Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread James Melin
PROTECTED] IST.EDU Subject Re: Linux Performance Issue 11/16/2004 04:24 PM Please respond to Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Mrohs, Ray
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linux Performance Issue We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system, and are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really have nothing running. I

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Kohrs, Steven
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:24, Tom Duerbusch wrote: But after the product is installed, then bring down KDE! I think a year or so ago, DB2/UDB required a gui screen for the install (just to ask one question). What am I missing here? I run X applications (DB2 installs, GSKit iKeyman,

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 11/17/2004 at 09:21 EST, Mrohs, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only time we saw idle SLES8 instances hog a system is when we brought up our z/VM 4.3 and it's guests under a 4.2 1st level at our DR site. 12 Linux instances pegged the CPU at 100%. We replaced the 1st level CP

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Post, Mark K
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux Performance Issue On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:24, Tom Duerbusch wrote: But after the product is installed, then bring down KDE! I think a year or so ago, DB2/UDB required a gui screen for the install (just to ask one question). What am I missing here? I

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Post, Mark K
you're running now, and it has had lots of changes made to enhance the running of Linux guests. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kaba Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux Performance

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Adam Thornton
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kaba Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux Performance Issue Update on the SuSE SLES 8 performance Issue: KDE was just turned on to configure the various components(DB2, etc), we

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-17 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:43:15 -0500, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing you're missing is that by using that export DISPLAY command, you're not using the SSH tunnel, and losing the value of the encryption that SSH provides. And you might want to look into the client configuration

Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread John Kaba
We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system, and are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really have nothing running. I was told by our Linux guy to give it lots of memory, so I

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread Adam Thornton
On Nov 16, 2004, at 2:58 PM, John Kaba wrote: We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system, and are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really have nothing running. I was told by

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread Jeremy Warren
Setting the kernel.hz_timer = 0 in the /etc/sysctl will probably help at least some but your probably going to have to do a detailed memory analysis to see how much memory is REALLY needed with DB2 in their 1GB might be the real number but my gut feel is thats WAY too large..

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread John Campbell
PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mine.netcc: Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: [LINUX-390] Linux Performance Issue 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED] IST.EDU

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread PatrickOBrien obrien
We are now messing with VM Page Space. I too have see major slowness with my SLES 8 Guest. Our VM guy has increased the Page Space, I'm checking it out now. - Original Message - From: John Kaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linux Performance Issue Date: Tue

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread John Kaba
Update on the SuSE SLES 8 performance Issue: KDE was just turned on to configure the various components(DB2, etc), we are using runlevel 3. I have since turned KDE off, I have reduced the Virtual memory on the Linux guest machine to 384MB, and set timer ticks to 0. I shutdown Linux, logged off

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread Kurt Acker
Subject Re: Linux Performance Issue We are now messing with VM Page Space. I too have see major slowness with my SLES 8 Guest. Our VM guy has increased the Page Space, I'm checking it out now. - Original Message - From: John Kaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linux

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread Tom Duerbusch
KDE? Yep, you can run it, but everytime I bring up KDE, it takes about 40% of our 60 MIP processor. There is very little that you ever need a desktop manager for that can't be done via command line. But it is really nice to have as a fall back to install some product. But after the product is

Re: Linux Performance Issue

2004-11-16 Thread Ihno Krumreich
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:24:23PM -0600, Tom Duerbusch wrote: KDE? Yep, you can run it, but everytime I bring up KDE, it takes about 40% of our 60 MIP processor. There is very little that you ever need a desktop manager for that can't be done via command line. But it is really nice to

Linux performance issue - NFS, 2GB....

2004-05-14 Thread Barton Robinson
I've been working with a few installations with less than stellar performance. Seems like NFS under linux is a culprit. As well as VM and it's 2GB constraints. This site set a new world record at 300,000 diagnoses per second per processor. Look at the first report at the system overhead as file