Re: FBA device driver

2005-05-18 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Leland Lucius wrote: >>>I was trying to change my Linux swap to vdisk and received >>he message >>>below. >>>Where do I get the driver. >>>I am using SUSE 9 - the free one. >>> >>Try run 'mkinitrd; zipl'. >>mkinitrd needs to be run after each change to /etc/fstab to >>make sure that all devices are

Re: FBA device driver

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
> > I was trying to change my Linux swap to vdisk and received > he message > > below. > > Where do I get the driver. > > I am using SUSE 9 - the free one. > > > Try run 'mkinitrd; zipl'. > mkinitrd needs to be run after each change to /etc/fstab to > make sure that all devices are properly activat

Re: FBA device driver

2005-05-18 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Peter Rothman wrote: > I was trying to change my Linux swap to vdisk and received he message > below. > Where do I get the driver. > I am using SUSE 9 - the free one. > Try run 'mkinitrd; zipl'. mkinitrd needs to be run after each change to /etc/fstab to make sure that all devices are properly act

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Ronald van der Laan
You could do something in /etc/ssh/sshrc, as that exit is called by sshd during login and before the user gets control. logons=`who | grep ^$USER | wc -l` if [ $logons -gt 1 ]; then fi Ronald van der Laan -- For LINUX-390

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, if you thing I'm going to learn, either way, you over estimate > me! > Actually, if Marcy hadn't brought it up I wouldn't have know about it either. :-) Leland - End forwarded message -

Samba 3 joining company ADC.

2005-05-18 Thread Brandon Darbro
Hey gang. Now that we have SLES 9 64bit (and service pack one) finally, I've wanted to move start using Samba 3 in Active Directory mode. The account "BSD3488" has permissions to add server accounts to AD, via Samba's net adc join command, to a an OU setup just for us. I've done the following: ki

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2005-05-18 at 21:47, Tom Duerbusch wrote: > The default permissions defined when a file is created, seems to be > +644. Actually the kernel doesn't really care. The property is set by what is called the umask (for daft historical reasons that don't matter). You can set it in a users login

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread David Boyes
> There is a multi step build/backup procedure that only one > person should be > running at a time. The idea was to restrict the build > scripts to only one > user. Then allow the build UID only one login at a time. Couple of ideas: 1) Use NQS (Networked Queue System) to do the builds. Think o

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Well, if you thing I'm going to learn, either way, you over estimate me! Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18/05 4:08 PM >>> Quoting Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Shouldn't that go into /etc/profile.local ? > > Oh sure...give him the right file name. Let him do it righ

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Benjamin White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks for the step by step solution, I knew PAM was the security module, > but never dug into it. > > I will start digging. Besides TLDP.org, any other good resources? > Google? :-) Oh, yea...man? (hehehehe, just kidding) Actually, I couldn't fin

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 18, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Benjamin White wrote: There is a multi step build/backup procedure that only one person should be running at a time. The idea was to restrict the build scripts to only one user. Then allow the build UID only one login at a time. A "lock" file may be left locked and ne

Re: Fw: [LINUX-390] Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > With the 'useradd' command, the option '-o' specifies to allow > "duplicate non-unique" userids. > > I assume that means to allow multiple signons of the same userid. > That allows more than one user NAME to have the same UID: sosaatm:/etc # useradd -o

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Benjamin White
Thanks for the step by step solution, I knew PAM was the security module, but never dug into it. I will start digging. Besides TLDP.org, any other good resources? From: Leland Lucius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Restrict user to only one

Re: Fw: [LINUX-390] Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:02 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: Fw: [LINUX-390] Restrict user to only one active login > > > With the 'useradd' command, the option '

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Shouldn't that go into /etc/profile.local ? > > Oh sure...give him the right file name. Let him do it right the first time and he'll never learn. :-) Leland -- For LINUX-390 subscrib

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 18, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: Perhaps even copying fstab to fstab.save before changing things. Then you only have to rename files instead of using "ed" to change lines in fstab. Ew. Just install ned. Adam -- Fo

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Marcy Cortes
Shouldn't that go into /etc/profile.local ? Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any informat

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Well, you know what they say... Great minds are still sick. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18/05 3:57 PM >>> Thanks, Tom. That matches the game plan I just finished writing down. I decided to do the "cp" instead of "mv," and for exactly the reasons you describe. Jon

Re: Fw: [LINUX-390] Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
With the 'useradd' command, the option '-o' specifies to allow "duplicate non-unique" userids. I assume that means to allow multiple signons of the same userid. It doesn't make sense that it would allow you to create multiple "same" userids...right? So I take a guess that it means at signon time.

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I would like to change something, somewhere, so that for certain users, > any files they create have permissions set to something like +640, or > perhaps +600. > You'll want to look in the following for umask specifcations: (this is for SLES): /etc/

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
Thanks, Tom. That matches the game plan I just finished writing down. I decided to do the "cp" instead of "mv," and for exactly the reasons you describe. Jon Having made many errors I wouldn't "mv" the directory, just "cp" it. Since you are creating the directory and contents on new di

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Benjamin White
There is a multi step build/backup procedure that only one person should be running at a time. The idea was to restrict the build scripts to only one user. Then allow the build UID only one login at a time. A "lock" file may be left locked and need to be reset if someone does not complete the pro

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
I considered that, but since I don't know what sort of magic MySQL might do behind the scenes, I wasn't too keen on trying it. I hope to start learning about MySQL soon -- at least enough to be able to poke around in it a little bit. Jon Have you tried mounting your 80GB system some

Re: Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Ferguson, Neale
In /etc/profile /etc/csh.login etc. change the umask from 022 to 026. On SUSE the default is 022 which says the default permissions for creating non-executable files is the exclusive or 022 against 666 -> 644. Changing it to 026 should give you 640 -> rw-r-. -Original Message- I've ask

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Benjamin White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How can a user be restricted to only one login at a time? > How's this look? May 18 15:45:17 sosaatm sshd[1101]: Accepted publickey for sysadmin from :::10.11.2.55 port 1543 ssh2 May 18 15:45:33 sosaatm sshd[1123]: Accepted publickey for sysadmin

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Having made many errors I wouldn't "mv" the directory, just "cp" it. Since you are creating the directory and contents on new disk space, keep the old directory spinning until you prove to yourself that everything is working with the LVM version. It is much easier to recover if you just have

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
Have you tried mounting your 80GB system somewhere and doing a symbolic link to it from /var? "A statesman is a dead politician. Lord knows we need more statesmen!" --Berkeley Breathed Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. Boeing Shared Services Group Enterprise Servers VM Technical Services 425-865-5940 > ---

Linux default permissions

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I've asked a simular question before this and the concensus was to use ACL instead of permissions, but... The default permissions defined when a file is created, seems to be +644. This allows any Linux user to read the file, even the user isn't the owner or isn't a member of the same group. That

Fw: [LINUX-390] Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread John Campbell
I admit that restricting users to a single login shell isn't particularly useful for us as Power Abusers, there are some environments (education, for instance) where an effort to cut down on multiple people "sharing" a login despite "policy" issues might be... attractive. I recall that there were

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread David Andrews
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 16:07 -0400, Jon Brock wrote: > If /var is one file system, I don't like even the suggestion that if, > say, syslogd filled up /var it could have bad consequences for my > database. Ah, I dig. I recall an unpleasant time of it once when /var/mail suddenly stuffed. Thanks.

Re: automating zLinux backup with DF/DSS under zOS

2005-05-18 Thread David Boyes
> thank you for your response. the article I found was: VM New > User How-to > Defining ESCON CTSs Between LPARS". Read it, very intersting. > I did some searches on the site regarding "file-level > backups" and also > looked under presentations to no avail. > please let me know how to find the a

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Hall, Ken (IDS DCS PE)
SSH uses PAM if the option is on in the conf file. That's the default in Suse. I've used PAM to validate SSH logins via ldap and Kerberos. Works fine. > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > John Campbell > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:06

Re: Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 18, 2005, at 3:05 PM, John Campbell wrote: It would strike me that this would be almost trivial to sneak into the pam.d stack... ...except that I seem to recall that SSH doesn't pay much attention to that. I would suggest getting the source to OpenSSH's sshd daemon and figuring out how to sn

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
It just gives me the willies due to a bad experience I had when trying to resize /var not long ago. (See my message to Adam.) As long as the MySQL is in a separate actual file system it shouldn't be too bad. If /var is one file system, I don't like even the suggestion that if, say, syslogd fi

Re: automating zLinux backup with DF/DSS under zOS

2005-05-18 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
David: thank you for your response. the article I found was: VM New User How-to Defining ESCON CTSs Between LPARS". Read it, very intersting. I did some searches on the site regarding "file-level backups" and also looked under presentations to no avail. please let me know how to find the arti

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Marcy Cortes
And instructions which work well are found here: http://www.linuxvm.org/Info/HOWTOs/movefs.html Just use /dev/vgname/lvname . Instead of /dev/dasd.. And /var/lib/mysql instead of /usr Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addresse

Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread John Campbell
It would strike me that this would be almost trivial to sneak into the pam.d stack... ...except that I seem to recall that SSH doesn't pay much attention to that. I would suggest getting the source to OpenSSH's sshd daemon and figuring out how to sneak in such a feature and implementing it locall

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread David Andrews
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 15:25 -0400, Jon Brock wrote: > MySQL, which defaults to placing its databases on /var (which I > consider a Bad Idea, but that's beside the point) Why is this bad? -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Olsen, Mike # PHX
Yes, that was put a lot better. Overmount /var/lib/mysql on /var, however, I've always had to remove/recreate the directories (empty) to make mount happy. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:50 PM To

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
That's reassuring to know (and I'm saving your email). The time I ended up reloading the system I was trying to resize /var. I took it down to single-user and issued the umount, which barfed on me (fuser said that "mount" had /var. Joy.) Anyway, a lazy unmount worked, but shortly after I tri

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
H. That may be the best idea yet. I was wanting to avoid moving the existing MySQL stuff, but the more I think about it, the better this sounds. Thanks, Jon You can put your LVM at /var/lib/mysql instead of just /var.

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 18, 2005, at 2:25 PM, Jon Brock wrote: We have a vendor installing a product on a zLinux image. This product uses MySQL, which defaults to placing its databases on /var (which I consider a Bad Idea, but that's beside the point). Because of this, they need 80 GB for /var. I have an 80 G

Re: automating zLinux backup with DF/DSS under zOS

2005-05-18 Thread David Boyes
> does anybody have ideas to share for how to automated backing > up the zLinux > RHEL system volumes using DF/DSS? Use the method I outline in my file-level backup presentation (http://www.sinenomine.net/node/465). This will work with either Amanda or Bacula, and allow the zOS system to handle th

Restrict user to only one active login

2005-05-18 Thread Benjamin White
How can a user be restricted to only one login at a time? -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlv

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We have a vendor installing a product on a zLinux image. This product > uses > MySQL, which defaults to placing its databases on /var (which I consider a > Bad Idea, but that's beside the point). Because of this, they need 80 GB for > /var. I have

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jon Brock > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:26 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Moving /var to LVM > > > We have a vendor installing a product on a zLinux > image. This product uses

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Marcy Cortes
You can put your LVM at /var/lib/mysql instead of just /var. Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this messa

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
Yeah, I know. I'm trying to talk them into changing the location -- I think it's mainly a matter of editing /etc/my.conf -- but I am not confident of success. Jon We have mysql installed and i have it pointed to /data as it's database. It can be configured to not put it in /var --

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
That's what I had planned on doing, but I'll need to either copy or move the existing /var data first. The part that kills me is that it is possible to tell MySQL to put its data somewhere else, but when I reminded the vendor about the existing file system the response I got was "The de

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread James Melin
We have mysql installed and i have it pointed to /data as it's database. It can be configured to not put it in /var Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Linux on To 390 Port LINUX-390@

automating zLinux backup with DF/DSS under zOS

2005-05-18 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
does anybody have ideas to share for how to automated backing up the zLinux RHEL system volumes using DF/DSS? Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] NCCI Boca Raton, Florida 561.893.2415 greetings / avec mes meilleures salutations / Cordialmente mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vänlig hälsning The informa

Stateless Linux

2005-05-18 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
Does anybody have much experience setting up "stateless linux" under the RHEL distro? Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] NCCI Boca Raton, Florida 561.893.2415 greetings / avec mes meilleures salutations / Cordialmente mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vänlig hälsning The information contained in this e

Re: Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Olsen, Mike # PHX
>From my AIX days, MQSeries wanted to use /var as well. What we did was overmount a LV on /var, using different disk. I'm not sure if that will work here though. Good Luck! -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: Wednesday, May

Moving /var to LVM

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
We have a vendor installing a product on a zLinux image. This product uses MySQL, which defaults to placing its databases on /var (which I consider a Bad Idea, but that's beside the point). Because of this, they need 80 GB for /var. I have an 80 GB ext3 file system created in LVM and

Re: HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Uriel Carrasquilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Under Intel, I would also use the lspci to list the pci hardware connected. > There might be a similar ls... command for the HIPER socket but I am also > new to Linux under S390. > On SuSE 9 at least, you can do an "lscss" to get a list of all the

Re: HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
Michael: do an "lsmod" or check your /etc/modules.conf to make sure that hsi is there. if not, try /sbin/modprobe hsi (if your kernel has the xxx.so driver built in, it should find this device). If that fail, make sure that VM has really attached the device and it is available to your Linux.

Re: Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Little, Chris
Barton? Plugging his wares gratuitously? Unheard of! :> -Original Message- From: Don Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:39 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Warning - select correct lpar processor type ! Smells like a gratuitous advertizement,

Re: FBA device driver

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Peter Rothman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 0.0.0202:0Configuring device 0.0.0202 > /sbin/dasd_configure: 116: /sbin/modprobe: not found > Could not load module dasd_fba_mod > Actually, you have a bit more of an issue the a missing module. The dasd_configure script can't find the modprobe exe

Re: HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Leland Lucius
Quoting Michael A Willett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > qeth device hsi0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. > What does "cat /proc/qeth" show? Leland -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction

FBA device driver

2005-05-18 Thread Peter Rothman
I was trying to change my Linux swap to vdisk and received he message below. Where do I get the driver. I am using SUSE 9 - the free one. Thanks 0.0.0202:0Configuring device 0.0.0202 /sbin/dasd_configure: 116: /sbin/modprobe: not found Could not load module dasd_fba_mod --

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Ceruti, Gerard G
Hi Jim I went thru the same problem and the found http://www.pexus.com/Download/downloadFiles.html X/Deep 32 freeware Regards Gerard -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregg, Jim Sent: 18 May 2005 03:27 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject

Re: HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Michael A Willett
The addresses are attached to the linux system. We do not have a problem with that we just don't understand why Linux cannot recognize them since they are attached. Any other ideas? Thanks, Mike Willett Thi

AW: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Friedrichs , Jürgen
Jim, you can start x-cygwin in multiwindow mode so that it runs seamless on your Windows desktop. Start it up with "xwin -multiwindow -clipboard" Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Jürgen Friedrichs FRIEDRICHS CONSULTING Schwedenweg 44, 85560 Ebersberg, Germany callto:+49-177-2421958 (mobile) callto:+49

Re: HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Brian France
IF you haven't added them to your image under the z/vm user directory either by a specific DEDICATE statement OR a CP ATTACH to linux I think would do this. At 10:57 AM 5/18/2005, you wrote: We are trying to define HIPER sockets on RedHat Enterprise version 4. We are running under z

Betr.: Re: Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Pieter Harder
Exactly, looking at the HMC System Activity Display would have shown the same info for 0$. Best regards, Pieter Harder [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18 5:39 >>> Smells like a gratuitous advertizement, Barton. -Original Message- From: Ba

Re: Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Don Sievert
Smells like a gratuitous advertizement, Barton. -Original Message- From: Barton Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:05 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Warning - select correct lpar processor type ! This happens more often than you'd think, don't be

HIPER socket definition

2005-05-18 Thread Michael A Willett
We are trying to define HIPER sockets on RedHat Enterprise version 4. We are running under z/VM 5.1. When we try to initialize the devices with ifup we are getting the error below. ifup hsi0 qeth device hsi0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. Below are the contents of th

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gregg, Jim > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:24 AM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Re: How to use X-Cygwin > > > Thanks John, > Works like a champwell almost. > Slow as grass growing. > R

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Ferguson, Neale
Have you tried VNC? It's a much "thinner" beast. It's even usable over dialup. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://w

Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Barton Robinson
This happens more often than you'd think, don't be embarrased. This is why Velocity Software provides zTUNE. >From recent mail - note that zTUNE identifies the problem and most of the solution: CUSTOMER: >>Since you left we have gotten 3 linux VM machines configured and >>running with Websphere an

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Jon Brock
Have you tried using VNC? That seems to do a pretty good job for me, although I don't use it for much. Jon I have been > trying to use > X-Cygwin but find the doccumentation poor and can not get > past having a > blank screen with an X for a cursor. > ---

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Gregg, Jim
Thanks John, Works like a champwell almost. Slow as grass growing. Remember I work for the state...WinNT and a dog of a processorOh Well. Jim -Original Message- From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:42 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: R

Re: Copied a guest from prod VM to test VM - Nicdef is a different address

2005-05-18 Thread James Melin
I think it had to do with wanting to be absolutely certain which VM they were playing with, as each has it's own VLAN but sharing an OSA. I'm trying to argue the point that it should be the same device addressing because then you can take a copy of a guest that is having issues, dumpt it into your

Re: Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Jim Elliott
Graeme: Sorry about that. Basically it comes down to ICFs, IFLs, and zAAPs all being the same thing (ICFs) from a hardware point of view (which is why they all have the same price). However, you still need to buy the "right" processor type as this affects software licensing charges. The PR/SM gui

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Richard Pinion
I use MI-X from Microimages. It wasn't that expensive $25-$35??? I purchased it myself and didn't bother asking for a reimbursement. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/18/05 09:42AM >>> > -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gregg, Jim > Sent: W

Re: How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gregg, Jim > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 8:27 AM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: How to use X-Cygwin > > > I have finally gotten a full install of Suse Linux9 loaded in > a Native LPAR > a

How to use X-Cygwin

2005-05-18 Thread Gregg, Jim
I have finally gotten a full install of Suse Linux9 loaded in a Native LPAR and booted OK. I can connect using SSH and have tried X-Win32 to connect using Xwindows OK. I work for a state agency and can not spend the money needed to buy X-Win32 and it has expired. So, I have been trying to use X-Cyg

Warning - select correct lpar processor type !

2005-05-18 Thread Graeme Westerman NFU Mutual Insurance
I have a confession / experience that I think maybe worth sharing with you if you run multiple lpars on a Z series box, ie mixture of z/OS lpars and z/VM lpars / Linux lpars. We have a single Z box in which we run 3 z/OS lpars and 2 z/VM lpars hosting SLES8 virtual machines. We were experiencing p