} }and it all worked just
> > > > as intended.I was recently asked to make a new version of the
> > > > piece. The mainchange is from a male voice to a female one,
> > > > but this necessitateda few changes in the other (instrumental)
> > > > staff.
riginal files as I now had Lilypond 2.23.4
> > > installed. I then edited these to produce the new version
> > > Unfortunately the behaviour of RehearsalMark seems to have changed.
> > >
> > > Whereas previously a mark only appeared over the staff whose music
>
ntal) staff. I ran convert-ly
> > on copies of the original files as I now had Lilypond 2.23.4
> > installed. I then edited these to produce the new version
> > Unfortunately the behaviour of RehearsalMark seems to have changed.
> > Whereas previously a mark only appeared
ortunately the behaviour of RehearsalMark seems to have changed.
Whereas previously a mark only appeared over the staff whose music it
was specified in, I find that now all of the marks appear in both
staves, regardless of which staff they are intended for.
Is this a bug or an intentional chang
behaviour of RehearsalMark seems to have changed.
Whereas previously a mark only appeared over the staff whose music it
was specified in, I find that now all of the marks appear in both
staves, regardless of which staff they are intended for.
Is this a bug or an intentional change? And is there a
%%
\version "2.21.0"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #LEFT
}
}
music = {
\key d \major
\tempo "MetronomeMark"
\mark "RehearsalMark"
\bar ".|:"
b2
}
\markup "default"
\n
Hi Simon,
> Should be left-edge, I think
I believe "left-edge" refers to the system?
In any case, using that doesn't seem to turn my M[N]WE into a MWE…
Cheers, Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.i
On 01.09.2017 23:01, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a break-align-symbols list such that a RehearsalMark left-aligns with
the first note in the measure, rather than the barline?
Should be left-edge, I think (untested, sorry). From
<http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentat
Hello all,
Is there a break-align-symbols list such that a RehearsalMark left-aligns with
the first note in the measure, rather than the barline?
%%% M[N]WE:
{
\tweak RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X #LEFT
\tweak RehearsalMark.break-align-symbols #'()
\mark \default
c'&#
2017-04-25 0:01 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2017-04-24 23:02 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > when removing both the Clef and BarNumber engraver, an occasional
> > RehearsalMark at the beginning of a line affects the horizontal position
> of
>
2017-04-24 23:02 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton :
> Hello all,
>
> when removing both the Clef and BarNumber engraver, an occasional
> RehearsalMark at the beginning of a line affects the horizontal position of
> the following note. How can I prevent this, so the first note of every l
Hello all,
when removing both the Clef and BarNumber engraver, an occasional
RehearsalMark at the beginning of a line affects the horizontal position of
the following note. How can I prevent this, so the first note of every line
is in the same horizontal position? See example below.
This is not
Il giorno dom 2 apr 2017 alle 22:24, Simon Albrecht
ha scritto:
Am 02.04.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Federico Bruni:
% this doesn't work:
\override RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #3
\mark \markup { "Coda" }
Just use
\tweak self-alignment-X …
and you’re all set.
I like this concise tweak.
Il giorno dom 2 apr 2017 alle 22:24, Simon Albrecht
ha scritto:
Am 02.04.2017 um 20:31 schrieb tisimst:
Under normal circumstances, it is implied that you are referring to
the Staff context.
That’s “to the Bottom (or Voice) context”, isn’t it?
Sure, I haven't typeset music for some ti
Am 02.04.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Federico Bruni:
% this doesn't work:
\override RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #3
\mark \markup { "Coda" }
Just use
\tweak self-alignment-X …
and you’re all set.
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-
Am 02.04.2017 um 20:31 schrieb tisimst:
Under normal circumstances, it is implied that you are referring to
the Staff context.
That’s “to the Bottom (or Voice) context”, isn’t it?
Best, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:47 AM Federico Bruni-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n20185...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a simple question, but I couldn't find a solution.
> I'm always confused with horizontal alignment..
>
> I want to move th
Hi all
I have a simple question, but I couldn't find a solution.
I'm always confused with horizontal alignment..
I want to move the RehearsalMark object to the left:
\version "2.19.57"
{
R1*4 \break
R1
% how to move it to the left?
% this doesn't work:
\ov
Hi Kieren,
It did work for this example, and although it required a little tweaking to
be usable on the project I'm working with, you gave me the lead I needed to
achieve the results. Thank you!
I paste the snippet below for future reference if someone finds this thread
and is dealing with a simi
Hi Stefano,
What about
\version "2.19.53"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #LEFT
\override TextSpanner.to-barline = ##t
\override RehearsalMark.padding = #2
\override TextSpanner.staff-padding = #2
}
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\re
Hi Andrew,
Yes, like both texts were written above the same imaginary horizontal line,
if that makes sense? In the same way that dynamics align with each other.
2017-03-22 0:34 GMT-03:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi Stefano,
>
> When you say aligned, do you mean having the baseline of the texts aligned
Hi Stefano,
When you say aligned, do you mean having the baseline of the texts aligned?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
xtSpanner.bound-details.left.text = \markup { \teeny {
"align with" } }
c \startTextSpan d e f |
g \stopTextSpan \mark "This" a b c |
}
}
}
How can you make the TextSpanner and the RehearsalMark objects aligned, in
a s
Hi David,
> "restart"? LilyPond is a batch program so you need to "restart" it for every
> try anyway.
That’s what I thought; thanks for the confirmation.
> If you taught Frescobaldi to call a particular version of LilyPond
> depending on the \version header, that is what will happen, and ever
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Harm,
>
> Do I have to recompile or restart Lilypond after modifying a file in scm/?
> Perhaps that’s the problem…?
"restart"? LilyPond is a batch program so you need to "restart" it for
every try anyway. It depends on where/how you run LilyPond whether your
chang
Hi Harm,
Do I have to recompile or restart Lilypond after modifying a file in scm/?
Perhaps that’s the problem…?
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
__
Hi Harm,
Thanks for the explanation(s).
> The hash isn't a scheme-thingy here in a .ly-file! It just tells the
> _LilyPond_-parser "scheme follows”.
> But if you use it this way in a .scm-file it throws an error.
That was my original understanding; thanks for the confirmation.
> it usually make
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David and Harm,
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:04 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> I think Harm's example was supposed to demonstrate that
>> there is nothing basically wrong with the approach
>
> Well at tleast that’s something I can take to hear
2016-08-03 12:34 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:05 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> Regarding scheme, there is no difference.
>
> So
>
> (1) the leading hash (which your example has and mine doesn’t) makes no
> difference; and
The hash isn't a scheme-thingy here in a
Am 3. August 2016 12:34:28 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan
:
>Hi Harm,
>
>On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:05 AM, Thomas Morley
>wrote:
>> Regarding scheme, there is no difference.
>
>So
>
>(1) the leading hash (which your example has and mine doesn’t) makes no
>difference;
The hash switches from LilyPond
Hi Harm,
On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:05 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Regarding scheme, there is no difference.
So
(1) the leading hash (which your example has and mine doesn’t) makes no
difference; and
(2) the functions ‘define' and 'define-public' are identical
?
Perhaps learning Scheme is going to
Hi David and Harm,
Thanks for the replies.
On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:04 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I think Harm's example was supposed to demonstrate that
> there is nothing basically wrong with the approach
Well at tleast that’s something I can take to heart as I try to teach myself
Scheme…
> so
2016-08-03 2:42 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Harm,
>
>> #(define (format-mark-null mark context)
>> (make-null-markup))
>
> Could you please explain in Scheme-noob terms why/how this differs from my
> attempt (other than the obvious: that yours works and mine doesn’t)?
Regarding scheme, th
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Harm,
>
>> #(define (format-mark-null mark context)
>> (make-null-markup))
>
> Could you please explain in Scheme-noob terms why/how this differs
> from my attempt (other than the obvious: that yours works and mine
> doesn’t)?
You don't show an actual diff. You do
Hi Harm,
> #(define (format-mark-null mark context)
> (make-null-markup))
Could you please explain in Scheme-noob terms why/how this differs from my
attempt (other than the obvious: that yours works and mine doesn’t)?
> works for me.
Me, too! Thanks.
> Not sure it's really what you want, tho
2016-08-02 23:12 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hello,
>
> I’ve got Lilypond note code which I want to reuse in multiple formats; for
> example, I have musical theatre songs which I would like to have in their
> original score format (using my custom musical theatre
> templates/stylesheets), and
Hello,
I’ve got Lilypond note code which I want to reuse in multiple formats; for
example, I have musical theatre songs which I would like to have in their
original score format (using my custom musical theatre templates/stylesheets),
and then republish in “Piano/Vocal Selections” form (think H
> Bad luck! But i hope that you will make a new version of the cheat
> sheet and visual index when 2.20 is out
sure!
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Go with the Proposed.png commit please.
S.B.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Janek Warchoł
wrote:
> 2014-02-23 17:33 GMT+01:00 Noeck :
>>
>>> My rewrite
>>> of the self-alignment interface (which is waiting on my desk for a
>>> year now) would make adjusting this easier. Maybe you'd like
2014-02-23 17:33 GMT+01:00 Noeck :
>
>> My rewrite
>> of the self-alignment interface (which is waiting on my desk for a
>> year now) would make adjusting this easier. Maybe you'd like to
>> finish my work?
>
> Unfortunately not. I have to follow your decision in the other thread
> and keep of
Hi Janek,
>> This looks like an improvement to me (if it still works for bar lines).
>
> Good!
>
>> The centre of the note head would be better for my feeling, but normal
>> text also has this left edge behaviour.
>
> That's the matter of alignment, not the attachment point.
Ok, I think I und
2014-02-23 16:58 GMT+01:00 Noeck :
>> The question is where the _attachment point_ ("anchor") should be.
>
> Ok, I see. I don't understand the old one,
That's the point - it was placed somewhat weirdly :)
> but the new one seems to be
> the left edge of the note or the stem.
That's the horizonta
> The question is where the _attachment point_ ("anchor") should be.
Ok, I see. I don't understand the old one, but the new one seems to be
the left edge of the note or the stem.
This looks like an improvement to me (if it still works for bar lines).
The centre of the note head would be better for
Hi David,
>> “rit” “rall” “a tempo” etc. are all rehearsal marks
> I don't think so. Those are tempo marks.
Oops. You’re right. Sorry.
That being said, I’ve definitely seen [mid-measure] rehearsal marks
simultaneous with [mid-measure] tempo indications like “a tempo”.
Kieren.
_
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> I don't think I've ever seen a mid-measure rehearsal mark in a
> traditionally-engraved piece. Can anyone provide an example?
>
> “rit” “rall” “a tempo” etc. are all rehearsal marks
I don't think so. Those are tempo marks.
--
David Kastrup
Hi,
I might lack the experience needed, but some comments to the suggestion:
With a small text like the "I" it looks strange that it is placed
somewhere in the middle between the notes.
I think the most important thing is, that the placement should clearly
indicate where it belongs.
The most obvi
Hi all,
> I don't think I've ever seen a mid-measure rehearsal mark in a
> traditionally-engraved piece. Can anyone provide an example?
“rit” “rall” “a tempo” etc. are all rehearsal marks (at least RehearsalMark-s)
that often appear mid-measure in traditionally-engraved piece
> -Original Message-
> From: Janek Warchoł [mailto:janek.lilyp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:45 AM
> To: LilyPond Users
> Subject: devs ask for feedback about RehearsalMark spacing
>
> Hello,
>
> we'd like to learn your
Hello,
we'd like to learn your opinion about issue 3875
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3875): should
there be extra space inserted between notes when there's a
RehearsalMark inside a measure? (see attachments)
We'd also be grateful if you tested the change
t; to appear at the end of line 2?
this is probably what you're looking for:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/visibility-of-objects#using-break_002dvisibility
use: \once \override RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-visible
(this isn't actually mention
ces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
pabuhr
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 5:51 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RehearsalMark
I'm sorry, I can't make this example smaller and generate the problem.
I want line 2 to end
I'm sorry, I can't make this example smaller and generate the problem.
I want line 2 to end with the mark "Fine", but the mark "Fine" appears at the
start of line 3. How do I get "Fine" to appear at the end of line 2?
\version "2.16.0"
melody = \relative c' {
\time 2/4
\partial 8
\re
Hi Alex,
> This is for a rehearsal mark with text, I'm not sure what Paul was
looking for, but I was asking is there is a way to type something like
\tempo "Andante" 4=90 "avec douleur"
Yes you are probably right.
>> As you can see you can write:
>>
>> \RehearsalMarkWithText #"Theme from 007" #-
This is for a rehearsal mark with text, I'm not sure what Paul was looking
for, but I was asking is there is a way to type something like \tempo
"Andante" 4=90 "avec douleur"
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Ed Gordijn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Please note that this is't the last message in this
tings, Ed
\version "2.17.96"
% #(ly:set-option 'debug-skylines)
#(define (format-mark-default mark context)
" Set the format for the RehearsalMark.
From the manual: The file Âscm/translation-functions.scm contains the definitions of format-mark-numbers
"
; Uncomment
Hi all,
> Do you have time to tell me what your hack is?
\once \override MetronomeMark.X-offset = #x
where x requires trial-and-error manual adjustment.
=(
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
Hi Alex,
> I ran into the same problem earlier. It should be much easier to write,
i.e., Allegro 4=130 doucement avec expression.
I have made a start with a function that does what you want but it still
needs manual setting the offset. This is probably not necessary but I don't
know how to fix it
gt;>> one section of my bass part:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone please whip me up a helper function which does the following:
>>> 1. automatically offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide down
>>> next to a concurrent RehearsalM
om
> > one section of my bass part:
> >
> >
> >
> > Can someone please whip me up a helper function which does the following:
> >1. automatically offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide
> > down next to a concurrent RehearsalMark; and
ction of my bass part:
>
>
>
> Can someone please whip me up a helper function which does the following:
>1. automatically offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide down
> next to a concurrent RehearsalMark; and
>2. automatically stretches a MultiMeasureRes
ically offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide down
> next to a concurrent RehearsalMark; and
>2. automatically stretches a MultiMeasureRest under a MetronomeMark such
> that it is sufficiently wide to incorporate the entire MetronomeMark.
>
> I am, of course, willing
offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide down next to a concurrent RehearsalMark; and 2. automatically stretches a MultiMeasureRest under a MetronomeMark such that it is sufficiently wide to incorporate the entire MetronomeMark.I am, of course, willing to pay a small bounty — bigger, if
Hi Keith,
Thanks for the helpful response(s)!
>> In the Do The Right Thing™ Department, I would think Lilypond should
>> automatically slide the [first]
>> MetronomeMark slightly to the right, allowing it to sit on the same baseline
>> as the RehearsalMark.
>
Kieren MacMillan sympatico.ca> writes:
> To be clear, \markLengthOn does not solve the problem.
>
Just for anybody searching the archives, what \markLengthOn *does* do
is space the music out to give room for the marks. So it helps when
the RehearsalMark and tempo are on differ
Kieren MacMillan sympatico.ca> writes:
> Given the snippet below, what do I need to do to have RehearsalMark and
MetronomeMark grobs sit on the same
> plane (“as expected")?
> In the Do The Right Thing™ Department, I would think Lilypond should
automatically slide the [first
Hello again,
To be clear, \markLengthOn does not solve the problem.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello all,
Given the snippet below, what do I need to do to have RehearsalMark and
MetronomeMark grobs sit on the same plane (“as expected")?
I’ve asked this question several times before, and believe that I’ve
incorporated the most recent “best practices”… but clearly not.
In the Do The
bb wrote
> Obviously there is a major change in syntax concerning "RehearsalMark"
> from \version 2.16.2 to
> \version "2.17.20". The example does not compile with2.16.2. Is \version
> 2.17.20 backward comatible? Does the "old" syntax form (see the layo
2013/6/24 Mark Polesky
[...]
> 1) How do I get the right vertical edges of the volta
> spanners to print when I've overridden the bar type at those
> moments? They only seem to print when there's a repeat bar
> in the staff.
>
Hi,
use #(allow-volta-hook "||")
>
> 2) Is there a more appropria
nister
>To: Mark Polesky ; lilypond-user
>
>Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 1:24 AM
>Subject: Re: volta bracket right-edges; also RehearsalMark conflicts
>
>
>Mark Polesky wrote:
>> 1) How do I get the right vertical edges of the volta
>> spanners to print whe
ll request
that feature if no one has a better idea...
Thanks!
- Mark
_______
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Obviously there is a major change in syntax concerning "RehearsalMark&
Mark Polesky wrote:
1) How do I get the right vertical edges of the volta
spanners to print when I've overridden the bar type at those
moments? They only seem to print when there's a repeat bar
in the staff.
Welcome back!
I have an amusing workaround for this particular case,
but this is
Oops, here's the picture I meant to include in the previous message.
\version "2.17.20"
>
>\paper {
> indent = 0
> line-width = #80
> tagline = ##f
>}
>
>\layout {
> \context {
> \Score
> \override RehearsalMark.font-size = #-3
> \override RehearsalMark.font-shape = #'italic
> \ov
Hi everyone. It's been a while!
Okay, here's the structure of a song I'm typesetting:
___
\version "2.17.20"
\paper {
indent = 0
line-width = #80
tagline = ##f
}
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override RehearsalMark.font-s
pacing-width = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)
> \override MetronomeMark #'Y-offset = #3.0
> \override MetronomeMark #'outside-staff-padding = #0.8
> \override MetronomeMark #'non-break-align-symbols =
> #'(paper-column-interface)
> \override RehearsalMark #'break-align-
7;Y-offset = #3.0
\override MetronomeMark #'outside-staff-padding = #0.8
\override MetronomeMark #'non-break-align-symbols = #'(paper-column-interface)
\override RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(staff-bar key-signature
clef)
\override RehearsalMark #'extra-s
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick or Cynthia Karl [mailto:pck...@mac.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:59 PM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Daniel Rosen
> Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 125, Issue 103
>
>
> \mark requires an "argument". In this case it is using "c'1." as
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Below are two examples, identical except for the fact that the second
> one has a RehearsalMark where the first one doesn't.
>
> \version "2.16.1"
> { \time 9/4 c'1. c'2. | \time 6/4 c'1. | }
> { \time 9/4 \mark c'
Below are two examples, identical except for the fact that the second one has a
RehearsalMark where the first one doesn't.
\version "2.16.1"
{ \time 9/4 c'1. c'2. | \time 6/4 c'1. | }
{ \time 9/4 \mark c'1. c'2. | \time 6/4 c'1. | }
When
On 7 August 2011 14:00, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Could you add it to the LSR (or does it need an updated version of
> LilyPond not available on the LSR?)?
It does use ly:grob-array->list, but I can still add a version to LSR
which includes a helper function to do this.
> I'm also wondering if th
On 6 August 2011 17:37, Neil Puttock wrote:
>
> This seems to be an improvement on the basic shift-right-at-line-begin
> function:
>
> \layout {
> \context {
>\Score
> \override RehearsalMark #'after-line-breaking =
>#(lambda (grob)
> (l
On 24 July 2011 21:10, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> I'm running into issue #1150 (RehearsalMark placement at start of line)
> again and again.
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1150
>
> Neil's workaround (see comment 2 & 5) is nice but:
>
> 1.
I'm running into issue #1150 (RehearsalMark placement at start of line)
again and again.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1150
Neil's workaround (see comment 2 & 5) is nice but:
1. It does not shift enough. I'd like these "begin of line" rehears
[Lilypond 2.13.47]
Hi all,
I can't seem to get quite the right set of overrides to have RehearsalMark
behave as follows:
1. If middle-of-system, center on the barline.
2. If beginning-of-system, center on a small empty column ("invisible bar
line") following the prefatory mate
On 11 July 2010 15:36, Nick Baskin wrote:
> I've encountered a similar problem in my scores. My solution has been to
> create a command "beforeMark = { \once \override Score.BarNumber
> #'break-visibility = ##(#f #f #f) }" at the beginning of the file, and then
> call it when I have a mark (i.e. \
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 04:38:33PM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Notation Reference
>
> 1.2.6
>
> Grace Notes (under Known Issues and Warnings). "Grace Note
> synchronization can also lead to surprises..."
Thanks but I'm quite familiar with grace note sychronization due to
the old LilyPo
Yes.
Notation Reference
1.2.6
Grace Notes (under Known Issues and Warnings). "Grace Note
synchronization can also lead to surprises..."
James
On 11 Jul 2010, at 15:51, Paul Scott wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Akira,
Maybe it would if you p
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> Maybe it would if you put a skip grace before the override, so that the
> timing is synched?
Is that use of "skip grace" documented somewhere?
Thanks,
Paul Scott
___
t seems to
work well for me.
HTH
Nick
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> > \once \override Score.BarNumber #'transparent = ##t
> > \mark \default
> >
> > but 2 problems ocurred.
> &g
Hi Akira,
> \once \override Score.BarNumber #'transparent = ##t
> \mark \default
>
> but 2 problems ocurred.
> One is that, because of setting #'transparent, the rehearsalmark is in
> too higher position so that it can avoid barnumber.(barnumber is not
> hid
blems ocurred.
One is that, because of setting #'transparent, the rehearsalmark is in
too higher position so that it can avoid barnumber.(barnumber is not
hid but just transparent.)
The other is that, when grace note is used, overrides setting on
barnumber itself doesn't work, so barnumber w
У чт, 2010-01-28 у 18:06 +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk пише:
> Yes, it's clear, thanks. I, probably, should say: "by default
> Mark_engraver is attached to Score and 'Y-offset works nice (for
> RehearsalMarks, for now, the future is unclear), while
> 'outside-staff-padding does not work --- to get it wo
У чт, 2010-01-28 у 16:54 +0100, Alexander Kobel пише:
> Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> > But, anyway, in this example i'm using only one Staff, so this means
> > that *in any case* (regardless one-staff or multi-stave system) i need
> > to remove and re-attach those engravers to get 'outside-staff-padd
Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
But, anyway, in this example i'm using only one Staff, so this means
that *in any case* (regardless one-staff or multi-stave system) i need
to remove and re-attach those engravers to get 'outside-staff-padding
working for marks --- really?
From the viewpoint of vertical
У чт, 2010-01-28 у 10:19 -0500, Kieren MacMillan пише:
> Hi Dmytro,
>
> > ps. I believe Metronome_mark_engraver should really be in a Score
> > context and should be movable with either 'outside-staff-padding or
> > 'Y-offset, but not both. So i must be still missing something.
>
> If you turn of
Hi Dmytro,
> ps. I believe Metronome_mark_engraver should really be in a Score
> context and should be movable with either 'outside-staff-padding or
> 'Y-offset, but not both. So i must be still missing something.
If you turn off collision detection for MetronomeMarks, wouldn't that solve the
pr
У чт, 2010-01-28 у 15:55 +0100, Alexander Kobel пише:
> Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> > So, what is _the proper way_ to drop down marks (MetronomeMark and
> > RehearsalMark)?
> >
> > Not both by the same command, but both by a single command would be
> > great.
>
Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
So, what is _the proper way_ to drop down marks (MetronomeMark and
RehearsalMark)?
Not both by the same command, but both by a single command would be
great.
Just an idea (untested): Have you tried to remove Mark_engraver and
Metronome_mark_engraver from the Score
8<-
%
% Both MetronomeMark and RehearsalMark
% are parts of Score context (accordingly to the doc)
%
melody = \relative c'' {
% A:
% \override Score.MetronomeMark #'outside-staff-padding = #-2
% B:
% \override Score.MetronomeMark #'
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 18:27 +0100, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > With this example: [...]
> > \override Score.RehearsalMark #'Y-offset = #3
> > [...] 2.12.3 produces "correct" result ("as expected") while 2.13.11 ---
> > really unexpected. Attached, please, ha
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
