Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 16:08 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:14:16 +0200
hermann brumm...@web.de wrote:
guitarix is a simple Linux Rock Guitar amplifier and is designed
to achieve nice thrash/metal/rock/blues guitar sounds.
Guitarix uses the Jack Audio
Robert Keller wrote:
Dear linux-audio developers,
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/
Thanks
for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
source later today, as I need time to get acquainted with their
system, but I have to be
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 02:28 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
There are copyright and GPL notices in every non-trivial source file.
Do I have to add another separate file as well?
You should include the text of the GPL in a file usually called COPYING.
See
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:08:49 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Dear linux-audio developers,
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/
Thanks
for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
source later today, as I need
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 11:22 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:38:23 +0200
hermann brumm...@web.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 16:08 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:14:16 +0200
hermann brumm...@web.de wrote:
guitarix is a
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:08:49 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Dear linux-audio developers,
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/
Thanks
for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will
Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
tools for a defined purpose.
Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
decent way, but the original author was thoroughly civilised
-- Forwarded message --
From: alex stone compos...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond
To: Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arnold Krillearn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
alex stone wrote:
Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
tools for a defined purpose.
Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
decent way, but the original author was
[Damon Chaplin]
I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
If you're using libraries like glib, it would be very kind of you to
supply a
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:06:33PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
If you're using libraries like
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:44 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Damon Chaplin]
caps memory errors in 3 plugins
Thanks for pointing out the make invocation. I haven't used valgrind
before so my cluelessness may show again in what follows.
Anyway, when running this:
$ valgrind --tool=memcheck
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 08:01:36 alex stone wrote:
Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
tools for a defined purpose.
Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
decent
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0400, alex stone wrote:
Neither have I. If Fons sets out to insult me, he does so with the
thoroughly literate grace and style of an insulter with class. I'd
expect nothing less.
I'll keep you high expectations in mind :-). But I don't
remember ever having
Aaaah, something we can BOTH look forward to..
:)
And we thought collaboration was a dying art.!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Fons Adriaensenf...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0400, alex stone wrote:
Neither have I. If Fons sets out to insult
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:02 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
Testing 2589: C* ToneStack - Tone stack emulation (caps.so)
==9992== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==9992==at 0x4129F9F: DSP::ToneStack::start_cycle(float**, int)
(ToneStack.h:103)
==9992==by
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 11:28:39 Robert Keller wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Ok, I see there is a svn version:
|svn co https://impro-visor.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/impro-visor
impro-visor |
I don't see copyright and license files yet though. I think
On Tuesday, 28 July 2009 at 9:19, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
When doing the right thing causes people to almost line up against the one in
the right [...]
People don't oppose you for doing the right thing, but for being a
self-righteous pompous a** who doesn't know when to shut up while doing
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
You should be able to empathize Bob's emotions, if not you are just
(a) liar(s)!
Oops, Raymonds emotions :D ...
okay, Bob's too, but I was talking about Raymond's undertsandable emotions.
Sorry.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 10:39:45 you wrote:
Raymond might be right or wrong.
I remember some mails were people recommended Raymond to be cool, even
if Bob might be wrong. I wonder why people now can't be cool, while they
guess Raymond is wrong!
So, even if Raymond should be wrong, why do
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
So the current status is:
amb OK
blopOK
calfmemory errors in 2 plugins
capsOK
cmt OK
fil OK
ladspa OK
mcp OK
rev OK
swh memory
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Damon
Chaplinda...@karuna.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
Damon - fantastic work. really great stuff.
I'd just like to remind LADSPA (and LV2)
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:54:23 +0100
Damon Chaplin da...@karuna.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
So the current status is:
amb OK
blop OK
calf memory errors in 2
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I should have?
I appreciate your help.
Regards,
Bob
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:33:19AM -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
I've tried to put my best foot forward in posting the sources as I
said I would. I spent all of last evening doing it and got it to a
level where it builds. Could someone other than you please tell me
what I should add to be
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:20:44PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
I'd just like to remind LADSPA (and LV2) plugin authors that use of
init() for module-level initialization has been deprecated for some
time. Plugins should mark the module-level init function with
__attribute__((constructor))
[Paul Davis]
[...]
and the cleanup function formerly known as fini() as
__attribute__((destructor))
failure to do this pretty much guarantees plugin crashes on OS X and
other platforms that dropped init+fini support years ago.
I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime ago
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Tim Goetzet...@quitte.de wrote:
[Paul Davis]
[...]
and the cleanup function formerly known as fini() as
__attribute__((destructor))
failure to do this pretty much guarantees plugin crashes on OS X and
other platforms that dropped init+fini support years ago.
[Paul Davis]
I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime ago but
hopeful users of caps on OSX tell me linking the .so fails:
$ g++ -nostartfiles -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC
-shared -o caps.so [list of object files]
why are you using -nostartfiles? i know
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Tim Goetzet...@quitte.de wrote:
[Paul Davis]
I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime ago but
hopeful users of caps on OSX tell me linking the .so fails:
$ g++ -nostartfiles -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC
-shared -o
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I should have?
I appreciate your help.
In Copying it's say: GPLv2 or at your
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure the majority of these people, as well as a large portion
of the general population, are easily manipulated by narcissists.
I became what psychology is defame as a borderline personality, because
I need to survive my childhood living with malignant
Hi Damon,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Damon Chaplin wrote:
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
Great job! Did you update your test program? Could you please post it to
the list?
Thanks,
Gabriel
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:03 +0400, alex stone wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: alex stone compos...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arnold Krillearn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
. And while Fons surely has his own way of extreme reactions
I never found him to
Okay, hopefully this will be my last mail :(. You are wrong.
David Robillard wrote:
P.S. The commentators and peanut gallery really do not help either ;)
Bob Keller subscribed to the list because of what you call The
commentators and peanut gallery, please read the whole thread.
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 21:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Okay, hopefully this will be my last mail :(. You are wrong.
David Robillard wrote:
P.S. The commentators and peanut gallery really do not help either ;)
Bob Keller subscribed to the list because of what you call The
commentators
Hi everyone!
I just compiled flac version 1.2.1 on my Linux Debian system. I got an error
in
examples/cpp/encode/file/main.cpp line 75
memcmp not declared in this scope.
I found out why: The file needs to include string.h or cstring. It doesn't,
at least not directly. I put it in and
Robert Keller wrote:
I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
Bob
Bob,
We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
below, because of our mail archive ;)
About the licenses. I think Impro-visor should have the same license of
the GPL source you use (Jmusic or something(?)).
About
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Hi Damon,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Damon Chaplin wrote:
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
Great job! Did you update your test
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
Bob
Bob,
We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
below, because of our mail archive ;)
Sorry, it was
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:08 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi Damon, thanks for your efforts.
How does your test compare to the ladspa demolition thing?
They're pretty similar actually. Unfortunately I hadn't heard of
demolition - maybe it should be mentioned on ladspa.org or go in the
SDK.
It feels like my several year old PC will crap out soon for one reason
or another, so I need a replacement, better sooner than later.
This time it should be a laptop and I heard that formerly IBM and now
Lenovo thinkpads are of good build quality, even if they only come
with intel CPUs and cost an
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 12:33:19 you wrote:
P.S. Bob kicked me off his Yahoo group with this new release he
just made.
Why would he do that? He never let me post any message previously
without
censoring or dumping them. So I haven't even sent any that might be
questionable to him since
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I should have?
I
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:02:48 you wrote:
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Keller at the moment is willing to comply with the GPL, it might be
a little bit late, but now he does, even if he needs still some time to
do it 100% perfect.
Wrong! Now he still does not. Past two replies of mine show
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:25:51 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, he is one big fat liar.
Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe you
should try defending the GPL with more maturity than that typical of
your average 12 year old. You expect people to take you
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:27:12AM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
It feels like my several year old PC will crap out soon for one reason
or another, so I need a replacement, better sooner than later.
This time it should be a laptop and I heard that formerly IBM and now
Lenovo thinkpads are of
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, he is one big fat liar.
Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe you
should try defending the GPL with more maturity than that typical of
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 18:58:40 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
One of the main reasons why R. Stallman started GNU/FSF/GPL because of
it's social aspect. You learn kids on schools for example to corporate
and help
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:36 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, he is one big fat liar.
Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe you
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
On 29 Jul 2009, at 00:43, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
5) You are giving GPL and FSF a bad name
Oh, piss off. The way I am doing it, to shame him, is a tactic used
by
GPL legal defender organizations.
You went beyond that. You threatened a tit-for-tat copyright
violation of Bob's preview
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:27:20 David Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:36 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically, he is one big fat liar.
Do you really
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:56:34 you wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:36 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Your goal of GPL compliance is a noble one, and entirely correct. But
... your tactics have become are really offensive to more and more of
us, and to claim that you take inspiration from
By blocked I meant banned. There is no separate thing as blocked
in the Yahoo! groups.
I know full well when I did it and it was last week after I was being
flamed, not last night.
By calling me a liar, you are just digging a hole for yourself.
Bob
Here is a partial screen shot from the
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:35 you wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:36 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
I blocked you last Friday, actually, when you were sending me those
flaming messages, not last night when I posted the release. I was
actually getting quite disturbed about your behavior, and
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:40:38 you wrote:
By blocked I meant banned. There is no separate thing as blocked
in the Yahoo! groups.
I know full well when I did it and it was last week after I was being
flamed, not last night.
By calling me a liar, you are just digging a hole for
james morris schrieb:
[ snip ]
3) Any suggestions for plugins to be ported
Hi,
yea
http://www.suse.de/~mana/ladspa.html
They are kind of broken because they disrespect the ladspa naming
guidelines. The code should be fine.
Regards
Uli
___
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:48:33 you wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... more of the usual ... ]
Again, it is funny how YOU take things out of context. I was referring to
one person, not everybody.
The context was:
Hell, I am a card carrying member
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:28:05 you wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and
Re: the general topic of this thread:
For the record, there is source for a partial LADSPA-LV2 porting tool
in the SLV2 source tree. It will generate the bulk of an LV2 data file
from a LADSPA plugin (note it won't do the whole job, which isn't really
possible to do automatically).
It's not
Yes, you are a liar.
Show me where the hole is?
There is no reason to remove someone from a group for emails
they send to you privately. That is why you are so very much a liar.
Raymond
I am a liar because I banned you from my group?
I refuse to continue this ridiculous exchange. I am
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 21:51:12 you wrote:
Yes, you are a liar.
Show me where the hole is?
There is no reason to remove someone from a group for emails
they send to you privately. That is why you are so very much a liar.
Raymond
I am a liar because I banned you from my group?
On 29 Jul 2009, at 02:29, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:03 you wrote:
On 29 Jul 2009, at 00:43, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
5) You are giving GPL and FSF a bad name
Oh, piss off. The way I am doing it, to shame him, is a tactic used
by
GPL legal defender
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 you wrote:
That woulds not be a violation at all. It is/was all under GPL.
Wrong. Because Bob violated the GPL, right?
By not putting a licence file or giving the source. You put a license
and provide the source. No more violation.
Remember? I'm pretty
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
Anyone who cares to examine the facts can see how transparent this
situation is.
Out of curiosity I checked. Assuming the entire source code of the
project is contained in what you get with:
svn co
On 29 Jul 2009, at 03:38, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 you wrote:
That woulds not be a violation at all. It is/was all under GPL.
Wrong. Because Bob violated the GPL, right?
By not putting a licence file or giving the source. You put a license
and provide the
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
Anyone who cares to examine the facts can see how transparent this
situation is.
Out of curiosity I checked. Assuming the entire source code of the
project is contained in what
70 matches
Mail list logo
