-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:20 PM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Newbie question on lvm
>>> On 10/6/2011 at 02:15 PM, "Davis, Scott"
wrote:
> Thanks for
>>> On 10/6/2011 at 02:15 PM, "Davis, Scott"
wrote:
> Thanks for the validation. I did a umount, e2fsck
> and resize2fs. It worked a treat.
Scott,
Was this file system created prior to SLES10 SP2? If so, that might explain
why you couldn't do the online resizing. There were so
@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:24 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Newbie question on lvm
>>> On 10/5/2011 at 08:36 PM, Shane wrote:
> resize2fs has been the supported (online) tool for a _very_ long time.
> If you can convenie
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 23:24:24 -0600 Mark Post wrote:
> It is still needed on SLES10 systems, which is what the OP was
> running.
In which case I apologise for being misleading.
Shane ...
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / ar
>>> On 10/5/2011 at 08:36 PM, Shane wrote:
> resize2fs has been the supported (online) tool for a _very_ long time.
> If you can conveniently get the lv unmounted and feel more comfortable,
> by all means do so, but is unnecessary.
It is still needed on SLES10 systems, which is what the OP was r
resize2fs has been the supported (online) tool for a _very_ long time.
If you can conveniently get the lv unmounted and feel more comfortable,
by all means do so, but is unnecessary.
Backups, thems is necessary - any time you're screwing with your data,
not just on resizing. But I (slightly) digres
: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: FW: Newbie question on lvm
>>> On 10/5/2011 at 05:13 PM, "Davis, Scott" wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am extending my LV. I successfully added my pv's to the vg.
> Next, I extended the lv. Now I need to do something with the
>
: Newbie question on lvm
Typo there ... should be 'lvextend'. Sorry.
-- R; <><
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:26, Richard Troth wrote:
> Hi, Scott, --
>
> I believe you want to enlarge the LV first, the
Typo there ... should be 'lvextend'. Sorry.
-- R; <><
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:26, Richard Troth wrote:
> Hi, Scott, --
>
> I believe you want to enlarge the LV first, then resize the filesystem
> it holds. Rough example ...
I am extending my LV. I successfully added my pv's to the vg.
Next, I extended the lv. Now I need to do something with the
file system. I don't think I want to mkfs, rather ext2online?
I get a message saying "no space left on device", what am I
doing wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
On older versions of Linux, you use ext2online, newer versions use resize2fs.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Davis,
Scott
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:13 PM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [LINUX-390] FW: Newbie
>>> On 10/5/2011 at 05:13 PM, "Davis, Scott" wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am extending my LV. I successfully added my pv's to the vg.
> Next, I extended the lv. Now I need to do something with the
> file system. I don't think I want to mkfs, rather ext2online?
> I get a message saying "no space le
Hello All,
I am extending my LV. I successfully added my pv's to the vg.
Next, I extended the lv. Now I need to do something with the
file system. I don't think I want to mkfs, rather ext2online?
I get a message saying "no space left on device", what am I
doing wrong? Any help would be appreciat
Hi, Scott, --
I believe you want to enlarge the LV first, then resize the filesystem
it holds. Rough example ...
lvexdent /dev/some/thing
ext2online /dev/some/thing
I usually do this offline. (And 'resize2fs', the offline resizer,
demands that I run 'e2fsck -f' first.)
-- R;
Mark wrote:
"Which ever way you go, you'll need to rummage through your system
afterwards, and make sure things are still configured the way you want them.
I've seen cases where "stuff" got changed, and I had to re-do them. Also,
look for "*.rmpnew" files. Those will be new versions of configura
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 2:59 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We are in the midst of installing our first "production" system under SLES10,
> under z/VM on a z/890.
>
> My question is, how do install SP1?
>
> I have a virtual machine that has the
Paul Noble wrote:
>We are in the midst of installing our first "production" system under
SLES10, under z/VM on a z/890.
>My question is, how do install SP1?
>I have a virtual machine that has the repository of all the files
necessary to install both SLES9 and SLES10. I >recently downloaded the is
We are in the midst of installing our first "production" system under SLES10,
under z/VM on a z/890.
My question is, how do install SP1?
I have a virtual machine that has the repository of all the files necessary to
install both SLES9 and SLES10. I recently downloaded the iso image of the DVD
l Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mark Post
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:26 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Linux Newbie question
>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 1:52 PM, in message
> <[EMAIL PRO
t
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:26 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux Newbie question
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 1:52 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Phillips.Val" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, all, we're testing Novell SLES9 SP3 unde
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2007 at 1:52 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Phillips.Val" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, all, we're testing Novell SLES9 SP3 under VM 5.3.
>
> We have a real shortage of disk space in our test system and the guy
> installing the app has run out of space. He wants
LVM would be the way to go if this system continues to grow. But if you
just need a quick and dirty. Add the new disk as a mountpoint within /opt
eg. /opt/IBM
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For LINUX-390 subscri
Did you use LVM to design the system for future expansion? Or, did you just
build a filesystem for /opt on its own 3390, without the benefit of
something like LVM?
The ideal situation for fixed / limited size disks (IMHO) is to use LVM and
create a volume group, for the single mount or for a set o
Hello, all, we're testing Novell SLES9 SP3 under VM 5.3.
We have a real shortage of disk space in our test system and the guy
installing the app has run out of space. He wants to increase the size
of his /opt directory. I can give him another 3390 mod3, but I don't
know how to ADD it to his cu
55905
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice theory and
practice are different."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:00 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subj
--Original Message-
From: Tom Shilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:29 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Newbie Question
We seem to be settling on SuSE, more for support than any other reason. If
we choose SuSE and an application we need will only be su
We seem to be settling on SuSE, more for support than any other reason. If
we choose SuSE and an application we need will only be supported on RedHat,
we will deal with that on a case-by-case basis.
tom
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Toto, I have a feeling we're not in the mainframe world any more.
_
nt to use the same distribution on your mainframe?
Do you need bleeding edge hardware support?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Hyatt
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:53 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Newbie Que
Mike Lovins
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 07:57
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Newbie Question
I cannot point you to any specific document but I am currently running
SuSe Linux on and IFL lpars on a Z800 and it is working very good. I
also understand the Redhat works well also
I cannot point you to any specific document but I am currently running
SuSe Linux on and IFL lpars on a Z800 and it is working very good. I
also understand the Redhat works well also.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/20/05 08:52AM >>>
Greetings All,
I am in the process of doing an exploration for
Greetings All,
I am in the process of doing an exploration for a proof of concept
project on using Linux on a zSeries box (z900). I am trying to locate
information on which flavor of Linux is best suited for various types of
deployments. I have looked in the archives but cannot seem to
Good Morning Listers !
** THANKS ** for your help in getting me started !
Mauri.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http
> If its a modern release (for example Fedora if the PC side can be the
> freebie version) then it should take about two hours (allowing 1.5 hours
> for non 'CD operator' tasks). That bit is if anything easier than
> feeding Windows to a PC nowdays. If you aren't used to Linux then
> post install y
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:14:48AM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
>
> Tao Linux is a Red Hat derivative, and is free, was developed on
> Hercules, and the maintainer considers Hercules to be the primary target
> environment--if it works on real iron, that's a bonus rather than the
> point for hi
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 01:26, Kanter Mauri wrote:
> Good Morning Listers !
>
> For a company with a need to test a a product, I got a request to install a
> mainframe version of RedHat 8 + Redhat 9 + AS 3.0 running under Hercules
> (running either under Windows or Linux for Intel)
>
> 1 - Do they ru
> > mainframe version of RedHat 8 + Redhat 9 + AS 3.0 running
> > under Hercules
> > (running either under Windows or Linux for Intel)
> >
> > 1 - Do they run under Hercules ?
RH 8 and 9 were never released for 390 or zSeries -- RH skipped from 7.2
to AS2.1 (limited availability) and AS3 for the m
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Cox
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 7:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Newbie question - Redhat 8 and 9
>
>
>
> > Install Hercules/390 on RedHat
On Iau, 2004-08-12 at 14:00, McKown, John wrote:
> Install RedHat on the Intel server - 1 work day, assuming no
> interruptions.
If its a modern release (for example Fedora if the PC side can be the
freebie version) then it should take about two hours (allowing 1.5 hours
for non 'CD operator' task
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kanter Mauri
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Newbie question - Redhat 8 and 9
>
>
> Good Morning Listers !
>
> For
On Iau, 2004-08-12 at 07:26, Kanter Mauri wrote:
> For a company with a need to test a a product, I got a request to install a
> mainframe version of RedHat 8 + Redhat 9 + AS 3.0 running under Hercules
> (running either under Windows or Linux for Intel)
Red Hat 8 and 9 were home user products and
Good Morning Listers !
For a company with a need to test a a product, I got a request to install a
mainframe version of RedHat 8 + Redhat 9 + AS 3.0 running under Hercules
(running either under Windows or Linux for Intel)
1 - Do they run under Hercules ?
2 - How do I obtain them ? Any idea about
BM Corporation
"If dogs don't go to heaven, then, when I die, I want to go
where they do." -- Will Rogers
Megh Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/30/2004 14:42
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subje
>Megh Bhatt said:
>
>Hi,
>I'm new to the list. I had a question about porting applications to linux
on
>z series from linux on intel. If the application does not contain any
>architecture specific code, how does one port it?
If the application was written properly, most people's experience has bee
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 13:42, Megh Bhatt wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to the list. I had a question about porting applications to linux on
> z series from linux on intel. If the application does not contain any
> architecture specific code, how does one port it?
Generally by typing "make".
The compiler
Hi,
I'm new to the list. I had a question about porting applications to linux on
z series from linux on intel. If the application does not contain any
architecture specific code, how does one port it? Is it as simple as
compiling it with some flags set to indicate that it is going run on linux
on z
> In the days of SLES7, I was able to create my own selection
> file so that I
> didn't have to do the "install too much, then remove the
> excess" dance. I
> haven't tried it with SLES8, so I don't know if that still
> works or not.
You can still do that, but the SLES8-supplied packages have so
ursday, May 06, 2004 1:56 PM
Subject: RES: Newbie question about PROFILE TCPIP
Nigel,
A year or more ago I had same problem, I installed suse/390 7 under VM/ESA
and I was able to ping from Linux to VM, from workstation to VM, but unable
to ping from linux to workstation and viceversa. The
lf Of Rod
Furey
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie question about minumum installation
> 2.) a minimum selection of
> software packages with SLES8 ( for e.g. a web- or FTP server?)
A quick perusal of the SUSE website shows that
you seem to hav
> 2.) a minimum selection of
> software packages with SLES8 ( for e.g. a web- or FTP server?)
A quick perusal of the SUSE website shows that
you seem to have a choice of Apache, Apache or Apache
in SLES8. Or anything that you decide to try and build and
install yourself which SUSE chose not to.
FT
x27;s filtering all
other traffic.
Thankyou Rich and Carlos
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2004 18:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie question about PROFILE TCPIP
Are you using ROUTED? If not, take out the BSDROUTINGPARMS para
ply. I've just tried adding PROXYARP and it's made no difference
> I'm afraid. Any other ideas?
>
> Nigel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 May 2004 12:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Newbie qu
: Re: Newbie question about PROFILE TCPIP
Thanks for the reply. I've just tried adding PROXYARP and it's made no
difference I'm afraid. Any other ideas?
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2004 12:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
Thanks for the reply. I've just tried adding PROXYARP and it's made no difference I'm
afraid. Any other ideas?
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2004 12:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie question about PROFILE
It looks as if your TCP/IP for VM and Linux are on the same subnet.
Your configuration also seems to be using a CTC to communicate with
Linux. You should add PROXYARP to your ASSORTEDPARMS section.
You may also want to consider implementing the Guest LAN feature. It
will greatly simplify your li
Greetings!
I'm new to this list and I'm just embarking on my first Linux s/390 trial. I'm
attempting to install Suse Linux Enterprise Server 8 as a VM guest within a test lpar.
We're running z/VM 4.3. But I'm having a problem with the VM TCPIP side of things.
I've got the Linux installation ker
Rod wrote:
"If you ask 10 people how you should partition things
then you'll get 11 answers. A lot of it depends on
what you want to do."
Certain vendors always reply, "It depends", ;-)
=
Jim Sibley
RHCT, Implementor of Linux on zSeries
"Computer are useless.They can only give answers." Pab
For a rough and ready figure of how big your filesystems
should be, you can go back to your minimal system and
issue a du against them, e.g. du -h /usr which will
at the end of it all give you a Mb size for what the
system thinks is contained in /usr. You can then back
calculate this to whatever nu
I've been very successful with installing a minimal SLES8 system on 1112
cylinders. This way three can fit on a 3390-3 volume with a very small
amount of left over space. I also have to make sure that I select
additional packages (inetd, vsftpd, THE and some others) either at
install time, or aft
Hi All,
Since some months we are running SuSe Linux Guests under z/VM. For the
initial installations I used IBM's redpaper written by Simon Williams
about building SLES8 systems under z/VM. This initial installation was
not very carefull with DASD space, it took about 2 3390-III volumes. So a
lot
Running Redhat EL3 under z/VM v4.4 and installing Oracle (sorry do not have
the release).
How do I create the raw devices required for Oracle?
Any help will be appreciated.
Robert Hobbs
Operating System Services
(972) 584-5227
--
Thanks to all who provided ideas - looks like MTU is the big winner.
Some quick tests this morning revealed that when I bring up the Linux
guest with an MTU of exactly 576 my missing telnet output shows up where
it should. Both higher and lower values fail, but since I pretty much
ensured a mismat
On Sunday 24 November 2002 11:41 pm, Steve Marak wrote:
> So do you, collectively or individually, have any particular
> recommendation for a fix or experiment to run tomorrow when I get to work
> (short of applying the TCPIP maint)? Drop the MTU size to something below
> 1492 and see what happens?
On Monday, 11/25/2002 at 09:24 ZE8, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't the relationship supposed to me
> MTU <= MRU
> where MTU and MRU are values at the opposite ends of the link?
>
> I can send as much as I like so long as it's no more than you expect to
> receive.
In theory, ye
25.11.2002 06:41:55 Steve Marak wrote:
>So do you, collectively or individually, have any particular
>recommendation for a fix or experiment to run tomorrow when I get to work
>(short of applying the TCPIP maint)? Drop the MTU size to something below
>1492 and see what happens?
Try MTU 576 in Lin
Although it's not really my system yet to change at will, I did build the
new TCPIP parms when the Linux guest CTC links were defined. It's true I
haven't verified that they weren't changed after I sent them to the person
who installed them. But as I wrote them, I specified an MTU size of 1492
on t
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 05:04, you wrote:
> That's assuming the MTU for the VM/TCPIP stack is >= 1492, which may not be
> the case (but most likely is the case). Rather than hit and miss, checking
> what it is and adjusting from there is important.
Isn't the relationship supposed to me
MTU <= MRU
whe
D]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie question)
Can you try lowering the MTU below 1492 and if it's still not working
then no-one can make any more MTU comments.
But from the problems I've seen in the p
MTU is really set to 1492 on the Linux/390 end in the MP3000.
> >
> >Mark Post
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Romney White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:38 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Mis
1492 on the Linux/390 end in the MP3000.
>
>Mark Post
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Romney White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:38 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie question)
>
>
>
/390 end in the MP3000.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Romney White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie question)
Steve:
Sounds like you need to turn on local echo in you
t;> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Marak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:12 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie question)
>>
>...
>> But when we telnet into the Linux guest
k Post
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Marak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie question)
>
...
> But when we telnet into the Linux guest from else
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 05:12:10PM -0600, Steve Marak wrote:
> I'm sure the answer is obvious and that 98% of this list will know it, so
> I'll just ask that you be gentle to yet another old VMer who is now
> beginning to play with Linux. (I did search the archives, as well as a
> bunch of other pl
twork definitions
include that value as well. You can check it with an "ifconfig" command.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Steve Marak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing telnet output (another stupid newbie quest
I'm sure the answer is obvious and that 98% of this list will know it, so
I'll just ask that you be gentle to yet another old VMer who is now
beginning to play with Linux. (I did search the archives, as well as a
bunch of other places, before posting. We found what looked like two other
people with
11:43:09 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: LINUX under VM newbie question
We getting ready to convert from running LINUX in LPAR mode to running
under zVM. In researchi
We getting ready to convert from running LINUX in LPAR mode to running
under zVM. In researching this conversion, I have an unanswered question;
In the "Building Linux Systems under IBM VM" Appendix A. Creating a new
disk on Linux/390 gives an example of a parmfile and changes needed to add
a min
this whole process and therefore the DASD=nnn in parmfile will
not need to change.
Does this make sense?
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: VM Newbie Question -
In a message dated 1/24/2002 9:27:29 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I just tested OFFLINDR and it works great! No changes necessary.I
> restored the backup to another device (same type) and restarted the Linux
> guest.Since guests use volser to find a mdisk and n
Well, if you are on the same processor:
1. Create a userid in User Direct that mimics the hardware the LPAR was
using.
2. Attach/dedicate the hardware to that user.
3. Logon the user and IPL
No need to backup/restore. You can go back to LPAR just as easy.
However, once you are under VM, you
volser of the restored volume.
Rob
--- Original Message -
From: "Dave Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: VM Newbie Question - Cloning an LPAR Linux system to a VM Guest
image
> Have a question f
Have a question for the VM gurus out there...
If I take a backup (using OFFLINDR util) of a
S/390 Linux system (that was installed in an LPAR)
and restore it to a VM Guest image (emulated 3390)
will I have to make any changes to this system,
or will it run as is under VM ?
NOTE: This assumes th
Hello,
Look in httpd.conf, and if you find the following directive, that could
be the trick !
#
# Enable server side includes (SSI) for the index.html pages, as some of
the content
# is created dynamically. Of course this should be disabled when setting
up a productive
# server.
Options
ettings in
/etc/httpd/httpd.conf. Certain directories are probably "trusted" while
others are not.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Kittendorf, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apachee Newbie question
On
On SuSE installation of Linux for S/390, I copied index.html to index2.html
in same directory. When I open index.html in a browser (MS IE) it looks
fine. When opening index2.html, some of the
What's breaking?
Thanks,
Craig Kittendorf
Systems Programmer
85 matches
Mail list logo
