Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #35 Sat, 16 Jun 01 04:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: So how many applications can Windows run on the IA-64? (Dave Martel)
Re: Why homosexuals are no threat to heterosexuals (jet)
Re: Linux inheriting DLL Hell (Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann?=)
Re
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #33Mon, 2 Apr 01 17:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Has Linux anything to offer ? (GreyCloud)
Re: Richard Stallman what a tosser, and lies about fre
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #32 Sun, 18 Feb 01 14:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: Another Linux "Oopsie"! (Pete Goodwin)
Re: SSH vulnerabilities - still waiting [ was Interesting article ] (Markus Friedl)
StaticIP enough for server settup? ("Sam")
Re:
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #31Sat, 6 Jan 01 04:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Why NT? (Shane Phelps)
Linux 2.4 Major Advance ("2 + 2")
Re: Why NT? (Shane Phelps)
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: RPM Hell (Donovan Rebbechi)
Re: RPM Hel
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #30 Sat, 18 Nov 00 03:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows SUX (Darin Johnson)
Re: I have had it up to *here* with Linux ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Of course, there is a down side... (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re: OS stability (The Ghost In T
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #29 Sun, 24 Sep 00 16:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (STATIC66)
Insight ("Martigan")
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (STATIC66)
Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #28Mon, 7 Aug 00 20:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: one of Lenin's Useful Idiots denies reality ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Will Linux Dominate the Desktop Future?
