Hi, i have a problem in my Linux running in the z800 with ThinkBlue
64bits.
When i compile tacacs+ end configure whith criptografy support (option
key) my client tacacs+
can't be validated by server. The solution is comment the option key.
Now whith radius-cistron or freeradius i have the same
I'm currently installing again SLES for S/390. For opening a session to LINUX I
use Hummingbird Exceed Hostexplorer 6.2.0.0 (i.e. telnet with VT220).
Unfortunately my function keys do not work, just PF1-PF4 are acting as expected.
There is a keyboard mapping display to define specific actions/keys
Hit 0 for PF10.
Scott Chapman
AEP
Werner Kuehnel
werner.kuehnel@mann To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
heimer.de cc:
Sent by: Linux on Subject: Function Keys
390 Port
Hey, David, does Adam have anything to make, um, er, you know, seem
bigger? 'Cause I've heard that sometimes size matters.
As a quick literature search shows, amplitude is always a factor of
initial motion with periodic reinforcement. If ya gonna make waves, ya
gotta keep pushing...8-)
Oh,
Running any compile on the SuSE 7.0 kernel 2.2.16 will drive the processor
usage to 100%. What or how can this be corrected. This linux image has 256m
of storage and a share of 100 rel. also running with 'quickdsp'. plus the
compiles run extremely slow.
Pat,
Compiling is CPU intensive. That's simply the nature of the task. Just
about any compilation will drive your CPU to 100% for the duration of the
compile.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Abruzzese, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:40 AM
To:
--- Received from FPU.MATTES 7993015 18-11-02 15:01
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I was interested in the attached post as we are currently investigating a
similar performance issue on our SLES7 Linux system running under z/VM
In our case this is occurring when an App
Hit cntrl-F, release the keys, and then hit 0. This works consistently
for all pf keys (cntrl-F and 1 thru = for PF1-PF12) on all terminal
types (including my venerable ADM1).
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
http://linuxvm.org/images/z900-on-S390-Desktop.png
So, yes, you can indeed run 64-bit VM on an H70.
And yes, the peak MIPS should get a little better than 0.02; the system
was idle when I snapped the picture.
Adam
In our case this is occurring when an App server (ATG Dynamo)
is driving
the JAVA compilation of JSPs.
At the moment we are suspecting the IBM JAVA 1.3.0 SDK, and
plan to install
1.3.1 to validate this theory.
If you are running 1.3.0, then you definitely need to upgrade. 1.3.1
fixed a
Andy,
Unfortunately, there's no way (yet) to do this on Linux/390. You'll have to
IPL your starter system to fix the parameter.
One other thing to keep in mind is that if you have more than one disk
device defined, you can write a kernel out on each of them, with different
parameters, kernel
Cross compiling would have been my first recommendation, until I ran into
differences in compilations between Linux/390 and cross compiling. Running
Hercules reduces the effective speed of the box, but I believe it allows you
to be more certain that what you end up with better reflects what you
Cross compiling would have been my first recommendation, until I ran into
differences in compilations between Linux/390 and cross compiling. Running
Hercules reduces the effective speed of the box, but I believe it allows you
to be more certain that what you end up with better reflects what
We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig file size limit?
If so, what can be done to get around the limit?
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
570 Washington Street - 2nd floor
New York, New York, 10080-6802
Telephone: 1-212-647-3793
Mkreiserfs -v2 /dev/
The -v2 will call the version that has LFS.
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:00 AM, Gustavson, John (ECSS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig file
size limit? If so, what can be done to get around the limit?
Jim,
Are the device nodes defined in /dev?? If not, then you should just be able
to do mknod commands to add them.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 26 Filesystem Limit?
I
What kernel version are you running?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Gustavson, John (ECSS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reiser file size limit
We are running reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre8 of reiser. Is there a 2 gig
2.4.7
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
570 Washington Street - 2nd floor
New York, New York, 10080-6802
Telephone: 1-212-647-3793
Fax: 1-212-647-3321
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
That has LFS, if you call ReiserFS with -v2
However, I would recommend you grab 2.4.18
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:27 AM, Gustavson, John (ECSS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2.4.7
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise Central Software Services (ECSS)
570 Washington Street - 2nd floor
New
Has anyone tried the new Linux NFS over TCP/IP code yet?
http://nfs.sourceforge.net/
The IBM Linux Test Project notes its absence, but this was early in the year:
http://ltp.sourceforge.net/NFS012002.php
Reason I ask is that we use NFS mounted storage extensively
in our labs, but the current
how do i get to swat.
i am using
Linux zvmlinx1 2.4.17-SuSE #1 SMP Thu Feb 28 14:28:29 GMT 2002 s390x unknown
i tried my ip 10.60.1.111:901nothing??
thanks
Ralph Noll
Systems Programmer
City of Little Rock
Phone (501) 371-4884
Fax (501) 371-4712
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
Yes, no problem there.
For example, on this system I added 120-124, with 120-123 working OK, but
I was unable to get 124 working, as dasdaa was unrecognizable to the mke2fs
utility, so I had to remove it to get SLES7 to boot completely.
Regards,
Jim
dalvs2:/boot/zipl # cat parmfile
After /dev/dasdz will be /dev/dasdaa
I have a user that needs a 20g partition. What steps are needed to add this
partition?
Edit inetd.conf and uncomment the lines to allow SWAT to run, be sure inetd
is running, it should be in rc.config as start inetd=yes, you can call it
with rcinetd start
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 9:49 AM, Noll, Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do i get to swat.
i am using
Linux zvmlinx1
Does any ome knows what this message means:
nfs:task 1197 can't get a request slot
The message appears during or after the command. the command hangs!
example, it seems when I do a df', ls to file/directory that
are mounted thru nfs.
When I do a
LSB-Certified: http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/register.html
binary compatibility:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-lsb.html
Regards, Jim
Linux S/390-zSeries Support, SEEL, IBM Silicon Valley Labs
t/l 543-4021, 408-463-4021, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Grace Happens ***
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:52:48PM -0500, Abruzzese, Pat wrote:
I have a user that needs a 20g partition. What steps are needed to add
this partition?
Assuming you're using SuSE LVM: figure out how many physical volumes
you'll need. Use pvcreate, then vgcreate, then lvcreate, then treat the
Dave Rivers wrote:
Gcc can be configured as a cross-compiler, but the gcc compiler
makes several assumptions that may or may-not be valid
about its host environment making it what I would
call a mostly cross-compiler.
If it does, this is a bug which you should report so it can get fixed
Could you show us what is in /dev? ls -l /dev/dasd*
/proc/dasd/devices is entirely unrelated to what is in /dev.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 26 Filesystem Limit?
As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word of warning, since
you're still running a 2.2 kernel, you will be limited to a _file_ size of
2GB each. So, if you need any individual file to exceed 2GB in size, you
must upgrade to a 2.4 system.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From:
Most notably - floating point arithmetic; which don't matter
to many applications.
This in particular will be fixed with gcc 3.3. Compile-time floating
point arithmetic will be done exactly identical in native and cross
compiles. (But even before 3.3, this should not be an issue for
Which is why I would _not_ recommend cross compiling for the majority of
people who want to do compiles on an x86 system. Running Hercules would be
a much better choice for them. If people who have been working with Linux
for quite a while have problems with it, it's not a good choice for the
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 18:54, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
will be different.So, one set
Dave Rivers wrote:
That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
will be different.So, one set of IEEE arithmetic on a PC
can get very
Mark,
Please explain what LVM means.
Thanks,
P. Abruzzese
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 20g partition
As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word of
Logical volume Manager
Www.sistina.com
On 11/18/02 11:11 AM, Abruzzese, Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Please explain what LVM means.
Thanks,
P. Abruzzese
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:56 PM
To:
Mark,
You are right!
It appears from the dates that dasda-dasdz were created at initial
install back on Jan 25 2002, and to add past dasdz I need to do:
mknod /dev/dasdaa b 94 104
mknod /dev/dasdaa1 b 94 105
mknod /dev/dasdaa2 b 94 106
mknod /dev/dasdaa3 b 94 107
...
Do you agree?
Thanks!
Dave Rivers wrote:
That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
will be different.So, one set of IEEE arithmetic on a PC
can get
Pat,
It stands for Logical Volume Manager. There's a section in the
Distributions Redbook that shows you how to set it up and use it on SuSE
7.0:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246264.html
Look at chapter 17.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From:
Jim,
I believe those node numbers are correct, but I don't have a working sample
to verify it.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 26 Filesystem Limit?
Mark,
You are right!
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
swat stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/swat swat
In /etc/inetd.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL
Starting Samba is not required for SWAT. You can use SWAT to setup and
start Samba.
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
swat stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/swat swat
In /etc/inetd.conf?
-Original Message-
What the hell is swat?
-
Starting Samba is not required for SWAT. You can use SWAT to setup and
start Samba.
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
Samba Web Administration Tool.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to get to swat
What the hell is swat?
#
# swat is the Samba Web Administration Tool
swatstream tcp nowait.400 root/usr/sbin/swat swat
#
above is what is in my inetd.conf..
it that right??
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:56 AM
SWAT is a really nice application that aids in Samba administration. I'd
never understood the format requirements of a minimal smb.conf file until
I'd run SWAT for a while. I still run it: it's easier than having to read
the documentation all the time, and even if you still need doc references,
yes all there
-Original Message-
From: Kittendorf, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to get to swat
Has Samba been started?
Do you have
swat 901/tcp
in /etc/services?
And
swat stream
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
ok i restarted my linux partition and swat came up..
now i get the above message
snip
-Original Message-
From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Issue rcinetd restart and point your browser to localhost, on port 901 I
think it says here.
Regards,
Jon
On 11/18/02 12:39 PM, Noll, Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes all there
-Original Message-
From: Kittendorf, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002
Log on as root first time and add yourself the the security piece.
Noll, Ralph wrote:
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
ok i restarted my linux partition and swat came up..
now i get the above message
snip
-Original Message-
From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL
You gave it the root user's id and password through the web dialog box?
That always worked for me
--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noll, Ralph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
Success!!! I now have 27 working filesystems!
Thanks to everyone!
Regards,
Jim Rich
jimrich@dalvs2:~ su root
Password:
root@dalvs2:/home/jimrich cd /dev
root@dalvs2:/dev mknod /dev/dasdaa b 94 104
root@dalvs2:/dev mknod /dev/dasdaa1 b 94 105
root@dalvs2:/dev mknod /dev/dasdaa2 b
Did you apply k_deflt-20020502.rpm ??? ... I did and it still not
working!
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
As Adam indicated, LVM is what you need. But as a word of warning, since
you're still running a 2.2 kernel, you will be limited to a _file_ size of
2GB each. So, if you need any individual file to exceed 2GB in size, you
must upgrade to a 2.4 system.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:37:34AM -0600, Jim Rich wrote:
Reason I ask is that we use NFS mounted storage extensively in our labs,
but the current UDP-only versions do not work well over a WAN, forcing
remote users to go back to FTP to get reliable copies of large files.
You might want to
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:56:43PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
You might want to consider a network filesystem which is designed for
WAN operation. There are several projects in this area, but the only
one that I have first-hand experience with is AFS. I do not know
whether anyone has used
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nfs+task+get+a+request+slotie=ISO-8859-1;
hl=enbtnG=Google+Search
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Command hangs... semms to be NFS problems
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.2-s390.diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.4.patch
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/arla-0.35.2-diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/memcpy.S
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Matt Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:34:21PM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.2-s390.diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/openafs-1.0.4.patch
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/arla-0.35.2-diffs
http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/memcpy.S
Mark Post
There is a nice presentation here:
http://linuxvm.org/present/
...
Presentations from SHARE 98, Nashville, March 4-8, 2002
...
5510 Kris Van Hees Andrew File System (AFS) on Linux for S/390 and zSeries Adobe PDF
Going to the source...
http://www.openafs.org/
...
29-Sep-2002 - OpenAFS 1.2.7
we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
command can we issue, and where from, to find out which one we have? tyia.
We've just run into the 2.4.7 kernel bug that occurs with Samba writing to
a Windows share. I've reviewed previous discussion on this list but I'm not
clear whether I can get around the problem by upgrading the kernel or
Samba. Can I just upgrade to the latest Samba by downloading the source and
From the console:
d m=cpu
..thanks
Chris Markle wrote:
we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
command can we issue, and where from, to find out which one we have? tyia.
Mark,
You can upgrade either one, but Samba would probably be easier. What I've
done in the past is take my distribution's .spec file for a package,
download the updated source, and create a new .spec file for it, using the
old one as a model. Then, use rpm to build and install the package.
From the console:
d m=cpu
this looks like a Z/OS command... Is it? We are running Linux(es) under
VM... If this is a Z/OS command, how would I do it in my Linux / VM
environment? tyia...
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:55:01PM -0600, Jim Rich wrote:
5510 Kris Van Hees Andrew File System (AFS) on Linux for S/390 and zSeries Adobe PDF
http://www.openafs.org/
...
29-Sep-2002 - OpenAFS 1.2.7 Released!
Jim
Kris' original presentation (and even more good stuff on AFS) is
available
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
Mark,
You can upgrade either one, but Samba would probably be easier. What I've
done in the past is take my distribution's .spec file for a package,
download the updated source, and create a new .spec file for it, using the
old one as a model.
Oops..sorry about that.
I'm not sure..what does cat /proc/cpuinfo show?
Chris Markle wrote:
From the console:
d m=cpu
this looks like a Z/OS command... Is it? We are running Linux(es) under
VM... If this is a Z/OS command, how would I do it in my Linux / VM
environment? tyia...
- Original Message -
From: Chris Markle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: how to display real model id on mp3000
we have an MP3 but aren't sure if it's a 7060-H30, H50 or H70. What
command can we issue, and where from, to find
Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Rivers wrote:
That is, of course one of the issues. The i386 IEEE implementation
is not the same as the mainframe, particularly when two variables
are loaded into registers and arithmetic is applied. The result
will be different.So, one
Thank to everyone who answered. I eventually found a RPM on the developers
CD set.
This I extracted and it installed perfectly.
It seems to me that when obtaining a distribution, you should always
get all the sources that it supports. At less that way you should be
guaranteed some level of
72 matches
Mail list logo
