Hi,
I have tried the contact form on the FFADO website and through the email
address provided in the contact pages at the SourceForge.net project page to
no avail. I'm not sure where else to ask except here. Are any of the FFADO
developers on this email group that can provide a contact email that
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 00:04 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:18:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawy
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:18:03 David Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative
> > > opinion, etc), very obviously and correct
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative
> > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL
> > version 2 or later, in the way rec
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
> > Anyone who cares to examine the facts can see how transparent this
> > situation is.
>
> Out of curiosity I checked. Assuming the entire source code of the
> project is contained i
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:39:16 you wrote:
> On 29 Jul 2009, at 03:38, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 you wrote:
> >>> That woulds not be a violation at all. It is/was all under GPL.
> >>
> >> Wrong. Because Bob violated the GPL, right?
> >
> > By not putting a licen
On 29 Jul 2009, at 03:38, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 you wrote:
>>>
>>> That woulds not be a violation at all. It is/was all under GPL.
>>
>> Wrong. Because Bob violated the GPL, right?
>
> By not putting a licence file or giving the source. You put a license
> an
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
> Anyone who cares to examine the facts can see how transparent this
> situation is.
Out of curiosity I checked. Assuming the entire source code of the
project is contained in what you get with:
svn co https://impro-visor.svn.sourceforge.
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:12:44 you wrote:
> >
> > That woulds not be a violation at all. It is/was all under GPL.
>
> Wrong. Because Bob violated the GPL, right?
By not putting a licence file or giving the source. You put a license
and provide the source. No more violation.
> Remember? I'm pret
On 29 Jul 2009, at 02:29, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:03 you wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2009, at 00:43, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
5) You are giving GPL and FSF a bad name
>>>
>>> Oh, piss off. The way I am doing it, to shame him, is a tactic used
>>
>> by
>>
>>> GPL lega
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 21:51:12 you wrote:
> > Yes, you are a liar.
> >
> > Show me where the hole is?
> >
> > There is no reason to remove someone from a group for emails
> > they send to you privately. That is why you are so very much a liar.
> >
> > Raymond
>
> I am a liar because I banned you
>
> Yes, you are a liar.
>
> Show me where the hole is?
>
> There is no reason to remove someone from a group for emails
> they send to you privately. That is why you are so very much a liar.
>
> Raymond
I am a liar because I banned you from my group?
I refuse to continue this ridiculous exchang
Re: the general topic of this thread:
For the record, there is source for a partial LADSPA->LV2 porting tool
in the SLV2 source tree. It will generate the bulk of an LV2 data file
from a LADSPA plugin (note it won't do the whole job, which isn't really
possible to do automatically).
It's not cur
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:28:05 you wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >> Robert Keller wrote:
> >>> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
> >>> notice to the package-info.java
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:48:33 you wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, wrote:
>
> [ ... more of the usual ... ]
>
> >Again, it is funny how YOU take things out of context. I was referring to
> > one person, not everybody.
>
> The context was:
> >>Hell, I am a card carrying member #7026 of
james morris schrieb:
[ snip ]
> 3) Any suggestions for plugins to be ported
Hi,
yea
http://www.suse.de/~mana/ladspa.html
They are kind of broken because they disrespect the ladspa naming
guidelines. The code should be fine.
Regards
Uli
___
Linux-a
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:40:38 you wrote:
> > By "blocked" I meant "banned". There is no separate thing as "blocked"
> > in the Yahoo! groups.
> >
> > I know full well when I did it and it was last week after I was being
> > flamed, not last night.
> >
> > By calling me a liar, you are just diggi
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:35 you wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:36 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> I blocked you last Friday, actually, when you were sending me those
> >> flaming messages, not last night when I posted the release. I was
> >> actually getting quite disturbed about your behavi
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:32:03 you wrote:
> On 29 Jul 2009, at 00:43, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> 5) You are giving GPL and FSF a bad name
> >
> > Oh, piss off. The way I am doing it, to shame him, is a tactic used
>
> by
>
> > GPL legal defender organizations.
>
> You went beyond that. You
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:41 PM, wrote:
[ ... more of the usual ... ]
>Again, it is funny how YOU take things out of context. I was referring to one
>person, not everybody.
The context was:
>>Hell, I am a card carrying member #7026 of the FSF and (facts aside) I'm
>>strongly inclined to side w
By "blocked" I meant "banned". There is no separate thing as "blocked"
in the Yahoo! groups.
I know full well when I did it and it was last week after I was being
flamed, not last night.
By calling me a liar, you are just digging a hole for yourself.
Bob
Here is a partial screen shot from t
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:56:34 you wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
>
> Your goal of GPL compliance is a noble one, and entirely correct. But
> ... your tactics have become are really offensive to more and more of
> us, and to claim that you take inspiration from Stallman, the F
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:36 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I blocked you last Friday, actually, when you were sending me those
>> flaming messages, not last night when I posted the release. I was
>> actually getting quite disturbed about your behavior, and thought it
>> best to detach. These are th
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 20:27:20 David Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:36 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Basically, he is one big fat liar.
> > >
> > >
On 29 Jul 2009, at 00:43, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 5) You are giving GPL and FSF a bad name
> Oh, piss off. The way I am doing it, to shame him, is a tactic used
by
> GPL legal defender organizations.
You went beyond that. You threatened a "tit-for-tat" copyright
violation of Bob's pr
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> Robert Keller wrote:
>>> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
>>> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
>>> COPYING.txt, and L
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:36 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Basically, he is one big fat liar.
> >
> > Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe yo
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
[ ... the usual stuff ... ]
You are not required to look up to anyone. Nobody has control over
you. Nobody expects you to be silent about matters of importance.
However, some basic civility and an awareness of how your behaviour
makes the community repr
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 18:58:40 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> One of the main reasons why R. Stallman started GNU/FSF/GPL because of
> it's social aspect. You learn kids on schools for example to corporate
> and
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 19:05:57 David Robillard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Basically, he is one big fat liar.
>
> Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe you
> should try defending the GPL with more maturity than that typical
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:27:12AM +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> It feels like my several year old PC will crap out soon for one reason
> or another, so I need a replacement, better sooner than later.
> This time it should be a laptop and I heard that formerly IBM and now
> Lenovo thinkpads are
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 18:51 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> Basically, he is one big fat liar.
Do you really think this tone helps in any way whatsoever? Maybe you
should try defending the GPL with more maturity than that typical of
your average 12 year old. You expect people to take you serio
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>
>> Robert Keller wrote:
>>
>>> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
>>> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
>>> COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
>>>
>>
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:25:51 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> > Robert Keller wrote:
> >> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
> >> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
> >> COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
> >>
> >> Is there a
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:02:48 you wrote:
> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Bob Keller at the moment is willing to comply with the GPL, it might be
> a little bit late, but now he does, even if he needs still some time to
> do it 100% perfect.
Wrong! Now he still does not. Past two replies of mine
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Robert Keller wrote:
> > Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
> > notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
> > COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
> >
> > Is there anything else I should have?
>
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:16:38 Robert Keller wrote:
> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
> COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
>
> Is there anything else I should have?
Non-violations of the GPL on the Yaho
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 12:33:19 you wrote:
> > P.S. Bob kicked me off his Yahoo group with this "new" release he
> > just made.
> > Why would he do that? He never let me post any message previously
> > without
> > censoring or dumping them. So I haven't even sent any that might be
> > questionable
It feels like my several year old PC will crap out soon for one reason
or another, so I need a replacement, better sooner than later.
This time it should be a laptop and I heard that formerly IBM and now
Lenovo thinkpads are of good build quality, even if they only come
with intel CPUs and cost an
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 22:23 +0100, james morris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The file amp.c needs a quick fix:
>
> line 46 (declaring argument for LV2_Handle instantiateAmp) reads:
>
> const LV2_Host_Feature * const* features)
>
> should read:
>
> const LV2_Feature * const* features)
Thanks.
Mos
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:08 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> Hi Damon, thanks for your efforts.
>
> How does your test compare to the ladspa demolition thing?
They're pretty similar actually. Unfortunately I hadn't heard of
demolition - maybe it should be mentioned on ladspa.org or go in the
SD
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Robert Keller wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Keller wrote:
I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
Bob
>>>
>>> Bob,
>>>
>>> We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
>>> below, because of our ma
Hi,
The file amp.c needs a quick fix:
line 46 (declaring argument for LV2_Handle instantiateAmp) reads:
const LV2_Host_Feature * const* features)
should read:
const LV2_Feature * const* features)
regards,
James.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> Hi Damon,
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> > A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps & cmt, and the
> > ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
>
> Great job! Did you update your
Robert Keller wrote:
> I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
>
> Bob
Bob,
We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
below, because of our mail archive ;)
About the licenses. I think Impro-visor should have the same license of
the GPL source you use (Jmusic or something(?)).
Abo
Hi everyone!
I just compiled flac version 1.2.1 on my Linux Debian system. I got an error
in
examples/cpp/encode/file/main.cpp line 75
memcmp not declared in this scope.
I found out why: The file needs to include string.h or cstring. It doesn't,
at least not directly. I put it in and everyt
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 21:35 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Okay, hopefully this will be my last mail :(. You are wrong.
>
> David Robillard wrote:
> > P.S. The commentators and peanut gallery really do not help either ;)
>
> Bob Keller subscribed to the list because of what you call "The
> comment
Okay, hopefully this will be my last mail :(. You are wrong.
David Robillard wrote:
> P.S. The commentators and peanut gallery really do not help either ;)
Bob Keller subscribed to the list because of what you call "The
commentators and peanut gallery", please read the whole thread.
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Robert Keller wrote:
>
>> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
>> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
>> COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
>>
>> Is there anything else I should have?
>>
>> I appreciate your help.
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:03 +0400, alex stone wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: alex stone
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> . And while Fons surely has his own way of "extreme reactions"
> I never found him to be that impolite and
> > insulti
Hi Damon,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps & cmt, and the
> ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
Great job! Did you update your test program? Could you please post it to
the list?
Thanks,
Gabriel
_
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am sure the majority of these people, as well as a large portion
> of the general population, are easily manipulated by narcissists.
I became what psychology is defame as a borderline personality, because
I need to survive my childhood living with malignant narcissist
On 28/7/2009, "lase...@gmail.com" wrote:
>Wake up people...
>Wake up people
>Wake up people
zz
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-d
[Paul Davis]
>> So will it link on OSX if I remove -nostartfiles?
>
>i'd suggest copying what swh's makefile does, which is something like this:
>
>gcc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/ringmod_1188.so
>-bundle .libs/ringmod_1188.o -lm -march=i686 -nostartfiles
>
>clearly, i was talkin
Robert Keller wrote:
> Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
> notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
> COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
>
> Is there anything else I should have?
>
> I appreciate your help.
>
>
In Copying it's say: GPLv2 or at
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Paul Davis]
>>> I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime ago but
>>> hopeful users of caps on OSX tell me linking the .so fails:
>>>
>>> $ g++ -nostartfiles -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC
>>> -shared -o caps.
[Paul Davis]
>> I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime ago but
>> hopeful users of caps on OSX tell me linking the .so fails:
>>
>> $ g++ -nostartfiles -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC
>> -shared -o caps.so [list of object files]
>
>why are you using -nostartfil
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Paul Davis]
> [...]
>>and the cleanup function formerly known as fini() as
>>
>> __attribute__((destructor))
>>
>>failure to do this pretty much guarantees plugin crashes on OS X and
>>other platforms that dropped init+fini support years ago.
>
[Paul Davis]
[...]
>and the cleanup function formerly known as fini() as
>
> __attribute__((destructor))
>
>failure to do this pretty much guarantees plugin crashes on OS X and
>other platforms that dropped init+fini support years ago.
I've added these attributes to _init() and _fini() sometime a
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:20:44PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> I'd just like to remind LADSPA (and LV2) plugin authors that use of
> init() for module-level initialization has been deprecated for some
> time. Plugins should mark the module-level init function with
>
>__attribute__((constructor
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:33:19AM -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
> I've tried to put my best foot forward in posting the sources as I
> said I would. I spent all of last evening doing it and got it to a
> level where it builds. Could someone other than you please tell me
> what I should add to
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I should have?
I appreciate your help.
Regards,
Bob
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:54:23 +0100
Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps & cmt, and the
> ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
>
> So the current status is:
>
> amb OK
> blop OK
> calf memory errors in 2 plugins
> caps OK
> cm
>
>
> P.S. Bob kicked me off his Yahoo group with this "new" release he
> just made.
> Why would he do that? He never let me post any message previously
> without
> censoring or dumping them. So I haven't even sent any that might be
> questionable to him since last year because of this. He is j
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Damon
Chaplin wrote:
>
> A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps & cmt, and the
> ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
Damon - fantastic work. really great stuff.
I'd just like to remind LADSPA (and LV2) plugin authors that use
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps & cmt, and the
ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version.
So the current status is:
amb OK
blopOK
calfmemory errors in 2 plugins
capsOK
cmt OK
fil OK
ladspa OK
mcp OK
rev OK
swh memory erro
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 10:39:45 you wrote:
> Raymond might be right or wrong.
>
> I remember some mails were people recommended Raymond to be cool, even
> if Bob might be wrong. I wonder why people now can't be cool, while they
> guess Raymond is wrong!
>
> So, even if Raymond should be wrong, why
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> You should be able to empathize Bob's emotions, if not you are just
> (a) liar(s)!
Oops, Raymonds emotions :D ...
okay, Bob's too, but I was talking about Raymond's undertsandable emotions.
Sorry.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing li
Raymond might be right or wrong.
I remember some mails were people recommended Raymond to be cool, even
if Bob might be wrong. I wonder why people now can't be cool, while they
guess Raymond is wrong!
So, even if Raymond should be wrong, why do you now blame him? Aren't
you able to follow you
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:39 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
> written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
> ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
>
> I've run it on the plu
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 09:57:55 you wrote:
> I'm not taking sides here, but there's also something to keep in mind.
>
> The GPL isn't a tool to beat people around the head with. And here,
> probably more than any other GPL based community, there's a lot of
> knowhow, and experience, in dealing wit
[Damon Chaplin]
>I can confirm that initializing the "model" and "tone" variables does
>fix the problems in CAPS. Though I'm not sure what they should be
>initialized to, so I'll leave that to you!
Thanks, that is rather helpful, and the issue may have been the cause
of real problems for some use
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 09:50:56 Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2009 at 9:19, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > When doing the right thing causes people to almost line up against the
> > one in the right [...]
>
> People don't oppose you for "doing the right thing", but for being a
> self-r
I'm not taking sides here, but there's also something to keep in mind.
The GPL isn't a tool to beat people around the head with. And here,
probably more than any other GPL based community, there's a lot of
knowhow, and experience, in dealing with GPL matters. Sometimes things
get out of hand, but
On Tuesday, 28 July 2009 at 9:19, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> When doing the right thing causes people to almost line up against the one in
> the right [...]
People don't oppose you for "doing the right thing", but for being a
self-righteous pompous a** who doesn't know when to shut up while doin
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 11:28:39 Robert Keller wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> > Ok, I see there is a svn version:
> > |svn co https://impro-visor.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/impro-visor
> > impro-visor |
> > I don't see copyright and license files yet though.
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:02 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> Testing 2589: C* ToneStack - Tone stack emulation (caps.so)
> ==9992== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==9992==at 0x4129F9F: DSP::ToneStack::start_cycle(float**, int)
> (ToneStack.h:103)
> ==9992==by 0
Aaaah, something we can BOTH look forward to..
:)
And we thought collaboration was a dying art.!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0400, alex stone wrote:
>
>> Neither have I. If Fons sets out to insult me, he does so w
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:03:53PM +0400, alex stone wrote:
> Neither have I. If Fons sets out to insult me, he does so with the
> thoroughly literate grace and style of an insulter with class. I'd
> expect nothing less.
I'll keep you high expectations in mind :-). But I don't
remember ever havin
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 08:01:36 alex stone wrote:
> Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
> forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
> tools for a defined purpose.
> Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
> dec
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:44 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Damon Chaplin]
> >caps memory errors in 3 plugins
>
> Thanks for pointing out the make invocation. I haven't used valgrind
> before so my cluelessness may show again in what follows.
>
> Anyway, when running this:
>
> $ valgrind --tool=m
[Damon Chaplin]
>caps memory errors in 3 plugins
Thanks for pointing out the make invocation. I haven't used valgrind
before so my cluelessness may show again in what follows.
Anyway, when running this:
$ valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
./test-ladspa -p caps
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:06:33PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> >I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
> >written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
> >ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
> If you're using libraries l
[Damon Chaplin]
>I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
>written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
>ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
If you're using libraries like glib, it would be very kind of you to
supply a
alex stone wrote:
> Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
> forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
> tools for a defined purpose.
> Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
> decent way, but the original author
-- Forwarded message --
From: alex stone
Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond
To: Arnold Krille
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
. And while Fons surely has his own way of "extreme
Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
tools for a defined purpose.
Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
decent way, but the original author was thoroughly civilised abo
Hi,
I've been having problems with a few LADSPA plugins recently, so I've
written a little test app that loads all LADSPA plugins, connects the
ports and runs them for one cycle. (I've attached it here.)
I've run it on the plugin packages I have installed, using valgrind, and
the results are:
a
Bengt Gördén wrote:
> Den Tuesday 28 July 2009 13.12.06 skrev Chris Cannam:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Bengt Gördén wrote:
>>
>>> And for the record. LAD and LAU is seldom hit by this kind of outbursts.
>>>
>> In the last 18 months in LAD we've seen some pretty emotive fla
Den Tuesday 28 July 2009 13.12.06 skrev Chris Cannam:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Bengt Gördén wrote:
> > And for the record. LAD and LAU is seldom hit by this kind of outbursts.
>
> In the last 18 months in LAD we've seen some pretty emotive flamewars
> about Reaper, LV2 in closed source so
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Bengt Gördén wrote:
> And for the record. LAD and LAU is seldom hit by this kind of outbursts.
In the last 18 months in LAD we've seen some pretty emotive flamewars
about Reaper, LV2 in closed source software, LinuxSampler licensing,
plugin output negotiation, JACK
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:08:49 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>
>> Robert Keller wrote:
>>
>>> Dear linux-audio developers,
>>>
>>> I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
>>> visor/
>>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>> for Impro-Visor, which
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 11:22 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:38:23 +0200
> hermann wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 16:08 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
> > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:14:16 +0200
> > > hermann wrote:
> > >
> > > > guitarix is a simple Linux
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:08:49 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Robert Keller wrote:
> > Dear linux-audio developers,
> >
> > I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
> > visor/
>
> Thanks
>
> > for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
> > source later t
David Robillard wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 23:54 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
>> PS: You all do remember what your next employer will find out about you when
>> googling your name, do you? :-)
>>
>
> We were all just kidding!
>
> :D
>
> -dr
And some guys have the same first name and
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 02:28 -0700, Robert Keller wrote:
> There are copyright and GPL notices in every non-trivial source file.
> Do I have to add another separate file as well?
You should include the text of the GPL in a file usually called COPYING.
See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.ht
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Ok, I see there is a svn version:
> |svn co https://impro-visor.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/impro-visor
> impro-visor |
>
> I don't see copyright and license files yet though. I think it's
> wise to
> add them.
There are copyright and GPL
Robert Keller wrote:
> Dear linux-audio developers,
>
> I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
> visor/
Thanks
> for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
> source later today, as I need time to get acquainted with their
> system, but I have
Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 16:08 +0200 schrieb hollun...@gmx.at:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:14:16 +0200
> hermann wrote:
>
> > guitarix is a simple Linux Rock Guitar amplifier and is designed
> > to achieve nice thrash/metal/rock/blues guitar sounds.
> > Guitarix uses the Jack Audio Connection Ki
Den Tuesday 28 July 2009 04.16.46 skrev Justin Smith:
> I have been following these list serves for a while, but I am just not
> interested in this kind of drama, and would like to mention for the
> record that I will no longer be following the lad or lau list serves.
That is up to you but a sugge
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
