Hi,
I have a client looking for video playback without having the user go
through the video installation.
Despite the norms of not installing software without explicitly
informing the user, has anyone done this installation for eitther
windows media or quicktime?
thanks
Julian
[To remove
you could do it using QT.
If you use the standalone player you can place an ini file next to it
(QuickTimeInstaller.ini) containing:
[QTSETUP]
license_option=0
no_dialogs=true
registration_dialog=false
supress_speed_dialog=true
install_qtjava=false
install_qd3d=true
show_sample=false
RE:
I have a client looking for video playback without having the user go
through the video installation.
-
Use Flash - Flash MX (.flv) video. The video can run inside a .swf file with
other video, images, graphics, etc, and used as a Flash Sprite in Director.
That's the (illegal) ticket. thanks Johan.
thanks all for your advice.
On 19 May 2005, at 08:18, Johan Verhoeven wrote:
you could do it using QT.
If you use the standalone player you can place an ini file next to it
(QuickTimeInstaller.ini) containing
[To remove yourself from this list, or to
definately flash!
it's amazing how high quality video you can get,
especially if you have/own (and use) Sorenson Squeeze.
arri
On 19 mei 2005, at 09:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use Flash - Flash MX (.flv) video. The video can run inside a .swf
file with
other video, images, graphics, etc, and
yes, this was indeed the problem.
actually two parentscripts were of type moviescript.
thanks again
arri
On 18 mei 2005, at 02:45, arjen wrote:
thanks for respons,
what irv writes could be possible cause,
i'll look into that tomorrow, it happened to me before that i created
a new script, not
I have noticied in many posts recently that people prefix some lingo statements
with an underscore like in _movie.???. Is this sysntax used only with the most
rescent version of Director ? BTW, I am using Director MX, the version before
MX 2004.
Thanks
- Yvan
[To remove yourself from this
At 9:23 AM -0400 5/19/05, Yvan Caron \(Alphatek\) wrote:
I have noticied in many posts recently that people prefix some lingo
statements with an underscore like in _movie.???. Is this sysntax
used only with the most rescent version of Director ? BTW, I am
using Director MX, the version before
Am 19.05.2005 um 15:23 schrieb Yvan Caron ((Alphatek)):
I have noticied in many posts recently that people prefix some
lingo statements with an underscore like in _movie.???. Is this
sysntax used only with the most rescent version of Director ? BTW,
I am using Director MX, the version before
Did prepareMovie always exist? Deep in my memory I seem to remember only
startMovie at some point. And I thought that preparemovie was introduced
to get rid of some of these problems. It seems that the order of events is
that sprites initialize themselves prior to startMovie. As a result you
Forgive me list, I figured it out. I had the params coming after the
file, but the params need to come after the app.
RIGHT: theApp /A page=8 thePath
WRONG: theApp thePath /A page=8
I would have checked the archives, but it seems like Lingo-L search
archives isn't working. Oh well.
Have a
Yes this is MX2004 syntax. I would highly recommend the upgrade to MX2004.
I was using 8.5 prior to this version, I dabled with MX but found it did
not give me any significant features for the upgrade. However I personally
find the changes to MX2004 well worth it. I very much like to use the
from a BuddyAPI forum post
In recent versions of Acrobat, I don't think you can do it- unless you
are running acrobat in a web page (which it sounds like you are not
doing). This is the best answer I found in a brief web search:
http://www.acrotips.com/acrofaq/general/index.php
There are
d'oh... yes, of course that works too ;)
I'll forward it to the buddy forum
Stephen
Mendelsohn, Michael wrote the following on 5/19/2005 10:12 AM:
Forgive me list, I figured it out. I had the params coming after the
file, but the params need to come after the app.
RIGHT: theApp /A page=8
This is what may have been in the archives, it's my reply the last time this
was asked:
8 -
OK, I did some tests in the message window based on the info in this doc:
Yes, the order of the arguments (of which the document itself is the second) is
obviously important.
Come to think of it, switches are usually the first arguments, aren't they?
I may be wrong, but I can live with that... (-;
Bertil Flink
Creative Media
- Original Message -
From:
Oh, just something that may go unnoticed depending on how your mail is
formatted.
Note the spaces padding the argument string:
theArgs = /A page=5
Better (as you may have figured out already):
theArgs = /A page=5
open theApp theArgs theDoc
Bertil Flink
Creative Media
Did prepareMovie always exist? Deep in my memory I seem to remember only
startMovie at some point. And I thought that preparemovie was introduced
to get rid of some of these problems. It seems that the order of events is
I think it all boils down to planning.
But I have no idea about the inner
Hi Mauricio,
Thanks for that info. I never do put any sprites in frame 1 but have been
burned by not remembering the event order during inter-movie navigation
and I think that's what I ulitmately wanted to point out that it is not
just a frame 1 issue but a _first_ frame issue and event order
Hi Tab
Thanks for keeping this List alive...I once had a nasty problem
..which was solved by one of the list members..Its time like when you
face a dead end the list comes to save you
thanks
Z
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
20 matches
Mail list logo
