at 11:03 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Kelly F.
> Hickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -snip-
> > That explains something, although fdasd doesn't think there are
> > partition tables either, I just tried again though, and I can still
> >>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:55 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Kelly F.
> Hickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I guess that I'm out of luck. It says that there are no valid
> > partition tables on any of my devic
End Blocks Id System
Command (m for help):
Thanks,
Kelly
>
> -Brad
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 06:55 -0500, Kelly F. Hickel wrote:
> > Well, I guess that I'm out of luck. It says that there are no valid
> > partition tables on any of my devices,
I thought that they would have had to have valid partition
tables before I could do that......
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
> -Original Message-----
> From: K
some of the
data. I know it prompts before writing anything, but there are too many
things I don't know about Linux on s390x, so I'm more than a bit
paranoid.
Thanks,
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PRO
/usr only contains the lib64 directory.
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
zcat
And that's all that I have to work with...
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
a1 (that should
be where /boot is, right?) with no luck.
I've googled and found a few cookbooks on getting back up after a device
or kernel change, but I can't get to the point where I can mount the
volume.
Any ideas what to try next?
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:12 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brad Hinson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 12:46 -0500, Kelly F. Hickel wrote:
> >> > -Original Message-
> -snip-
> >> Qeth: loadi
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Justin Payne
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:48 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: any help installing 4.4 for s390 (or s390x) on Z9-BC?
>
> While there is no version 5 of Centos, you
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> > Brad Hinson
> > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:38 PM
> > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: FW: any help installing 4.4 for s390 (or s390x) on Z9-
> BC?
> >
> > Hi Kelly,
> >
> > Does
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Brad Hinson
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 12:38 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: any help installing 4.4 for s390 (or s390x) on Z9-BC?
>
> Hi Kelly,
>
> Does dmesg show any qeth-rel
Does Centos support the ASCII emulator on the HMC of the z9BC? If so,
> then maybe you could use that as your terminal for entry.
>
[Kelly F. Hickel] John, no, that doesn't seem to work. Only the
Operating System Messages screen from the HMC allows me to see what&#
>
> > [Kelly F. Hickel] I was told that it didn't need it (and the prompt
> > itself says that it is optional). That address isn't supposed to be
> in
> > use by any other LPAR.
>
> You don't need a portname if your OSAs are at a certain microcode
l
SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
> > > > > SIOCSIFBRDADDR: No such device
>
> That version of CentOS is probably old enough that it still requires a
> portname for the OSA port to initialize correctly. There were later
RPM
> packages for the OSA drivers that removed that
Scott,
We aren't running VM, e200 is the addr of an OSA adapter.
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 P
Hmm, no responses?
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelly F. Hickel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:18 AM
> To: Kel
n't being used by anything else.
I have no idea how to even begin tracking down what the problem is, does
anyone have any ideas?
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Product Architect
MQSoftware, Inc.
952-345-8677 Office
952-345-8721 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.mqsoftware.com
SEE BUSINESS WORK
>
m?
>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 12:38 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Kelly F.
> Hickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> -snip-
> > I already had the 390 RPMs locally, so I tried that and got th
means you have only the s390 or s390x version
> installed (but not both), hence the longer command above.
That's where I started, I only have the s390x rpms installed, as that's
all that's available in the repo. The guides that I've found on 32 bit
compatibility (mostly for
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Michael MacIsaac
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:34 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Centos 4.4 S390x - what's the proper way to install the
> 32 bit libstdc++ rpm?
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTE
m?
>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:55 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Kelly F.
> Hickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got an LPAR running Centos 4.4 s390x and I'm trying to install
> a
> > product that needs
ge does
exist in the repository (I'm using the default yum configuration).
What's the "proper" way to deal with this? I could grab the rpms I need
from an S390 ISO image, but I'm not sure that's the right thing to do.
So, I thought I ask before I fry this LPAR
Brad,
I looked in there and didn't like what I saw, talked to one orf
the guys that configured the hardware, he said to try a different OSA
that wasn't shared with Z/os, with addrs E200-E202, and that worked!
Thanks everyone!!
--
Kelly F. Hickel
Senior Software Architect
Thu, Apr 5, 2007 at 8:40 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Kelly F.
> Hickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -snip-
> > I've tried Mark, Rich and Brad's suggestions as best I can figure
> out
> > (thanks guys), but I still get pretty muc
> Enter the bus ID and the device number of your CCW devices.
> CTC/ESCON and LCS need two subchannels:
> (e.g. "0.0.0600,0.0.0601" will configure the CTC or ESCON interface
> with the subchannels 0x600 and 0x601)
> QETH needs three subchannels p.e. 0.0.0300,0.0.0301,0.0.0302
>
> --> 0.0.0e38,0.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark
> Post
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:45 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: any help installing 4.4 for s390 (or s390x) on Z9-BC?
> > Trying to install 4.4 on an lpar on a z9- BC
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brad
> Hinson
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:11 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: any help installing 4.4 for s390 (or s390x) on Z9-BC?
>
> The syntax is very different for CentOS 3.
John Summerfield suggested I ask my question on this list, so here goes...
(He also said to tell you folks that he sent me, but he may have just been
shining me on! ;> )
-Kelly
From: Kelly F. Hickel
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 12:45 PM
To:
29 matches
Mail list logo
