Hello,
here is the doc:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/BarLine#BarLine
and snip:
% -
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override BarLine #'hair-thickn
Well, I just tried printing the document with Adobe Reader under
WinXP. At least the bars have just the right length, but they still
look too thick.
Even if I still used Evince, I could take care of that if there were
any way to hand-tune the length and thickness of the bars. How do I do
that?
200
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:34 -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Tom Hall wrote:
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change eit
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:34 -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Tom Hall wrote:
> > Hello List
> >
> > A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4)
> > note,
> > by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an
> > overide as
> > below seems to make no
n.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3777 (20090119) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Tom Hall wrote:
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have brackkets
print by default in such cases?
Hi Chip,
How do I resolve this?
When it comes to spacing, I only resort to "spacer notes" in rare
circumstances — instead, I prefer to manipulate the X-extent of the
objects, to force the space I need. Here's an example in this case:
%
\version "2.12.0"
\include "english.ly"
r16 a a8 a16 a8 g16-\bendAfter #-4
In the above snippet the drop at the end of the measure is cut short by
the barline. I reviewed the info in the manuals about spacer notes but
just don't get how to insert a little extra space between the barline
and the drop. Right now the drop line gets cut
Hello List
A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) note,
by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an overide as
below seems to make no change either. Is there a simple way to have brackkets
print by default in such cases?
\override Tuple
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I don't know. This is definitely a strange example. The \mark
command is meant to insert something over a barline, so maybe it'd be
best to delete this example altogether and reword things a bit so that
the example with "colla parte" is the only one illustrating this
Lasse Rempe wrote:
How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications
that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached. If this looks
o.k. then I'll make the patch.
I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader
would interpret the text to corre
How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications
that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached. If this looks
o.k. then I'll make the patch.
I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader
would interpret the text to correspond to the beginni
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 19:32:45 schrieb Lasse Rempe:
In 1.8.1, the following is used as an example for text marks:
c4 \mark "Allegro" c c c
Tempo indi
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2009 19:32:45 schrieb Lasse Rempe:
> > In 1.8.1, the following is used as an example for text marks:
> >
> > c4 \mark "Allegro" c c c
>
> Tempo indication
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
No, \mark is mainly used for naming subparts A, B, C, ... These marks are
centered over the bar line.
Cheers,
Reinhold
Yes, I am aware of this (this is the only thing I use it for, in fact).
However, the section in question discusses placing more expansive text
(i.e.
Am 19.01.2009 um 20:27 schrieb J. Van Thuyne:
As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would
you code this
in a correct manner?
\tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56
I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign.
How can it
be overridden?
Best regar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 19. Januar 2009 02:23:51 schrieb Lasse Rempe:
> Would you consider "Menuetto" / "Trio" as appropriate uses of the \mark
> command? If so, these could perhaps be used in the example.
>
> But even in these cases I would suggest that text in th
As the subjoined code obviously isn't working, how exactly would you code this
in a correct manner?
\tempo "Grave, solemn." 2 = 54-56
I presume this property will only accept numbers, not a minus sign. How can it
be overridden?
Best regards,
Jethro.
___
Alberto Simões wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Alberto
Is there any way to compact this kind of construct?
The simplest way is probably
sopWordsB = \lyricmode {
\repeat "unfold" 48 { \skip 4 }
Re- cor- da- ...
}
1. Would s4 work for \skip 4? I haven't \skip for m
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:59:47 -0700
> Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>
> > Evince has a problem with the barlines (it's a bug). On Ubuntu, I work
> > in Evince while I'm writing, but I print the final PDF from Adobe
> > Acrobat.
>
> xpdf also does a good job and is lighter than Acroread. It's in th
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I find \relative to work quite nicely for chords, once I understood that
the first note in a chord gets its octave from the first note of the
previous chord. I use \relative mode virtually exclusively for note entry,
regardless of whether it's in si
On Monday 19 January 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> This statement is not true when trying to split relative chords and
> produce parallel relative voices, because of the way lilypond works.
>
> The octave on the first note of a chord in relative mode is determined
> by comparison with the first
hi,
On Jan 18, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Looking into the full score of Strauss's `Salome', I can confirm that
(it's one bar before rehearsal number 68, page 50): the position of a
whole note tremolo is exactly the same as if there were a stem.
This is e
On 1/19/09 5:05 AM, "David Raleigh Arnold" wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009, Tim Woodall wrote:
>> And, of course, I found some bugs as soon as I'd posted.
>>
>> Quick breakdown of how it works incase anyone really wants to hack on
>> it.
> Wow. I am impressed, honestly. I am not a program
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> It says that each can "Retrieve a stencil", which strikes me as
>> useful. I was actually looking for a scheme-way of accessing
>> stencils, but the function description is bewildering to me.
>
> Well, improvements are welcome :-)
>
>> Ca
I installed the 64bit version - it works. It seems that suprisingly I am
on a 64 bit machine :-o
Thanks for all of you for the tips.
Bert
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 12:20 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Bertalan
Fodor (LilyPondTool):
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Yo
It IS run by default. The problem is the following:
$ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly
Look, this is NOT /usr/local/bin/lilypond, you cannot run this.
Ok, but then why
$ /usr/local/bin/lilypond
says
exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: not found
?
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Tim Woodall wrote:
> And, of course, I found some bugs as soon as I'd posted.
>
> Quick breakdown of how it works incase anyone really wants to hack on
> it.
>
> First it splits the three parts out into three files. Basically all it
> does is remove the other two notes
Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 12:20 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Bertalan
Fodor (LilyPondTool):
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed,
> > can you figure out why that's not being run by default?
> >
> >
> It IS run by default. The problem is t
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
> It IS run by default. The problem is the following:
>
> $ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond --verbose test.ly
your output of "whereis lilypond" was /usr/local/bin/lilypond, so try
$ /usr/local/bin/lilypond test.ly
I have lilypond correctly install
I'm afraid we are going to speak about not the real problem.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You state that /usr/local/bin/lilypond-book is being installed,
can you figure out why that's not being run by default?
It IS run by default. The problem is the following:
$ /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/
Op maandag 19-01-2009 om 18:55 uur [tijdzone +0800], schreef Graham
Breed:
> That's weird. I see this in
> ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But lilypond-book
> works for me. The binary is ~/bin/lilypond-book and that
> overrides the Python version.
lilydev is Han-Wen. You're not s
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line:
#!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python
Your system has a lilydev user you are not aware of. From my poor
knowledge of install int
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
> I don't really want to update the kernel if it is not a must. (There are
> many services running on the server.)
I only meant that fresh installs of lilypond work perfectly on fresh
installs of Ubuntu. Any further changes to the PATH or whatever could
pr
2009/1/19 Graham Breed :
> Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
>> No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line:
>>
>> #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python
>
> That's weird. I see this in ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But
> lilypond-bo
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
> No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line:
>
> #!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python
Your system has a lilydev user you are not aware of. From my poor
knowledge of install internals, it seems that the lil
Oh, then that's alright like that.
I hope I don't have to upgrade the ubuntu installation. I don't want to
start wandering in dependency hell.
Graham Breed wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first
line:
#!/home/lilydev
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
No, it's not me. The lilypond-book script contains this as the first line:
#!/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/tools/root/usr/bin/python
That's weird. I see this in
~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book as well. But lilypond-book
works for me. The binary is ~/bi
Graham Breed wrote:
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it
says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not
found".
Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book:
/usr/local/lilypond/
I don't really want to update the kernel if it is not a must. (There are
many services running on the server.)
The output of the installer script is:
Making /usr/local/lilypond/
Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond
Creating script /usr/local/bin/lilypond-wrapper.python
Creating script /usr/l
I am root.
Francisco Vila wrote:
Bertalan, it is possible that sudo sh lilypond---etc does not work for
an user without privileges. Only users who are in the sudoers file can
issue sudo commands.
Try again as the privileged user (the first you created on install of Ubuntu)
_
Bertalan, it is possible that sudo sh lilypond---etc does not work for
an user without privileges. Only users who are in the sudoers file can
issue sudo commands.
Try again as the privileged user (the first you created on install of Ubuntu)
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.or
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
>
>> If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well.
>>
>> Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine?
>>
>
> Afaik the machine is 32-bit as well, its an Intel P4.
>
> Linux version 2.6.17-12-generic (r...@king) (
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:30:42AM +0100, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
> I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very
> strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve.
> I used the script to install:
>
> sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh
>
> /Then I try
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says that
the given file was executed and returned the error "not found".
Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book:
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says
that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found".
I obtain another message.
$ lilypond unexisting.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.12.1
warning
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
>
> I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it says
> that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found".
I obtain another message.
$ lilypond unexisting.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.12.1
warning: cannot find file: `unexist
If you mean 2.12, right. Otherwise I hope you uninstalled 2.11 as well.
Are you using a 32-bit Ubuntu installation on a 64-bit machine?
Afaik the machine is 32-bit as well, its an Intel P4.
Linux version 2.6.17-12-generic (r...@king) (gcc version 4.1.2 20060928
(prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
> Francisco Vila wrote:
>> What's the output of "whereis lilypond" ?
>
>
> lilypond: /usr/local/bin/lilypond /usr/local/lilypond
same as mine.
>> Did you have the lilypond package previously installed from the
> standard repositories?
>
> No, IIRC I used
I'm not sure this says that the given file wasn't found. I think it
says that the given file was executed and returned the error "not found".
Hm. That can be true - as there is a problem with running lilypond-book:
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond-book
bash: /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/li
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very strange
thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve.
I used the script to install:
sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh
I did a local install, and it works fine as
~/bin/lilypond
and
I find this confusing, so many cloned menus, furthermore when they _do
not_ bring you directly to the LilyPondTool options.
Also the name is not consistent. Multiple names LilyPondTool,
LilyTool, Lily4jEdit, are confusing for novices.
Bertalan: when you have the time, please put some order on
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very
strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve.
I used the script to install:
sudo sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh
I hope this is not the exact
2009/1/19 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) :
> I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very
> strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve.
> I used the script to install:
>
> sudo sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh
I hope this is not the exact command you issued.
>
> The
These links show already filed bugs on the issue. I am completely sure
that I myself filed a bug on poppler or libpoppler regarding to the
lilypond barlines, but I cannot find the URL despite of having been
searching for half an hour now.
Poppler is the PDF rendering library of evince, if I'm not
I tried to install LilyPond 2.12 on an Ubuntu machine. I found a very
strange thing I couldn't explain, and couldn't solve.
I used the script to install:
sudo /sh lilypond-X.Y.Z.linux-x86.sh
/Then I try to run lilypond:
lilypond test.ly
and I get:
exec: 4: /usr/local//lilypond/usr/bin/lilypon
> It says that each can "Retrieve a stencil", which strikes me as
> useful. I was actually looking for a scheme-way of accessing
> stencils, but the function description is bewildering to me.
Well, improvements are welcome :-)
> Can I somehow use it like this...
> \once \override NoteHead #'sten
Johan Vromans writes:
> This definitely looks like the problem discussed here earlier.
See message and thread.
http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/lpev.png shows an example.
-- Johan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
Fibonacci Prower writes:
> Well, I just tried printing it, and the bars look even worse - not
> only are they too thick, they also seem to be a bit too long, so that
> they go beyond the limits of the staff on both sides
This definitely looks like the problem discussed here earlier.
Did you try
2009/1/18 Michael Falkenburg :
> Francisco Vila wrote:
>> Configure LilyPondTool so that the path to the lilypond executable is
>> /usr/local/bin
>>
>
> Where do I do this?
>
Go to the menu Plugins -> LilyPondTool -> Development -> LilyTool
Options, the go to the "LilyPondTool -> General" section
Op zondag 18 januari 2009, schreef Kieren MacMillan:
> Of course, there are more complicated ways as well (using \set
> associatedVoice, etc.).
That would be starting a new lyrics context at the desired moment:
\score {
<<
\new Staff \new Voice = "mel" \relative c' {
c d e f g f e
61 matches
Mail list logo
