MuseScore seems to work for simple scores. For the sort of things I do
it doesn't work yet anyway. But I belive would be good to have a free
and robust alternative to finale and on top of that integrated with
lilypond.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
2011/9/25 Hilary Snaden :
> On 2011-09-25 11:13, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>> 2011/9/24 Graham Percival:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
MuseScore should be integrated.
>>>
>>> What do
On 2011-09-25 11:13, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/24 Graham Percival:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
MuseScore should be integrated.
What does that mean?
- better lilypond export for musescore: go a
2011/9/24 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
>> MuseScore should be integrated.
>
> What does that mean?
>
> - better lilypond export for musescore: go ahead and send patches
> there.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
> MuseScore should be integrated.
What does that mean?
- better lilypond export for musescore: go ahead and send patches
there.
- lilypond import for musescore: go ahe
Dear David,
I'd worked for Years with Finale and Sibelius. Since about 3 years I'm
working with lilypond.
I choosed it, because I do write my music first by hand and than I do the
fair copy with the computer.
In my opinion Lilypond is the most efficient way to do this work, altough I
have to admit,
2011/9/24 Janek Warchoł :
> i can elaborate.
Please, do it. One of the things that could integrate it a bit more
would be a javascript plug-in for entering music with lilypond syntax
in a pop up widget.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.o
2011/9/24 Janek Warchoł :
> For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
> MuseScore should be integrated. LilyPond does better job than
> MuseScore when we compare default engraving, but GUI is invaluable in
> some areas, and some users won't even try to use a tool without GUI
>
2011/9/24 m...@apollinemike.com :
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Seth Williamson wrote:
>> Somebody said there have been 2 million downloads of MuseScore. Does
>> anybody know if MuseScore is gaining many former LilyPond adherents? I know
>> for a fact that my girlfriend definitely prefers it.
>
On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Seth Williamson wrote:
> This has all been very interesting. But almost nobody addressed my main
> question. Namely, are there any, or many, pros out there who have chosen
> LilyPond over Sibelius or Finale? I did appreciate hearing from Kieran
> MacMillan.
>
I
This has all been very interesting. But almost nobody addressed my main
question. Namely, are there any, or many, pros out there who have chosen
LilyPond over Sibelius or Finale? I did appreciate hearing from Kieran
MacMillan.
Somebody said there have been 2 million downloads of MuseScore. Doe
2011/9/23 Tim Reeves :
>>3. Re:High-level users? (m...@apollinemike.com)
>
>> Just got back home from transcribing chipmunk noises for my most recent
>> choral work.
>> I'll just say that being called nuts is the single greatest compliment I
>
>> could possibly receive.
> .>
>> Cheers,
Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 23.09.2011 01:53, schrieb Tim Roberts:
>>
>> From a publishing perspective, that's impressive on a nearly magical
>> scale. As a musician, please forgive my parochial and archaic attitude,
>> but that's nuts.
> Did you take the time to explore the pieces?
> I don't think one
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> (It means my music production route is Capella download -> Musescore ->
> MusicXML -> mxml2nwcc -> Noteworthy -> nwctxt -> nwctxt2ly -> lilypond ->
> pdf)
>
But you know you can export from musescore to lilypond directly, don't
you? Any reas
- Original Message -
From: "Bernardo Barros"
To: "Brent Annable"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: High-level users?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Brent Annable
wrote:
I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's mai
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
> I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a
> typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's
> better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill
> in', something th
On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Peekay Ex wrote:
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 23.09.2011 01:53, schrieb Tim Roberts:
>>>
>>> Janek Warchoł wrote:
If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this:
http://www.apollinemike.com/
2011/9/23 Brent Annable :
> I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a
> typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's
> better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill
> in', something that Lilypond's text-input para
Mike
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 23.09.2011 01:53, schrieb Tim Roberts:
>>
>> Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>>
>>> If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this:
>>> http://www.apollinemike.com/scores/granini.pdf
>>
>> From a publishing perspective, that
Pretty amazing stuff, both musically and visually! Mike, any chance of
seeing the original ly files?
On 9/23/11 10:22 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.09.2011 01:53, schrieb Tim Roberts:
Janek Warchoł wrote:
If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this:
http://www.apollinem
Am 23.09.2011 01:53, schrieb Tim Roberts:
Janek Warchoł wrote:
If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this:
http://www.apollinemike.com/scores/granini.pdf
From a publishing perspective, that's impressive on a nearly magical
scale. As a musician, please forgive my paro
I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a
typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's
better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill
in', something that Lilypond's text-input paradigm doesn't really allow for.
But
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this:
> http://www.apollinemike.com/scores/granini.pdf
From a publishing perspective, that's impressive on a nearly magical
scale. As a musician, please forgive my parochial and archaic attitude,
but that's nut
Am 23.09.2011 00:54, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2011/9/22 Seth Williamson:
I use LilyPond at a relatively low level. Mostly just to re-write single
parts, change clefs, transpose, etc.
A friend of mine, however, is a much-published composer who has written for
film, TV, high school and college band
2011/9/22 Seth Williamson :
> I use LilyPond at a relatively low level. Mostly just to re-write single
> parts, change clefs, transpose, etc.
> A friend of mine, however, is a much-published composer who has written for
> film, TV, high school and college bands, jazz charts, etc. We got to
> talk
Hi Seth,
> My buddy was telling me how, when Jerry Goldsmith was recording with Sony,
> there'd be a table of four music majors from USC at work stations with Finale
> and/or Sibelius, ready to produce changes on the fly in parts and conductor
> scores, etc. Are there any Big Guns like this wh
I use LilyPond at a relatively low level. Mostly just to re-write single
parts, change clefs, transpose, etc.
A friend of mine, however, is a much-published composer who has written for
film, TV, high school and college bands, jazz charts, etc. We got to
talking about various notation software b
27 matches
Mail list logo
