http://www.nocerinachannel.it/home.php
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:25:27 -0700, Louis Gorenfeld
louis.gorenf...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nocerinachannel.it/home.php
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
I
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:21:12AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:06:28PM +0900, michael noble wrote:
hi folks,
Hi!
Are any interested or invested parties willing to provide some clarification
on this? I know distros are fully welcome to package whatever they
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:32:16AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to
jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1
instead.
May I ask for the reasoning behind this?
There are many reasons, some technical,
torbenh wrote:
Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to
jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1
instead.
great... many thanks. :(((
For me this will be an advantage, because now I need to build several
dummy packages
hermann wrote:
Am Freitag, den 16.04.2010, 18:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
torbenh wrote:
Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to
jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1
instead.
great... many thanks.
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2010 19:23:33 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
hermann wrote:
I hope, when debian switch to jack2, they will make it in one packet
(maximal a second for the dev files), that's what could make it
easer to
switch the version for people
On 04/16/2010 08:06 AM, michael noble wrote:
hi folks,
I just saw an interesting line over at opensuse.org (
http://news.opensuse.org/2010/04/14/opensuse-11-3-milestone-5-the-community-strikes-back/)
regarding the installation of JACK2 as default in the upcoming opensuse 11.3
release. That
Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:31:08AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
First, we can't have virtual packages for shared libraries in Debian, so
we cannot provide two different versions of libjack.
i don't understand this. either i'm not understanding the point, or it
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:55:56PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
First, we can't have virtual packages for shared libraries in Debian, so
we cannot provide two different versions of libjack.
i don't understand this. either i'm not understanding the point, or it
sounds likea
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
wrote:
It's debian-specific. I don't know the details, but the build system
can't resolve dependencies on virtual shared libraries. Something like
that.
That's pretty pathetic. But I guess there's not much to be done
On 17 April 2010 04:33, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
Clearly, we can't dispose of that. But to what extent should the
future development path of JACK be determined by the limitations of
packaging systems?
Does anyone really want to have to choose between JACK1 and JACK2 (and
Paul Davis wrote:
We didn't write JACK to be part of the desktop
environment, we wrote it as a tool for people doing serious
audiomusic work.
Full ACK, from the standpoint of a user.
the right thing being that
anyone can implement their own version of JACK and if its compliant
then anyone
13 matches
Mail list logo
