Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

On Thu 19 Mar 2020 at 23:19:07 (+0100), Pablo Cordal wrote: > Yes, I noticed that too. In the text "file not found" some strange > symbols appear... if that's the problem... men, I have no idea how to fix > it! That looks as if you're running a system in ISO Latin-1 but LilyPond is outputting

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

ha scritto: What happens if you use Lilypond 2.19.84 Why you don't suggest 2.20 (new stable)? I am slow ... I hadn't noticed 2.20 has been released already ... Thanks for the reminder :-) MT

Re: version 2.18.2 - incorrect bar numbers with full measure rests

Eby Mani wrote > My understanding of "full measure rests" is, it covers the full measure > based on the time signature. Thus R1 is sufficient for a measure that is > in 4/2 time. Hi Ebi, What you are saying is true (in most cases) for the graphical representation in the output, but, as Michael

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Ok, finally the command line test worked perfect! (the problem was the lilypond version). With 2.20.0 I execute from the command line and I get a pdf and a midi file. Thank you all. Best regards Pablo El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 23:19, Pablo Cordal () escribió: > Yes, I noticed that too. In

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Yes, I noticed that too. In the text "file not found" some strange symbols appear... if that's the problem... men, I have no idea how to fix it! Now I'm trying to add the 2.20.0 new installation to the windows path, cause now when I write "lilypond a.ly" in the command line I get an error

Re: Three voices in same staff, from two variables

Ben Rosen writes: > Hi all, > > I'm new here, so hopefully this isn't too basic of a question... > > I'm trying to write out harmonizations for standard melodies, so my initial > thought was to keep the melody in its own variable and the harmonies in > another and then combine them using the "<<

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Am Donnerstag, den 19.03.2020, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Pablo Cordal: > I don't think so, because I compile a.ly from Frescobaldi with no > problem (it uses the same lilypond.exe than the command line). Now > I'm installing 2.20.0 version of lilypond, when it's ready I'll > comment the results. Is it

Re: Nesting paper blocks

Just so I am clear, you *don't *want to do something like this: \version "2.20.0" paperGlobal = \paper { indent = 0 } paperGlobalLine = \paper { \paperGlobal line-width = 10 \cm } paperGlobalLineCategory = \paper { paperGlobalLine system-system-spacing.basic-distance = 30 } \paper {

Re: Nesting paper blocks

Hi Peter, I accomplish something similar by putting paper definitions into various .ily files. Then just include the ones I want with \include. It seems it's OK to have multiple \paper blocks as a result of many \includes. Have you tried that? Kevin On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 17:45, Peter Crighton

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

I don't think so, because I compile a.ly from Frescobaldi with no problem (it uses the same lilypond.exe than the command line). Now I'm installing 2.20.0 version of lilypond, when it's ready I'll comment the results. El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 22:24, Kevin Barry () escribió: > Is it possible

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Is it possible that this is some kind of 32bit vs 64bit problem? On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 21:06, Pablo Cordal wrote: > > No luck, with a simple a.ly I get the same error : ( > > El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 21:53, Federico Bruni () > escribió: >> >> >> >> Il giorno gio 19 mar 2020 alle 21:36,

Re: quoting percent repeats

Hi Paul, OK I see the problem. In my opinion this is a bug. In the circumstances I think you should find a workaround that prints the output you want. (I can't recommend anything because I don't know the motivation for quoting repeat signs.) Kevin On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 20:56, Paul Scott

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Hi Sami, I think your alignment problem arises because you moved the barline engraver from the score context to the staff context. Each staff doesn't seem to "know" about the alignment of bars in other staves so it cannot align with them. Since it seems you need different bar types in different

Re: quoting percent repeats

Those are single beat repeat marks (slashes). They should be percent signs. Thank you for looking at this, Paul On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Kevin Barry wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I see the repeat signs in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th bars when I engrave it. > I have attached what I see. How is it

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

Il giorno gio 19 mar 2020 alle 21:36, Martin Tarenskeen ha scritto: On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Pablo Cordal wrote: Hi folks, I just copied the file in C:\Users\ana and lilypond found the file, started to compile it... and returned an error. I attach image and the a.ly file. I compile the

Re: quoting percent repeats

Hi Paul, I see the repeat signs in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th bars when I engrave it. I have attached what I see. How is it different from what you are looking for? Kevin On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 15:55, Paul Scott wrote: > > I would expect the output to have simple percent signs in the 2nd, 3rd and >

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Pablo Cordal wrote: Hi folks, I just copied the file in C:\Users\ana and lilypond found the file, started to compile it... and returned an error. I attach image and the a.ly file. I compile the a.ly inside Frescobaldi with no problems. What happens if you compile a

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available! (convert.ly issue)

David Kastrup writes: > Zone Dremik writes: > >> Thank you David, Marnen, David and Carl for your excellent >> suggestions and helpful examples. (I will definitely be using more >> variables in the future.) >> For the convert.ly issue, your recommendations inspired me to try >> using BBE. The

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available! (convert.ly issue)

Zone Dremik writes: > Thank you David, Marnen, David and Carl for your excellent suggestions and > helpful examples. (I will definitely be using more variables in the future.) > For the convert.ly issue, your recommendations inspired me to try using BBE. > The multi-file search & replace

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality - first test failed

El 19/3/20 a las 19:07, Pablo Cordal escribió: > Hi, > > I'm doing the easy first test with this issue. I created a file a.ly > and put it in c: > > When I run the command prompt lilypond doesn't find the file (I attach > the results). > > Anybody knows what am I doing wrong? > >

Build of 2.20 for 64-bit Mac

Dear all, There are several threads about the 64-bit version but I'm choosing open a new thread, because issue may be different and not related to the others. I installed the new Darwin binary of version 2.20 on a new machine running 10.15.3. (Catalina). After that I permanently get this

Nesting paper blocks

Hello all, I have my paper variables split up across separate files. Depending on the project I am working on, I need to include several of them. paperGlobal is always included, paperSize depends on the paper size I want to produce, and paperCategory depends on what type of project I am working

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi Pablo, Don't know anything about Visual Basic, but it's the lilypond.exe binary that you need to call to do the work for you directly. I am sure Visual Basic can call external commands?

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Pablo Cordal wrote: Hi everyone, May be this is not the right forum to expose this question but I'm sure that some of you guys are not lilypond expert users but expert programmers too and may be you can give me a hand, so here goes my problem: I'm writing a small

Re: Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

Dear Pablo, Il giorno gio 19 mar 2020 alle ore 17:25 Pablo Cordal ha scritto: > What I need is to generate the pdf and midi file from visual basic directly. > Is there any way I can use the compile functionality of Frescobaldi from > visual basic? "compile functionality of Frescobaldi" =

Using Frescobaldi compile functionality from another program

Hi everyone, May be this is not the right forum to expose this question but I'm sure that some of you guys are not lilypond expert users but expert programmers too and may be you can give me a hand, so here goes my problem: I'm writing a small visual basic program where I enter some notes in

Re: quoting percent repeats

I would expect the output to have simple percent signs in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th bars. Paul On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:21 AM, Kevin Barry wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Your example compiles for me, but I'm not sure what you are trying to > do or what the expected output is. Could you please provide more >

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

I apologise for flooding your email. Just found out another issue that I would like your help, again with the barlines. Should I open another thread? I thought they were in the same topic as before. The question is: Is there a way to align the barlines correctly at the end of the system? I have

Re: modaltranspose & scheme function

(iota 8) produces (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7). > (iota 8 0 -1) would produce (0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7). > oh, great! Thanks Aaron! g.

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

Thank you, that is what I meant. Thank you for the link as well. I would like to take the opportunity to that all of you great people. Lilypond plays basically without opponents when it comes to more "out-of-the-box" things, like polymeter and polytemporality, and I understand more and more every

Re: modaltranspose & scheme function

On 2020-03-19 4:20 am, Gianmaria Lari wrote: multiModal = #(define-music-function (scale patternRhytmic patternMelodic) (ly:music? ly:music? ly:music?) #{ #@(map(lambda (p) #{ \changePitch $patternRhytmic \modalTranspose c #(ly:make-pitch -1 p) $scale $patternMelodic #})

modaltranspose & scheme function

Long time ago with the help of the people in this forum I have been able to write (to collect) this simple code \version "2.19.82" \include "changePitch.ly" multiModal = #(define-music-function (scale patternRhytmic patternMelodic) (ly:music? ly:music? ly:music?) #{ #@(map(lambda (p)

Re: Whole-note tremolo beams

Am Do., 19. März 2020 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb Leo Correia de Verdier : > > For the sake of clarity, a MWE: > > %%% > > \version "2.20.0" > \repeat tremolo 16 {dis'32 dis’’} > > %%% > > > 19 mars 2020 kl. 11:01 skrev Leo Correia de Verdier > > : > > > > Dear list! > > > > I’m working

Re: Whole-note tremolo beams

For the sake of clarity, a MWE: %%% \version "2.20.0" \repeat tremolo 16 {dis'32 dis’’} %%% > 19 mars 2020 kl. 11:01 skrev Leo Correia de Verdier > : > > Dear list! > > I’m working on a piece with a lot of whole note tremolos and was wondering if > any of you have a nice

Whole-note tremolo beams

Dear list! I’m working on a piece with a lot of whole note tremolos and was wondering if any of you have a nice workaround for the beams (issues 318 and 704). I would like them slanted (with the same slope as a regular beam), centered between the noteheads and avoiding accidentals on the

Re: quoting percent repeats

Hi Paul, Your example compiles for me, but I'm not sure what you are trying to do or what the expected output is. Could you please provide more information about what you are trying to do? Best wishes, Kevin On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 20:27, Paul Scott wrote: > > A better example would be: > >

Re: Confused newbie

Hi Robert, Welcome to the Pond! I don't have a Mac myself. Maybe someone who does will be able to help. Can I ask how you are executing lilypond? If you are running it from the command line you could try enabling more verbose logging by passing the "-l DEBUG" option and sending us the output.

Re: Peculiar behavior of barlines

> [...] This is the snippet! I know that it would do a lot for people > like me, maybe it should be included in the section about barlines? Mhmm, this is very special, and LilyPond's documentation is already more than 2000 pages... I rather suggest that you contribute a well-documented snippet

Re: version 2.18.2 - incorrect bar numbers with full measure rests

> My understanding of "full measure rests" is, it covers the full measure based > on the time signature. Thus R1 is sufficient for a measure that is in 4/2 > time. That understanding is wrong. A full measure rest has a duration like normal rests, thus you will have to scale it according to