already in MacPorts, both lilypond and lilypond-devel, and at least the latter seems to be working fine, though some systematic testing would be good.

Re: macOS 64-bit

Carl Sorensen writes: > I'm pretty sure there are no Mac build instructions for Lilypond. > > The Linux build instructions are in the Contributor's Guide. > > GUB is a Linux build environment. The CG does not contain GUB building instructions I think, just native ones. LilyPond uses autoconf

Re: macOS 64-bit

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:06 PM Jahrme Risner wrote: [...] > Second, one of the consistent issues which Travis CI would not be able to > solve is the dependence on LaTeX (texlive). There is not, AFAIK, *any* > elegant > solution to the usage of texlive on macOS. Homebrew, which is the package >

  1   2   >