I'm running Suse Linux under Z/OS on an MP3000 system. We have Tomcat V.4
running a custom servlet and performance is pretty bad. We're running
against a custom servlet that uses CORBA to fetch data from our application
on Z/OS, but the OS390 Linux seems to be pretty CPU-intensive.
> I'm running Suse Linux under Z/OS on an MP3000 system. We have
> Tomcat V.4 running a custom servlet and performance is pretty bad.
> We're running against a custom servlet that uses CORBA to fetch data
> from our application on Z/OS, but the OS390 Linux seems to be pre
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with a few concurrent jobs and the 6 Unix CPU's were
pegged at 100% for 10+ hours (1.2 GHz CPU's) under AIX.
We also have Linux SuSE under zVM with Ora
Hello group. We are using Mainline Systems for SuSE linux support. While
their support is good, it's also expensive. Can you give me some of your
support providers to compare? Thanks.
Lea Stahr
Linux/Unix Team
630-753-5445
[EMAIL PROT
At this time I am trying to provide management with the various components
of a Linux system in order to justify the replacement of a half-dozen file
servers and print servers with Linux/Samba configuration.
I understand that the OS is basically free, and that there is a cost for
license support f
My attempt to install PHP4 in Suse S390 linux had problems. The
configuration log complained about the -R option of he C compiler and many
other errors. Apache ver 1 was installed and working.
If anyone has had sucsess, what else needs to be done in addition to the
standard PHP4/Linux install pro
im
Elliott
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suse Linux
> I'm running Suse Linux under Z/OS on an MP3000 system. We have
> Tomcat V.4 running a custom servlet and performance is pretty bad.
> We're running against a custom servlet that u
Forwarded message:
> From: Steve Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sorry to confuse you. I'm running under VM, of course. As far as the size
> of the machine, why is that relevant? I have an MP3000 H70, which is still
> small until you compare to Intel or Mac. Then its big at about 115 MIPS.
> U
On Monday 14 January 2002 10:35 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>a) An MP3000-H70 is, IIRC, a box like the P/390 in that OS|2
> is running to handle much of the I/O. Yes, it's bigger
> than a PC and it's CP's are NOT those single-board s/390
> CMOS CPUs; But it still
> CMOS CPUs; But it still won't win many prizes.
I'd be more than happy to take it if you don't like yours... ;-)
> You really need to keep track of VM's own performance monitors.
> Not being a VM/CMS maven, I'm more that a little innocent when
> it comes to perf
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob
van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suse Linux
> CMOS CPUs; But it still won't win many prizes.
I'd be more than happy to t
TED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suse Linux
-snip-
The MTU is set to 1492. Linux and z/OS have their own device. There is
vCTC between MVS and Linux.
ECTED]
Subject: Re: Suse Linux
I would change the MTU to something more like 32K, or higher. There's no
reason to throttle yourself like this if the network traffic between these
two systems doesn't get forwarded on to somewhere else.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Steve Guthrie
> Ah, but it does. It goes out through a secure VPN link and allows Internet
> access to the mainframe. That's the whole idea.
How about adding an extra pair of CTC's that you run with a large MTU
and separate the two connections? Would that make sense?
Rob
ubject: Re: Suse Linux
> Ah, but it does. It goes out through a secure VPN link and allows
Internet
> access to the mainframe. That's the whole idea.
How about adding an extra pair of CTC's that you run with a large MTU
and separate the two connections? Would that make sense?
Rob
I have a simple question. If I build an application on Suse on s/390, will
it run on IBM's z/Linux? It's all Posix code.
Thanks,
Paul
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.m
I got the SUSE Linux 10 SP1 installed under VM on our Z9. The basic
system seems to be working well. I am having some problems, however,
installing some web based email servers. Both of them make use of the
ioncube loader which comes included with the programs, atmail and
webmail. Both behave the
21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with a few concurrent jobs and the 6 Unix CPU's were
pegged at 100% f
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with
:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/21/06, Fargusson.Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
> to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chips are generally
> fas
On 6/21/06, Yu Safin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am talking throughput here, not speed.
What would be the difference if your test fully saturates the 6 CPU's
? That would suggest the test is limited by the processing capacity
right now. Less and/or slower CPUs will make it slower. If that's
: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:50 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/21/06, Fargusson.Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chi
on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:29 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Benchmark
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benc
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather see a benchmark involving Oracle on the Z and the Java app on
the {pSeries,iSeries,Sun} and if you can find a decent Opteron box, that
too.
That would make sense.
And if it has to be all on zSeries, we learned that it does help
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 08:44
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather see a
userscreens and this for a couple of projects...
Regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 08:44
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, John Summerfi
Hmm - might be a fair fight then...
What is the disk subsystem on the current AIX box like?
How many / what kind of channels to what storage box for the Z?
If youre still using ESCON to RAMAC... well...
--
Jay Brenneman
--
Fo
39 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
On 6/22/06, Frank Schwede, LSY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My 2 cents:
>
> Take 3-4 IFLs and put this Oracle on it. Enough for 98% of the coming
> load I think...
> Take 2-3 OpteronBoxes for the Java in fron
At the last site I worked, we took our largest Oracle application and moved
it to a Linux quest running SLES7. We installed Oracle-9i, it had just
come out. The developers, users reported better response time and reports
ran faster than on a SUN-280R. Performance was even better than the old
On 6/22/06, Lawrence R Schiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the last site I worked, we took our largest Oracle application and moved
it to a Linux quest running SLES7. We installed Oracle-9i, it had just
come out. The developers, users reported better response time and reports
ran faster than
Subject
Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
06/22/2006 02:43
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
On 6/22/06, John Summerfield &l
MAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: SuSE Linux Benchmark
06/22/2006 02:43
AM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IS
On 6/29/06, Doug Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to know if anyone has run lmbench on zSeries?
It looks to be platform agnostic using no platform specific code and is
compiled with the native GCC compiler on the platform being tested.
I do believe the kernel team in Boeblingen
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SuSE Linux Support
Hello group. We are using Mainline Systems for SuSE linux support. While
their support is good, it's also expensive. Can you give me some of your
support providers to compare? Thanks.
Lea Stahr
Linux/Unix Team
630-753-5445
[EMAIL PROT
gt;
> Mark Post
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stahr, Lea
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:18 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: SuSE Linux Support
>
> Hello group. We are using Ma
Is there a freely available (without support) version of SUSE Linux for
390? My company would like to evaluate it and then decide whether we
want to run a supported production Linux image.
Thanks,
Chuck Kreiter
Lead Systems Programmer
State Auto Insurance
* This message was scanned by State
Hi Doug,
As you said, Samba will do file/print serving just fine.
Here's a who's-doing-what list from IBM that will give you a taste of
other software that's available for various things:
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/solutions/s390da/linuxproduct.html
As to backups, you can use D
:
Sent by: LinuxSubject: SuSE Linux - TOC
on 390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARIST.EDU>
01/27/03 04:53
PM
Please respond
to L
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Doug Clark wrote:
> At this time I am trying to provide management with the various components
> of a Linux system in order to justify the replacement of a half-dozen file
> servers and print servers with Linux/Samba configuration.
>
> I understand that the OS is basically fre
ally be used as the base level for
later incremental backups.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: paultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TOC
Hi Doug,
As you said, Samba will do file/print serving just fi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Scott Chapman wrote:
> you can either do full-volume dumps using your existing OS/390
> infrastructure (assuming you have one) or file-level backups from within
> Linux, or possibly a combination thereof. Full-volume dumps really only
> work for static volumes. File-level ba
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Keep in mind that those DF/DSS dumps will be at a "partition" level, and not
> a file level. So, they would be more appropriate for a DRA recovery than
> anything. Since there's no integration between that tool, and what goes on
> "inside" the Linux/390
tate where
your root file system (and as many others as possible) is mounted read-only,
that will certainly help things.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TO
ited.
>
> Mark Post
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TOC
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
>
> > Keep
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:53:52AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Take a look at rsync for backups. There are scripts around that allow
> you to maintain more-or-less any number of full backups on disk for
> instant recovery.
One such solution is rdiff-backup (packaged in Debian).
Description:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:58, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:53:52AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Take a look at rsync for backups. There are scripts around that allow
> > you to maintain more-or-less any number of full backups on disk for
> > instant recovery.
>
> One such solution is
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:56:44PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:58, you wrote:
> > [rdiff-backup]
>
> The rsync solutions differ in that you could offer them as Windows shares via
> Samba, and users could peruse directories and files as they were at the time
> of the bac
Thanks! That does look very helpful. And easier to understand than
Amanda!
Scott Chapman
John Summerfield
cc:
Sent by: Linux on 390Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TOC
Port
On Monday 27 January 2003 17:31, Scott Chapman wrote:
Performance needs to be tracked from VM's perspective, and maybe
from Linux's. Therefore some sort of VM monitor like RTM (not
necessarily a recommendation!) or Velocity Software's product is
probably required. I believe Candle also has s
ummerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TOC
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> _Do_ backup Linux with non-Linux tools while it's if you want a real DRA
I can't guess what the missing wor
m: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Joe
> Poole
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSE Linux - TOC
>
>
> On Monday 27 January 2003 17:31, Scott Chapman wrote:
>
> Performance needs to be tracked
One question that I currently have is how we interpret the "TOP" command in Linux when
running Linux on the Mainframe on an Lpar. E.g. If we allocate 1GB of memory to that
lpar, the TOP command show that memory allocated is 1GB and memory used is very close
to 1GB. There is only a few users logg
to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: PHP4 Suse Linux
My attempt to install PHP4 in Suse S390 linux had problems. The
configuration log complained about the -R option of he C compiler and many
other errors. Apache ver 1 was installed and
] Behalf Of
Benjamin White
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PHP4 Suse Linux
My attempt to install PHP4 in Suse S390 linux had problems. The
configuration log complained about the -R option of he C compiler and many
other errors. Apache ver 1 was installed and
I downloaded the PHP source package from PHP.net and followed their
configure and make instructions.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: PHP4 Suse Linux
> Just h
I saw this on Slashdot today:
"According to the Wall Street Journal, VMware is attempting to acquire Novell's
SUSE Linux operating system business. This move would give VMware a full stack
of enterprise
software<http://blogs.gartner.com/chris-wolf/2010/09/16/vmware-novell-sus
There is no IBM Linux for System z (or any other platform for that
matter). Commercially, there is either Novell's SUSE Linux (SUSE Linux
Enterprise) or RedHat (Redhat Enterprise Linux).
Paul Dembry wrote:
I have a simple question. If I build an application on Suse on s/390,
will
it r
There is no IBM Linux for System z (or any other platform for that
matter). Commercially, there is either Novell's SUSE Linux (SUSE Linux
Enterprise) or RedHat (Redhat Enterprise Linux).
Perfect, thanks.
Paul
--
For LINU
r any other platform for that
> > matter). Commercially, there is either Novell's SUSE Linux (SUSE Linux
> > Enterprise) or RedHat (Redhat Enterprise Linux).
> Perfect, thanks.
> Paul
--
John McKown
Maranatha! <><
ork the first time. I debugged it on
> Linux/Intel and simply ftp'ed the jar file to the other systems and it
> did run correctly.
>
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 11:11 -0800, Paul Dembry wrote:
> > > There is no IBM Linux for System z (or any other platform for that
> >
>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 4:16 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got the SUSE Linux 10 SP1 installed under VM on our Z9. The basic
> system seems to be working well. I am having some problems, however,
> installing some we
What email applications have a ZLinux build? I am having
trouble finding one. Any help you can provide would be
great.
Thanks
Joseph Locascio
- Original Message Follows -
From: Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux application issue
Dat
> What email applications have a ZLinux build? I am having
> trouble finding one. Any help you can provide would be
> great.
User interface or MTA? All the major MTAs do (exim, postfix, sendmail),
and a vast majority of the modern text-mode user interfaces (pine, mutt,
elm) do.
-
>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 2:50 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Locascio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What email applications have a ZLinux build? I am having
> trouble finding one. Any help you can provide would be
> great.
Did you see my reply of yesterday?
The most common MTA is
I'm attempting to install SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (64 bit) for IBM
zSeries on an LPAR. I've assigned 512MB to the partition along with a 3390
mod3 as a swap partition. I'm trying to install from an FTP server on which
I've set up an installroot directory with core9 a
We got a 6 mos trial version from them back about year or so. If they have
one of those still available wouldn't that do it?
At 02:51 PM 10/19/2005, you wrote:
Is there a freely available (without support) version of SUSE Linux for
390? My company would like to evaluate it and then d
You need to contact Novell. They have several options.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreiter, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:52 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: SUSE Linux for 390
>
> Is there a freely avail
: SUSE Linux for 390
You need to contact Novell. They have several options.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Kreiter, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:52 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: SUSE Linux for 390
>
> Is the
lable wouldn't that do it?
At 02:51 PM 10/19/2005, you wrote:
Is there a freely available (without support) version of SUSE Linux for
390? My company would like to evaluate it and then decide whether we
want to run a supported production Linux image.
Thanks,
Chuck Kreiter
Lead Systems
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
You can download the code right from the SuSE web site. I don't have a
URL handy for the correct page, but navigate around through the
downloads area, it will be there.
Brian France wrote:
> We got a 6 mos trial version from them back about year o
> Is there a freely available (without support) version of SUSE Linux for
> 390? My company would like to evaluate it and then decide whether we
> want to run a supported production Linux image.
There is. Start at:
http://www.novell.com/products/linuxenterpriseserver/eval.html
If you
Exactly what I was going to send you, in case you couldn't find it. :)
Kreiter, Chuck wrote:
Thanks. I think I finally found a 30 day trial (with support) at
http://www.novell.com/products/linuxenterpriseserver/eval.html
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Main: (262)392-2026
Cell: (414)491-60
On 10/19/05, Kreiter, Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a freely available (without support) version of SUSE Linux for
> 390? My company would like to evaluate it and then decide whether we
> want to run a supported production Linux image.
>
> Thanks,
>
> C
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
Thanks. I think I finally found a 30 day trial (with support) at
http://www.novell.com/products/linuxenterpriseserver/eval.html
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
> I actually don't think there is any software checking.
> We bought support during the period and we never had
> to change anything from the original install.
What ends is your ability to pull maintenance from portal.
~ Daniel
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Daniel Jarboe wrote:
> > I actually don't think there is any software checking.
> > We bought support during the period and we never had
> > to change anything from the original install.
>
> What ends is your ability to pull maintenance from portal.
Makes a decent case for De
world. Another reason why PHBs stink, but unfortunately
they're a fact of life.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
shogunx
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 1:26 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
-snip
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> shogunx
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 1:26 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
>
>
> -snip-
>
> Makes a decent case for Debian s/390 and good old
>
> apt-get update && apt-get upgrade.
>
>
And what does any of that have to do with what I said?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
shogunx
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:02 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Post
005 4:02 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Post, Mark K wrote:
>
> > If and only if ISV certifications are not an issue, and they usually
> > are. Plus, while I know the gang at SNA does a good job of providing
Uhhh, yeah. Thanks for sharing.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
shogunx
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:44 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SUSE Linux for 390
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Post, Mark K wrote:
>
Where can I download the tape version of suse..
The image,initrd that I can put on tape and then
Ipl from???
Ralph
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mes
How much memory is cached? On the zSeries that is essentially 'extra'
memory that is overallocated. What is this LPAR intended to do?
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 12:58, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> One question that I currently have is how we interpret the "TOP" command in Linux
> when running Linux on t
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 12:58, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> One question that I currently have is how we interpret the "TOP" command in Linux
> when running Linux on the Mainframe on an Lpar. E.g. If we allocate 1GB of memory to
> that lpar, the TOP command show that memory allocated is 1GB and memory
> One question that I currently have is how we interpret the
> "TOP" command in Linux when running Linux on the Mainframe on
> an Lpar. E.g. If we allocate 1GB of memory to that lpar, the
> TOP command show that memory allocated is 1GB and memory used
> is very close to 1GB. There is only a few use
t; Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSe Linux 8 - LPAR
>
> How much memory is cached? On the zSeries that is essentially 'extra'
> memory that is overallocated. What is this LPAR intended to do?
>
> On Thu, 2004-08-1
Linux on 390 Port [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Boyes
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSe Linux 8 - LPAR
>
> > One question that I currently have is how we interpret the
> > "TOP" command in Linux wh
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:46:17AM +0200, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> The lpar is intended to run a java based timesheet application using postgrel as its
> database. The following is the output from "FREE"
>
> >linux141:/ # free
> total used free sharedbuffers ca
On Aug 12, 2004, at 6:46 PM, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
The lpar is intended to run a java based timesheet application using
postgrel as its database. The following is the output from "FREE"
linux141:/ # free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:773612 7
Yes the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Adam Thornton
Sent: Fri 8/13/2004 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: SuSe Linux 8 - LPAR
Moloko Monyepao wrote:
Yes the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
So without users this is what you need. Measure again when you have a
few users, and if you cannot be there all the time run sar or other
tools to capture the utilisation of the system over time. You can not
the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Adam Thornton
> Sent: Fri 8/13/2004 6:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject:
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 07:11, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> Yes the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
Well, right now you have a whole lot of resources on the LPAR that are
not being used. Get some usage pictures when the application is in
heavy use, and that will tell you whe
SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton
> Sent: 13 August 2004 04:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSe Linux 8 - LPAR
>
> On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 07:11, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> > Yes the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
&g
04 04:31
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: SuSe Linux 8 - LPAR
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 07:11, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> > > Yes the application is running but the no users are using it as yet
> >
> > Well, right now you have a whole lot
I definetely will
Moloko Monyepao
OS390/L390 System Programmer
arivia.kom
Tel : +27 11 203 6210
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
> Sent: 16 August 2004 03:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SuSe
shop are very interested in helping making sure Linux/390 is a
success. I don't think they're going to view things like this as being a
"bother."
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 9:35 AM
To
Cross-posted to Linux-390, IBMVM, and IBM-Main
All,
SUSE today announced the general availability of SUSE Linux Enterprise 12.
SUSE also introduces an updated customer portal, SUSE Customer Center, to make
it easier for customers to manage their subscriptions, access patches and
updates, and
Hello All,
Has there been any occurrences of CP disabled wait states during
installation of Suse 11 sp3 Linux in a z Lpar environment?
Just thought I would see if anyone on here has run into a similar
situation.
Thanks,
Steve
-
et Journal,
VMware is attempting to acquire Novell's SUSE Linux operating system
business. This move would give VMware a full stack of enterprise
software<http://blogs.gartner.com/chris-wolf/2010/09/16/vmware-novell-suse-acquisition-rumors-why-it-makes-sense/>
and allow it to establish i
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
