Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Helge, On 11 April 2012 13:02, Helge Kruse wrote: > Am 11.04.2012 19:24, schrieb James: >> >> Well it requires that any changes I do in the English document are >> picked up and translated by the trasnaltors. The assumption is that >> those that do the German Translating see my checkins and make

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Helge Kruse wrote: > Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse >>  wrote: >> It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of >> voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results: >> stemUp

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse wrote: > Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: >> >> 2012/4/11 Helge Kruse: >>> >>> Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 >>> documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint >>> to >>> favor voiceOne/Two

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, On 11 April 2012 17:53, Helge Kruse wrote: > Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: >> >> 2012/4/11 Helge Kruse: >>> >>> Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 >>> documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint >>> to >>> favor voiceOne/Two

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 11.04.2012 09:36, schrieb James: 2012/4/11 Helge Kruse: Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint to favor voiceOne/Two/Three. But I did not read thorough 763 pages. Which section are you referrin

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-11 Thread James
Hello, 2012/4/11 Helge Kruse : > Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse ... > > Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14 > documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint to > favor voiceOne/

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-10 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł: On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse wrote: What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the stem up/down? It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse wrote: > What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the > stem up/down? It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results: stemUp/Down only changes the

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 09.04.2012 21:12, schrieb Thomas Morley: I'd use \override Script #'staff-padding = #'() and \voiceOne, \voiceTwo and \oneVoice: This looks great. I also played around with an approach that doesn't use the two voices since it's just the left hand that plays some part of the voice. \versi

Re: Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Thomas Morley
Am 9. April 2012 20:53 schrieb Helge Kruse : > Hello, > > I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch. But > all look similar like this: > > \context PianoStaff << >  \context Staff=right \relative c'' { >    \key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp >    d4~ d16 a' g\prall fis

Avoiding tie/prall collision

2012-04-09 Thread Helge Kruse
Hello, I have some measures with similar rhythmic pattern but different pitch. But all look similar like this: \context PianoStaff << \context Staff=right \relative c'' { \key g \major \time 3/4 s2. \stemUp d4~ d16 a' g\prall fis e\prall d cis\prall b | % 33 } \context Staff=lef