Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 11:10 AST, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HOME > xxx.yyy.1.101 HIPER50 Make sure you are using chpid 50 on Linux. 1. CP Q V xxx (where xxx is the vdev of the HiperSocket). Note the SUBCHANNEL number. 2. CP D SCHIB nnn (where nnn is the subchannel number) 3.

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Kim Goldenberg
Alan Altmark wrote: On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 11:10 AST, Kim Goldenberg You need to display the routing table on z/OS. Since you're not [shouldn't be] running OSPF or RIP on the HiperSocket there will be an INTERFACE statement in omproute's configuration. If there isn't, then it is defaulting a

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread David Boyes
> > What are the IP addresses and subnet masks on the z/OS HiperSocket > interfaces? > ; *** > ; HIPERSOCKET CHIPID 50 > ; *** > DEVICE IUTIQD50 MPCIPA > LINK HIPER50 IPAQIDIO IUTIQD50 > HOME >zzz.yyy.72.82 OSA2

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Kim Goldenberg
Mark Post wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:00:02 inet addr:xxx.yyy.40.21 Bcast:xxx.yyy.40.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr:

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:17 AST, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xxx.yyy.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 hsi0 I haven't been following this in detail, but I see two possibilities: 1. The OTHER system is configured INcorrectly. Remember that it is a two-way stree

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Kim Goldenberg
David Boyes wrote: ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:00:02 inet addr:xxx.yyy.40.21 Bcast:xxx.yyy.40.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 hsi0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet addr:xxx.yyy.1.103 Bcast:xxx.yyy.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 OK,

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-09 Thread Kim Goldenberg
David Boyes wrote: All the basics look good. Thanks. Are you explicitly specifying the IP address of the other host (xxx.yyy.1.zzz)? Specifying it where? in the ping? then yes. If you're using the name, then that probably maps to the .40 address (unless you're really good, and gave the .1.z

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-06 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- > ifconfig > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:00:02 > inet addr:xxx.yyy.40.21 Bcast:xxx.yyy.40.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::200

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum Revisited

2007-07-06 Thread David Boyes
> > ifconfig > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:00:02 > inet addr:xxx.yyy.40.21 Bcast:xxx.yyy.40.255 > Mask:255.255.255.0 > > hsi0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 > inet addr:xxx.yyy.1.103 Bcast:xxx.yyy.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 OK, adapte

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-07-02 Thread Kim Goldenberg
Mark Post wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 3:43 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got to the Hipersockets, that is. -snip- z/OS -- OSA -- network -- OSA -- Linux (on vswitch) Wan

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-07-02 Thread David Kreuter
: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Kim Goldenberg Sent: Mon 7/2/2007 12:13 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets Conundrum David Kreuter wrote: > also check that the MTU sizes match. > David > Hi Dave - First thing I checked. -- Kim Goldenberg Systems Programmer I State of

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-07-02 Thread Kim Goldenberg
David Kreuter wrote: also check that the MTU sizes match. David Hi Dave - First thing I checked. -- Kim Goldenberg Systems Programmer I State of NJ - OIT 609-777-3722 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For LINUX-390 subsc

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-07-02 Thread Kim Goldenberg
Rich Smrcina wrote: So are your OSA devices and Hipersocket devices all on the same network? In other words do they all have a 172.20.1.x address with a netmask of 255.255.255.0? No, Hipersockets on 172.20.1/24 and OSAs on 172.20.40/24 via vswitch. Kim -- Kim Goldenberg Systems Programmer I

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-06-30 Thread Phil Tully
What does your routing table look like? Kim Goldenberg wrote: We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got to the Hipersockets, that is. We are trying to talk to two z/OS LPARs, one development and one production. in our IFL LPAR, z/VM 5.2 RSU 0701 and SLES9x SP3. POC

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 3:43 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got > to the Hipersockets, that is. -snip- > z/OS -- OSA -- network -- OSA -- Linux (on vswitch) > > Wanted: > > z/

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-06-30 Thread David Kreuter
also check that the MTU sizes match. David -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rich Smrcina Sent: Fri 6/29/2007 11:51 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Hipersockets Conundrum So are your OSA devices and Hipersocket devices all on the same network? In

Re: Hipersockets Conundrum

2007-06-29 Thread Rich Smrcina
So are your OSA devices and Hipersocket devices all on the same network? In other words do they all have a 172.20.1.x address with a netmask of 255.255.255.0? Kim Goldenberg wrote: We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got to the Hipersockets, that is. We are tryin