From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Anatop is a mfd chip embedded in Freescale i.MX6Q SoC.
Anatop provides regulators and thermal.
This driver handles the address space and the operation of the mfd device.
Signed-off-by: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Acked-by: Shawn
On Thursday 15 March 2012, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
From: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) paul@linaro.org
Anatop is a mfd chip embedded in Freescale i.MX6Q SoC.
Anatop provides regulators and thermal.
This driver handles the address space and the operation of the mfd device.
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 05:51:48PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:16:36PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
I
Hey,
On 03/15/2012 01:39 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
Hi,
This is interesting. I'd like to reproduce the Ethernet speed tests.
Do you have the exact command lines?
Sure. You'll need two machines, on being the board. Both need to be in
the same 100 or 1000 MBit/s LAN.
On the receiver's end,
On 15 March 2012 15:39, Jannis Pohlmann jannis.pohlm...@codethink.co.uk wrote:
Hey,
On 03/15/2012 01:39 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
Hi,
This is interesting. I'd like to reproduce the Ethernet speed tests.
Do you have the exact command lines?
Sure. You'll need two machines, on being the
W dniu 15.03.2012 11:31, Jassi Brar pisze:
Cool. You might also want to take a look at 'netperf', a small yet
powerful tool.
Or iperf which I use for bandwidth tests.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:07:29AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Very broadly speaking, I wonder whether we could use the regmap
infrastructure for these things in the future, but I would first
need to understand whether that is actually in the scope of regmap.
It seems that you just need a
Dear Peter Maydell,
Thanks for your reply. Would you mind give me more help?
My PC architecture is x86, so the tcg_out_qemu_ld() and tcg_out_qemu_st()
is in tcg/i386/tcg-target.c. Nevertheless, it is difficult for me to
understand them completely.
Do you means that the QEMU TLB maps the guest
2012/3/15 周春华 uuli...@gmail.com:
Do you means that the QEMU TLB maps the guest virtual address to host
virtual address,
Yes.
and the begging and end virtual addresses of the memory
allocated for RAM device emulating are the RAM physical begging and end
address from guest view?
I don't know
On 03/14/2012 09:15 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
Located in ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools can be found the newest
version of live-build, a45 with the following linaro features
applied:
1) armhf support (both native and cross)
2) linaro meta bld information as was discussed at 4Q11 Linaro Connect
3)
Dear Peter Maydell,
I am very appreciated for you great help. There is still a question exist:
Note that there are other slow paths for memory access which don't
use the TLB and instead do go via physical addresses at the time
they need to do the load/store.
I want to know how to use these
On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann jannis.pohlm...@codethink.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do requires
a lot of disk and network I/O, I've been paying special
2012/3/15 周春华 uuli...@gmail.com:
Peter Maydell wrote:
Note that there are other slow paths for memory access which don't
use the TLB and instead do go via physical addresses at the time
they need to do the load/store.
I want to know how to use these slow paths. Will they will guest virtual -
On 15 March 2012 15:20, Jani Monoses wrote:
On 03/14/2012 09:15 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
Located in ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools can be found the newest
version of live-build, a45 with the following linaro features
applied:
1) armhf support (both native and cross)
2) linaro meta bld
Dear Peter Maydell,
Thank you for your help. I got an idea to log the guest physical address,
would you mind help me to check it?
Because the function tcg_out_qemu_ld() and tcg_out_qemu_st() know the guest
virtual address should be accessed, we can call the
[target-arm/helper.c:get_phys_addr]
Hey,
On 03/15/2012 01:26 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann jannis.pohlm...@codethink.co.uk
wrote:
3) Origen
* the internal USB hub runs at Full Speed (12 MBit/s), resulting in a
maximum USB disk I/O of 1.5 MByte/s
* since the board does not feature
On Thursday 15 March 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
There were some other mutterings about using regmap for memory mapped
devices, mostly from the point of view of building framework features
like this on top of it. regmap currently makes some assumptions that
the I/O is going to be slow so
As far as I know this has not happened. Such a change would also have
to include making the use of timer interrupts (as opposed to PMU counter
interrupts) selectable at runtime. I believe the use of timer
interrupts for oprofile data collection is still a configuration/boot
option.
Hi there,
Launchpad now supports blueprint work items natively and we've already
migrated the work items from the whiteboards of most Linaro Blueprints.
Most of us wouldn't even notice those changes because we still have a
text field to enter work items and it uses the exact same format we used
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Avik Sil avik@linaro.org wrote:
On 12 March 2012 11:28, Belisko Marek marek.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
For the 12.01 cycle the Linaro Platforms team is pleased to announce
the
Hi Ashish,
Any update on below patch?
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 18:18 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
This driver adds support for the watchdog functionality provided by the
Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMIC chip.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by:
Hi there. Over the next three months both GCC 4.7 and Ubuntu 12.04
'Precise' are coming out. We'll switch over to these pretty quickly
which will affect our internal testing and anyone using the binary
toolchain.
The changeover plan including dates, details of what's happening, and
backwards
This is just an early notification that the Linaro validation farm will be
physically moving to a new site next week. Unfortunately, the network
cables won't stretch that far, so it will mean some downtime. :)
Here's the tentative plan:
Wednesday, March 21st - the rack with the toolchain server
On 16 March 2012 15:50, Paul Larson paul.lar...@linaro.org wrote:
This is just an early notification that the Linaro validation farm will be
physically moving to a new site next week. Unfortunately, the network
cables won't stretch that far, so it will mean some downtime. :)
Here's the
Hi,
On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard mans.rullg...@linaro.org wrote:
On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann jannis.pohlm...@codethink.co.uk
wrote:
Hi,
I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do
25 matches
Mail list logo
