Calzaretta Henry - hcalza wrote:
John,
- Here is contents of /etc/exports on the system running the NFS server:
/xs2files 192.168.47.72(rw,sync,no_root_squash)
- The lock and portmap daemons appear to be running on the effected
system(s).
- I don't see any .nfs* files in the filesystem.
Just
390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Summerfied
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:21 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS hangs
Calzaretta Henry - hcalza wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have a filesystem which is shared by 4 Linux guests via NFS. We
have
&g
u can see above.
Thanks,
Hank
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Summerfied
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:21 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS hangs
Calzaretta Henry - hcalza wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
Calzaretta Henry - hcalza wrote:
Hello,
We have a filesystem which is shared by 4 Linux guests via NFS. We have
been using this setup for quite some time. Recently we've seen 2 cases
where access to the NFS file on 1 or more of the non-owning guests began
to slow down. A "df" command on the
Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS hangs
On Tuesday, 02/14/2006 at 11:37 EST, Neale Ferguson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Some questions:
> - What other changes have taken place on the VM system?
> - How big
rfkit.
Thanks,
Hank
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Neale Ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:37 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS hangs
Some questions:
- What other changes have taken place on the VM system?
- How bi
On Tuesday, 02/14/2006 at 11:37 EST, Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Some questions:
> - What other changes have taken place on the VM system?
> - How big are the virtual machines?
> - Do other commands on the affected Linux guests respond quickly (what
> about on the NFS server(s))?
>
Some questions:
- What other changes have taken place on the VM system?
- How big are the virtual machines?
- Do other commands on the affected Linux guests respond quickly (what
about on the NFS server(s))?
- How much storage does your VM system have?
- What are the SRM settings for your VM system
Hello,
We have a filesystem which is shared by 4 Linux guests via NFS. We have
been using this setup for quite some time. Recently we've seen 2 cases
where access to the NFS file on 1 or more of the non-owning guests began
to slow down. A "df" command on the effected system would stop before
> -Original Message-
> From: Betsie Spann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: nfs hangs on NetApp NAS device
>
>
> My RH AS 3.0 system frequently hangs with the message "nfs:
> server
Adam Thornton writes:
> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 12:42, McKown, John wrote:
> > If you do not recommend the "soft" option (at least for R/W), what else is
> > possible? If the NFS server "dies" or is unavailable for some reason, does
> > that mean that all the client boxes which use it should die as w
On Mer, 2004-02-25 at 20:03, Adam Thornton wrote:
> I'm not a fan of NFS, although I am given to understand that v3 and v4
> work a little better than v2 did.
v2 NFS is fairly simplistic
v3 adds support for files > 2Gb and support for client side asynchronous
writeback done safely
v4 adds
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 12:42, McKown, John wrote:
> If you do not recommend the "soft" option (at least for R/W), what else is
> possible? If the NFS server "dies" or is unavailable for some reason, does
> that mean that all the client boxes which use it should die as well?
Yes.
If you're mounting
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: nfs hangs on NetApp NAS device
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nfs hang
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nfs hangs on NetApp NAS device
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 12:17, McKown, John wrote:
> > I _think_ you
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 12:17, McKown, John wrote:
> I _think_ you need to do a "soft" NFS mount instead of a "hard" mount.
>
> Try
>
> http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x-087-2-nfs.mountd.html
>
> Look at the "soft" option. The "hard" option is the default.
Well, then you won't have to reboot.
ied that any disclosure, copying, or
distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is
strictly prohibited.
> -Original Message-
> From: Betsie Spann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
My RH AS 3.0 system frequently hangs with the message "nfs: server pafiler not
responding"
It's a NetApp NAS device that is ro nfs mounted by the entire universe here. My Linux
guest frequently waits on it. Then it has to be rebooted. Network restarts hang on
the server also.
I am using NFS
11, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NFS hangs writing to SFS from SAS/Linux390 (moderately
long)
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 21:21, Ted Manos wrote:
-snip-
> I am running 31-bit Linux "2.4.7-SuSE-SMP #1 SMP Wed Oct 17 15:31:03 GMT
> 2001 s390" under z/VM V4.3.0 (PUT 0301
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 21:21, Ted Manos wrote:
> I do not believe that the problem is SFS, or that SFS is hung. SFS
> continues to function perfectly normally when accessed from CMS. I also
> don't *think* that it is the VMNFS server, as that appears to continue to
> function normally for any/all
|
| cc: (bcc: Eddie Chen/SIAC)
|
| Subject: Re: NFS hangs writing to SFS from SAS/Linu
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Ashley Chaloner wrote:
> (Also, a particular annoyance is that processes in uninterruptible
> sleep are counted in the load average so there is a high load average
> without any load on the processor.)
loadaverage counts active processes, and if it's actively waiting on a
dev
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ted Manos wrote:
> (cross-posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
> Hello all (particularly Alan, Romney and crew!),
>
>
> We have been doing testing with a new development version of SAS V9 for
> Linux390 for a couple months now, and had not run into any major
side of things :-)
Ashley Chaloner.
DCS,UoW,UK.
http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/~csuwf/
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ted Manos wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:21:15 -0500
> From: Ted Manos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Try 'mount -o nfsvers=2 '
WBR, Sergey
What was the format of the mount command that you used? (i.e. what options
were specified, just enter mount to display this stuff). If you haven't try
specifying intr and soft as options. This way you should be able to kill
things without a re-IPL. Also what rsize/wsize did you specify? What's the
(cross-posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hello all (particularly Alan, Romney and crew!),
We have been doing testing with a new development version of SAS V9 for
Linux390 for a couple months now, and had not run into any major issues
until just recently. We are near the end of
27 matches
Mail list logo
