Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
Simple question from a simple person I created a linux machine under VM and created an IPL'able tape per SuSE install instructions. When I issue the IPL I am getting a disabled wait. HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 000A 0068 Can anyone shed some light on the reason? Anyone k

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 2/21/06, David Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I created a linux machine under VM and created an > IPL'able tape per SuSE install instructions. When > I issue the IPL I am getting a disabled wait. > > HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 000A 0068 It could be you have the kern

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 15:48:00 On 2/21/06, David Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I created a linux machine under VM and created an > IPL'able tape per SuSE install instructions. When > I issue the IPL I am getting a disabled

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Peter 1 Oberparleiter
David Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21.02.2006 15:15:54: > HCPGIR450W CP entered; disabled wait PSW 000A > 0068 > > Can anyone shed some light on the reason? Anyone > know where I can find the error messages/codes? The PSW indicates that a program check error condition occured durin

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
IN3 OUT say Done. REWIND 181 exit Original Message From: Peter 1 Oberparleiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 16:23:00 -

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Neale Ferguson
Is the virtual machine you are IPLing SUSE in "MACHINE XA" or did you use a CMS template and maybe have "MACHINE XC" in the directory entry for that user? Neale -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Troyski
EFILE IN2 OUT > say Writing:  left(file3,23) > MOVEFILE IN3 OUT > say Done. > REWIND 181 > exit > > ---- Original Message > > From: Peter 1 Oberparleiter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Cc: > Subject: Re: Initial IPL o

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
When I tried the Virual RDR I used fix 80 and when I did the FTP for a tape IPL I used 1024. I have both versions in my 191 disk and they look correct. Original Message From: Troyski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Dat

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
Thanks Neale, I have it defined as MACH ESA I'll try XA. Original Message From: Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 10:53:00 Is the virtual machine you are IPLing SUSE in &quo

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Troyski
ey look correct. > > Original Message > > From: Troyski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Cc: > Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 > Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 15:55:00 > > When you transferred the initial file

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Neale Ferguson
ESA == XA in this context (I'm not sure there is any difference at all in fact). XC would have spewed as soon as you tried any DAT stuff (or a SIGP to put it into zArchitecture mode too I guess). -Original Message- Thanks Neale, I have it defined as MACH ESA I'll try XA. ---

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
MACH XA, XC and ESA same results. Original Message From: Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 10:53:00 Is the virtual machine you are IPLing SUSE in "MACHINE XA" or d

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread Peter 1 Oberparleiter
David Heilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21.02.2006 16:45:59: > This is part of the SuSE instructions and I > followed them to the letter. These instructions look ok. I think providing the console output during a failed IPL with the TRACE instruction suggested by Rob van der Heij might shed som

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread John Schnitzler Jr
>Tried the virtual RDR first and it also failed. I >double checked to make sure I was using the >correct files from the CD and everything looks good. In what sequence did you punch the files to the reader? I use the following exec on VM to punch the files to the reader ? /* */ Parse Arg fn ft fm

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
When I try IPL'ing from the reader I'm doing the same as you Image parm initrd all 80 character records. Original Message From: John Schnitzler Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006,

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread John Schnitzler Jr
>When I try IPL'ing from the reader I'm doing the >same as you Image parm initrd all 80 character >records. Dave, What version of sles9 are you using? (GA, sp1, sp2, sp3) (31 or 64 bit) How far into the IPL are you getting before it abends? Looking at the files you are trying to ipl via the re

Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9

2006-02-21 Thread David Heilman
Cc: Subject: Re: Initial IPL of SuSE 9 Date: Tue, February 21, 2006, 17:26:00 >When I try IPL'ing from the reader I'm doing the >same as you Image parm initrd all 80 character >records. Dave, What version of sles9 are you using? (GA, sp1, sp2, sp3) (31 or 64 bit) How fa