On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
OK, I put together:
http://wiki.linaro.org/Process/ReleaseTesting
As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them up
into
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org wrote:
As we are starting to produce a number of images now, I've split them up
into two categories, 'Primary' and 'Secondary'. Of course it would be
nice if all images were tested but if we can get through the Primary
On 10 Sep 27, Jamie Bennett wrote:
Hi,
We have only 43 (or 42 depending on your timezone) days until the Linaro
final release [1] and
as we get closer, the need for more structured testing is essential. An idea
that has been
incubating for some time is to have a weekly 'test day' where
Only one comment for now. I'll test the patch.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@gmail.com wrote:
I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
and merge the code.
--
Regards,
Shawn
# Begin patch
=== modified file 'linaro-media-create'
---
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, Shawn Guo wrote:
I made a l-m-c patch to add imx51 support. I need your help to review
and merge the code.
Thanks!
You probably want to use the board name, mx51evk, not the SoC name,
imx51; this also avoids mixing mx51 (kernel flavor) and imx51 (DEVNAME)
in the
Hello, I have been lurking here and on irc for a while and felt like it was
time to introduce myself.
I have a BB-C4 with all the trimmings and have been booting SD flash with
the daily builds and trying different configurations. I have also signed up
for weekly testing on the BB.
From the
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
boards,
it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
similar to
'testdrive' for Ubuntu is required for the next cycle.
Why can't l-m-c ask some
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:45 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
IMHO, as we continuously add support for more platforms and even more
boards,
it will become untenable to maintain these wiki pages. Something
similar to
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:27:48 +0300, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org
wrote:
And with the right packaging, upgrades to linaro-testdrive will
continually add support for new platforms and boards.
That will require some changes to l-m-c as well, to allow us to specify
board customisations,
Official proposal for stakeholder process for the following idea.
Anyone can contribute.
Summary
--
Amit Kucheria has suggested we create a script called linaro-testdrive
to ease the knowledge required to download images and create bootable
media.
In his opinion as we continuously add
I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
.
dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'amd64' does not
appear in
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:33:59AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
I'm working on building in ARM cross compile support to the Ubuntu
kernel packaging. I am encountering the following error:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-omap arch=armel
.
dh_gencontrol -plinux-image-2.6.35-22-omap
All,
I've created a wiki page at https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Hacking
to describe the various steps for building your own linaro images on
arm hardware using live helper. This also includes the steps to
modifying seeds to add/subtrack packages to suite your own goals
whatever they might
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:22:52AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
Cross-building of Debian packages is meant to be handled by using the
'dpkg-buildpackage -a${target_arch}' interface. This sets the environment
variables shown in the output of 'dpkg-architecture -a${target_arch}'.
Do you have an
2010/9/29 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de:
[Me]
Any hints on how to get out of this and create a simple
git tree or set of trees is welcome, I have yet not found
any.
I think you need to stop basing on top of linux-next and
move to basing on top of the smallest possible set of trees
other
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
The big hit from using Nicolas tree will rather be that it is
2.6.35-based, while we have a lot of stuff merged for
2.6.36 and a similar pile of stuff stacked in different next
trees so I will have to pull all of that out (including some
extensions
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the post!
It comes up more or less happily, but as soon as I connect
Hi,
On 09/30/2010 03:42 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:21:54PM +0300, Robert Berger wrote:
In order to see home exactly I'm cooking it you can look here:
http://ebvbeagle.blogspot.com/2010/09/linaro-on-beagle.html
Oh, this is pretty neat. Thanks for the post!
Hi Tom,
Thanks for guiding the package manipulation. I'm building mx51
headless hwpack image on mx51evk. Though I can make local changes to
get it work, I'm wondering when the lh headless config trunk will have
mx51 hwpack support in there.
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:48 AM,
19 matches
Mail list logo
