RE: lingo-l XPOST: Audio Xtra interest

2004-02-11 Thread Johan Verhoeven
drop in some decent midi support (multiple midi outs/in support, midi events in/out, midi player) make it OSX and win ... (well would get it without midi as well..) and I'm your man.. seems like it would be everything that's needed.. (maybe ASIO and VST support, or AU on the mac... hmmm..) J.

Re: lingo-l Bug of the week

2004-02-11 Thread roymeo
I think you're also missing a very important thing in that beginSprite handler!! on beginSprite me tempVar = timeOut(test).new(500, #doSomething, me) end beginSprite You need to set the returned value of that timeout().new() to a variable, or you get hemorrhoids and excessive eye-booger

RE: lingo-l FileIO limits

2004-02-11 Thread Ken Hubbell
I ran into this same problem recently. The limit is 127 characters including the filename and extension. This is a known bug to Macromedia in both Director and Authorware. Apparently it has been known internally to Macromedia for several versions and has not and is not going to be fixed. Causes

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Troy Rollins
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Craig Taylor wrote: Also, I know there have been threads about this, but the conclusion is that there really is no way of protecting video files (MPEG-1) from being accessed outside of the protected program. Correct? Protect to what degree? You

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Mathew Ray
Ultimately someone could use a screen capture program or even a video camera pointed at your monitor if you wanted the video bad enough...No matter what level of encryption and authentication. All about making it as irritating as possible without causing end-users grief. IMO, they shouldn't

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Feb 11, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Craig Taylor wrote: Also, I know there have been threads about this, but the conclusion is that there really is no way of protecting video files (MPEG-1) from being accessed outside of the protected program. Correct? Correct, for all practical purposes. Use

RE: lingo-l FileIO limits

2004-02-11 Thread Kerry Thompson
I ran into this same problem recently. The limit is 127 characters including the filename and extension. This is a known bug to Macromedia in both Director and Authorware. Apparently it has been known internally to Macromedia for several versions and has not and is not going to be

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Colin Holgate
Which is why the DRM stuff in iTunes and the like is irritating. If I buy a song on one machine, I should be able to take that song to any machine I want without being bugged. I mean, if I have a cd, I can take the media with me to unlimited machines, so long as it can't be played two places

Re: lingo-l FileIO limits

2004-02-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:37 AM, Kerry Thompson wrote: I don't know of any other way to read a text file in Director. Try importFileInto. You should also be able to set the member.filename of a #text member. You might still get the 127-char limit but baShortFileName can resolve that. Warren

Re: lingo-l Windows Desktop

2004-02-11 Thread Kyle Smeby
On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:26 PM, Valentin Schmidt wrote: It would be much safer to find out the actual Desktop-Folder with some xtra like Buddy Api: Result = baSysFolder( desktop) On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote: One way to find out might be to check via Buddy API. Don't know for

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Craig Taylor
Correct, for all practical purposes. Use QuickTime; it supports media keys that offer some measure of protection. If the pieces are short enough consider conversion to Flash MX video. You can import those directly into your cast and keep them internal. Unfortunately, neither were options.

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Colin Holgate
Colin, you mentioned renaming the file - simply that just change the extension and make it an unexpected file name. Unexpected to whom? Does not MPEGAdvance still play them? [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Troy Rollins
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Craig Taylor wrote: Troy, you mentioned changing the headers - new ground for me - relatively easy process? Is there somewhere you can direct me for more info? UpdateStage has the BinaryIO xtra. Its documentation has some links that are useful

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Mathew Ray
There were also some very good posts about this in the past year or two. A quick trip to the archives may answer a lot of the detailed questions on procedure and methodology to ripping the heads off video and reassembling later on-disk. Since you don't mind writing to disk, hopefully it won't

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Andrew Dempsey
My vote is for the vList xtra. I am using it in a pretty important project to do exactly what you are talking about, and it works great. Andrew Having said that, I am not looking to stop a determined party. Just looking to make it annoying or, at the very least, unobvious. Colin, you

lingo-l way of protecting video files (MPEG-1)

2004-02-11 Thread Bernard.Lang
Also, I know there have been threads about this, but the conclusion is that there really is no way of protecting video files (MPEG-1) from being accessed outside of the protected program. Correct? Thanks for all the insight, Craig Hi Craig, You can protect/unprotect MPG files on the fly using

Re: lingo-l FileIO limits

2004-02-11 Thread Daniel Nelson
baShortFileName works fine with FileIO for pathnames longer than 127. Though Buddy's open dialogue breaks down for very long path names (255? at least, it did when increasing the path name by making one very long folder name). I just tested it on Win XP with a pathname 169 characters

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Deane Venske
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:34:43 -0500, Craig Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct, for all practical purposes. Use QuickTime; it supports media keys that offer some measure of protection. If the pieces are short enough consider conversion to Flash MX video. You can import those directly into

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Deane Venske
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:49:03 -0500, Troy Rollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Craig Taylor wrote: Also, I know there have been threads about this, but the conclusion is that there really is no way of protecting video files (MPEG-1) from being accessed

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Troy Rollins
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 05:22 PM, Deane Venske wrote: Why not think about using Valentina DB, you could store the MPEG videos into the database as BLOB and even encrypt this. That way your video can't be accessed outside your program. How exactly would you then access them

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Mathew Ray
Unfortunately you can't play mpegs directly out of the database...AFAIK They have to exist on a hard drive somewhere first, which is bad if you don't want to be copying big ol' files to someone's hard drive, or take the time necessary to do so while unencrypting them. It also opens up the

Re: lingo-l way of protecting video files (MPEG-1)

2004-02-11 Thread Craig Taylor
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts on video file protection. Seems like either vList or binaryIO Xtras will be the best way to go. I'm now headed in the right direction and appreciate you all taking the time. Thanks again, -_Craig - Original Message - From: Bernard.Lang [EMAIL

Re: lingo-l password protection

2004-02-11 Thread Deane Venske
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:33:55 -0500, Troy Rollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 05:22 PM, Deane Venske wrote: Why not think about using Valentina DB, you could store the MPEG videos into the database as BLOB and even encrypt this. That way your video can't be

lingo-l MPEG-4 and Windows 2000 Compatibility

2004-02-11 Thread Greg Lippert
Does anybody know if there is a compatibility issue with MPEG-4 and Windows 2000? I authored a Director CD which installs QT 6.4. The movie contains lots of video. It runs great on Windows 2000 but a tester who tried it on 2000 said the movies (videos) were all garbled looking ­ but the audio was