@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-
Alexandre Ficagna
www.myspace.com/alexandreficagna
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/elegant-compound-time-signatures-tp20053025p21045760.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive
Hi Bageh,
2008/12/21 alexandre_ficagna alr...@ibest.com.br:
Hi,
Does somebody knows if compound times works with time signatures on top
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=272 ?
I tried several tweaks, but they doesn't seem to work in this type of time
signatures (for example, they remain
On 10/20/08 4:33 PM, Joseph Wakeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No nastiness felt from this end, your response was not entirely
unexpected -- after all, as you say, you've put in a lot of effort to
generate this tool as it is. I'm very grateful for that, and a friendly
prod to put my ideas
On 20 Oct 2008, at 06:53, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
This gankino horo snip is typeset as (2+2)+(2+1)+(2+2), again not
wrong,
but scores use the styles 4+3+4 or (2+2)+3+(2+2). (Hitting the
same 2+1
problem.)
What, like this? I
@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: elegant compound time signatures
On 20 Oct 2008, at 06:53, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
This gankino horo snip is typeset as (2+2)+(2+1)+(2+2), again not
wrong,
but scores use
@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: elegant compound time signatures
On 20 Oct 2008, at 06:53, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
This gankino horo snip is typeset as (2+2)+(2+1)+(2+2), again not
wrong,
but scores use
Graham Percival wrote:
Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my
example? I believe it does everything you want.
One thing your snippet doesn't display -- time signatures of the form,
3+3+2
8
Is this possible?
The other alternative time signature form is something
On 20 Oct 2008, at 11:21, Graham Percival wrote:
Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my
example? I believe it does everything you want.
Yes, I think it was clear from my reply. I mentioned that although
writing in each measure
\unset subdivideBeams
\unset
Graham Percival Monday, October 20, 2008 10:21 AM
Trevor: a top-post in this case makes the thread really bloody
confusing to read. (I know this email compounds the problem, but
I've given up on this thread)
Perhaps. But having to scroll down looking for additions
can be equally annoying.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:36:20PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 11:21, Graham Percival wrote:
Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my
example? I believe it does everything you want.
Yes, I think it was clear from my reply. I mentioned that although
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:41:22 +0100
Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So (being more positive) do you or anyone have a real example
when #(override-beam...) stuff is essential, i.e., when
beamGrouping doesn't work? That would be a useful addition
to the manual, or alternatively it
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:15, Graham Percival wrote:
I managed to get this working without individual tweaks. It's
messy, but once it's all set up, you can write any number of bars
and get the 2_2, 3, 4 beaming. If you want the final 4 to be a
2_2 as well, it should be obvious how to make that
Graham Percival wrote:
One thing your snippet doesn't display -- time signatures of the form,
3+3+2
8
Is this possible?
Yes, see the very first message in this thread!
Forgive me, that was badly phrased. What I was really meaning to ask
was if you could add this second case as an
On 20 Oct 2008, at 12:53, Graham Percival wrote:
The second problem is that LilyPond beamings varies quite a bit from
version to version, so sprinkling, so this solution may not be
stable.
This shouldn't be a problem if you set up the overrides correctly,
and as long as there aren't any
Dear all,
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
previous message about elegant compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
- arbitrary time signatures, with arbitrary compound-ness.
- more aesthetically pleasing graphical display, including less
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:16:56PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 13:15, Graham Percival wrote:
treat it like the global voice that many people use for
rehearsal marks and the like.
Thank you, I saw it, though I find hard to understand what the second
bracelet group does:
{
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:23:25PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I don't think I have the second email you sent ... ? I only have emails
with the same subject as this mail.
Whoops! I forgot to set up my lilypond-user alias, so I tried to
send that email to a non-existant mailing list. Sent
I managed to get this working without individual tweaks. It's
messy, but once it's all set up, you can write any number of bars
and get the 2_2, 3, 4 beaming. If you want the final 4 to be a
2_2 as well, it should be obvious how to make that happen.
Just add a \repeat unfold around the second
On 20 Oct 2008, at 15:01, Graham Percival wrote:
... I find hard to understand what the second
bracelet group does:
{
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
s4
\unset subdivideBeams
\unset beatLength
s8. s4
}
This gives you the single beam between the 2nd and
Graham Percival wrote:
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
previous message about elegant compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
I'm afraid I get horrible horrible errors with the files you attached
:-( The resulting output has no time
On 20 Oct 2008, at 15:00, Graham Percival wrote:
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot.
Ahem...
Please ignore the
previous message about elegant compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
- arbitrary time signatures, with arbitrary compound-ness.
- more
the
previous message about elegant compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
- arbitrary time signatures, with arbitrary compound-ness.
- more aesthetically pleasing graphical display, including less
wasted score-space
- nicer .ly files (although still not ideal
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:18:17PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
I am pleased to re-announce that I am an idiot. Please ignore the
previous message about elegant compound time signatures; the
attached file is *much* better.
I'm afraid I get horrible horrible
On 20 Oct 2008, at 12:53, Graham Percival wrote:
There is a need of a more general beaming pattern selection scheme.
To be picky, this is a problem about subdivided beams, not the
main beams.
From what I can see, one needs to create a general trees structure,
as generated by + and
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:04:50PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Mao, I added the comments just before sending the file, and forgot
that scheme used a different symbol for comments.
The attached file fixes this.
Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess
2008/10/20 Joseph Wakeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess you know this) the
bracketed (3+3+2) etc. markup should surely not affect the horizontal
music spacing as it does. Is there anything that can be done?
\with-dimensions #''(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) for the
Graham Percival wrote:
It's not markup. I've changed the way the time signature is
displayed. The parenthesis is part of the time signature.
Sorry, that was my bad phrasing (again). I understood perfectly well
what it was -- if it wasn't part of the time signature, the spacing
wouldn't have
Neil Puttock wrote:
2008/10/20 Joseph Wakeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Very nice! A couple of comments: first (I guess you know this) the
bracketed (3+3+2) etc. markup should surely not affect the horizontal
music spacing as it does. Is there anything that can be done?
\with-dimensions #''(0
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
This gankino horo snip is typeset as (2+2)+(2+1)+(2+2), again not wrong,
but scores use the styles 4+3+4 or (2+2)+3+(2+2). (Hitting the same 2+1
problem.)
What, like this? I think this is the second bar of the gankino
horo
I'm reasonably happy with my solution to compound times. I'm
still wondering about the printing -- should I leave it as
3 + 3 + 2
8 8 8
or change it to something like
8 (3+3+2)
8
Anyway, that's a relatively minor issue. The attached file prints
compound time signatures and sets up
30 matches
Mail list logo
