Seeing a lot of these since we upgraded from SLES10SP4 to SLES11SP2:
scale_rt_power: clock:3806a691fbdb1 age:3806a4e60fe00, avg:5d4b8d2f
Oct 23 04:43:19 sandbx3 kernel: scale_rt_power: clock:3806a691fbdb1
age:3806a4e60fe00, avg:5d4b8d2f
scale_rt_power: clock:3806a71c9a763 age:3806a6c2e6300,
I haven't seen it that I recall, but a Google search suggests that it
comes from load balancing when you're running tickless.
scale_rt_power: clock:3806a691fbdb1 age:3806a4e60fe00, avg:5d4b8d2f
The scheduler is trying to tell you something (because the
scale_rt_power() function is in the
Hi,
First time posting here... I hope I found the right place.
I have two web servers, they are duplicates of each other, serving the same
webpage. They are 'clustered' by a network load balancer. I want to see if I
can have them share the same volume in z/VM.
One of the RHEL servers will be
David,
Edit /etc/fstab to avoid the execution of fsck on that filesystem upon
boot; since it is a RO FS, you don't want anyone touching it. =)
Regards,
Pedro Principeza
SW Support Engineer -- IBM
From: Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor) david.d...@dc.gov
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu,
Date:
If you want both of the servers live at the same time, you need the content
volume r/o to both systems, or a cluster file system, or to mount the content
from a 3rd machine via NFS.
If you're OK with a single point of failure, you can set up one system as a NFS
master and then mount the
Thanks for the feedback.
Let me understand this... so, if the system that has RW (call this the master)
to the volume crashes, the system that has RO (call this the client) will not
have access to the serve the data housed in that volume?
I want the content and the servers to be live
Hi, David.
Yup, you're at the right spot:-)
What version/release level of both Red Hat and WebSphere are you now
running?
DJ
On 10/23/2013 10:17 AM, Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor) wrote:
Hi,
First time posting here... I hope I found the right place.
I have two web servers, they are
Hi DJ,
I'm at RHEL 6.2... however, this is just a simple Apache webserver housing some
PDFs for users.
The LVM where I have the PDFs and HTMLs can get pretty large... I want to share
them between two RHEL servers.
Thanks!
Serve DC is proud to present NeighborGood, a new, free tool to help
Think about it this way.
How will the r/o guy know the content has changed?
If it changes out from under him, he will surely find errors and something
won't be happy.
Now, i suppose you come up with some scripting to
Umount from r/o 2nd server
Remount as r/w on 1st server
Make your changes
On 10/23/2013 at 11:35 AM, Diep, David (OCTO-Contractor)
david.d...@dc.gov
wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
Let me understand this... so, if the system that has RW (call this the
master) to the volume crashes, the system that has RO (call this the client)
will not have access to the
On 10/23/2013 at 07:32 AM, karlkings...@ongov.net wrote:
Seeing a lot of these since we upgraded from SLES10SP4 to SLES11SP2:
scale_rt_power: clock:3806a691fbdb1 age:3806a4e60fe00, avg:5d4b8d2f
Oct 23 04:43:19 sandbx3 kernel: scale_rt_power: clock:3806a691fbdb1
age:3806a4e60fe00,
If you need pretty high but not really high availability , NFS will likely meet
your needs. Otherwise you are looking at a clustered solution like Mark listed.
Marcy
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi, All,
Running RHEL 6.3 on z/VM 6.2, and this is our first time bringing them up at
DR. We have an internal DR facility on an isolated network.
z/VM and all the Linux guests came up at initial IPL of z/VM at DR, and we
changed the IP address in TCPIP on z/VM to the DR network prefix and
Great help!
Thanks Mark and Marcy.
Serve DC is proud to present NeighborGood, a new, free tool to help residents
engage in meaningful service and connect with the causes and organizations they
care about. Visit NeighborGood at http://serve.dc.gov/service/neighborgood
-Original
Hi John,
Do you have Hipersockets defined? That's one way I was able to FTP files when
I did the same thing.
Serve DC is proud to present NeighborGood, a new, free tool to help residents
engage in meaningful service and connect with the causes and organizations they
care about. Visit
On 10/23/2013 at 11:58 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
After learning the hard way that vi doesn't play well with a 3270 console
session, we tried changing the IP address of a Linux machine in ifcfg-eth0
with sed. After changing the address and rebooting Linux (probably overkill,
Do you also have a default gateway you need to change too?
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Chase,
John
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:58 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] Changing IP address at DR site
You could use:
ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.x
route add default gw 10.0.0.y
And use ssh to connect and change files with vi.
As Mark and Marcy already said, you probably missed setting the default
gateway. Try pinging it (ping -c 2 gateway-ip) and see if you can connect.
Mauro
Yes; it was also changed. Internal DR network starts with 10.2.; rest of the
address is the same as in the live network. Every IP address (DNS, Gateway
and the guest's IPADDR) in ifcfg-eth0 was updated to 10.2.original.original.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Post
On 10/23/2013 at 11:58 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
After learning the hard way that vi doesn't play well with a 3270
console session, we tried changing the IP address of a Linux machine
in ifcfg-eth0
Did your gateway and netmask also change?
Thanks,
Chris Burgess
Phone: 1-800-445-2588 x42149
1-508-249-2149
Fax: 1-508-497-8027
Email: christopher.burg...@emc.com
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Chase,
John
Sent:
On 10/23/2013 at 12:39 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Post
-snip-
Did you also change the default gateway for the systems?
Yes.
Ok, then
1. Drop your firewall, if one is running on the Linux system.
2. Ping
John, can someone from the wan group check the switch or router (default
gw) to see if they can ping the MF and
maybe clear cache ?
Oscar R. Quesada
Systems Administrator Leader
CSC
Southern California USA
Cell # 818-370-2579 oques...@csc.com
This is a PRIVATE message. If
Don't rename ifcfg-eth0 to ifcfg-eth0anything. When the network starts, it
will read *every* file named ifcfg-* and try to put it online. Try renaming
to original-ifcfg-eth0. Running service network reload is enough to
re-read all the files, no need to reboot.
If you still cannot connect, try
Are the linux guests connected through a vswitch?
Perhaps this is a vlan grant issue...
The vlan you are using have changed... either change the default vlan for
the vswitch or grant the linux guests to that new vlan...
Offer
On Oct 23, 2013 7:54 PM, Mauro Souza thoriu...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of burgess, christopher
Did your gateway and netmask also change?
Gateway address was updated, but netmask stayed as 255.255.255.192 (we have the
bottom 64 addresses, same as on the live network).
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Oscar R Quesada
John, can someone from the wan group check the switch or router (default
gw) to see if they can ping the MF and
maybe clear cache ?
Request is in, but they are on lunch break at the moment.
The mainframe is
For a sanity check, can you quick switch the networking settings back and
restart the network to make sure there wasn't something else that changed
when you rebooted? Related, is sshd running? :-)
From: Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU,
Date: 10/23/2013 01:22
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Offer Baruch
Are the linux guests connected through a vswitch?
Perhaps this is a vlan grant issue...
The vlan you are using have changed... either change the default vlan for the
vswitch or grant the
linux guests to that new
Try the following commands and send the output...
Q vswitch VMASW1 details
We will be able to see if you need to change anything or not
Offer
On Oct 23, 2013 8:42 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Offer Baruch
Are the
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Offer Baruch
Try the following commands and send the output...
Q vswitch VMASW1 details
q vswitch vmasw1 details
VSWITCH SYSTEM VMASW1 Type: QDIOConnected: 4Maxconn:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mauro Souza
Don't rename ifcfg-eth0 to ifcfg-eth0anything. When the network starts, it
will read *every* file
named ifcfg-* and try to put it online. Try renaming to original-ifcfg-eth0.
Running service network
reload is
Mark Post mp...@suse.com 10/23/2013 9:47 AM
On 10/23/2013 at 12:39 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Post
-snip-
Did you also change the default gateway for the systems?
Yes.
Ok, then
1. Drop your firewall,
33 matches
Mail list logo
