Hi
I'm not so sure that you would have hurt anyone's feelings too much by
terming the behaviour's bloat ware. The reality is that most behaviours
shipped with director need to almost every possible use of the behaviour.
That means when you go to write your own, you'll find significant amounts of
> Um, okay. I'm sure James Newton and the other authors of the behavior
> libraries will appreciate your term "bloated crap".
I was having a bad day that day. Apologies to James Newton, all coders who
built the behaviours and anybody else who may have taken offence...
There are still a few probs
> ps LePhuronn my code is better than yours.
Exactly whih bit of code are you talking about here? Anything that I have
put up here has usually been off the top of my head so hasn't been fully
optimised or even particualarly slick. And no I'm not taking offence at your
comment as it is entirel
Curses. That was NOT supposed to go to the list :P
D'oh!
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and help
> Did you see that?
Ok chick with dick I don't care
Kerry helps supports those who post messages on this list
So there
Giles
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED
> Rant away--but I bite back sometimes :-)
>
>
> Cordially,
> Kerry Thompson
> Learning Network
[> yeah and she rocks all the time so there !
( ps LePhuronn my code is better than yours. )
Giles>
Hehe :)
Did you see that? That proves your notion that he thinks you're a w
> Rant away--but I bite back sometimes :-)
>
>
> Cordially,
> Kerry Thompson
> Learning Network
[> yeah and she rocks all the time so there !
( ps LePhuronn my code is better than yours. )
Giles
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http:
>> Because the behaviour library is mostly bloated crap?
>
> Well... I think that's a bit over-generalized. A lot of the behaviors, like
> rollover cursor change, rollover member change, and the like, are just
> fine. I use them all the time.
>
> An advanced programmer could undoubtedly write so
>Because the behaviour library is mostly bloated crap?
Well... I think that's a bit over-generalized. A lot of the behaviors, like
rollover cursor change, rollover member change, and the like, are just
fine. I use them all the time.
An advanced programmer could undoubtedly write sophisticated
Kerry wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why don't you just use the "Rollover Member Change"
behaviour?
Because the behaviour library is mostly bloated crap?
A lot of the pre-built stuff is a pain to use like the Multiuser Server
stuff. The behaviours are so interwoven with each other it's difficu
10 matches
Mail list logo
