Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-19 Thread Mike Ross
> > > less software costs (one copy per engine vs one copy each for each >boxes) then > > > most other platforms. > > > > software costs lower. How many copies of Red Hat PC boxed set can >you buy > > for a VM license ;) > >How much is a SuSe Linux/390 distribution these days? A German user >told

Re: IBM's special expo at the start of LWE this year

2002-01-20 Thread Mike Ross
I'll have a wander round the expo; 'no budget for the rest this year' :( Mike >Hello from Gregg C Levine normally with Jedi Knight Computers > >Has anyone who has registered to attend the event(s), gotten their >registration materials, as of Friday? I have not. I am looking forward >to Tuesday's

Re: reasons why management don't want linux

2002-01-21 Thread Mike Ross
snip.. >It may not be a question of SuSE-on-S/390 versus no Linux-on-S/390, you >know. Further, it may well be going into a shop that wants to run Linux >on Intel boxes as well. Those shops usually want to use a single >vendor's Linux distributions across their platforms. There is at least >on

Re: What happened to Linuxvm.Org?

2002-01-23 Thread Mike Ross
>What happened to www.linuxvm.org? I just visited the site and found it >was a home page for Velocity Software. > >Is my memory failing and the url is really something else? > >? Nope that's correct and it really is Velocity: Registrant: Velocity Software, Inc. (LINUXVM2-DOM) 196-D Castr

Re: SuSE: Announcement of beta, trial and evaluation versions of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server for S/390 and zSeries

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Ross
snip... >The download location for the latest SuSE Linux Enterprise Server is: >ftp://nozzle.suse.de/pub/suse/s390/sles7-beta/31-bit/cd1/ >ftp://nozzle.suse.de/pub/suse/s390/sles7-beta/31-bit/cd2/ > > >Trial versions are based on the GA version of the current SLES versions. >Under >a special agre

Re: GNU Public Licence

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Ross
snip... >b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, >that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the >Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at >no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. > >It seems quite clear to me that no one can c

Re: GNU Public Licence

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Ross
snip.. >I'm not actually saying anything different. I wish SuSE well in their >efforts to sell maintenance and support - it's a major requirement for >corporate acceptance. Agreed entirely. Remember though, the nice thing about open-source is that, if you're a big/confident enough outfit, you're

Re: SuSE: Announcement of beta, trial and evaluation versions of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server for S/390 and zSeries

2002-02-01 Thread Mike Ross
> > > > Under a special agreement you may use SuSE Linux Enterprise Server > > > > for S/390 and zSeries for sixty (60) calendar days for testing > > > > purposes (e.g. proof of concept). Trial versions must not be used in > > > > production, and they must not be redistributed. > > > > > isn't thi

Re: SuSE: Announcement of beta,trial and evaluation versions of SuSE Linux Enterprise Server for S/390 andzSeries

2002-02-02 Thread Mike Ross
>I just couldn't pass this one up... > > > The download location for the latest SuSE Linux Enterprise Server is: > > ftp://nozzle.suse.de/pub/suse/s390/sles7-beta/31-bit/cd1/ > > ftp://nozzle.suse.de/pub/suse/s390/sles7-beta/31-bit/cd2/ > > >OK, we are going to download this from a FTP site.

Re: SuSE: Announcement of beta,trial and evaluation versions of SuSELinux Enterprise Server for S/390 andzSeries

2002-02-02 Thread Mike Ross
>I did reread the press release. It says "After the 60-days trial period >you >might decide to purchase the full product, or you return the software back >to >SuSE". > >Now, since you downloaded it, to return the software, are you suppose to >upload >it? > >(You must be working too muchno sen

Re: Linux/390 Community Members

2002-02-07 Thread Mike Ross
Mark, Don't know if I qualify as more than a very occasional member of the community, but if you want a pic try my website at http://www.corestore.org/intro.html The least bad pics are to be found on the 'wedding photos' page! Cut paste and edit as you wish. Mike >For some time now, I've bee

Re: Linux/390 Community Members

2002-02-07 Thread Mike Ross
> > http://www.corestore.org/intro.html > >THIS could be PROMISING. >When we all run out of work, we can swipe Mike's >gas turbine to power our surplus 9672s and 3090s and what not. That's my cunning plan... recently got in touch with a guy who's about to give up on restoring a 370/148 as he can

Re: VM for Intel?

2002-02-19 Thread Mike Ross
>But that was my question. Since IBM and VMWare are partnering on this >effort, would IBM have contributed any sort of functionality lifted from >z/VM? If not, why the partnership? Romney has stated that there are going >to be certain conceptual similarities, and I realized that from the >begin

OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-15 Thread Mike Ross
Some amusment over on the Hercules list - the 'Linux on S/390' Redbook, SG244987, originally contained a chapter on running Linux on the Hercules emulator. Not surprising - it's known to be used by quite a few folks inside IBM. As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-15 Thread Mike Ross
> > As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without > > incrementing the version number, contrary to normal IBM > > practice), and *all* > > references to Hercules have been carefully expunged! > > Anyone with a clue what's going on? Suspicious of rewriting history! > >Pure sp

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-15 Thread Mike Ross
> > Some amusment over on the Hercules list - the 'Linux on S/390' Redbook, > > SG244987, originally contained a chapter on running Linux on the >Hercules > > emulator. Not surprising - it's known to be used by quite a few folks >inside > > IBM. > >It was, certainly. Is it still? I've no idea -

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-15 Thread Mike Ross
snip.. >According to Jay's site the product is called: "The Hercules System/370, >ESA/390, and >z/Architecture Emulator". > >That's three IBM trademarks, right there. No, that's the *title* of the *page* Phil! It tells you what the page is about (Hercules) and what that is (it's a System/370, ESA

Re: comp.os.linux.s390

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Ross
There are several news servers that listen on additional ports to get around this very problem - teranews, for one, listens on port 25, and several ports in the 750X range. Mike >My concern is if this list is turned into a newsgroup, I won't be able to >access it from work. I'm not conversant wi

Re: The Fish flame: the final word

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Ross
>From: Phil Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> snip... >Armed with your refusals, I placed Yahoo 'on notice' of both the obscenity >and the libel with >a "Notice and Take Down". I indicated that I had already contacted the >moderators and had met >only with blank refusals - I included the URLs of both of

Missing redbook chapter found!

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Ross
I've done the obvious and posted the 'missing' chapter from the Linux/390 redbook on the web for those who need it. 47Kb, .rtf format. It's at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/files/ Now, I *think* you may need to be a member of the Hercules list to get access to the files area, but t

Re: comp.os.linux.s390

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Ross
>You miss the point. This is not some challenge for the edu-weenies or >script kiddies to surmount. >It is a company policy/rule. Though shalt not ... It doesn't make any >difference how you do it >or why, violating the policy is grounds for dismissal. > >As I said earlier, "I can neither read nor

Re: Missing redbook chapter found!

2002-04-19 Thread Mike Ross
>From: Phil Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've done the obvious and posted the 'missing' chapter from the >Linux/390 > > redbook on the web for those who need it. 47Kb, .rtf format. > > > > It's at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/files/ > >Dangerous. I doubt very much that an entire

Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory... unmasked

2002-12-18 Thread Mike Ross
My first post on this subject didn't make it through moderation... You can get a copy from IBM, on their Taiwanese website (the Redbook IS in English!) - go to: http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/index.d2w/report You'll see it listed about four items up from the bottom. Click on it, a

Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory

2002-12-18 Thread Mike Ross
about that? If I try to access the first URL, it just bounces me to the second one. I may have been too slow. Mark Post -Original Message----- From: Mike Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Yet Another

Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory

2002-12-18 Thread Mike Ross
Fortunately it's still available from IBM Taiwan, who it seems aren't singing from quite the same hymnsheet as the folks in the USA :) http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/check.d2w/report?No=194 See also http://www2.tw.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/techdoc/index.d2w/report Grab it before the

Re: Yet Another IBM Conspiracy Theory... light shed

2002-12-18 Thread Mike Ross
Thanks for the good news Mike! I speak for myself and not for IBM. I should be working on CUPS and Samba printing, but this thread has created an itch I just have to scratch. I'll shed some light on the conspiracy theory, though you won't find a smoking gun :)) In October of this year, both

Re: I got unsubscribed...

2003-01-14 Thread Mike Ross
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:03:19 +0100 Phil Payne said: >Subject: I got unsubscribed... > >People have been unsubscribed before, for reasons that no one ever had the guts to admit. Not on this list. If I do it, I'll admit to it. Generally it is bounces or out of office messages. I've never done any

Re: so correct me if I am wrong

2003-02-20 Thread Mike Ross
so correct me if i am wrong if you want to stay current with Linux (either Suse or RedHat) you are going to have to pay. I can't speak WRT RedHat, but with Suse you have a problem - they don't put the latest distro on their public ftp, you are reliant on 3rd parties if you want to download the l

Re: so correct me if I am wrong

2003-02-20 Thread Mike Ross
> so correct me if i am wrong > if you want to stay current with Linux (either Suse or RedHat) > you are going to have to pay. Yes. That's how they pay their bills. I was under the impression that they pay their bills primarily from the revenue stream they get for *support* - the GPL means they

Re: so correct me if I am wrong

2003-02-21 Thread Mike Ross
I think YAST prevents you from doing so with SuSE, but I'm only going on hearsay. SuSE users are better-placed to suggest, but read the licence. YAST license permits free redistribution, but you can't charge. Maybe just the cost of the media if it's CD rather than FTP? Mike http://www.corestore.o

Re: IFL speed.

2003-03-06 Thread Mike Ross
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:27:30 -0600, Lucius, Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, that's correct. The z900 uses the same processor chip as the z800, but it's clocked faster and better packaged. Think there's a jumper or two we could use on the z8s to overclock 'em? ;-) Unfortunately it's in the mi

Re: WTHOT: cinnamon rolls

2003-03-21 Thread Mike Ross
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:49:54 -0500, Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:21:54PM -0600, Richard Troth wrote: Warning to all: The night Marilyn and I had some stew Dave had made (it was really good!) she went into labor with our first child. Presumably not *every* mem

Re: SLES 8

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:43:56 +0100, Benny Thys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Our customer wants to install SuSE 8 (SLES 8) for S390 (working on a Multiprise 3000), does anyone know where it can be downloaded ? Benny Suse have chosen not to make it available on their FTP site. I think we have a copy so

Re: SLES 8

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:14:05 -0600, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then SuSE doesn't get compensated for their hard work, they stop making money and stop making a distribution. Who wins? This is Linux. Open-source. You can't make a business plan predicated on being able to raise revenue f

Re: SLES 8

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:14:36 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:14, Rich Smrcina wrote: Then SuSE doesn't get compensated for their hard work, they stop making money and stop making a distribution. Who wins? *WHOSE* hard work Well said Alan.. Mike http://

Re: SLES 8

2003-03-26 Thread Mike Ross
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:54:16 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip.. * A major one: the distro is not worth much without the patches. What you download from that server is nice for testing, but it is still not enough for production, because it lacks, say, the latest sendmail patch. S

Application Starterpack 3000?

2003-11-07 Thread Mike Ross
Folks, Not sure how many of those IBM ever actually sold - I've spoken to a couple of hardware brokers who have handled hundreds of Multiprises but never *heard of* an Application Starterpack 3000... anyway, I'm looking for one. If anyone here knows someone who might be getting rid of one, or who