On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions of patch X if the
linaro gcc codebase diverged?
I might need help
On 1 March 2011 18:07, Andrew Stubbs andrew.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/03/11 07:00, Jim Huang wrote:
I think thats fine. however, how do we ensure that we have patches
that always apply to both release/snapshots? do we maintain branches
for gcc-patches.git in case you need two versions
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:50 +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
[...]
I'm not sure that highmem is the right solution. First, this will force
systems with rather small amount of memory (like 256M) to use highmem just
to support DMA allocable memory. It also doesn't solve the issue with
Forwarded for interest; a number of ARM / Linaro folks were involved
last week.
- Forwarded message from Hector Oron zu...@debian.org -
From: Hector Oron zu...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:03:02 +
To: debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org
Cc: b...@genesi-usa.com,
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:04:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
following different kinds of snapshot image:
linaro-alip/
linaro-developer/
linaro-graphical-engineering/
linaro-handset-plasma/
linaro-headless/
On 1 March 2011 16:03, Steve Langasek steve.langa...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:04:54PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi. On snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/ there are now the
following different kinds of snapshot image:
...but I can't find anything on the wiki which
W dniu 01.03.2011 16:49, Jamie Bennett pisze:
Please take a look at the dates and highlight any problems that could
arise from them. If there is positive feedback we can make these dates
'official' very soon meaning teams could start using this format next
month.
Sice having no planned
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
Throughout Linaro we are looking at ways to better coordinate the
deliverables that come from Linaro's Working Groups and Platform teams.
The idea of Monthly Component releases, a fixed date in the month where
Hi,
You can see them at
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Meetings/2011-03-01
or below.
Thanks,
James
=== Attendees ===
* Mattias Backman
* Guilherme Salgado
* Deepti Kalakeri
* James Westby
* Jamie Bennett
* Alexander Sack
=== Agenda ===
* Actions from last
On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi,
Throughout Linaro we are looking at ways to better coordinate the
deliverables that come from Linaro's Working Groups and Platform teams.
The idea of Monthly
On 1 March 2011 20:45, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org
wrote:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones
If agreed I would propose that all projects use the
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Vishwanath Sripathy wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Attached patch set has support for MPU DVFS (cpufreq) on OMAP4 and
these are rebased against latest .38 linaro kernel.
omap cpufreq driver changes are already posted to lo
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 1 March 2011 20:45, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org wrote:
On 01/03/11 at 01:25pm, Tom Gall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jamie Bennett jamie.benn...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Rigby wrote:
The resulting kernel builds and boots but some modules have problems:
$ modprobe fat
fat:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
On 1 March 2011 10:45, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
I'd like to use Skia as a toolchain benchmark but the upstream seems a
bit messy. I'm using this export:
Hi, John:
I have one question about the origin/dev/linaro.android branch
right now for beagleboard xM.
After tried, I still can not see the terminal log after the Virtual
kernel memory layout message with EARLY_PRINTK enabled., even printk
messages in omap3_beagle_init() can not be seen.
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 14:23 +0800, Jeremy Chang wrote:
Hi, John:
I have one question about the origin/dev/linaro.android branch
right now for beagleboard xM.
After tried, I still can not see the terminal log after the Virtual
kernel memory layout message with EARLY_PRINTK enabled., even
17 matches
Mail list logo
