Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-18 Thread Clark, Rob
/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/omap_pvr_drv.so which is the same as *drv* gives. - Martin On 04/16/12 16:42, Clark, Rob wrote: There is an omap_drv.so which should be the xorg driver to load.. it will attempt to load (if present) omap_pvr_drv.so as a submodule for EXA accel.  I'm not entirely

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-16 Thread Clark, Rob
There is an omap_drv.so which should be the xorg driver to load.. it will attempt to load (if present) omap_pvr_drv.so as a submodule for EXA accel. I'm not entirely sure why it is named pvr_drv.so in your filesystem, but from list of symbols it seems to match what I would expect to be

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

2012-04-16 Thread Clark, Rob
/drivers/omap_pvr_drv.so which is the same as *drv* gives. - Martin On 04/16/12 16:42, Clark, Rob wrote: There is an omap_drv.so which should be the xorg driver to load.. it will attempt to load (if present) omap_pvr_drv.so as a submodule for EXA accel.  I'm not entirely sure why

Re: won't someone please think of the users!?

2012-04-09 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Ricardo Salveti wrote: On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: The fundamental question really is 'are we a distro or not'? If linaro is not a distro then no-one

Re: won't someone please think of the users!?

2012-04-06 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: +++ Clark, Rob [2012-04-05 21:10 -0500]: just some random thoughts on our release model, etc..  I've been meaning to write up for a while but haven't had time There has been some feedback, for example on #pandaboard

won't someone please think of the users!?

2012-04-05 Thread Clark, Rob
just some random thoughts on our release model, etc.. I've been meaning to write up for a while but haven't had time There has been some feedback, for example on #pandaboard, that the monthly release cycle is confusing and detrimental for folks looking for something working and stable, and not

Re: [ACTIVITY] Graphics WG status report - wk34.2011 (20110822-20110826)

2011-08-31 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Dechesne, Nicolas n-deche...@ti.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Ilias Biris ilias.bi...@linaro.org wrote: Also note the development on MM: Jesse is preparing a GIT tree to contain the patches available, including components from the

Re: 11.07 oprofile on panda busted?

2011-08-29 Thread Clark, Rob
Could you try also adding 'nohz=0' to bootargs to disable tickless scheduler? Depending on what is the default in current linaro kernel, this might help.. BR, -R On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote: An update on my oprofile adventures with panda. I did add

Re: ION: google's answer to GEM?

2011-04-12 Thread Clark, Rob
12, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Clark, Rob r...@ti.com wrote: hmm, https://review.source.android.com/#change,22239 From a quick look, it appears to be doing a similar thing as GEM.. although as a stand-alone driver rather than coupled with display driver (drm). BR, -R

Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-26 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kyungmin Park kmp...@infradead.org wrote: Rough schedules. 1. Warsaw meetings (3/16~3/18): mostly v4l2 person and some SoC vendors  Make a consensence at media developers. and share the information.  Please note that it's v4l2 brainstorming meeting. so memory

Re: Future desktop on dumb frame buffers?

2011-03-23 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Robert Fekete robert.fek...@linaro.orgwrote: On 21 March 2011 21:08, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 20:25, Jesse Barnes

Re: Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

2011-03-08 Thread Clark, Rob
Then this sounds to me a bit like like GEM.. (or maybe I should say DRM and either TTM/GEM below)? If you can pass buffers back and forth between kernel and various processes by integer id, and then optionally read/write/mmap thru some ioctls if needed.. then the buffer sharing problem is solved.

Re: [st-ericsson] v4l2 vs omx for camera

2011-02-25 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2011 14:04:19 Hans Verkuil wrote: On Thursday, February 24, 2011 13:29:56 Linus Walleij wrote: 2011/2/23 Sachin Gupta sachin.gu...@linaro.org: The imaging coprocessor in

Re: [st-ericsson] v4l2 vs omx for camera

2011-02-24 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Edward Hervey bilb...@gmail.com wrote:  What *needs* to be solved is an API for data allocation/passing at the kernel level which v4l2,omx,X,GL,vdpau,vaapi,... can use and that userspace (like GStreamer) can pass around, monitor and know about. yes yes yes

Re: [st-ericsson] v4l2 vs omx for camera

2011-02-21 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Robert Fekete robert.fek...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, In order to expand this knowledge outside of Linaro I took the Liberty of inviting both linux-me...@vger.kernel.org and gstreamer-de...@lists.freedesktop.org. For any newcomer I really recommend to do some

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-17 Thread Clark, Rob
, maybe it can serve as what we needed. Regards, Jammy On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Clark, Rob r...@ti.com wrote: I'm still in the learning-as-I-go phase here, so definitely not ready to propose a solution, but it does seem to me like there is room for some sort of kms-helper library

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-17 Thread Clark, Rob
I'm all for a more modular drm, although I think the framework of CRTCs, encoders, and connectors is a nice fit, at least for our hw. It would be nice to have a better way to expose overlays. And I'm still thinking about how/if GEM fits in with our various video and 2/3d accelerators. BR, -R On

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-17 Thread Clark, Rob
. If we can implement one, it would be beneficial for all ARM platforms. By the way, does X driver of TI support XRandR1.2+? Regards, Jammy On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Clark, Rob r...@ti.com wrote: Hmm, I was thinking more on the xf86 side of things.. ie. to provide default

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-16 Thread Clark, Rob
, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: On Tuesday 15 February 2011, Clark, Rob wrote: I'd been experimenting a bit on the side w/ the DRM driver framework ( http://gitorious.com/~robclark/pandaboard/robclarks-kernel-omap4/commits/omap_gpu ), but had to add a good chunk of mostly boilerplate

Re: Notes Actions: Linaro Graphics Working Group - Feb 09, 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Alexandros Frantzis alexandros.frant...@linaro.org wrote:  * First version of Unified Memory Management position:   https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Projects/UnifiedMemoryManagement btw, the access control aspect of this sort of

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-15 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote: The driver patch itself is Cced to linux-fbdev, only the introductory mail is not. Ok, I see. Did you consider making the driver a KMS driver instead of a frame buffer?

Fwd: [gst-devel] Camerabin2 Prototype and IRC Meeting

2010-12-05 Thread Clark, Rob
in case any of the multimedia/middleware folks interested in camerabin2 didn't notice this email from gst-devel list: -- Forwarded message -- From: Thiago Sousa Santos thiago.sousa.san...@collabora.co.uk Date: Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [gst-devel] Camerabin2