Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:55:14AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: There is a section in the Learning Manual, section 5.2 When things don't work, which I intend to extend to include help about common errors, obscure error messages or mysterious happenings, like music running off the edge of

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I think we should just add a discussion about common errors in LM 5.2 (also, make sure you include the highly cryptic error message when you forget a } ). I just wonder whether this cryptic error message can be improved, for example, by adding a note for the user to check the existence of the

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I think we should just add a discussion about common errors in LM 5.2 (also, make sure you include the highly cryptic error message when you forget a } ). I just wonder whether this cryptic error message can be improved, for

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:50:02AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: The meow... yum comment was about a cat eating the canary, since I like cats. Aah. In what form do you like cats? On my bed, and purring. :) (... I said on, not in!) Perhaps as cat juice? May I call you Alf? :-) Huh, I

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:50:14PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Graham Percival wrote: I intend on really testing my claim that a FAQ merely demonstrates problems in the docs. Why not view the FAQ as part of the docs? Where do we draw the line for F? I mean, how do I make artificial

good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or a wrapper program like gv or gsview. Have a look at the attached image: the left part

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
The meow... yum comment was about a cat eating the canary, since I like cats. Aah. In what form do you like cats? Perhaps as cat juice? May I call you Alf? :-) Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or a wrapper program

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Graham Percival wrote: Agreed! That's why it goes in when things go wrong. Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 When thing's don't work or somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section on common mistakes of the FAQ) into When things go wrong, I'd claim that it's

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 When thing's don't work or somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section on common mistakes of the FAQ) into When things go wrong, I'd claim that it's still a

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Bertalan Fodor
E.g. LilyPondTool preview is better. Original message From: Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl Sent: 2 Jul 2009 10:18 +02:00 To: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: good rendering of PDF On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:27 AM On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 When thing's don't work or somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section on common mistakes of the FAQ) into

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Trevor Daniels
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:42 AM From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or a wrapper program like gv or

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Graham Percival wrote: On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 When thing's don't work or somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section on common mistakes of the FAQ) into When things go wrong, I'd

bww to lilypond converter

2009-07-02 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Dear Lilyponders, An acquaintance of mine from another venue, Jezra Lickter, has written a Python script to convert .bww and .bmw files (Bagpipe Music Writer format) to Lilypond format. I don't know anything about bagpipe music, but I've tried the script on a few .bww files and it seems to

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote: Yes, there is an enhance thin lines setting in Reader 9 (or perhaps in 8 as well), which should be turned off I think. Good call! I never knew about this setting but it helps. The barlines (for example) look much more natural without the enhanced thin

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Have a look at the attached image: the left part shows the rendering result of a piece (compiled with lilypond 2.13.1) with gv (at 25% scaling, using gs 8.64), and the right part is with acroread 8.1.5 (at 58.6% scaling). What a difference. Interesting and strange! I don't know in de

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Jonathan Kulp
-Eluze wrote: Werner LEMBERG wrote: From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or a wrapper program like gv or gsview. Have a look

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
- the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2 Not on Linux... - how did you convert from pdf to png (is it a snapshot, a conversion with another tool, something else?) A simple screen snapshot of the two PDF viewer windows side by side. - what does it mean to have a scaling of

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Werner LEMBERG wrote: - the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2 Not on Linux... I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 7/2/09 1:41 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:50:14PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Graham Percival wrote: where is the gui is unfortunately still common, but the new website and the 10.5 GUI work should fix that. Actually, I beg to

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
- the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2 Not on Linux... I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04. Ah! Good to know. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread David Stocker
9.1.2 on Ubuntu 8.04 Upgrades come later for Linux, but they get around in time. David Jonathan Kulp wrote: Werner LEMBERG wrote: - the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2 Not on Linux... I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04. Jon

Re: spanner question

2009-07-02 Thread David Stocker
Thanks, Nick. I'll fiddle with it some and see how it works for me. David Nick Payne wrote: Here's the function I use for indicating harmonics: %=== == harmonics = #(define-music-function (parser location text

Re: new website: draft 3

2009-07-02 Thread Patrick Horgan
Graham Percival wrote: ...oh there was various stuff (I'm sure I don't remember what) elided here... I didn't expect a reference to Nanoha on the -user mailist. (so of course I had to add one myself ;) Thank you for that:) Cheers, - Graham Regards, Patrick

RE: good rendering of PDF

2009-07-02 Thread Nick Payne
-Original Message- From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Werner LEMBERG Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2009 10:33 PM To: elu...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: good