Re: \StaffGroup \consists "Mark_engraver"

2017-10-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Joe Neeman writes: > > > I have a hunch: once upon a time (IIRC), the staves of each StaffGroup > > were contained in some container grob (maybe VerticalAxisGroup?). The > > vertical spacing was don

Re: \StaffGroup \consists "Mark_engraver"

2017-10-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > 2017-10-19 16:15 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Luc Gauthier >: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I'm trying to move the "Mark_engraver" from the \Score context to the > >> \StaffGroup context so as to have \mark \default be displayed

Re: NR 4.1.6: blank-last-page-force and penalty values

2012-08-10 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Federico Bruni wrote: > NR 4.1.6, \paper variable for page breaking > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/**Documentation/notation/other-_** > 005cpaper-variables#_**005cpaper-variables-for-page-**breaking

Re: Incremental compiling

2012-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Vaughan McAlley wrote: > Following one of the tangents from the “Sibelius Software UK office > shuts down thread”, here’s a potential algorithm for incremental > compiling. It’s only a suggestion: sorry if it’s flawed or you don’t > like it! > The new ly:one-line-b

Re: ly2video - create videos from your LilyPond projects

2012-05-26 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, FireTight wrote: > > Hello, > my name is Jiri "FireTight" Szabo and I would like to introduce program > ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond > projects that contains moving music staff, which is synchronized to music ( > http://www

Re: Two questions about vertical layout and lyrics spacing

2012-03-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: > > There are two competing desires here: you want the systems to be spaced > > more-or-less evenly (ie. with a similar amount of space between the > staves), > >

Re: Two questions about vertical layout and lyrics spacing

2012-03-18 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Example #2, padding.png, shows a piece which has a large variation in staff > height, because there are either two lines of lyrics to a staff or none at > all. As lilypond tries to keep an even system-system-distance, the result > is

Re: Suppressing \pageBreak within score

2012-02-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: > On 15.02.2012 20:14, Ralph Palmer wrote: > >> ... >> >> >> I would like to : >> 1) have LilyPond put as many complete scores as possible on each page; >> 2) have LilyPond *not* make a page break within a score, if possible; and >> 3) have

Re: More vertical spacing confusion

2011-08-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Joe Neeman writes: >> >>>> So I have several questions: >>>> >>>>  - Is the behaviour I am experiencing (a system spilling over onto a >>>>    

Re: More vertical spacing confusion

2011-08-03 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a piece of music which should easily fit on one page, and > indeed does until I change the paper size from A4 to US Letter, at > which point the final system spills over onto a second page.  The > source and resulting PDF are

Re: Vertical spacing for fixed y-offset of systems *calculated from top staff line*?

2011-05-27 Thread Joe Neeman
st uses, because it allows you to fix the top system on each page, but still have lilypond do everything else automatically. But if you really want to fix the position of every system and you're happy to do manual breaks and everything, then line-break-system-details 'Y-offset is still the w

Re: LilyPond 2.13.52

2011-03-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > %% Lyrics overlap the lower staff > << >\new Staff \new Voice = "a" { >b1 >} >\new Lyrics \lyricsto "a" { > first > } >\new Lyrics \lyricsto "a" { > second > } >\new Lyrics \lyricsto "a" {

Re: LilyPond 2.13.52

2011-03-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tim Sheasby wrote: > Difficult to create a snippet because my template is quite complex. Here is > a screenshot of the problem. > > > Am using vertical spacing commands to get even spacing between the Venda > original and the English italicised translation. > This

Re: No Lilypond output with XeLaTex

2011-03-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Albert Frantz wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm getting a strange and persistent bug trying to integrate LilyPond with >> XeLaTeX, namely no graphics >> (LilyPond) outpu

Re: No Lilypond output with XeLaTex

2011-03-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Albert Frantz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting a strange and persistent bug trying to integrate LilyPond with > XeLaTeX, namely no graphics > (LilyPond) output in the final .pdf file. > > I've been testing with many files, most recently a simplified variant of > the

Re: alpha test, spacing ajusments

2010-10-28 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Keith E OHara wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:01:26 -0700, Nick wrote: > > Actually, the vertical layout problem I reported a few weeks ago >> (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1252) still exists >> with 2.13.37. >> > > The information in the b

Re: First impressions of alpha test

2010-09-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Keith E OHara wrote: > What are everyone's first impressions of 2.13.34, the alpha test? > > I remembered to run convert-ly (which worked for me, but I don't have MacOS > 10.4, where James W ran into trouble) but it made very few changes to scores > written for 2

Re: vertical spacing not under my control

2010-09-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:27 PM, James Wilkinson wrote: > I added a \paper block and put in it > > between-system-spacing = #'((space . 20) (stretchability . 30)) > > which I found in the "Vertical Dimensions" section, which I got to from a > link in the "Vertical spacing between systems" sections

Re: vertical spacing uncontrollable

2010-08-31 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James Wilkinson wrote: > I was wondering why I never got a response to this. Turns out that I sent > it to gun.org. Duh. Let's try again. > > > version is 2.13.29-1 > > > This is a flute part, so there's just one staff per system. It's two pages > long. Page one

Re: (re?)directing compile output to a file

2010-08-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 06:56 +0800, curri...@iinet.net.au wrote: > > > > > On Tue Aug 10 3:26 , Joe Neeman sent: > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 07:39 -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:24 AM, David Currie > wrote: >

Re: Lilypond performance

2010-08-06 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 05:26 -0700, ornello wrote: > In my installation, Lilypond runtime seems to increase exponentially (at > least not linearly) with the number of pages to engrave. Is there any option > to speed up Lilypond, e.g. by removing time-consuming engravers, such that > the performance

Re: Possible bug in lyrics mode

2010-07-13 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote: > On 2010-07-13 16:48, Arle Lommel wrote: > > Line height for lyrics (at least in 2.13.24) is determined by the >> postscript bounding box for the characters in the line (or at least >> that's what it seems), *not* the em-square, which is

Re: after-last-staff-spacing when "last staff" is a non-staff

2010-06-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 00:03 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Joe and Carl, > > > this discussion would be clearer if you could provide > > an example to show what you want to achieve. > > Well, as just one manifestation of the problem, here's one side effect > that is not expected (by me, anyw

Re: after-last-staff-spacing when "last staff" is a non-staff

2010-06-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 07:17 -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > On 6/19/10 6:27 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" > wrote: > > > Hi Joe, > > > >> if you set padding then it will affect the amount of whitespace > >> between the last staff of the ChoirStaff and the first staff > >> of the PianoStaff (and not

Re: after-last-staff-spacing when "last staff" is a non-staff

2010-06-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:04 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > [Lilypond 2.13.23] > > Hi all, > > I've got a classic setup in my choral score(s): > > << > \new ChoirStaff << > \new Staff \fooMusic > \addlyrics \fooLyrics > \new Staff \barMusic > \addlyrics \barLyrics > >> >

Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive]

2010-06-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 13:00 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Joe, > > >> No doubt one or more of my problems is related to the known bug regarding > >> the missing properties > >> blank-page-force = 0 > >> blank-after-score-page-force = 0 > >> but I've explicitly set that as well. > > > > W

Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive]

2010-06-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 11:11 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > [Lilypond 2.13.21] > > Hey all, > > I'm trying to get a score out this afternoon (for a competition deadline > tomorrow!) and I'm running into a bug... Sorry, I'm on holiday and I haven't been checking email regularly, so this probabl

Re: 2.13.11-1: Y-offset for RehearsalMark?

2010-01-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 18:27 +0100, Alexander Kobel wrote: > Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > > Hi. > > > > With this example: [...] > > \override Score.RehearsalMark #'Y-offset = #3 > > [...] 2.12.3 produces "correct" result ("as expected") while 2.13.11 --- > > really unexpected. Attached, please, ha

Re: (bug?) irregular lyrics distance in 2.13.10

2010-01-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 06:18 +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > Op donderdag 14 januari 2010 schreef Joe: > > > So it should just be a matter of finding the > > right default for minimum-distance. > > From my experimentation, 3.2 is a fine default value I think. 3 is a little > tight, 3.5 a little

Re: Still some vertical spacing/fitting problems

2010-01-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 18:44 +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > I have no vertical spacing overrides in the attached score, other than > setting top-margin and bottom-margin, but when I build it with 2.13.10, > the bottom stave on the first page almost completely vanishes off the > bottom of the page. So

Re: (bug?) irregular lyrics distance in 2.13.10

2010-01-13 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 23:12 +0100, Alexander Kobel wrote: > Joe Neeman wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 17:02:18 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> That's basically the approach taken by Joe for spacing staves: Place the > >> center lines minimum-spacing

Re: (bug?) irregular lyrics distance in 2.13.10

2010-01-13 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:21 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 17:02:18 schrieb David Kastrup: > > Alexander Kobel writes: > > > Wilbert Berendsen wrote: > > >> LilyPond 2.12.2 and 2.13.1 display the Lyrics lines cor

Re: Strange page breaking issue in 2.13.10

2010-01-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 17:50 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Hi all, > I have a score with a full-page title page and several scores. Now, > everything > fits on 3 pages, but the page breaks are not ideal and I can afford to use 4 > pages anyway. > > So, I insert a force page break before th

Re: Distance from bottom stave to footer

2009-12-28 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 12:53 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > PS > > > The property you want is bottom-system-spacing > > Thanks to Joe's work, we also have "semi-ragged-bottom"!!! > i.e., by setting ragged-bottom = ##t and giving #'bottom-system-spacing some > #'stretchability, VOILA! > This is

Re: Distance from bottom stave to footer

2009-12-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 21:16 +, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:09:26AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > > The foot-separation variable that can be used in the \paper block > > doesn't seem to have any effect. It's documented in the 2.13.9 NR as: > > Yes, we know. The spacing v

Re: Piano /centered/ dynamics

2009-12-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 11:58 +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > >> is it possible to have the Dynamics (the \p in the example below) > >> in a layout like the "Piano centered dynamics" really centered > >> between the staves (i.e., the st

Re: Vertical spacing in 2.13

2009-12-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:31 -0500, Trevor Bača wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Joe Neeman > wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:51 +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > > On 15/12/09 10:56, Joe Neeman wrote: > > > On Tue

Re: Vertical spacing in 2.13

2009-12-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 12:51 +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > On 15/12/09 10:56, Joe Neeman wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 08:01 +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > > > >> How is vertical spacing between staves controlled now in 2.13.x? In > >> s.4.4.1 and s.4.4.2 the NR f

Re: Vertical spacing in 2.13

2009-12-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 08:01 +1100, Nick Payne wrote: > How is vertical spacing between staves controlled now in 2.13.x? In > s.4.4.1 and s.4.4.2 the NR for 2.13.9 still talks about using \override > Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent and between-system-padding in > the \paper section, bu

Re: \set vs \override

2009-11-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 22:45 +, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:31:40PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > > I don't see a good rationale why \set, \override, \revert, \tweak should > > not work on the same set of properties (including subproperties). I > > don't see an explanati

Re: \set vs \override

2009-11-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 23:31 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Joe Neeman writes: > > > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 17:22 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > >> There is a chapter "set vs override" in the manual. > >> > >> I am afraid that I fail to grasp the d

Re: \set vs \override

2009-11-21 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 17:22 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > There is a chapter "set vs override" in the manual. > > I am afraid that I fail to grasp the difference from the chapter. > > It says: "There are actually two different kinds of properties." > > But then it says > > Context propertie

Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]

2009-11-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 22:33 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Carl Sorensen writes: > > The code to establish a ritardando could be easily written, and may (or may > > not) be done as part of the forthcoming GLISS (Grand LilyPond Input Syntax > > Stabilization) project. There's currently some disagre

Re: distance between staves?

2009-10-27 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 10:20 +0200, Marc Hohl wrote: > I have a file with normal and tab staves, and in the last bar > the highest notes touch the tab staff regardless of the > values for VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent. > How can I increase this distance? Hi Marc, Try \layout { \context {

Does anyone still use breakbefore?

2009-10-19 Thread Joe Neeman
For a couple of years now, we've had Nicolas' cool top-level \pageBreak commands. So I'd like to get rid of the code supporting the old breakbefore \paper block variable. Before I do, is there still a use-case for it? Cheers, Joe ___ lilypond-user ma

Re: vertical spacing problems with Lyrics

2009-10-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 06:55 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Joe, > 1. I used to define custom contexts FirstLyric and MoreLyrics, in > which [only] the #'minimum-Y-extent was set differently, in order to > control inter-multiple-Lyric spacing — am I right in inferring that > #'inter-loose

Re: vertical spacing problems with Lyrics

2009-10-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:30 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a fix yet for the problem [2.13.4-1] that between-system- > padding etc. doesn't work with Lyrics (because they're nonspaceable)? > It's killing me with the lead sheets I'm trying to put out. =( between-system

Re: Vertical spacing

2009-10-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 14:28 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > Joe: is this already documented? Hot to control spacing from a lyrics > line and the staff below it? Simple lyrics seem to almost collide. This is now configurable via Lyrics.VerticalAxisGroup #'non-affinity-spacing. I've given it a defau

Re: Vertical spacing

2009-10-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 14:28 +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > For any vertical spacing problem, please use 2.12 instead; Joe Neeman > has been responsible of a rework of vertical spacing, but he is too > much occupied these days, we all are. See below > > 2009/10/7 Thomas Scharkow

Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

2009-10-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:53 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > shortest note playing here.") > > > (shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? "The duration of the > > > shortest note that starts here.") > > > + (hide-tied-accident

Re: problems with layout variables in 2.13.4

2009-09-29 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:25 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up a legenda for tablature (see attached files). > I have problems with layout variables. > > I have seen on the web documentation that names are changed: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Page-for

Re: Lilypond Speed

2009-09-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 22:05 +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:52:13PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > > Actually, I stumbled upon something very odd: though I haven't the > > exact numbers, with 2.12 my opera used to compile in ~40 minutes on > > Win32, ~25 minutes on Li

Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble

2009-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 18:45 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/8/7 Joe Neeman : > > How about just checking for an empty extent, like in the attached patch? > > That's probably the best option, since it should allow users to take > advantage of setting X-extent f

Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble

2009-08-06 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 23:03 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/8/6 Joe Neeman : > > > As per usual, it turned out to be more complicated than I expected. But > > it's fixed in git now. > > Nice work, Joe; it's a great fix. > > I had a go at fixing it

Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble

2009-08-06 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 19:30 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > There is a problem, however -- a > > slight extra space appears where the invisible fake-barlines > > (possible break-points) are. And the obvious way of correcting > > that didn't work. I'll ask the other developers if there's a way > >

Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble

2009-08-02 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 10:39 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > There is a problem, however -- a > > > slight extra space appears where the invisible fake-barlines > > > (possible break-points) are. And the obvious way of correcting > > > that didn't work. I'll ask the other

Re: new website, draft 7

2009-07-30 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 03:42 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > Hi all, > > http://lilypond.org/~graham/index.html > > We have a few experiments with the design, such as a condensed > 2nd-layer TOC. This allows all the Manuals to fit onto my > 800-pixel wide screen, but the text _is_ smaller. Let u

Re: new spacing test/example

2009-07-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 21:39 +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2009/7/25 Kieren MacMillan : > > Thanks — when I figure out how to get Joe's branch checked out, I'll be able > > to use that information. > > - go to http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git > > - at the bottom, click on "d

Re: new spacing test/example

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:28 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello all (and especially Joe): > > Now that my most recent musical "crisis" is over — the premiere of my > newest (Lilypond-v2.12-engraved) commission is this Friday! Congratulations! > — I'm > revisiting some recent scores, to s

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-22 Thread Joe Neeman
A quick update on the new vertical spacing: the version now in dev/jneeman has most of the features that I had planned (although there are still lots of loose ends to tie up). In particular, you can - space staves in groups using \override StaffGroup.StaffGrouper #'after-last-staff-spacing = #'((s

Re: FW: [frogs] Re: Patching the output file naming code (Was: thanks to whomever put this in the LSR...)

2009-06-22 Thread Joe Neeman
> > -- Forwarded Message > From: Ian Hulin > Reply-To: > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:25:42 -0600 > To: Reinhold Kainhofer , > Conversation: [frogs] Re: Patching the output file naming code (Was: thanks > to whomever put this in the LSR...) > Subject: [frogs] Re: Patching the output file namin

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-18 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > What I would *really* love are high-level commands to set intra-piece > (section) system-count and page-count options. > For example, I'd like to say that in an ABA form piece, the B section mus

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > At Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:25:54 +0300, > Joe Neeman wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > [1.1 ] > > > > [1.2 ] > > I've started working on a new system for doing vertical layout in one > pa

Re: RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-16 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 17:25:54 schrieb Joe Neeman: > > I've started working on a new system for doing vertical layout in one > pass > > (ie. positi

RFC: new vertical layout engine

2009-06-15 Thread Joe Neeman
I've started working on a new system for doing vertical layout in one pass (ie. positioning and stretching the systems simultaneously). This should give better default behaviour than the current code and it should also allow easier and more useful overrides. I plan to merge the code after 2.14 is r

Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

2009-05-30 Thread Joe Neeman
On Saturday 30 May 2009 08:10:46 pm Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Joe, > > > Not really > > =\ > > > the code that places a tied accidental after a line break isn't > > accessible from scheme (it lives in lily/accidental.cc, in the > > print function). > > Ah... > > > here's a patch (to be applied w

Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

2009-05-30 Thread Joe Neeman
n). Anyway, here's a patch (to be applied with "git am") that implements a new property, 'hide-tied-accidental-after-break, in the Accidental grob. I'll apply it soonish unless there are complaints. Cheers, Joe From 057d39e33c669dacc98833bbc766d8ca693f084a Mon Sep 17 00

Re: Tweaking end-of-line time signature?

2009-05-26 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:13 -0500, Trevor Bača wrote: > Is there a way to set two grob properties at once (in a function with > no arguments)? (if (ly:foo something) (begin (ly:set! ...) (ly:set! ...))) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilyp

Re: Optimal page breaking

2009-05-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 00:18 +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > Isn't working "quite right" and I can't see how to fix it (12.2). >From the content of your email, I suppose you mean page-turn-breaking rather than optimal-breaking? > > I've got a piece that I would like to fit on 3 pages (it insi

Re: "Orphaned pages"

2009-02-26 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 20:37 -0700, Neil Thornock wrote: > > Is there some reason that you don't use > > \paper { > > ragged-last-bottom = ##f > > } > > ? > > Yes... I've found that often the final page in such a score gets > cheated in the number of systems assigned to it. So I may have 5 > syst

Re: "Orphaned pages"

2009-02-25 Thread Joe Neeman
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 09:01 -0700, Neil Thornock wrote: > I always include a dummy score after my main score, something as simple as: > > \score { \mypiecehere } > \pageBreak > {c1} > > It forces the spacing routine to spread systems evenly across all pages. > Good luck! Is there some reason tha

Re: Fitting as many lines as possible on a page

2009-02-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 20:00 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 19:49:05 Joe Neeman wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:13 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > > On Samstag, 31. Januar 200

Re: Fitting as many lines as possible on a page

2009-02-01 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 12:13 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Samstag, 31. Januar 2009 02:06:38 Joe Neeman wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:53 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME

Re: Fitting as many lines as possible on a page

2009-01-30 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 00:53 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Freitag, 30. Januar 2009 23:37:28 Tim Yang wrote: > > It doesn't work. I set the page-count as 2 and Lilypond still uses 3 > > pages. I think it is because somehow Lilypond thinks

Re: automatic setting of `currentBarNumber'

2009-01-23 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:03 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > The following problem: > > \score { > \relative { > c1 | c1 | c1 | c1 |% Bars 1-4 > } > > \score { > \relative { > c1 | c1 | c1 | c1 |% Bars 5-8 > } > > I know how to manually set `currentBarNu

Re: tuplet bracket required, override doesn't work?

2009-01-19 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:34 -0600, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Tom Hall wrote: > > Hello List > > > > A triplet that begins with a quaver (8) rest, followed by a crotchet (4) > > note, > > by default prints no bracket. This I thought unusual, more so that an > > overide as > > below seems to make no

Re: page-turn-breaking horizontal spacing

2008-11-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 00:12 +, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/11/24 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It's a little hard to tell without an example, but it sounds like > > lilypond is refusing to give things more space because that would make > > for a ba

Re: page turns and page count

2008-11-24 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 16:31 -0700, Neil Thornock wrote: > Hello! > > I'm using the page-turn-engraver for the first time. Is there a way I > can specify a page-count - and have it be recognized - in addition to > using the page turns? I specify 10 pages, the program finds 73 > page-break candida

Re: page-turn-breaking horizontal spacing

2008-11-24 Thread Joe Neeman
(moved to lilypond-user) On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 16:09 -0500, Dan Eble wrote: > Does anyone know why the variables that control horizontal spacing > (base-shortest-duration, shortest-duration-space, extra-spacing-width) > would have no effect when the page-breaking function is set to ly:page- >

Re: Trouble getting my page layout just right

2008-11-03 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 21:53 +1100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > In short, I'm stumped! > > Any ideas? So I had a look at the file you sent off-list and it turns out that the unevenness is being caused by poor extent-estimates. A workaround is to set VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent to #'(-4 . 4

Re: Trouble getting my page layout just right

2008-10-31 Thread Joe Neeman
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 21:53 +1100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 07:46:16AM +1100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:00:17PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > > > Hmm, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks it's strange! And it's > > nothing recent eithe

Re: ragged-last-bottom in multiple scores

2008-10-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:26 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:07:13 -0700 > Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:54 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > > > I have a collection of scores that I'd like to print in

Re: ragged-last-bottom in multiple scores

2008-10-14 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:54 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > I have a collection of scores that I'd like to print in one book. > Is there any way of getting the non-last-scores to use > ragged-last-bottom=##t ? Check out Nicolas' new \bookparts. ___ l

Re: Vertical spacing on big systems

2008-09-15 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 11:47 +0200, Michael Käppler wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > I've collected some raw data about estimated extents and real ones one > > various scores. I still have to study them, maybe a more suitable amount > > of reserved space will emerge. > that would be nice... Maybe it's also

Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time

2008-09-05 Thread Joe Neeman
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 20:37 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I think the easiest approach is to simply move to 'long long' for the > rational class. We could start using GUILE's rationals, but it will > complicate memory management, so I think it's not worth the trouble. What about using libgmp? I

Re: issues making lilypond

2008-08-22 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 05:12 +, Kevin Sapp wrote: > Hi, > I've been having trouble making lilypond due to a very strange error. The > make > claims that a file in $[LILYPOND]/flower, called file-name.cc, has some > undeclared variables (specifically: PATH_MAX and cwd in the function 'string >

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-12 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:15 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/8/12 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I would say that the second case should just be false. Unless 'me' is a > > staff symbol, you should not call Staff_symbol::on_line(me). And if 'me&#x

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-11 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 19:49 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/8/11 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 21:03 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > >> It was my idea to have all the real code in the staff-symbol file, and > >> have staff-symbol

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-10 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 21:03 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > It was my idea to have all the real code in the staff-symbol file, and > have staff-symbol-referencer just be a wrapper, ie. Makes sense to me. We'll end up with a smaller patch this way, too.

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-10 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 23:19 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/8/10 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Ah, sorry, I evidently hadn't read your last email completely. The patch > > you sent on the 7th looks pretty much OK to me. My only concern is that > > you

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-10 Thread Joe Neeman
Neil Puttock wrote: 2008/8/10 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I think Han-Wen's point is that the first argument to Staff_symbol::some_function(Grob *me, ...) should always be a staff symbol (whereas the first argument to Staff_symbol_referencer::some_function(Grob *me, ...) should

Re: GDP -- Revised second draft of Fretted strings

2008-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:49 -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > Dear Lilypond Users and Developers, > > We're pleased to announce a revised second draft of NR 2.4 Fretted strings. > > This draft includes the new predefined-fretboards functionality that enables > transposable guitar fret diagrams. >

Re: [PATCH] Re: Duration dots and Bar lines on custom Staves.

2008-08-09 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 01:06 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2008/8/9 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This does not make sense to me at all. line-positions is a property > > of the staff symbol, as is line-count. If someone is calling > > > > Staff_symbol::on_line(x, y) > > > > where x is

Re: Lilypond Style Guide

2008-08-05 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 00:03 -0700, Jordan Eldredge wrote: > I am currently working on wikilily.org and realized that one thing > that could be very helpful when collaborating on Lilypond code, would > be a style guide. My question for all of you is: has any other project > drafted a style guide for

Re: spacing problem

2008-08-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:34 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's not specific to dotted notes but to notes which have longer > > durations, and which get squeezed far too much -- the same problem > > occurs for, say, hal

Re: Chord spacing issues in 2.11 series

2008-08-03 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 07:51 -0500, Shamus wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I recently upgraded from 2.10.33 to 2.11.52 and noticed that > SeparatingGroupSpanner is no longer available. I used to use it to keep > my chord names from running into each other w

Re: GDP: first public draft, NR 1.4 Repeats

2008-07-29 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:12:38 +1000 > Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Normal repeats: > > I see you have an example with a partial alternative. Maybe you > > shoul

Re: GDP: first public draft, NR 1.4 Repeats

2008-07-28 Thread Joe Neeman
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 22:22 -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > I'm happy to announce the first public draft of NR 1.4 Repeats! > Ralph Palmer has done a lot of work preparing this section; please > read it carefully and let us know about any mistakes or omissions. This looks really good! I don't know

Re: I don't know if anyone else cares, but

2008-07-07 Thread Joe Neeman
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Offtopic, but I'm always wondering, how this can happen. > What changed in the last 10 years? The C++ specification or the Intel > architecture? > Could you explain? I suspect it's just the ability of mod

Re: beams

2008-07-04 Thread Joe Neeman
On 7/3/08, James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 03.07.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > >> Hi James, >> >>> So is this a bug? >> >> Looks like it... This was a bug, but it is now fixed in git. Joe ___ lilypond-user mailing list li

  1   2   3   >