Re: Multi Measure Rests in Cadenzas

Hallo Calvin, (First time posting here - I hope this works!) I've found the following (based on https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=836) works well in this sort of situation. The function `cadenzatoMetre` takes two music expressions as arguments. The first denotes the rhythmic "frame"

Re: Multi Measure Rests in Cadenzas

Hello Calvin, MM rests and cadenzas do not play well together. The reason for this is that the MM is placed centered between start and end of measure. But \cadenzaOn is not really made for creating arbitrary length measures. What is does is simply telling Lilypond to stop counting. So when you

Multi Measure Rests in Cadenzas

I have a cadenza where Staff A rests while Staff B plays and after the cadenza Staff A comes back in. In the below minimal example, there is an extra rest added above the note when Staff A comes back in. How do I get rid of this rest? If I use r1 instead of R1 I don't have this issue (but I

Re: How can I change the width of multi-measure rests in the irregular measure?

Le 02/08/2021 à 03:53, takumi ikeda a écrit : \version "2.19.81" { \compressFullBarRests \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 \time 5/4 R4*5 \time 4/4 R1*2 } { \compressFullBarRests \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 \override Staff.MultiMeasureRest.space-increment

How can I change the width of multi-measure rests in the irregular measure?

\version "2.19.81" { \compressFullBarRests \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 \time 5/4 R4*5 \time 4/4 R1*2 } { \compressFullBarRests \set Score.restNumberThreshold = #0 \override Staff.MultiMeasureRest.space-increment = 10 \time 5/4 R4*5 \time 4/4 R1*2 } % Thanks, %

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

tten out. I think the rule is that multi-measure rests indicate the number of measures regardless of their meter. But LilyPond does not seem able to handle that.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

And to make it more challenging, measure numbers should be correct afterwards, too... A tagged measure attached spanner would be a workaround I guess, if there’s an easy way to hide (but count) the remaining but unnecessary measures. Thanks to you all, Max __

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Precisely! :) > On Nov 21, 2020, at 16:16, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > I think the OP wants a compressed visual representation of a whole bunch of > 4/4+3/4 two-measure chunks, without actually seeing them written out.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

> Compound meter, perhaps? p.s. Gould explicitly notes that compound meter and strictly alternating meter are two distinct things. :) Best, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him/his) ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: kie...@kierenmacmillan.info

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Hi Tim, > As far as I can tell from looking at the docs, the only way to do this using > multi-measure rests will be in 7/4. It will count out the same, assuming the > right number of measures is chosen. Yes… That’s why I suggested a measure-attached "x" spanner.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Hi Aaron, > Compound meter, perhaps? I don’t know whether the OP is willing to use compound meter…? Let’s wait to hear OP’s response. Thanks! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him/his) ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email:

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

itten out. As far as I can tell from looking at the docs, the only way to do this using multi-measure rests will be in 7/4. It will count out the same, assuming the right number of measures is chosen.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

On 2020-11-21 7:14 am, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Phil, I don’t think that solves the OP’s problem, as I understand it to be… I think the OP wants a compressed visual representation of a whole bunch of 4/4+3/4 two-measure chunks, without actually seeing them written out. Of course, I might be

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Hi Phil, I don’t think that solves the OP’s problem, as I understand it to be… I think the OP wants a compressed visual representation of a whole bunch of 4/4+3/4 two-measure chunks, without actually seeing them written out. Of course, I might be wrong! =) Best, Kieren.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

ges. > Not multiple 7/4 measures but actually 4/4 | 3/4 | 4/4 | 3/4 and so on. > > If for some instruments these measures only contain rests, could this somehow > be expressed with multi-measure rests? You might rewrite it to 7/4, as there is no difference in musical performance.

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Here's an alternative semi-automatic way (proof of concept): \new Score { << \new Staff {   \time 3/4 c''2. \time 4/4 c''1 \time 3/4 c''2. } \new Staff {   \new Voice \with {     \remove "Rest_engraver"     \consists "Completion_rest_engraver"   }   {R1*10/4} } >> } On 20/11/2020 15:45,

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Fantastic! Thank you! __ http://www.marcoll.de subscribe to newsletter > On 20 Nov 2020, at 15:30, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: > > Hi Max, > >> Sure, that would be great. But how would that be possible with the same >> music-content also

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

lan > wrote: > > Hi Max, > >> If for some instruments these measures only contain rests, could this >> somehow be expressed with multi-measure rests? > > What about a measure of 4/4 and a measure of 3/4 with a spanner over it > saying “12x” (or whate

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Hi Max, > Sure, that would be great. But how would that be possible with the same > music-content also being used for the full score? Tags. =) Hope that helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer (he/him/his) ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email:

Re: Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

Hi Max, > If for some instruments these measures only contain rests, could this somehow > be expressed with multi-measure rests? What about a measure of 4/4 and a measure of 3/4 with a spanner over it saying “12x” (or whatever)? Hope that helps!

Multi-measure rests with alternating time signatures

on. If for some instruments these measures only contain rests, could this somehow be expressed with multi-measure rests? Otherwise there would be just a lot of full measure rests with alternating time signatures, which wouldn’t be very convenient for the individual performer. Any ideas how

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 2018-06-15 13:39, David Kastrup wrote: Karlin High writes: On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

Karlin High writes: > On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! >> Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. > > The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or > something? I think the term is

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 6/15/2018 2:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Simple, and almost obvious, once someone has told you the answer! Oh. Then we should patent it before someone else does. The FSF / GNU overlords would then... call in an airstrike or something? -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

David Sumbler writes: > On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: >> > >> > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals >> > Reference, >> > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what >> > these

Re: {SPAM 02.0} Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 21:08 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals > > Reference, > > and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what > > these > > values represent.  Can you

Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 15.06.2018 20:11, David Sumbler wrote: I had seen the usable-duration-log variable in the Internals Reference, and its default value of '(-3 -2 -1 0) .  But I have no idea what these values represent.  Can you enlighten me? They are the negative logarithms (base 2) of the usable durations.

Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 19:36 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 15.06.2018 19:08, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that > > LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests.  I should like them > > to > > appear as semibreve rests, as they would

Re: Form of multi-measure-rests

On 15.06.2018 19:08, David Sumbler wrote: In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests.  I should like them to appear as semibreve rests, as they would if the bars were shorter. I have tried modifying the stencil using the method

Form of multi-measure-rests

In a piece which is in 21/8 time (7 dotted crotchets) I find that LilyPond sets whole-bar rests as breve rests.  I should like them to appear as semibreve rests, as they would if the bars were shorter. I have tried modifying the stencil using the method shown in NR5.5.3.  But as it stands this is

Re: barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests?

Hi Andrew, >> It's not the bar number check that breaks the MM rest, it's the separation >> of s1. * 17 into pieces of 9 and 8 measures that does. > Okay, that makes sense, if a bit unexpected. There are several threads in the archive where some people try to explain why it’s expected (or at

Re: barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests?

On 13/7/17 4:57 pm, Robert Schmaus wrote: It's not the bar number check that breaks the MM rest, it's the separation of s1. * 17 into pieces of 9 and 8 measures that does. Okay, that makes sense, if a bit unexpected. Why don't you insert the check at bar 18 and keep use s1. * 17 - that should

Re: barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests?

age <degue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > G'day. > > Is there a reason why \barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests? > Or is this a bug? > > Thanks, > Andrew Bromage > > % Example follows > > \version "2.19.60" > > Timeline = { >

barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests?

G'day. Is there a reason why \barNumberCheck breaks multi-measure rests? Or is this a bug? Thanks, Andrew Bromage % Example follows \version "2.19.60" Timeline = { \time 3/2 s1. * 9 \barNumberCheck #10 s1. * 8 \bar "|." } ViolinOne = \relative c'' { R

Re: Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Yeah, that seems to work, thanks! I'd prefer if it didn't reduce the left margin, but there's no point in being picky. I guess it can be fixed by tweaking the X-offset and the scaling factor. I'm considering experimenting with modifying the stencil expression itself, though. Getting the

Re: Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Hi, here are some hints, how might tweak the output: \new RhythmicStaff { b'1 | \afterGrace { % we place the drum-roll on a grace position % override the stencil for the MultiMeasure stencil \once \override MultiMeasureRest.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (let ((stil

Doing some strange stuff with multi-measure rests

Basically, I want to show a rest with indeterminate length for all parts, except the drumset, which is to make undefined creepy noises, and the cymbal, which should do a drumroll-crescendo (not sure if there's any fancy name for that) before the rest of the parts resume playing. I've attached

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Tue 26 Apr 2016 at 01:21:00 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote: > On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote: > > But I see you've now acknowledged (indirectly) that LP can set > > multiple marks at the same point after stating that it can't. > > Are there other things that LP can be persuaded to do itself

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

this rest that wide" because next time > round it might not be a rest! > > And apologies if I am grumpy about this topic, but as I said earlier > in the thread, it seems that every time I work around one problem, a > different one replaces it - that's why the original post j

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

inters?". I always used to deal with the multiple markups problem by doing "s4\markup s2.", except that this time round I noticed the problem with it breaking up multi-measure-rests. So I (re)found the trick of "<>\markup", except that moved the markup to the left a

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 4/26/16 3:56 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote: >2016-04-26 2:21 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists : >> On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote: >>> (I still don't know what you're trying to accomplish >>> [...]) >>> >> Copy "House Style", maybe? >> And the whole

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

2016-04-26 2:21 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists : > On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote: >> (I still don't know what you're trying to accomplish >> [...]) >> > Copy "House Style", maybe? > And the whole point of this entire thread has been about > SAVING VERTICAL SPACE - it's just

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 24 Apr 2016 at 19:18:01 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: >> On 24/04/2016 03:13, David Wright wrote: >> >> Ah - does that mean the rehearsal mark would happily overwrite the >> blank space at the start of the other markup string? > > Typically, yes.

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

nclude are not. But you can > >add spaces to the beginnings of strings to avoid collisions. > > Ah - does that mean the rehearsal mark would happily overwrite the > blank space at the start of the other markup string? Typically, yes. > But as for "why would I want

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

uld drop down and save us a line. SAVING VERTICAL SPACE is the point. I want some semi-automatic way so I can push the other markup to the right of the rehearsal mark and make sure I only use three lines. Oh - and if I use "extra-spacing-width" (which iirc works fine with multi-meas

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

y round - the "This" would collide with the rehearsal mark, > and it would take four lines. I'm not quite sure why you'd do that. The tempo is part of the music. The tune titles that you want to include are not. But you can add spaces to the beginnings of strings to avoid collisions. &g

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 23/04/2016 12:23, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Wol, if I use "extra-spacing-width" (which iirc works fine with multi-measure-rests), as soon as I have another part which actually has some notes in the first bar of the MMR, that first bar will be the same width as the markup so that

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Hi Wol, > if I use "extra-spacing-width" (which iirc works fine with > multi-measure-rests), as soon as I have another part which actually has > some notes in the first bar of the MMR, that first bar will be the same > width as the markup so that then looks awful \

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

On 23/04/16 01:52, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David, > >> It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a >> multi-measure rest. >> Who does this, and what does it mean, musically? >> In this example, you are actually placing a fermata on a single bar of rest. >> In

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

and "This is the army mr jones" were the other way round - the "This" would collide with the rehearsal mark, and it would take four lines. I want some semi-automatic way so I can push the other markup to the right of the rehearsal mark and make sure I only use three lines. Oh - and

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

On 23.04.2016 02:06, Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a multi-measure rest. Who does this, and what does it mean, musically? You must be kidding. While calling R1 a MultiMeasureRest may be slightly confusing in LilyPond

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

Hi David, > It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a > multi-measure rest. > Who does this, and what does it mean, musically? > In this example, you are actually placing a fermata on a single bar of rest. > In which case, this works fine: > { \compressFullBarRests

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions

> Try the following ... > > f1->\fermata R1*3 R1\fermata > > The first fermata prints fine. The second fermata prints > "programming error: Object is not a markup." in the log and doesn't > print. It strikes me as conceptually problematic to try to put a fermata on a multi-measure rest. Who does

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On Fri 22 Apr 2016 at 15:47:59 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote: > On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > >David K wrote: > >>>Hm? How could you even have a compressed multi-measure rest when there > >>>is anything like an "8-bar phrase" in parallel? > >>>That sounds like a problem that

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 16:55, David Kastrup wrote: >The first fermata prints fine. The second fermata prints "programming >error: Object is not a markup." in the log and doesn't print. So >that's another bug tracked down in my piece, That's_explicitly_ what \fermataMarkup is for. If people consulted

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Hi, > f1->\fermata R1*3 R1\fermata You can use \fermataMarkup { R1\fermataMarkup } I know it looks more like a workaround than something one would expect, but it works. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

gt;>multiple \tag constructs just to handle this issue. > >Me too. I asked a long time ago and got the idea that I was the only > >one concerned about this. Essentially why is alignment different for > >multi-measure rests than notes. > And other things too? Try the following ...

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

gt;multiple \tag constructs just to handle this issue. >> Me too. I asked a long time ago and got the idea that I was the only >> one concerned about this. Essentially why is alignment different for >> multi-measure rests than notes. > And other things too? Try the following ... >

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

that I was the only one concerned about this. Essentially why is alignment different for multi-measure rests than notes. And other things too? Try the following ... f1->\fermata R1*3 R1\fermata The first fermata prints fine. The second fermata prints "programming error: Object i

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Wol: Scan through the thread starting at and see if anything there helps. Good luck, Kieren. Just scanned it - unfortunately I'm using \markup on an s, rather than \mark, for

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

On 22/04/2016 14:31, Kieren MacMillan wrote: David K wrote: >Hm? How could you even have a compressed multi-measure rest when there >is anything like an "8-bar phrase" in parallel? >That sounds like a problem that cannot occur. I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

I assume Wol (like me) has the problem where the compressed rest happens > in the part, not in the full score — but one wants not to have to use > multiple \tag constructs just to handle this issue. Me too. I asked a long time ago and got the idea that I was the only one concerned about this. E

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Hi Wol, > My usual bugbear ... :-( > I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo mark, […] Yeah… this causes me no end of grief, too. It probably represents a good 10% of my score/part tweaking time. David K wrote: > Hm? How could you even have a compressed

Re: Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

Anthonys Lists writes: > My usual bugbear ... :-( > > I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo > mark, and a tune name all wanting to be over the same barline (this is > an arrangement, where there are several tunes and each is identified >

Multi-measure rests and mark collisions ...

My usual bugbear ... :-( I have a couple of instances where I have a rehearsal mark, a tempo mark, and a tune name all wanting to be over the same barline (this is an arrangement, where there are several tunes and each is identified where it occurs). So I have something along the lines of

Re: custom multi-measure rests

Am 24.03.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi David, It’s LSR 753 I think you are after. D'oh – I searched the LSR for "multi measure rest" but did not find that one ;-) Marc Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: custom multi-measure rests

Hi David, It’s LSR 753 I think you are after. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: custom multi-measure rests

Am 24.03.2016 um 02:47 schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine: I'd like to figure out how to execute something found in some Jazz charts for drums. It is a compact way to indicate "play time for X measures" in a single measure. I think this has been discussed (and solved) already, see

custom multi-measure rests

ick but squiggly (or even just a bunch of tildes.) Is it possible to define such a new style for displaying multi-measure rests? It doesn't have to be exactly the style--I'd settle for the diagonal line in the first example. The main point is, I'd like some other format for multi-measure rest that i

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

David Wright writes: > Quoting Gilberto Agostinho (gilbertohasn...@gmail.com): >> Simon Albrecht-2 wrote >> > On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: >> >> \version "2.17.95" >> > >> > Just out of interest: what makes you still use that particular version? >>

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Quoting Gilberto Agostinho (gilbertohasn...@gmail.com): > Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > > On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: > >> \version "2.17.95" > > > > Just out of interest: what makes you still use that particular version? > > I don't, I actually use 2.19.15. The thing is I have

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

- Original Message - From: "Gilberto Agostinho" <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 1:04 PM Subject: Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests Hi Simon, Simon Albrecht-2 wrote So if you like you may rais

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

list. Can you confirm to me if I am doing something wrong? Thanks a lot! Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-and-multi-measure-rests-tp182372p182426.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at N

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

ombine-and-multi-measure-rests-tp182372p182428.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

fine-music-function (parser location N) (integer?) #{ \repeat unfold $N R1 #} ) { \RN 10 } -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-and-multi-measure-rests-tp182372p182375

partcombine and multi-measure rests

Hello LilyPonders, When changing the type of \partcombine (for instance, using \partcombineApart in the middle of the score) when one of the parts has multi-measure rests I get some strange results: <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182372/39.png> code: partbug.ly <http:/

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

ts slightly more annoying in cases like the one I posted above since one has to manually find the point to break the chunk of R1, but I do understand it isn't a bug. Thanks for your reply and take care, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-a

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

Quoting Gilberto Agostinho (gilbertohasn...@gmail.com): > When changing the type of \partcombine (for instance, using > \partcombineApart in the middle of the score) when one of the parts has > multi-measure rests I get some strange results: > > <http://lilypond.1069038.

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: \version "2.17.95" Just out of interest: what makes you still use that particular version? Regards, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

On 14.10.2015 20:41, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: Something just crossed my mind and this works out well: by using \repeat unfold N R1 we can solve this problem, This is not a full solution: if you try \compressFullBarRests, you’ll notice different behaviour (some wrote a music function to deal

Re: partcombine and multi-measure rests

/lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/partcombine-and-multi-measure-rests-tp182372p182378.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: question about multi measure rests from a blind user

/detail?id=3687 There is a music function \compressMMRests available from Release 2.19.20 and later whose action is strictly limited to multi-measure rests. It is likely \compressFullBarRests will be deprecated at some time, or more likely renamed to better indicate its true action

Re: question about multi measure rests from a blind user

/issues/detail?id=3687 There is a music function \compressMMRests available from Release 2.19.20 and later whose action is strictly limited to multi-measure rests. It is likely \compressFullBarRests will be deprecated at some time, or more likely renamed to better indicate its true action

question about multi measure rests from a blind user

Hello all, I was just curious as to what the difference is between the commands \compressFullBarRests and \set Score.skipBars = ##t ? I arranged some salsa charts that were performed over the weekend, My friend who played trumpet mentioned that I had a rest that was 32 bars long. He told me

Re: question about multi measure rests from a blind user

Daniel Contreras daniel.c.9...@gmail.com writes: I was just curious as to what the difference is between the commands \compressFullBarRests and \set Score.skipBars = ##t ? skipBars prints nothing and gives no indication about what was left. I arranged some salsa charts that were performed

Re: question about multi measure rests from a blind user

limited to multi-measure rests. It is likely \compressFullBarRests will be deprecated at some time, or more likely renamed to better indicate its true action. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Hiding multi-measure rests in multi-voice polyphony

Hey all, If I have four voices on a staff, is there a way to tell LilyPond to hide a multi-measure rest if there are notes in the measure and to only ever print one at a time? Kinda like \partcombine but for more than two voices. Cheers, MS ___

Re: Hiding multi-measure rests in multi-voice polyphony

2013/7/20 Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org: Hey all, If I have four voices on a staff, is there a way to tell LilyPond to hide a multi-measure rest if there are notes in the measure and to only ever print one at a time? Kinda like \partcombine but for more than two voices. Cheers, MS

multi measure rests

I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do this? the fractions confuse the heck out of me lol! I'm in 12/8 so I'll have 4 doted quarter notes so would the multi measure rest look like this for one measure R4. R4. R4. R4. | for example? Thanks all. and

Re: multi measure rests

- Original Message - From: Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 4:13:44 PM Subject: multi measure rests I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do this? the fractions

Re: multi measure rests

Am 03.05.2013 18:13, schrieb Sarah k Alawami: I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do this? the fractions confuse the heck out of me lol! I'm in 12/8 so I'll have 4 doted quarter notes so would the multi measure rest look like this for one

Re: multi measure rests

, 2013, at 9:23 AM, bobr...@centrum.is wrote: - Original Message - From: Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 4:13:44 PM Subject: multi measure rests I read the docs on how to do

Re: multi measure rests

Am 03.05.2013 18:44, schrieb Sarah k Alawami: Ok. I see there a dotted hole note, but a dotted whole note or in this case whole rest is only 8 eithgh notes if I counted correctly which my coffee deprived brain probably did not lol! I get the feeling that i'm making this harder then it

Re: multi measure rests

Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 4:13:44 PM Subject: multi measure rests I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do this? the fractions confuse the heck out of me lol! I'm in 12/8 so

Re: multi measure rests

...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 4:13:44 PM Subject: multi measure rests I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do this? the fractions confuse the heck out of me lol! I'm in 12/8 so I'll have 4 doted

Re: multi measure rests

: - Original Message - From: Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 4:13:44 PM Subject: multi measure rests I read the docs on how to do this but is there an easier way to memorize how to do

Re: multi measure rests

Hi, I also have a question for you: You seem to use braille music output from LilyPond. Is that builtin in LilyPond? Could you (or anyone) point me to some documentation how to use that? I would like to try it. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: Re: multi measure rests

On 05/03/2013 03:11 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: I remember and use it this way: R length times so many so: R1*3 is three times the length of one whole note. Always calculate the total length you need and that it gets there. FWIW, the general form of what I do is R1*time

Re: multi measure rests

Actually I'm not. The university brailled my piano transcript Im working off of. It would be nice though if maybe a musk student could learn lily pond and output it in to braille so all of my stuff could be done in house. using music vml or some such thing. Take care. On May 3, 2013, at 2:30

Re: Multi measure rests vertical positioning

Hi Werner, I must solve everything for R manually while r works fine. Any ideas to solve that? Can you write a callback function to determine the position of the r and apply it to the R? Just a thought. Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

  1   2   >