Hi Werner,
>> Might I suggest that “to-barline” is potentially
>> misleading/confusing…?
> I suggest you file an issue.
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6709
Cheers,
Kieren.
__
My work day may look different than your work
Hi Mats,
> Exactly the same feature might also be useful for hairpins and other spanner
> types
Indeed!
I’ll be sure to make the issue I submit a general spanner issue…
Best,
Kieren.
__
My work day may look different than your work day. Ple
xtend the use of \endSpanner to
provide the equivalent result. I would have expected to the following to
work, but it doesn't:
\score {
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\time 6/8
\relative c' {
c8 b a g e c |
\set Staff.pedalSustainStyle = #'mixed
\override Staff.
> Might I suggest that “to-barline” is potentially
> misleading/confusing…?
>
> On the other hand:
>
> end-at-barline, for a pedal coded for release on a note **just
> after** a barline, might be more clearly descriptive of the
> current behaviour; and
>
> extend-to-barline, for
for release on a note **just before**
a barline, might be more suggestive of the behaviour Maurits was expecting.
Is there any technical reason both of these different-but-related properties
can’t/shouldn’t be made available?
Cheers,
Kieren.
__
My work day
Hi Jean,
Of course you are right. Let me explain how I got to this to explain my
confusion.
My first attempt was to add it to the next note without using \override
Staff.PianoPedalBracket.to-barline = ##t (as I wasn't aware of it
existence at that point). What I discovered however is that
Le mardi 09 avril 2024 à 23:55 +0200, Maurits Lamers via LilyPond user
discussion a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> I encountered a situation where the PianoPedalBracket setting to-barline
> doesn't always do what you'd expect. Given the following code, the pedal
> bracket is not extended to the end of
Hi Aaron,
Yes it does. It is just unexpected that this would be necessary.
cheers
Maurits
Op 10-04-2024 om 00:12 schreef Aaron Hill:
Does the empty chord construct help?
<>\sustainOff
(I'm away from my normal environment, so I cannot test this locally to
confirm.)
-- Aaron Hill
On 2024-04-09 2:55 pm, Maurits Lamers via LilyPond user discussion
wrote:
Only when the \sustainOff is placed outside of the tremolo, the bracket
extends to the barline:
%%%
\version "2.24.0"
\score {
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\time 6/8
\relative c' {
c8 b a g e c |
Hey all,
I encountered a situation where the PianoPedalBracket setting to-barline
doesn't always do what you'd expect. Given the following code, the pedal
bracket is not extended to the end of the bar:
%%%
\version "2.24.0"
\score {
\new Staff {
\clef bass
\time 6/8
\relative
\compressEmptyMeasures works (also in 2.24.1), thank you.
Gerardo
Il giorno mer 21 feb 2024 alle ore 21:49 Mats Bengtsson
ha scritto:
>
>
> On 2024-02-17 01:15, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I need to change the time in the middle of a bar.
> I managed to do that using \partial, but it
On 2024-02-17 01:15, Gerardo Ballabio
wrote:
Hello,
I need to change the time in the middle of a bar.
I managed to do that using \partial, but it seems that after that,
\compressMMRests no longer works -- only for the group of measures
immediately
> On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 11:27 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > works out of the box with 2.25.13.
> > Please consider to upgrade.
Thank you.
I'm using 2.24.1 because that is what's shipped with Debian stable. If
there's no way to make it work with this version I'll look into using
; %%
>
> Hi,
>
> works out of the box with 2.25.13.
> Please consider to upgrade.
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
>
I've recently done this:
\unfoldRepeats {
\relative c'' {
...
\partial 8 e8 |
a,8. b16 a8 a4 a8 |
...
a8. fs16 d8 fs4 e8 |
\partial 8*5 d4. d4 \bar "||"
\repeat volta 2 {
a'8. fs16 d8 d8. e16 fs8 |
...
- and it works fine. No time signature change, just going from
anacrusis to complete bars. The unfolded repeats are to make the MIDI
work.
Martin
--
J Martin Rushton MBCS
Am Sa., 17. Feb. 2024 um 01:18 Uhr schrieb Gerardo Ballabio
:
>
> Sorry, forgot the attachment.
>
> Il giorno sab 17 feb 2024 alle ore 01:15 Gerardo Ballabio
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I need to change the time in the middle of a bar.
> > I managed to do that using \partial, but it seems
Sorry, forgot the attachment.
Il giorno sab 17 feb 2024 alle ore 01:15 Gerardo Ballabio
ha scritto:
>
> Hello,
> I need to change the time in the middle of a bar.
> I managed to do that using \partial, but it seems that after that,
> \compressMMRests no longer works -- only for the group of
Hello,
I need to change the time in the middle of a bar.
I managed to do that using \partial, but it seems that after that,
\compressMMRests no longer works -- only for the group of measures
immediately following, then it resumes working normally.
See example below, attaching the output that I
> Would it be possible to reformulate a bit to make it even more clear
> that this is analogous to how \layout blocks behave (the only
> difference being that a \score block that contains nor a layout
> neither a midi block implicitly contains a layout block). For
> example: [...]
Sorry for
On 2023-11-12 14:31, Werner LEMBERG
wrote:
MIDI settings can be changed globally (or in a book or bookpart), but
the generation of an actual MIDI file is only triggered when a \midi
block is encountered inside of a \score .
Thanks
> MIDI settings can be changed globally (or in a book or bookpart), but
> the generation of an actual MIDI file is only triggered when a \midi
> block is encountered inside of a \score .
Thanks for the idea and wording.
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2171
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> +A @code{@bs{}midi} block outside of @code{@bs{}score} does
> +@emph{not} create a MIDI file.}
MIDI settings can be changed globally (or in a book or bookpart), but
the generation of an actual MIDI file is only triggered when a \midi
block is encountered inside of a
> Thanks. I'll add this information to the NR.
>
>
> Right now, the NR says the following
> (https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/notation/the-midi-block.html).
> What
> do you think needs to be clarified?
>
> To create a MIDI output file from a LilyPond input file, insert
>
Thanks. I'll add this information to the NR.
Right now, the NR says the following (https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/notation/the-midi-block.html). What do you think needs to be clarified?
To create a MIDI
>> I wonder whether it is expected that this simple input
>>
>> ```
>> { c' }
>> \midi{}
>> ```
>>
>> doesn't create a MIDI file.
>
>
> Yes. [...]
Thanks. I'll add this information to the NR.
Werner
> I wonder whether it is expected that this simple input
>
> ```
> { c' }
> \midi{}
> ```
>
> doesn't create a MIDI file.
Yes. Otherwise you could not do
```
\midi { global MIDI settings ... }
fooMusic = ...
\score { \fooMusic \layout { } }
\score { \unfoldRepeats \fooMusic \midi { } }
[2.24.2, 2.25.10]
I wonder whether it is expected that this simple input
```
{ c' }
\midi{}
```
doesn't create a MIDI file. I have to explicitly put everything into
a `\score` block to get that.
For me, this looks odd, and I couldn't find a hint in the
documentation for that behaviour.
Thank you. It worked. С уважением,Виноградов Юрий.10.10.2023, 21:31, "Jean Abou Samra" :Le mardi 10 octobre 2023 à 21:16 +0300, Виноградов Юрий a écrit :Hello. Please help me to remove this collision at the beginning of the piece. So that everything starts smoothly.You need to insert grace skips
Le mardi 10 octobre 2023 à 21:16 +0300, Виноградов Юрий a écrit :
> Hello. Please help me to remove this collision at the beginning of the piece.
> So that everything starts smoothly.
You need to insert grace skips (“\grace { s8 }”) in each staff that does not
start with a grace note.
See
The oldest bug of all, I believe!
Just put hidden ("s") appoggiaturas in the other parts and then everything will
line up.
Paul
From: Виноградов Юрий
To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org"
Sent: 10/10/2023 19:16
Subject: The problem of acciaccatura from the b
Hello. Please help me to remove this collision at the beginning of the piece. So that everything starts smoothly. С уважением,Виноградов Юрий.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:34 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Suppose tagline "worked" in \score blocks. What would this code print?
>
> \version "2.24.2"
>
> \score {
> \header {
> tagline = "Tagline 1"
> }
> { c' }
> }
>
> \score {
> \header {
> tagline = "Tagline 2"
> }
> { d'
> Well, I could imagine that the last 'tagline' entry wins.
It is at least not more consistent than the existing behavior, which
is also documented. Ergo, I see no bug here.
Best,
Jean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Another observation: tagline is not in either the command index or
> the index in the Notation Manual. The documentation I could find on
> tagline was pretty sparse (unless I missed something).
I've added index entries in
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/2104
> Suppose tagline "worked" in \score blocks. What would this code print?
>
> \version "2.24.2"
>
> \score {
> \header {
> tagline = "Tagline 1"
> }
> { c' }
> }
>
> \score {
> \header {
> tagline = "Tagline 2"
> }
> { d' }
> }
>
> \score {
> \header {
> tagline =
Le mardi 12 septembre 2023 à 15:38 -0700, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> Hi everyone.
>
> I have a few observations that I'd like to share. Nothin too urgent.
>
> If you put tagline = ##f in a header block, it will work everywhere except in
> the score block.
Suppose tagline
through
some search on google.
-Will
On 9/12/23 18:38, Knute Snortum wrote:
Hi everyone.
I have a few observations that I'd like to share. Nothin too urgent.
If you put tagline = ##f in a header block, it will work everywhere
except in the score block. Here is a MWE to illustrate this:
Hi everyone.
I have a few observations that I'd like to share. Nothin too urgent.
If you put tagline = ##f in a header block, it will work everywhere except
in the score block. Here is a MWE to illustrate this:
\version "2.25.7"
% \header { tagline = ##f } % <-- this
pler
> > > Subject:Re: Getting readline to work in scheme-sandbox
> > > Date:Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:22:38 +0100
> > >
> > > Am 17.01.2020 um 00:32 schrieb Knute Snortum:
> > >
> > >> That did it! Thanks!
> > >
> > > Nice to
pler
> > > Subject:Re: Getting readline to work in scheme-sandbox
> > > Date:Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:22:38 +0100
> > >
> > > Am 17.01.2020 um 00:32 schrieb Knute Snortum:
> > >
> > >> That did it! Thanks!
> > >
> > > Nice to
On Tue 10 Jan 2023 at 10:34:19 (-0500), Kevin Cole wrote:
> An old thread at
> https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-01/msg00350.html
> finished up with:
>
> > From:Michael Käppler
> > Subject:Re: Getting readline to work in scheme-sandbox
> > Date:F
An old thread at
https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-01/msg00350.html
finished up with:
> From:Michael Käppler
> Subject:Re: Getting readline to work in scheme-sandbox
> Date:Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:22:38 +0100
>
> Am 17.01.2020 um 00:32 schrieb Knute Snortum
Jean Abou Samra writes:
> Le 11/11/2022 à 14:28, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>>\override NoteName #'stencil = #ChimeNoteNames
>> This is the problematic line, and the error message should have
>> indicated as much. This should be NoteName.stencil but you really
>> really really should figure
on "2.23.80"
>
> #(define (ChimeNoteNames grob)
> (grob-interpret-markup
> grob
> #{
>\markup \with-string-transformer
> #(lambda (layout props str)
> (string-upcase str))
>#(ly:grob-property grob '
Le 11/11/2022 à 14:28, David Kastrup a écrit :
\override NoteName #'stencil = #ChimeNoteNames
This is the problematic line, and the error message should have
indicated as much. This should be NoteName.stencil but you really
really really should figure out how to run convert-ly in the
Viktor Mastoridis writes:
> Hello list,
>
> The construct below used to work for my educational needs up to 2.20.
> Now in 2.22 it doesn't work anymore and it's beyond my understanding to fix
> it.
> I passed update.ly in Frescobaldi, but no joy.
It's convert-ly you need t
Hello list,
The construct below used to work for my educational needs up to 2.20.
Now in 2.22 it doesn't work anymore and it's beyond my understanding to fix
it.
I passed update.ly in Frescobaldi, but no joy.
Please help?
--
\version "2.22.0"
music =\relative c'
On Fri 14 Oct 2022 at 10:24:37 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 01:51 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
> > On 2022-10-14 12:18 am, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> > > For some reason best known to Microsoft Windows held
> > > systems down in 32-bit node for years after they were
On Fri 14 Oct 2022 at 09:48:41 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
> Thanks David for your comments.
>
> As I said to Werner, I will probably have to do Lilypond work on the Windows
> 10 machine, albeit inconvenient.
On Fri 14 Oct 2022 at 00:16:39 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
> Hi Dav
From: Nicholas Bailey
I see you have a Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern
Studies, University of Oxford email address. They shouldn't be using that OS
any more.
When I retired from Oxford University (where I was a department network
manager) six years ago, most departments were
own the title, copyright, and other intellectual property rights in the
Software. The Software is licensed, not sold."
So if you buy in, you have to do what they want you to, or risk losing your
work all at once. I see you have a Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern
Studies, University of Ox
You can make W 10 look just like XP with Stardock Window Blinds:
https://www.stardock.com/products/windowblinds/
And you can get quite similar to XP as follows:
https://winaero.com/get-windows-xp-look-in-windows-10-without-themes-or-patches/
Andrew
seems to do
Lilypond work on the Windows 10 machine, albeit inconvenient.
Best regards
Dag
Thanks David for your comments.
As I said to Werner, I will probably have to do Lilypond work on the Windows 10
machine, albeit inconvenient.
Best regards
Dag
-Original Message-
From: David Wright
Sent: Friday, 14 October 2022 05:10
To: Dag Bergman
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject
Thanks Werner for your comments,
I will eventually test your suggestions, but the quickest way seems to do
Lilypond work on the Windows 10 machine, albeit inconvenient.
Best regards
Dag
-Original Message-
From: Werner LEMBERG
Sent: Friday, 14 October 2022 05:12
To: Dag Bergman
Cc
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 01:51 -0700, Aaron Hill wrote:
> On 2022-10-14 12:18 am, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> > For some reason best known to Microsoft Windows held
> > systems down in 32-bit node for years after they were internally
> > 64-
> > bit.
>
> Microsoft did not "hold systems down". In the
I used XP64 for a while. What killed it for me was that when XP service pack 3
came out, many programs started to require the new facilities it included, and
so checked for SP3 being installed. XP64 had the same service pack, but
because the 64bit XP had come out later than the 32bit version,
On 2022-10-14 12:18 am, J Martin Rushton wrote:
For some reason best known to Microsoft Windows held
systems down in 32-bit node for years after they were internally 64-
bit.
Microsoft did not "hold systems down". In the era of XP, Windows came
in a 64-bit version, colloquially known as
Probably quite off the wall and not acceptable, but there are other
operating systems! At work we regularly repurposed old 32-bit Windows
boxes as up to date 64-bit Linux boxes when a special use one-off node
was needed. For some reason best known to Microsoft Windows held
systems down in 32-bit
At 23:51 12/10/2022 +, Dag Bergman wrote:
What is the latest version of Lilypond that actually works on Windows XP?
I happen to have an old Pentium Windows XP system from about 2004,
which I used until about 2017. It has Lilypond 2.18.2 (the then
"stable" version?) on it. I've checked,
Sorry, I can neither activate nor get updates for XP in my virtual
machine with a proper licence. I'll bow out of this now.
Andrew
On 14/10/2022 3:21 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
OK./ I'm running up Windows XP 32 bit on a VM. I'll see if I can help out.
OK./ I'm running up Windows XP 32 bit on a VM. I'll see if I can help out.
Andrew
> first time:
>
> Error message: "The system cannot execute the specified program."
OK. So we have a first hint: the 32bit MinGW executable for 2.22.2
doesn't work on (your) XP at a very fundamental level. I can now only
suggest that you search for the last executable that ac
sions of
> > > Lilypond. It does not work so well when I try to use a newer program
> > > developed with a later version of Lilypond, as I get many error messages.
> > > I therefore tried to install LilyPond-2.22.2, which is newer than the
> > > versions of
Just saying I'm happy to help you out with XP etc but this is probably
getting OT, so we could do it offline if you care to.
Andrew
Each to his own. But allow me to mention that VueScan supports hundreds
of scanners, it not every scanner, and provides a very good solution to
that if you are ever interested.
It's unfair to say Microsoft has made network file sharing difficult
(why would they try?). Millions of users have
ERG
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2022 15:17
To: Dag Bergman
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LilyPond-2.22.2 does not work on Windows XP
> How do I know which of the versions listed and offered for download
> are for 32 bits or 64 bits systems?
*All* versions given in my link are 32b
the waste of
time having to relearn how to do things or even never manage to figure out how
to do things in 10 that were very easy to do in XP.
Other important reasons include that my expensive and well working side
hardware (such as expensive scanners and printers) don't work with 10.
Finally, many
Still curious now about XP. There's no certainty next versions will work.
Andrew
On 14/10/2022 10:42 am, Dag Bergman wrote:
Thanks Karlin and Michael for your kind replies, and for considering how to
test Lilypond versions on a Windows XP machine.
It appears to be far too complicated for you
13 October 2022 16:36
To: Michael Hendry
Cc: Dag Bergman ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LilyPond-2.22.2 does not work on Windows XP
On 10/13/2022 10:27 AM, Michael Hendry wrote:
> run legacy software on a Windows XP virtual machine
That reminds me -- Windows 7 Pro with its XP Mode based
Hello Dag,
As mentioned in my post Windows XP is way, way past any support from
Microsoft (EOL 2009!). A couple of others have queried why it is
necessary for you to be running this system also. Before people go to
extraordinary lengths to source XP machines to try to help, would you
ever so
On Wed 12 Oct 2022 at 23:51:22 (+), Dag Bergman wrote:
>
> I have a Windows XP computer with Lilypond 2.10.25. It works fine with
> simple program codes and advanced code developed with earlier versions of
> Lilypond. It does not work so well when I try to use a newer program
On 10/13/2022 10:27 AM, Michael Hendry wrote:
run legacy software on a Windows XP virtual machine
That reminds me -- Windows 7 Pro with its XP Mode based on Microsoft
Virtual PC, that would be less of an ask.
I have remote access to one of those, but it is at a customer's place
and is
On 13 Oct 2022, at 15:35, Karlin High wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2022 6:51 PM, Dag Bergman wrote:
>> I get the error message: “The system cannot execute the specified program.”
>
> This seems like a pretty broad error. I see mentions of needing Right-Click
> -> Properties -> Unblock, to allow a
On 10/12/2022 6:51 PM, Dag Bergman wrote:
I get the error message: “The system cannot execute the specified program.”
This seems like a pretty broad error. I see mentions of needing
Right-Click -> Properties -> Unblock, to allow a downloaded executable
to run.
Other cases involve system
> How do I know which of the versions listed and offered for download
> are for 32 bits or 64 bits systems?
*All* versions given in my link are 32bit versions. Recent 64bit
versions are provided on gitlab. Note that we no longer provide 32bit
versions.
Werner
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Not exactly a supported platform nowadays. [...]
I would be curious if (older) LilyPond versions would work under ReactOS[1]..
~ Hendursaga
[1] https://reactos.org/
),
they will not work either. I clearly need to get hold of the latest 32 bits
version, and I don't know which that is and how to get it.
Best regards
Dag
-Original Message-
From: Karlin High
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2022 04:33
To: Dag Bergman
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re
Thanks Werner for your quick and elaborate reply.
I guess you are correct that the error messages I received are due to changes
in the syntax between versions of Lilypond. The problem is that using
`convert-ly` would probably only work if running an old script with a later
version of Lilypond
Windows XP mainstream end date April 14 2009, extended end date April 8
2014.
Not exactly a supported platform nowadays. No possibility for you to
upgrade? At the very least you would get support for Lilypond from the
list, and be able to use 64 bit. Not too many members would have XP
> I have a Windows XP computer with Lilypond 2.10.25. It works fine
> with simple program codes and advanced code developed with earlier
> versions of Lilypond. It does not work so well when I try to use a
> newer program developed with a later version of Lilypond, as I get
Which link did you use? This one?
<http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/mingw/lilypond-2.22.2-1.mingw.exe>
The full collection of past downloads is here:
<http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/mingw/>
Try 2.20 or 2.18 if a fresh download of 2.22 doesn't work.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
Hi,
I have a Windows XP computer with Lilypond 2.10.25. It works fine with simple
program codes and advanced code developed with earlier versions of Lilypond.
It does not work so well when I try to use a newer program developed with a
later version of Lilypond, as I get many error messages
Hi Jean,
This is great. I installed the latest version and it is all working fine.
Thanks very much. --Jim
Le 21/08/2022 à 23:08, Jim Cline a écrit :
Hi Jean,
thanks for pointing that out. It looks like the functionality I need
does not exist in the previous versions of lilypond. And Ubuntu still
only provides 2.20. Hopefully I can build 2.22 by hand. best, Jim
Indeed, \alternative with more
ation in repeated sections". I don't need to work hard
to create a minimal (not)working example, since the one given right there
in the documentation gives me the same errors as in my full score:
\version "2.20.0"
\fixed c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
R1
\alternative {
-sections
under "Other variation in repeated sections". I don't need to work
hard to create a minimal (not)working example, since the one given
right there in the documentation gives me the same errors as in my
full score:
\version "2.20.0"
\fixed c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
tions". I don't need to work
hard to create a minimal (not)working example, since the one given
right there in the documentation gives me the same errors as in my
full score:
\version "2.20.0"
\fixed c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
R1
\alternative {
\volta 1 { c1 }
Hello, I would like to have an alternative within a repeat block, as
described in the documentation,
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/long-repeats#other-variation-in-repeated-sections
under "Other variation in repeated sections". I don't need to work hard
t not in Lilypond 2.23.3+. Does somebody know how to make it work
> in more recent versions? This is the snippet:
>
Probably better and more inline with what's done internally, let the
classes-entry be done automatically:
#(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry)
(let* ((met
t not in Lilypond 2.23.3+. Does somebody know how to make it work
> in more recent versions? This is the snippet:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \header {
> tagline = ##f
> }
>
> #(define-event-class 'music-boxer-event 'span-event)
>
> #(define-event-class 'box-
Hello,
I grabbed this snippet a while ago from somewhere™ which puts a box around
music (an "improvisation box"). It works perfectly in Lilypond 2.22.1, but not
in Lilypond 2.23.3+. Does somebody know how to make it work in more recent
versions? This is the snippet:
\version "2
l file abd my engraving (so far);
> >
> >
> > Unrelatedly to your problem, but in case that helps, "Fanfare,
> > from 'La Péri'" is slightly inaccurate: the original title
> > "Fanfare pour précéder La Péri" would translate as "Fanfare to
> >
the original title
> "Fanfare pour précéder La Péri" would translate as "Fanfare to
> precede La Péri", i.e. the composer doesn't consider it part of
> the work La Péri itself. As far as I can read from the Wikipedia
> page in French <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_P%C3
uot; would translate as "Fanfare to
precede La Péri", i.e. the composer doesn't consider it part of
the work La Péri itself. As far as I can read from the Wikipedia
page in French <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_P%C3%A9ri_(Dukas)>,
Dukas composed it as a way to start the performance
That worked! Thank you!
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:06 AM Dimitris Marinakis
wrote:
>
> \override MultiMeasureRest.expand-limit = 1
>
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/internals/multimeasurerest
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:51 AM Kenneth Wolcott
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi;
>>
>> I'm
\override MultiMeasureRest.expand-limit = 1
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/internals/multimeasurerest
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:51 AM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I'm looking at the Notation Reference regarding \compressMMRests.
>
> I see "R2.*2" (I want 3 bars, cool).
>
something like this ?
\version "2.22.1"
\header {
}
global = {
\key c \major
\time 4/4
}
sopranoVoice = \relative c'' { \global g g }
verseSopranoVoice = \lyricmode { Господь воцарися}
mezzoSopranoVoice = \relative c'' { \globale e }
sopranoVoicePart = \new Staff {
I think here you can use the instrument name to achieve your desired effect.
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = "я не знаю"
}
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:49 PM Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > Hello. I saw this design in the sheet music. And I really need to try to
> > do the same. But I don't know
Hello. I saw this design in the sheet music. And I really need to try to
do the same. But I don't know where to start. Or rather, I know how to
do everything related to the notes, but I don't know how to put the text
in front of the stanza.
Help, please. Very much it is necessary to do so.
I
Hello. I saw this design in the sheet music. And I really need to try to do the same. But I don't know where to start. Or rather, I know how to do everything related to the notes, but I don't know how to put the text in front of the stanza.Help, please. Very much it is necessary to do so. С
1 - 100 of 1327 matches
Mail list logo
