Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2001-05-09 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #34 Thu, 10 May 01 00:13:04 EDT Contents: Re: The long slow slide to Microsoft.NOT ("Tom Wilson") Attacked! BTWorm! (Charlie Ebert) Re: MS server appliance; 7 key benefits over Linux ("mmnnoo") Re: bank switches from usi

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2001-04-05 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #33Thu, 5 Apr 01 04:13:03 EDT Contents: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (silverback) SSE == Corporate Bigot... (was Re: Microsoft should be feared and despised) ("Stephen S. Edwards II") Re:

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2001-02-21 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #32 Wed, 21 Feb 01 15:13:05 EST Contents: Re: Opsss there goes another one. ("dev null") Re: Who said LinZealots know contractions? ("dev null") Re: Opsss there goes another one. ("Masha Ku'Inanna")

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2001-01-10 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #31 Wed, 10 Jan 01 23:13:02 EST Contents: Re: KDE Hell (Craig Kelley) Re: you dumb. and lazy. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Linux is crude and inconsistant. (Charlie Ebert) Re: you dumb. and lazy. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: KDE Hell (Craig Kelley

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-11-23 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #30 Thu, 23 Nov 00 05:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Alessandro Rubini's very interesting article on system calls... ("Aaron R. Kulkis") Re: yo (Jim Broughton) Re: Which distribution do I get? (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: Which distri

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-10-01 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #29Sun, 1 Oct 00 08:13:03 EDT Contents: RE: Can Win9x and NT be considered in the same family? ("Raul Iglesias") Re: Why should anyone prefer Linux to Win2k on the DeskTop (Mike Marion) Re: Windows+Linux+MacOS = BeOS (Mike Ma

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-08-13 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #28 Sun, 13 Aug 00 14:13:06 EDT Contents: happiness (Richard) Re: Be OR Linux (jay jefferson) Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says Linux growth stagnating Re: OS advertising in the movies... (was Re

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-06-28 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #27 Wed, 28 Jun 00 04:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: Why X is better than Terminal Server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Linux, easy to use? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Linux Upgrades (Mandrake 7.0 to 7.1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Do you people really think that

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-05-05 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #26Fri, 5 May 00 15:13:04 EDT Contents: Re: MS App. Spin-Off Company Logo Revealed? (Peter Gavin) Re: This is Bullsh&^%T!!! ("Erik Funkenbusch") Re: This is Bullsh&^%T!!! ("Erik Funkenbusch") Re: This is Bullsh&

Linux-Advocacy Digest #377

2000-02-24 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #377, Volume #25 Thu, 24 Feb 00 13:13:07 EST Contents: Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Craig Brozefsky) Re: Giving up on NT - Win95+QT = No problem! (josco) Re: How does the