Related to this topic, I would recommend reading through this...
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/theatre-sound-list/WbysqMHs6iw
AVB isn't dead no, but it certainly isn't close to dominant at this point,
at least on my side of the pond. It may be a different situation on the
other side, n
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
>
> I'd also like to get feedback from users, about what tools are needed
> most: plugins, synths, effects? Yet-Another-DAW?
> If any of the above, please provide details / intended use-case.
>
>
Since you asked and it was recommended to me
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dave Phillips wrote:
>
> So, in your honest and bold opinion as user and/or developer, what do we
> lack most and what can we do without that we already have ? Please feel
> free to expand your remarks as you like. I'm planning an article on the
> topic and will li
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Kjetil Matheussen <
k.s.matheus...@notam02.no> wrote:
> Thanks. This is just insane though. It's a 2.6 second clip of a drum loop
> that's so standard that could probably be taken from around 2000 songs.
>
> So much copyrighted music put up on youtube, and they blo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Kjetil Matheussen <
k.s.matheus...@notam02.no> wrote:
> I don't know the origin of the drum loop,
> but that UMG all of a sudden heard about this video (there's only been 9
> views),
> somehow recognized the short loop that's used in it from material that
> they ha
Kontakt works relatively well in Wine actually, but that is beside the
primary point of the conversation.
Seablade
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Tom's Lists wrote:
> I know this is somewhat already covered in this discussion, but this is
> straight from the head of Chicken Systems (a frie
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:11 PM, J. Liles wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Paul Giblock wrote:
> > I didn't necessarily mean for transport or archival. I imagine "just
> > dereference it" is one of the motivations for links in the first place.
> I
> > was more concerned about windows use
012 at 05:14:50PM -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
>
> > Personally I prefer Ardour's behavior myself. I do keep my samples on an
> > external drive, but in the end the ability to maintain a self-contained
> > session for portability purposes is important to me.
>
> You
Personally I prefer Ardour's behavior myself. I do keep my samples on an
external drive, but in the end the ability to maintain a self-contained
session for portability purposes is important to me. But to each their own.
Seablade
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> O
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> That doesn't exclude any interactive version in the future
> of course. OSC control would certainly be a possibility, it
> will depend on demand from users. So I've set that counter
> to +1 now...
>
>
Add another +1 for that, there is mor
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Carl Hetherington wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure ...
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2#Notable_IA-32_CPUs_not_supporting_SSE2
Assuming the hitchiker's guid... eer wikipedia is accurate of course.
Seablade
___
Li
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03, 2011 04:40:22 am Thomas Vecchione wrote:
>> Just to clarify, the N9, and N950(The 'developer' device
>> that most of the existing community really wants over
>> the n9) isn't r
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Niels Mayer wrote:
> Specifically, MeeGo on the Nokia N9 (
> https://flors.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nokia-n9-state-of-the-art-of-mobile-linux-and-qt/
> ). I'm sure that it will be easier to create handheld multimedia
> applications on an in-production and widely-d
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Johannes Kroll wrote:
> Are you saying Ardour has good restoration functionality built-in? If
> so, would you care to give a hint/link on how to use it?
>
> But you're probably talking about some Windows-only VST plugin or
> such... :-/
As Paul mentioned, Ardour ha
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
>
> You either need to break out some code, or some cash.
>
>
Heh if I could code DSP processing I would, however I never even took Calc,
so for the most part I am way out of my league there. I should get my wife
to teach me sometime. Cash
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Geoff Beasley wrote:
> GWC is the only program I've ever used successfully under linux; and it was
> as 'good' as anything else i've used on other platforms
Sadly I would strongly disagree. The results I can get from what are fast
becoming basic tools on other
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> It would help to know the origin of the the 'noise' or to have a
> sample of it.
>
>
Agreed in as far as helping to address it, however it still leaves the fact
that there just aren't many, if any, good restoration solutions on Linux so
e
It depends on what you need to do precisely.
To be clear, the frequency dependant functionality of the noise removal in
the windows programs mentioned, only appeared in Adobe Audition (1.5 I
believe) after Adobe had purchased Cool Edit from Syntrillium(sp?). Before
that Cool Edit had used only a
here often you get a video edit after you've started doing
> your mixing, and you have to move big blocks of tracks in time. I'd
> also like to know if there's a simple way to do this in ardour, or to
> add my vote for it =)
>
> Cheers,
> Andres
>
> 2011/
Fons
Being someone that tracks recordings live constantly, I am curious, if the
singer only wanted to overdub one section of their vocals with another, and
you are not touching the remainder of the recorded tracks, exactly what
stops you from doing a standard punch in/out in your example?
Even if
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Cherrett
wrote:
> Seems a bit more than a question, seems there is a few insinuations.
>
Not really. There is the statement that not attributing is not
morally correct, and as I said some people do disagree with the choice
to fork rather than commit t
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Christopher Cherrett
wrote:
> I suspect there is much more to this puzzle than attribution. I suspect we
> rocked the boat just a bit too much and too fast.
>
No, there really isn't.(At least not in as far as the original post
that started this was concerned)
Not
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Raymond Martin wrote:
> Another fool. Trademarks apply to commercial interests, the program is
> non-commercial in nature. Thus it would be very difficult for anything
> to be done about this for creating a free program from a free program.
>
Sorry you are incorre
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:21 PM, James Cameron wrote:
>
> The installation discs for Mac OS X already contain software licensed
> under the GNU GPL (e.g. bash), so the additional obligations under the
> GPL would not have been the reason to exclude a compiler.
>
> It seems much more likely that it
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> You are confusing Copyright and Trademark Law. Copyright law says that
>> yes
>> they can fork the project.
>>
>> Trademark Law however says that Miss B. is allowed to follow up legally to
>> prevent a trademark, which can be registered or
Damn Reply-To-All, yet again.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chuckk Hubbard
> wrote:
>
>> I guess my thought was that people who want to use audio
>> professionally are less likely to make decisions ba
Once again forgot to hit Reply-All.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I'm not interested to take sides, I only want to learn about the GPL.
>
> Assumed that Miss B. forks a GPL'd project, as far as I understand the GPL,
> Miss R. is allowed to fork a project with a similar nam
Forgot to send to the list.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Raymond Martin wrote:
>
>>
>> Not at all. There is even evidence in the FSF documentation somewhere
>> exactly
>> about this point and they vehemen
Sorry you got this twice Hermann, I am still used to the reply munging that
was gotten rid of some time ago.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:52 PM, hermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Yes, I don't understand why people mean linux audio is a mess, last
> day's I have setup a new box with debian/sid and it took m
Just realised this needed to go to both lists... bah.
Seablade
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:19 AM, James Stone wrote:
>
>> The Mac fanboi backlash is by turns amusing and irritating but
>> always unsurprising.
>>
Hmm jconv as a LV2 plug would interest me as well I think.
Seablade
Always looking for more toys;)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > The 4-band paramatric filter plugin has been updated:
> > ...
> > Nedko Arnaudov is preparing an LV2 versio
Sounds like what you are looking for are IEMs(In-Ear Monitors). Unlike the
other poster I don't have much problem with Sennheisers for wireless, but
the Shure PSM600 series is the one I have used most on this and have been
pleased with them.
Seablade
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Marc
Sadly no native Linux version yet, but many people do run it in Wine is my
understanding.
Seablade
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Bengt Gördén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Den Friday 08 August 2008 03.52.47 skrev Thomas Vecchione:
> > 3D Cad tools unfortuanatly I have
3D Cad tools unfortuanatly I haven't found any I particularly like among the
open source projects. Personally I am using QCad for 2D and Sketchup for
3D. I use Blender for organic modleing and rendering though.
Seablade
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:17 PM, nescivi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Ok that explains things a bit at least, thank you Fons.
You are correct in that there are no connections(I think are what you are
looking for rather than paths which I think of from Gimp/Photoshop/Inkscape
as a bit different in QCad. I actually used to think that was a problem,
but after doing se
I'll be honest in that I personally find QCad to be invaluable for 2D
drafting. I am not sure exactly how you are planning on using the vector
drawing program is part of the problem. In the past I have also used
Inkscape for web design, and OpenOffice Draw for some things as well. I,
like others
Seeing as the file downloads are hosted on Sourceforge, my bet is that its
code is in SF's CVS repository
http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=100023
Seablade
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:55 AM, jaromil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
While my post is used as an example, I would prefer to have it left on. I
can't count how many times I have to resend things I accidentally did not
send to the entire list on lists without it, and those are just the things I
caught. My only real problem is because I have multiple lists on the sam
On 7/21/07, . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > > > I've been working with the 2.6 series kernel now for some
> time with satisfactory
> when
> you all say RT Patched you mean realtime module built, loaded configured
and
> used by jack correct?
please learn how to quote. heres a scre
Translation: no "tie in" here.
My "Tie In" comment was directly related to this specific sentence by
Thorsten...
For the common user, hosts and plugin collections should be part
of the distribution he uses.
I despise the thought of being "tied in" to a distribution as a user,
especial
Tie in?
Tie someone into a specific distribution because that is the first one
they tried and had something they liked.
This is FLOSS, right? Nobody gets to tell people what to do or not
in the end. So if anyone wants to create 'arbitrary' extensions,
he will. No profiles, no nothing change
For the common user, hosts and plugin collections should be part
of the distribution he uses.
Oh I sincerely hope we are not going to tie people in like this, that
would be a VERY bad thing IMO.
It might be far easier to list the supporting hosts for each plugin,
once the number of extens
the problem will be rather: why has this plugin a GUI in ardour and
ingen and not in qtractor.
while this other plugin has a gui in qtractor and non in ardour and
ingen.
That is an exact example of one case that is certainly possible.
What has understanding internals to do with this?
All th
I don't really see the point of these "profiles" at all, to be honest.
Seems like just defining things for the sake of defining things.
All it does is maintain an easier way of telling if a plugin will work
for the end user.
Keep in mind I am NOT talking about the programmer here, I am referr
Gonna answer several posts with this I think in the interest of
simplicity as I tihnk I was misunderstood somewhat
Lars:
You could have meta-extensions that were simply a collection of other
extensions. "To support this extension, a host must support extensions
A, B, and C". Or something l
This is intentional. LV2 is not intended to include every single
feature that everyone might want. It is intended for it to
be /possible/ to implement any feature someone might want (this is why
LV2 actually exists in a useful state and, say, GMPI does not...)
While this makes perfect since i
46 matches
Mail list logo
