I finally completed my quagga .spec file. I had to make additional
adjustments. I created a "quagga-0.96.4-3.s390.rpm". I used rpm to
uninstall zebra and then used my new quagga rpm to install quagga. I then
customized my zebra and ospfd conf files and all seems to be working fine.
This was my
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
file /usr/sbin/zebra from install of quagga-0.96.4-3 conflicts with file
from package zebra-0.93b-83
One of the things your package probably should say is 'Conflicts:
zebra' so that RPM will force you to take zebra out before you install
quagga.
Rob
--
I replaced ucc-snmp with ucdsnmp and replaced initscripts with aaa_base
and rebuilt. As Mark pointed out, this was in the original src.rpm for
Zebra. I ran the "rpm -ihv --test quagga-0.96.4-3.s390.rpm" and it failed
with many conflicts such as the following:
file /usr/sbin/zebra from install o
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
error: failed dependencies:
ucd-snmp is needed by quagga-0.96.4-3
initscripts >= 5.60 is needed by quagga-0.96.4-3
I think this is because your Red Hat spec file specifies pre-required
package names that are used for Red Hat packages, and no
switch, but that's something I prefer to avoid.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quagga Installation Questions
O
OK, I am getting excited now. I just built my first rpm and it looks good,
at least to a Linux newbe like myself. I think I am ready to install it,
but?.
The following command reveals "rpm -ihv --test quagga-0.96.4-3.s390.rpm"
error: failed dependencies:
ucd-snmp is needed by quagga-0
Pepco
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quagga Installation Questions
I am getting all so close, I have completed my .spec file and successfully
tested it. Some last minute questions.
I am ready to do the "rpm ?bb quagga-0.96.4.spec". There was a me
> I am ready to do the "rpm ?bb quagga-0.96.4.spec". There was a method
to
> redirect the output to the terminal and to a file so I can review it.
It
> was a redirection command and for the life of me, I cannot get my
syntax
> correct. Can someone provide me the syntax?
Something like "rpm -bb qua
I am getting all so close, I have completed my .spec file and successfully
tested it. Some last minute questions.
I am ready to do the "rpm ?bb quagga-0.96.4.spec". There was a method to
redirect the output to the terminal and to a file so I can review it. It
was a redirection command and for t
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Quagga Installation Questions
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 10:28, Post, Mark K wrote:
> > Adam,
> >
> > Except I don't think that SUSE is the one introducing the tetex
requirement.
> > The .spec file did come from s
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 18:37, Adam Thornton wrote:
> Fair enough. Then it's why I dislike Red Hat *too*.
>
> Hey, I just want a system that doesn't think it has to install X, TeX,
> and audio libraries to, say, handle e-mail.
And since some of the packages are named differently, the build
require
> I am seeing a build requirement for package tetex. This is not part
> of the SuSe SLES8 distribution. I have been unable to determine if
> tetex is really necessary or not. Should I install tetex as well?
> Any ideas and opinions are welcomed. Thanks.
There are te... and ...tex type packages ava
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 10:28, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Except I don't think that SUSE is the one introducing the tetex requirement.
> The .spec file did come from someone building it on a Red Hat system of some
> kind (most likely Intel).
Fair enough. Then it's why I dislike Red Hat *too*.
Adam
Thornton
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quagga Installation Questions
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 09:48, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
> I have downloaded Quagga 96.4. In the tarball directory I found the
> following under subdirectory redhat
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 09:48, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
> I have downloaded Quagga 96.4. In the tarball directory I found the
> following under subdirectory redhat containing quagga-0.96.4.spec. I used
> this as a template to create a spec for SuSE SLES8. I am seeing a build
> requireme
I have downloaded Quagga 96.4. In the tarball directory I found the
following under subdirectory redhat containing quagga-0.96.4.spec. I used
this as a template to create a spec for SuSE SLES8. I am seeing a build
requirement for package tetex. This is not part of the SuSe SLES8
distribution. I hav
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
I did not see any Quagga source for SuSE SLES8. Can I use the source RPM
for the Fedora distribution and if so, what if anything do I need to
change?
You mention the i386 version and build my s390.rpm package. What do I need
to change in the i386 package?
Id
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 10:15, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
> I am currently running SuSE Linux SLES8 SP03 in a Linux LPAR. I am
> currently running Zebra that was package with SuSE Linux and wish to
> upgrade or replace it with the latest release of Quagga. SuSE does not
> have a Quagga RP
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Quagga Installation Questions
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
>Is their a preferred site for obtaining the latest release of Quagga?
>
>Should I download the source tarball and simply compile it using
>c
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
Is their a preferred site for obtaining the latest release of Quagga?
Should I download the source tarball and simply compile it using
configure, make, and make install?
You could, but you will be on your own. You also have to install a
compiler and all ot
I am currently running SuSE Linux SLES8 SP03 in a Linux LPAR. I am
currently running Zebra that was package with SuSE Linux and wish to
upgrade or replace it with the latest release of Quagga. SuSE does not
have a Quagga RPM or SRPM. I am a newbe and have the following questions:
Is their a prefer
21 matches
Mail list logo
