A 3:30pm session has been added. Please see the agenda below.
--
Meeting Location:
This quarter's meeting will be held at the Hewitt Associates 'East Campus'
located at 100 Half Day Road, in Lincolnshire, IL. We will meet in
Conference Room 100-M3, just off the Cafeteria.
If you
Do you have QIOASSIST on ?
After setting NOQIOASSIST on the OSA addresses, we got rid of a similar
problem under zVM440.
'DEDICATE 710 710 NOQIOASSIST'. There should be some pfts comming soon.
Regards,
Kurt.
- Confidentiality Notice -
This communication and the information it contains is
HI,
the QIOASSIST problem occured in our installation with VM440.
We installed PTFs:
UM31170, UM31340, UM31370
Due to the conversion to VM510 we ran only 3 weeks with these ptf's -
without a new occurrence of the error.
VM510 was shipped with the appropriate ptf's installed (I don't know the
At 05:47 AM 6/21/2005, you wrote:
HI,
the QIOASSIST problem occured in our installation with VM440.
We installed PTFs:
UM31170, UM31340, UM31370
Due to the conversion to VM510 we ran only 3 weeks with these ptf's -
without a new occurrence of the error.
VM510 was shipped with the appropriate
Some of you may already have noticed that the Linux on zSeries
developerWorks-pages are available at the new URL:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/
Some time later today (Tuesday 2005-06-21), re-directs from our old URLs
will start to be effective, re-routing links to
Hi,
I can´t get by the initrd 75% problem when installing.
I got an answer tht it is a relative path problem.
I use NFS and mounts the /space/SLES9
Here is ls -l
# ls -l /space/SLES9
total 18
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 19 Feb 2 16:09 boot -
sles9-i386/CD1/boot
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
I can´t get by the initrd 75% problem when installing.
Is this for x86? Was a little confused at all the i386 talk in your email.
Otherwise, this sounds similar to an experience we recently had. When using
either the SLES9 or SLES9-SP1 installation images the process would hang with
zipl
Hello list,
The redbook z/VM and Linux on zSeries: From LPAR to Virtual Servers in
Two Days is on the Web (finally! 52 days late) at:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246695.html
The files associated with this book are on the Web at:
ftp://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246695/
The book
Hi
I've noticed that Linux kernel 2.6 requires zVM 4.4.
Can someone tell me what support , in short words, 2.6 needs in 4.4 that
4.3 lacks.
TIA
Thomas Broman
Systems Engineer
Pulsen Productions AB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For
We are migrating a DB2-UDB LINUX/390 SLES 7 server with the EXT2 filesystem
to a SLES 9 server. Because of the nature and size of the databases we
encounter a lot of issues with the 2 GIG file size limit (database
containers, backups to disk, export and load files etc.). The long restarts
after a
Hearsay says that ReiserFS is a very poor performer on the zSeries. EXT3 would
be easiest because EXT3 is simply EXT2 + journelling. You can convert your EXT2
to EXT3 in place. But I don't understand the comment about the 2 Gb file size
limit. I no longer have Linux on zSeries, but there is no
We only have Linux on zSeries and at SLES 7 with EXT2 there is a 2G file
size limitation. I'm assuming EXT3 being EXT2 and journel would not get us
over the size limit
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 21,
There is not a 2G file size limit on EXT2. I suspect that you are using an old
version of DB2 that is not compiled with large file support. If this is true
then it does not matter what filesystem you use. Another possibility is that
you are using a very old kernel. I think the 2.2 kernel
I haven't seen anything as such. I ran a 2.6 kernel while on 4.3.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Broman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 8:59 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Linux 2.6 and zVM 4.4
Hi
I've noticed that Linux kernel 2.6 requires zVM 4.4.
On Tuesday, 06/21/2005 at 03:58 ZE2, Thomas Broman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that Linux kernel 2.6 requires zVM 4.4.
Where did you see this, Thomas? Can you point me to a URL?
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
I'm z/VM 4.2 running SLES9 with SP1.
Do you have any indication on what kind of problems I may be having
running Linux?
I'm not saying that I don't have problems, just I'm not sure what
problems are mine and what problems are due to z/VM 4.2G.
The only think I can think of is in the realm of
Can someone tell me if SUSE 8.0 will recognize a 3390 mod 9 disk drive
or not?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Thanks for the info. Does SuSE pick them up as mod 9 or do you configure
them as mod 9?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/21/2005 11:09:13 AM
yep. 3390-3 3390-9 3390-27. use all of them here.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lovins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:08 AM
To:
Thanks,
I will give the NOQIOASSIST a try and get back with the results.
Regards,
Darren
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 04:47, Leonard Janus wrote:
HI,
the QIOASSIST problem occured in our installation with VM440.
We installed PTFs:
UM31170, UM31340, UM31370
Due to the conversion to VM510 we
It really doesn't know what a mod x is. Just see is as dasd with 10017
(16?) cylinders.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lovins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:16 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 3390 mod 9
Thanks for the info. Does SuSE pick them up as
Has anyone tried adding FCP tapes to linux. I was able to add FCP dasd
to Suse v8 and I'm in the process of adding them to Suse v9, but I'm
getting nothing but error messages when I try to add an FCP tape device
to either system. I suspect, but I'm not sure, that I've probably got a
problem with
Sure, since SUSE 7.0 recognize it.
Carlos Alberto Bodra
S/390 System Programmer
Sao Paulo - Brazil
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Lovins
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 1:08 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 3390 mod 9
Can
Yes, it will.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike Lovins
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:08 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: 3390 mod 9
Can someone tell me if SUSE 8.0 will recognize a 3390 mod 9 disk drive
or not?
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:07:30AM -0500, Mike Lovins wrote:
Can someone tell me if SUSE 8.0 will recognize a 3390 mod 9 disk drive
or not?
Yes.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
The ext3 file system does not have that limitation when running on a 2.6
kernel. In your place, I would be using ext3.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joe Nocket
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:20 AM
To:
We did some experimenting and found that it's DB2 (V7) that has the 2G file
size limitation and not the ext2 filesystem, I believe DB2 V8 will lift this
restriction. We are probably going to use ext3, but I am still curious if
anyone has any experience using JFS on zSeries Linux since it's IBM
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/perf/tuning_res_journal
ing.html#begin
or if you get a line break in that . . .
http://tinyurl.com/8fg67
-Original Message-
From: Joe Nocket [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:21 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Question:
would my volume-group and logical-volume (LVM) be in trouble if I re-label
one or more of the physical volumes allocated to the lv?
I forgot to label the volumes when I created them and my zOS guy is getting
them in his reports (bad label). We use zOS DF/DSS for backups so I am
very
My initial guess is that it doesn't use the volume label. I know that you
can change device numbers, and device names and lvm will still find it.
However, don't take my word for it. i've screwed up before.
-Original Message-
From: Uriel Carrasquilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
go for it. you'll be fine. you'll have the same risks as any other mounted
filesystem.
-Original Message-
From: Uriel Carrasquilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 5:10 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: /tmp as a logical volume
We have /tmp as part of
I have run fdasd against LVM minidisks and recreated the VTOC from
0x0300 (for example) to a standard pack name that can be read by the
z/OS systems.
Betsie
Little, Chris wrote:
My initial guess is that it doesn't use the volume label. I know that you
can change device numbers, and device
I build all my systems with /tmp separate from /. That goes for Linux/390 and
Intel Linux. SLES9 will handle it nicely.
I'm beginning to have doubts about LVM (version 1 at least) on 64-bit systems.
I've had two cases where my volume groups have disappeared after an IPL, and
hence all my
32 matches
Mail list logo
