Hi, lily ponders:
There is lilypond-windows.exc and lilypond.exc in \usr\bin. What is the
difference? I have window 10 - which one should I use?
Immanuel,Ming___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
OSX 10.4.2
Lilypond 2.6.3-1 (dmg-download)
I am new to lilypond, and am trying to use lilypond-book, but get:
lilypond-book ~/Desktop/silly.ly
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond-
book", line 59, in ?
import lil
Hi,
I would like to know how to use a TEX commands which use an special
latex package from a ly file. Something like\usepackage{} from latex,
but in a *.ly file, for compiling with lilypond. Not with
lilypond-book.
I have some *.ly files include with lilypondfile{} in my latex
document, and i
Er... I respond to myself:
lilypond --set=latexpackages=PACKAGE test.ly
well, if somebody more didn't know it.. now does :)
José Luis
A 12/10/03 19:09:10
José Luis Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know how to use a TEX commands
Hi
I just downloaded the software and did all the right (I hope) stages, but the
file does not open. what did I do wrong? I am using windows 2000
thanks
Ester De Beer___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
m the
printer. Still the results were great.
These days I'm a composer and I use Sibelius 4 as a composition tool,
and the thought of learning a new language is rather daunting. Can
Lilypond accept a Midi file and convert it into its own format, and
then to its beautiful printed outp
Hi,
I have downloaded your latest version of Lilypond, and began working
with.
I found that when using a scale (i.e. E flat minor), it is still
necessary to use es and is for notes like A, B, etc.
Please let me know if I missed something in the tutorial or in your
examples.
If not, please
I just discovered LilyPond and wanted a chance to thank everyone that has been
involved with creating and maintaining it. I don't have much experience with
music printing programs, but have use used CakeWalk (really just a sequencer),
and Finale. Although these are good programs, I don'
I checked about 20 of the mirrors, but none of them show lilypond as available. Can
you point me to a download site that has the file? Thanks. Paul OBrien.
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
By my last post, I, unfortunately, evoked a discussion concerning
LilyPond, LilyPond snippets, and the GPL which actually did not belong
to the original topic. During this discussion Harm stated, that „maybe
LSR should better use GPL 3, not this deprecated one (Public Domain)“.
Urs asked whether
There is lilypond.exe and lilypond-windows.exe in the Lilypond edition
for Microsoft Windows.
You use lilypond.exe when you want to capture the output of the
program, e.g. error messages.
lilypond-windows.exe opens a new window, outputs the messages in this
windows and closes it finally.I usually
- Original Message -
From: "Helge Kruse"
To: "MING TSANG"
Cc: "Lilypond-user Mailinglist"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: lilypond-windows.exc vs lilypond-exc
There is lilypond.exe and lilypond-windows.exe in the Lilypond edition
Helge: Thank you for the explanation.
Phil: Thank you for the link. Since I am not running lilypond in command
mode. I use frescobaldi as front end to execute lilypond. I run both
lilypond-windows.exc and lilypond.exc and I don't see any difference. I can see
the log file
Hi Daniel and Valentin, and other LilyPond + KDE or LilyKDE users,
I just released a basic package for lilypond editing under KDE 4.1+
http://lilykde.googlecode.com/files/lilypond-kde4-0.1.tar.gz
It contains
- three icons for LilyPond documents, based on oxygen, crystalsvg and one
neutral one
Hi,
when executing lilypond-book contained in Lilypond.app (Mac OS X), I get
the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/Applications/TeX/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond-book",
line 44, in ?
import lilylib as ly
ImportError: No module named l
Hi,
I think it might be a good idea for Lilypond to provide a facility
which, based on an input file, provides
a normalized intermediate file which is itself a valid Lilypond file,
with exactly the same semantics as the
original one, but where the variables (or at least, the user-define
ones
HI
Is this in some way an better option than changing the the lilypond
executable to cmd=elatex??
not sure what this does??
Aaron
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 19:36, José Luis Cruz wrote:
> Er... I respond to myself:
>
>
> lilypond --set=latexpackages=PACKAGE test.ly
>
>
> w
Aaron wrote:
HI
Is this in some way an better option than changing the the lilypond
executable to cmd=elatex??
That's something completely different. José just wanted to ask LaTeX
to include some packages, whereas you want to replace the full LaTeX
program with another program (elatex)
thanks
Mats,
I am always looking for a way to make the hebrew support better.
I was wondering about unicode and thoughts about supporting it??
AA
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 10:31, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Aaron wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > Is this in some way an better option than chan
Karsten Reincke writes:
> By my last post, I, unfortunately, evoked a discussion concerning
> LilyPond, LilyPond snippets, and the GPL which actually did not belong
> to the original topic. During this discussion Harm stated, that „maybe
> LSR should better use GPL 3, not this de
ments alone
and basically comment only on that one:
Am 30.10.19 um 00:06 schrieb Karsten Reincke:
By my last post, I, unfortunately, evoked a discussion concerning
LilyPond, LilyPond snippets, and the GPL which actually did not belong
to the original topic. During this discussion Harm stated, that „
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 00:46 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>
> I disagree with your assessment that calling any code/function makes
> the
> work doing so a derivative of that code (that would concern using
> OpenLilyLib code). [...]
I agree with you, that the question, when and how a piece o
icensed software indicates that I create a
> derivative work and that the strong copyleft effect is triggered.
Which would imply that distributing your LilyPond input combined with
OpenLilylib code would require licensing your LilyPond input under the
GPL.
It doesn't cover the output of running your LilyPond code, namely the
PDF.
--
David Kastrup
On 10/29/19, 5:46 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
Karsten Reincke writes:
> By my last post, I, unfortunately, evoked a discussion concerning
> LilyPond, LilyPond snippets, and the GPL which actually did not belong
> to the original topic. During this dis
> From: Karsten Reincke
> To: lilypond-user
> Cc: k.rein...@fodina.de
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:06:32 +0100
> Subject: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL
> By my last post, I, unfortunately, evoked a discussion concerning
> LilyPond, LilyPond snippets, an
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 00:55 +, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 10/29/19, 5:46 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
> Karsten Reincke wrotes:
>
>[...]
> >
> > [4] But if a GPL licensed LilyPond snippet is used by another LilyPond
> &
ate a
> > derivative work and that the strong copyleft effect is triggered.
>
> Which would imply that distributing your LilyPond input combined with
> OpenLilylib code would require licensing your LilyPond input under the
> GPL.
Yes, exactly. That's my point.
>
> It doe
on in a GPL licensed snippet which
only
modifies the apperance of a score. Such a function does not concern the music
itself. And therefore, the copyleft effect is not applied of the music.
Then it seems that you try to generalize your argumentation: Every piece of
LilyPond code describing the
ly
>modifies the apperance of a score. Such a function does not concern the
>music
>itself. And therefore, the copyleft effect is not applied of the music.
>
>Then it seems that you try to generalize your argumentation: Every
>piece of
>LilyPond code describing the music score
o your code.
> So, here we have the solution to your dilemma: don't copy them.
Yeep, that's what I will do: as long as I am afraid to lose not only my LilyPond
code (which I do not care), but the rights of my using scientific / musical
work,
I won't use any snippet whi
n /
>> > method delivered by a GPL licensed software indicates that I create a
>> > derivative work and that the strong copyleft effect is triggered.
>>
>> Which would imply that distributing your LilyPond input combined with
>> OpenLilylib code would require licensing your Li
Karsten Reincke writes:
> Many thanks for your comment. It contains an important hint. BUt it is a bit
> apart
> from my crucial point:
>
> I am not arguing that my LilyPond work (or a snippet) is covered by
>the GPL because it is 'executed' by LilyPond. I argue tha
the path to that file as an
>argument. Or you
>copy the snippet literally and directly into your code.
>
>
>> So, here we have the solution to your dilemma: don't copy them.
>
>Yeep, that's what I will do: as long as I am afraid to lose not only my
>
ly to the contents of
your book or the PDF or printed version of it, because the code of TeX (or
LilyPond) isn’t in there, it was just used to generate the result. (Same if you
use OS software to generate graphics, videos etc.)
A *program* that’s using open source code *contains* this code (in com
ted version of it,
That's an unproven proposition
> because the code of TeX (or LilyPond) isn’t in there, it was just used to
> generate the result. (Same if you use OS software to generate graphics, videos
> etc.)
Not it isn't.
Again - like others in this thread - you are mixing t
On 10/30, Karsten Reincke wrote:
> Here, the analogy of gcc and Lilypond matches perfectly: As we are
> must distribute binaries which are compiled by the gcc on the base a
> GPL licensed source code, we must also distribute the binaries (png)
> which are compiled by LilyPond on the b
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 09:41 -0700, ma...@masonhock.com wrote:
> On 10/30, Karsten Reincke wrote:
> > Here, the analogy of gcc and Lilypond matches perfectly: As we are
> > must distribute binaries which are compiled by the gcc on the base a
> > GPL licensed source code, we mus
coming lib - licensed
under
the MIT license - into his OpenLIlyLib. I only refused and refuse to use
any GPL
licensed Lilypond snippet as 'module' / 'lib' for my own work.
I am curious as to why you feel you cannot use any GPL licensed LilyPond
snippet but you can use th
From: Karsten Reincke
Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 9:02 AM
To: Henning Hraban Ramm , lilypond-user
Cc:
Subject: Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 15:08 +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
[...]
It’s the same if you publish a book using TeX:
No, it isn&#
to complere the analogy used by
> other participants of this discussion.
Okay, then GCC didn't need to be brought up at all. Sorry for
misunderstanding. That said, a pdf generated by Lilypond still does not
need to contain or use any Lilypond code. Users do not need to fear
that they wil
ld not have to obey the conditions on
>> redistribution of the copied text.
>
> This says to me that you can consider LSR snippets as part of the code used
> to create music (any music, not just your specific music). You can then put
> your specific music in a separate file,
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 22:14, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>>The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses, I
>> believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus
>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton file and
>> GCC libra
ould be contained in an included .ly file.
>
> When the fret-diagram code was executed, no part of that code ended up in the
> resulting PDF or PNG files. The fret-diagram code created ink at specified
> locations; but the specified locations were not part of the code I wrote.
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>
>> The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses,
>> I believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus
>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton
>>
e to obey the conditions on
redistribution of the copied text.
>
> This says to me that you can consider LSR snippets as part of the code
used to create music (any music, not just your specific music). You can then
put your specific music in a separate file, with separate copyr
ode created ink at specified
locations; but the specified locations were not part of the code I wrote.
Instead they were generated by the interaction of the main lilypond
distribution with the music input I wrote. And the result was printed music
that matched my intent. If the music was original, th
eparate file, with
>> separate copyright. And the modified LilyPond (including the LSR
>> snippets) is a derivative work of LilyPond, and has GPL rights, and
>> you would be required to share all of that code. But the created
>> music engraving (pdf, svg, or midi) is not
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Hans Åberg writes:
>>
>>> The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses,
>>> I believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus
>>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same rol
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:36, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>
>>> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Hans Åberg writes:
>>>
The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses,
I believe, because the processed part remains in the
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 22:14, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses, I
> believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus
> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton file and
> GCC libraries
hether artistic or scientific), and in that respect it is
exactly equal to using \ottava or \accidentalStyle.
Then it seems that you try to generalize your argumentation: Every piece of
LilyPond code describing the music score does not not concern the music,
but only
the appearance.
Urs:
...
> One of the main issues we have at play here (and that has been discussed
> by others in this thread) is that tools like LilyPond and LaTeX blur the
> lines between source, program, and document.
>
> The arguments that are expressed *for* a requirement to license
and
that copyright will remain if copy-and-pasted into user code.
In the US, a typeface is not copyrightable. But a computer program that makes
a font or its glyphs is copyrightable. I can see your argument here. But if
this argument is true, then it seems that all music set with LilyPond is GPL
gram that
> makes a font or its glyphs is copyrightable. I can see your argument here.
> But if this argument is true, then it seems that all music set with LilyPond
> is GPL3, because the code for drawing beams, stems, staff lines, and
> straight flags is in LilyPond and is
sted into user code.
>>
>> In the US, a typeface is not copyrightable. But a computer program
>> that makes a font or its glyphs is copyrightable. I can see your
>> argument here. But if this argument is true, then it seems that all
>> music set with LilyPond is GPL3,
> On 31 Oct 2019, at 21:31, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> All those parts should be LGPL, and also included headers, I believe:
>> Not GPL, because that would legal technically force copyright
>> limitations on the output, and not public domain, because then one
>> could exploit the inputs in ways
Hans Åberg writes:
>> On 31 Oct 2019, at 21:31, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> All those parts should be LGPL, and also included headers, I believe:
>>> Not GPL, because that would legal technically force copyright
>>> limitations on the output, and not public domain, because then one
>>> could ex
> On 31 Oct 2019, at 22:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg writes:
>
>>> On 31 Oct 2019, at 21:31, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
All those parts should be LGPL, and also included headers, I believe:
Not GPL, because that would legal technically force copyright
limitations on
onal
treaty about the copyright on fonts, but since it was not ratified by enough
countries it’s not effective.
BTW there is _no_ copyright on the design of sheet music, even if some music
publishers claim it.
LilyPond-generated PostScript code I see equivalent to the generation of fonts.
But it
On 01/11/2019 10:45, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
>
> BTW there is _no_ copyright on the design of sheet music, even if some music
> publishers claim it.
>
This depends upon the country. In the UK: "The typographical
arrangement of a published edition lasts for 25 years from first
publicatio
> Am 2019-11-01 um 12:16 schrieb J Martin Rushton
> :
>
> On 01/11/2019 10:45, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> BTW there is _no_ copyright on the design of sheet music, even if some music
>> publishers claim it.
>
> This depends upon the country. In the UK: "The typographical
> arrangement of
2008/11/8 Wilbert Berendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just released a basic package for lilypond editing under KDE 4.1+
Hi Wilbert,
wonderful! I'll have a look right away.
> - three icons for LilyPond documents, based on oxygen, crystalsvg and one
> neutral one, based on t
Op zaterdag 8 november 2008, schreef Valentin Villenave:
> I hope you've also had a look at the icon I drew at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-09/msg2.html
Yes! I used the same approach. Your oxygen variant is even better, with the
shadowed note! :-)
b
ce).
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Last year I put together a package of templates to make it easy to use
the templates in the documentation. I tried to make it easy to install.
As you know LilyPond is a moving target but they still work for me as
they stand.
They may prove useful to others. I know I had a great deal of fun
You explicitly called lilypond-book. I suspect you do not have the
bin directory in your PATH. lilypond-book reads your PATH to find
where lilylib is located. Your path should look like this:
PATH=/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/Current/bin:.:/opt/
local/bin:/opt/local/sbin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Fred Leason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You explicitly called lilypond-book. I suspect you do not have the
> bin directory in your PATH. lilypond-book reads your PATH to find
> where lilylib is located. Your path should look like thi
tadir = '/usr/share/lilypond/2.10.13'
if not os.path.isdir (datadir):
datadir = '/usr/share/lilypond/2.10.13'
sys.path.insert (0, os.path.join (datadir, 'python'))
# dynamic relocation, for GUB binaries.
bindir = os.path.abspath (os.path.split (sys.argv[0])[0])
Nicola:
I know I had the same problem before. It may be a problem with the
distribution of 2.10.17-1. I am using 2.11.13. Open up lilypond-
book and look for the code that precedes the "import lilylib as ly".
Mine looks like this:
os.environ['PATH'] = bindir + os.
I've installed 2.6 using the autopackage on Ubuntu Linux.
There's problems with lilypond-pdfpc-helper. This links to
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-2.6.0, which attempts to run
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-bin-2.6.0.
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-bin-2.6.0 doesn't exist, so no point-and-click...
looks
I've installed 2.6 using the autopackage on Ubuntu Linux.
There's problems with lilypond-pdfpc-helper. This links to
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-2.6.0, which attempts to run
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-bin-2.6.0.
lilypond-pdfpc-helper-bin-2.6.0 doesn't exist, so no point-and-click...
looks
I'm writing something like a book of cello exercises, with a lot of
short music fragments and some text.
I find a combination of LaTeX and Lilypond-book a perfect tool for my
work, at least in theory.
However, there are some problems in practice.
Using Lilypond version 2.0.1 with Fedora
te.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
When I load a .ly file after installing lilypond-snapshot I get:
File mode specification error: (file-error "Cannot open load file" "
lilypond-mode")
Debian unstable.
Thanks again for these packages.
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user
I cannot get lilypond to run the lilypond-book.itely example.
It is NOT the screech-boink example which ends up clear and crisp.
Version: 2.5.0 (same as 2.4.0 I assume)
The most important here is the information of errormessages.
The backtrace, I mean, doesn't give much help as to wh
Citerar Darius Blasband <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I think it might be a good idea for Lilypond to provide a facility
> which, based on an input file, provides
> a normalized intermediate file which is itself a valid Lilypond file,
> with exactly the same semanti
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erik Sandberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Since this intermediate file is a valid Lilypond file, an intermediate
pass can perform some kind of transformation
on it before passing it back to Lilypond for actual processing.
Is this reasonable ? or i
Check the lyqi Emacs mode:
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/lilypond/lyqi.html
--
Feri.
_______
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
We released Lilypond 2.21.82 yesterday. This has a few bug fixes and
documentation updates from 2.21.81 and is the latest release candidate for
stable release 2.22.0. We encourage users and developers to download, use and
test it.
--
Phil Holmes
Hello everyone,
Functions in Lilypond can also be written in pure Sheme syntax like this
#(define abcd
(lambda (x y ... )
PROCEDURE USING x y ...))
and then called within Lilypond with the syntax
\abcd x y ...
or within a Sheme fucntion with the syntax
(abcd x y ...)
If anyone is
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.1. This is a development
version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the latest stable
version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.20.0 version.
--
Phil Holmes
Hi,
I am trying to put together a book. A collection of 13 pieces with lilypond.
I would like the book to be setup in this way
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
\version "2.20.0"
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "letter")
top-margin = .50\in
right-margin = .50\in
Dear community,
so that I have any idea on where to look and maybe give more useful
information, I got this warning (that should be an error, because the pdf
output is useless) when using lilypond-book after upgrading to Lilypond 2.22.1
(it used to work perfectly before) on Ubuntu 20.04
Windows 10
Lilypond 2.19.83
Hi,
I have written a bagpipe tune (25th_kosbs) which has four
parts, each with a repeat which should start on a new line. The format is A4 in
lanscape mode. I cannot get this to work and at the same time maintain a flush
right margin. Suggestions
Hello,
does anyone knows about interfaces and/or notation systems written in
other programming languages which use lilypond as backend? Two examples
of such interfaces are fomus (https://common-lisp.net/project/fomus/doc/)
and abjad (http://projectabjad.org/).
cheers,
Amir
conversely print off uni work at home. I assume the uni
machines are WinBoxes, we run Linux and Windows at home.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
lain text files and a php formatter. Like Lily it
is designed to be extensible by the use of plugins, which users are
encouraged to publish.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https:
Hello. I am trying to use the lilypond-book example in Chapter 3.1 :
lilypond-book --output=out --pdf lilybook.lytex
but got an error message: cannot determine format for: lilypond-book.lytexa
so I added "-f latex: to the input : lilypond-book -f latex --output=out
--pdf lilybook.lytex
Are there any istructions available to try to compile lilypond 2.21 on
windows?
Thanks, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello 'Ponders!
This question was asked over a decade ago[1] and doesn't appear to have been
answered. At any rate, I'll ask again: does anyone have Yasnippets concerning
LilyPond to share? I've checked in the official collection[2] and the Doom
one[3]. Incidentally
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.10. This is
termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However,
if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the
current stable release.
As a reminder, the official binaries can be downloaded from GitLab
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.11. This is
termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However,
if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the
current stable release. Please refer to the Installing section in the
Learning Manual for
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.12. This is
termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. However,
if you require stability, we recommend using version 2.22.2, the
current stable release. Please refer to the Installing section in the
Learning Manual for
pagani laurent writes:
Can someone answer Laurent?
> Hi Jan,
>
> Sorry to disturb you (possibly I should have gone to some forum but
> this is so fundamental for me that if the answer is no, I won’t use
> Lilypond, so I don’t want to bother entering the forum if it is to
> le
nt writes:
>
> Can someone answer Laurent?
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > Sorry to disturb you (possibly I should have gone to some forum but
> > this is so fundamental for me that if the answer is no, I won’t use
> > Lilypond, so I don’t want to bother entering the fo
Hi Laurent,
As you can see, Jan redirected you to the lilypond-user mailing list, which
is the primary discussion 'forum' for LilyPond.
Since your name sounds French: there is also a French-speaking equivalent of
this list, lilypond-user-fr. I'm mentioning it just in ca
orry to disturb you (possibly I should have gone to some forum but
> > > this is so fundamental for me that if the answer is no, I won’t use
> > > Lilypond, so I don’t want to bother entering the forum if it is to
> > > leave it immediately).
> > >
> > > I
i Laurent,
>
> As you can see, Jan redirected you to the lilypond-user mailing list, which
> is the primary discussion 'forum' for LilyPond.
>
> Since your name sounds French: there is also a French-speaking equivalent of
> this list, lilypond-user-fr. I'm mentioning it ju
2022 à 11:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen a écrit :
>>> pagani laurent writes:
>>>
>>> Can someone answer Laurent?
>>>
>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to disturb you (possibly I should have gone to some forum but
>>>> this is
Hello Laurent,
Le dim. 18 sept. 2022 à 16:23, pagani laurent a
écrit :
> Unlike Latex editors (texstudio, or texshop e.g.), it does not have the
> list of reserved words/commands in lateral menus to retrieve quickly
> something you don’t remember. But I guess there are not so many things to
> re
1 - 100 of 2093 matches
Mail list logo
