> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Urs Liska
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:28:05 +0200
> Subject: Re: Advice on naming and structuring scholarLY command
>
> Hi Elaine,
>
> Am 15.06.2018 um 02:21 schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine:
>
>
> Actually I think \edmark and \edMarkup (or
On 2018-06-15 16:44, Rohan Srinivasan wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to specify the vertical staff placement for full-measure
rests as there is for smaller rests (e.g. "b4\rest")?
Overriding MultiMeasureRest.staff-position should do it.
See
Hi all,
Is there a way to specify the vertical staff placement for full-measure
rests as there is for smaller rests (e.g. "b4\rest")?
Thanks,
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 2018-06-15 13:39, David Kastrup wrote:
Karlin High writes:
On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer!
Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does.
The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or
Karlin High writes:
> On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer!
>> Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does.
>
> The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or
> something?
I think the term is
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 19:33, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 15.06.2018 18:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
> > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
> > The following code
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > #(define (f
2018-06-15 22:21 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> If a list contains only strings it's also possible to do:
>
> (string-concatenate '("foo" "bar" "buzz"))
> =>
> "foobarbuzz"
And if a list contains only characters:
(list->string (list #\a #\b #\c))
=>
"abc"
Ofcourse it would be best to know what
2018-06-15 20:11 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill :
> On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
>> frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
>> The following code
>>
>> \version "2.19.81"
>> #(define (f w) w)
>> $(f "Hello")
>>
On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer!
Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does.
The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or something?
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 20:12, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
> > frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
> > The following code
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > #(define (f w) w)
> >
David Sumbler writes:
> On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote:
>> >
>> > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals
>> > Reference,
>> > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) . But I have no idea what
>> > these
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals
> > Reference,
> > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) . But I have no idea what
> > these
> > values represent. Can you
On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote:
I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals Reference,
and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) . But I have no idea what these
values represent. Can you enlighten me?
They are the negative logarithms (base 2) of the usable durations.
Hi all,
> "will include the following as one of many constituents
> upon instantiation to be part of its translator group"
\involves
\incorporates
??
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
Hi David,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:37 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "consists of" and "will include the following as one of many
> constituents upon instantiation to be part of its translator group" is
> not the same.
>
> Well, if the latter of these is what "\consists" is intended to mean in
On 6/15/2018 12:19 PM, crimsonsunr...@protonmail.com wrote:
I have a few questions in regards to \partcombine
I use \partcombine in most all of my projects. Very rarely do I have
more than 2 voices per staff, though.
Here's an explanation of \partcombine I once got in response to a
On 2018-06-15 09:03, David Kastrup wrote:
"consists of" and "will include the following as one of many
constituents upon instantiation to be part of its translator group" is
not the same.
I asked you to defend the hyperbolic "factually utterly wrong". At most
the distinctions are that of
Mensagem Original
Ativo 15 de jun de 2018 15:15, Carl Sorensen escreveu:
From:
Reply-To:
Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 at 11:19 AM
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: questions in regards to combining multiple parts
After looking and not finding much, on top of asking in the
From:
Reply-To:
Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 at 11:19 AM
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Subject: questions in regards to combining multiple parts
After looking and not finding much, on top of asking in the mailing list
without much return, I have a few questions in regards to \partcombine
-
On 2018-06-15 09:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
The following code
\version "2.19.81"
#(define (f w) w)
$(f "Hello")
generates a pdf file containing "Hello".
If my function f is
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 19:36 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 15.06.2018 19:08, David Sumbler wrote:
> >
> > In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that
> > LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests. I should like them
> > to
> > appear as semibreve rests, as they would
After looking and not finding much, on top of asking in the mailing list
without much return, I have a few questions in regards to \partcombine
- Considering a number of scores have an odd number of instruments combined
(i.e. 3 Trumpets, 3 Clarinets, etc.), why partcombine only works on an even
On 15.06.2018 19:08, David Sumbler wrote:
In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that
LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests. I should like them to
appear as semibreve rests, as they would if the bars were shorter.
I have tried modifying the stencil using the method
On 15.06.2018 18:40, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
The following code
\version "2.19.81"
#(define (f w) w)
$(f "Hello")
generates a pdf file containing "Hello".
If my
In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that
LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests. I should like them to
appear as semibreve rests, as they would if the bars were shorter.
I have tried modifying the stencil using the method shown in NR5.5.3.
But as it stands this is
>> \enbike \debike
> You mean \mount \unmount ?
No… \addbiketoshed \removebikefromshed
=)
K.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
___
lilypond-user mailing
Kieren MacMillan writes:
>>> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding
>> Or \engages / \disengages . So many bike sheds.
>
> \enbike \debike
You mean \mount \unmount ?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
I'm trying to write some code in scheme. At the moment I do it using
frescobaldi and I need some help for the output.
The following code
\version "2.19.81"
#(define (f w) w)
$(f "Hello")
generates a pdf file containing "Hello".
If my function f is called passing something that is not a string
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2018-06-14 23:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>>> Here is a usage of the \consists command:
>>>
>>> \context {
>>> \Staff
>>> \consists Mark_engraver
>>> \consists Metronome_mark_engraver
>>> }
>>>
>>> To convey what this
\bunk \debunk
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Kieren MacMillan
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 8:38 AM
To: David Kastrup
Cc: Flaming Hakama by Elaine ; Lilypond-User Mailing
List ; Carl Sorensen
Subject:
>> Another alternative might be \including and \excluding
> Or \engages / \disengages . So many bike sheds.
\enbike \debike
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
On 2018-06-14 23:58, David Kastrup wrote:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
Here is a usage of the \consists command:
\context {
\Staff
\consists Mark_engraver
\consists Metronome_mark_engraver
}
To convey what this does, it would be more along the lines of
"Create a Staff
How about \contains and \excludes?
\contains says that we want a context to contain a particular kind of translator
\excludes says that we want exclude a translator that would normally be
included
\includes and \excludes would be more a natural pair, but then there is a
conflict between
Carl Sorensen writes:
> How about \contains and \excludes?
>
> \contains says that we want a context to contain a particular kind of
> translator
> \excludes says that we want exclude a translator that would normally be
> included
>
> \includes and \excludes would be more a natural pair, but
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2018-06-15 03:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
Sorry, this is not going at all in the direction you were aiming for
but from a purely technical standpoint getting rid of \remove
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 15:00, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 05:27, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > #(define Ez_numbers_engraver
> >(make-engraver
> > (acknowledgers
> > ((note-head-interface engraver grob source-engraver)
> > (let* ((context
On 2018-06-15 05:27, Gianmaria Lari wrote:
\version "2.19.81"
#(define Ez_numbers_engraver
(make-engraver
(acknowledgers
((note-head-interface engraver grob source-engraver)
(let* ((context (ly:translator-context engraver))
(tonic-pitch (ly:context-property context
On 2018-06-15 03:29, David Kastrup wrote:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
Sorry, this is not going at all in the direction you were aiming for
but from a purely technical standpoint getting rid of \remove would
be a much more worthwhile
This code
\version "2.19.81"
\new RhythmicStaff { \easyHeadsOn a4 b8 a }
generate this score:
[image: image.png]
That's great.
Now instead of the note name, I would like to write the numbers
representing the scale-degree inside the note head. So I tried adding to
the previous code the
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>> > Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>> >
>> >> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
>> >
>> > Not really: that remains something to look up in the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 1:42 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
> >
> >> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
> >
> > Not really: that remains something to look up in the documentation.
> >
> > Now I'll readily admit that
David Kastrup writes:
> Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
>
>> I think that conveys more clearly what is happening.
>
> Not really: that remains something to look up in the documentation.
>
> Now I'll readily admit that \consists / \remove does not make for an
> appealing antonym pair. I'd be
Am 15. Juni 2018 09:28:05 MESZ schrieb Urs Liska :
>Hi Elaine,
>
>
>Am 15.06.2018 um 02:21 schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine:
>>
>> Actually I think \edmark and \edMarkup (or something along these
>> lines) might be the best compromise between the generality of the
>> command,
[Adding a distinction in the thread title]
Am 15. Juni 2018 09:44:44 MESZ schrieb "N. Andrew Walsh"
:
>Pedantry Corner: the *active* verb that Elaine is seeking is actually
>"comprise." As in, "the committee comprises representatives from
>various
>disciplines." The verb in the opposite
Just adding a distinction in the thread title
Am 15. Juni 2018 09:44:44 MESZ schrieb "N. Andrew Walsh"
:
>Pedantry Corner: the *active* verb that Elaine is seeking is actually
>"comprise." As in, "the committee comprises representatives from
>various
>disciplines." The verb in the opposite
Pedantry Corner: the *active* verb that Elaine is seeking is actually
"comprise." As in, "the committee comprises representatives from various
disciplines." The verb in the opposite direction is "compose:"
"representatives of various disciplines compose the committee." "Composed"
can be used in
Am 15.06.2018 um 08:58 schrieb David Kastrup:
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
This is probably tilting at windmills at this point,
since we seem to have adopted this language,
both in LilyPond and in the ee.
But, from the perspective of our terminology reflecting English language
usage,
Hi Elaine,
Am 15.06.2018 um 02:21 schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine:
Actually I think \edmark and \edMarkup (or something along these
lines) might be the best compromise between the generality of the
command, expressiveness and practicality.
Urs
My $0.02 is that you should
Flaming Hakama by Elaine writes:
> This is probably tilting at windmills at this point,
> since we seem to have adopted this language,
> both in LilyPond and in the ee.
>
> But, from the perspective of our terminology reflecting English language
> usage,
> I feel compelled to point out that
49 matches
Mail list logo
