> Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>
>> Most probably I will check the software coming to editor side, but
>> somebody else should look at cdparanoia. Has anyone tested how those
>> new "do not work on CD-ROM devices" audio CDs works with cdparanoia?
>>
>> They put uncorrectable digital errors to those ne
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 00:32, Bob Ham wrote:
> If there's GPL code in there, then he's breaking the law
A quick investigation implies that this is not the case:
node@insanity:~/proj/gsynth-0.4.8/modules/tb303/.libs$ objdump -T --demangle
libtb303.so.0.0.1 | grep 303
libtb303.so.0.0.1: file
Juan Linietsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > but if there is free code in there, the man is flagrantly violating
> > the GPL at the moment. This is worrying.
>
> Very serious.. I cant wait for the code so i can add it to legasynth
> ;)
Oh blah. If it's just the gsynth engine use that. Filter st
On 13 Aug 2002 00:32:04 +0100
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:53, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > OTOH the 303 code is based on gsynth, which is GPL, and David
> > Singer writes on the Reborn website, that he will release the
> > source code soon, after some cleanup. A
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:53, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> OTOH the 303 code is based on gsynth, which is GPL, and David Singer
> writes on the Reborn website, that he will release the source code
> soon, after some cleanup. And Reborn definetly needs Jack support
> sooner or later.
If there's GPL co
Frank Barknecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > A good start though. My biggest complaint is totally on getting the
> > 303 to sound authentic.
> > [...]
>
> OTOH the 303 code is based on gsynth, [...]
Ah ok, I'll take my snobby ain't-no-303 comments over there.
--
Billy Biggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Billy Biggs hat gesagt: // Billy Biggs wrote:
> A good start though. My biggest complaint is totally on getting the
> 303 to sound authentic.
>
> Oh, and then the whole licensing thing. Clearly the author has no
> intention of releasing this under a free license, as commercial
> resell
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 16:57, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Hi, Josh:
>
> Takashi sent me the correct invocation for using soundfonts with
> TiMidity++. For my purpose all I needed was a configuration file with
> this line in it:
>
> soundfont /home/dlphilp/sfonts/8mbgmsfx.sf2
>
> Then if I cal
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:35:34PM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
> Well, you never know... but it is a bit Broadcast2000 deja vu on the
> licence front, isn't it?
Broadcast2000 is under the GPL. It is actually called cinelerra now. I
just compiled and installed it the other day.
Jeremiah
>
> I
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:43:54PM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Closed source was a disaster for TAON but
> seems to have worked well for RTSynth. At least BC2K saw its sources
> released under the GPL, so further development is not ruled out.
What happened to TAON? It seems to have died and/o
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:35:59 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> >Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
>
> Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
> I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
> Th
Greetings:
IIRC he states that he'll release the sources when ready. There's
really no telling whether that's a good plan or not, perhaps it depends
on the thing being created ? Closed source was a disaster for TAON but
seems to have worked well for RTSynth. At least BC2K saw its sources
releas
Robert Jonsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Anybody tried the (new?) Rebirth clone, Reborn?
> http://www.deadvirgins.org.uk/reborn/
>
> Only had a 10 second test run, I'm already sold :-)
The filter seems awfully sharp and the attack also sounds too quick
for the 303 emulator. The 808/909 samples
Well, you never know... but it is a bit Broadcast2000 deja vu on the
licence front, isn't it?
I'm a bit concerned that the author, who may still have genuine OS
leanings, has still failed to understand the "release early/release
often" ethic. He seems to be doing himself out of a lot of help.
Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Anybody tried the (new?) Rebirth clone, Reborn?
> http://www.deadvirgins.org.uk/reborn/
>
> Only had a 10 second test run, I'm already sold :-)
Yes, I tried it out for a while yesterday. Very sweet !
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sou
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:44:38PM +0200, Sebastien Metrot wrote:
>Mine does :-) , but have you listened to the sample soundclips (the opera
>singer)? It sounds so bad I wonder how they expect to sell anything with
>such material.
Here it sounds good actually :)
Also expect loss of quality due t
Hi,
Anybody tried the (new?) Rebirth clone, Reborn?
http://www.deadvirgins.org.uk/reborn/
Only had a 10 second test run, I'm already sold :-)
Regards
/Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Touquet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] Chameleon DSP engine
> You get lowlatency without patches,
> and: does your pc has programmable knobs
> and does it fit in
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:04:45PM +0200, wires wrote:
>> Very much so :)
>As a related question, how does this machine's speed compare to, say, a
>modern pc (apart from the advantages of having a display etc)?
That's comparing pears to apples ...
The DSP runs at 100 Mhz, but its a *dedicated*
pr
Quoting Vincent Touquet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >Anyway, that thing looks usable.
>
> Very much so :)
As a related question, how does this machine's speed compare to, say, a
modern pc (apart from the advantages of having a display etc)?
Jelle.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
(cut)
>Anyway, that thing looks usable.
(cut)
Very much so :)
v
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
Well, it uses a standard motorola dsp.
I'm sure you can find a suitable compiler.
Then you only need an editor and a way
to send your data over in sysex.
Shoul
Steve Harris wrote:
>Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
>
>- Steve
>
>On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:56:00 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
>> http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
Strange because they use all the GNU tools to compile the code for
that thin
Sadly it can't be programmed form linux (or couldn't last time I checked).
- Steve
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 03:56:00 +0200, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
http://www.soundart-hot.com/developers1.htm
Remembering past threads, i know
some of you have wanted to create
a fully programmable DSP engine.
Well, it has been done.
Separate DSP & controller,
fully programmable display and IO.
SDK and everything needed to
program the beast are given
away for
Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
>>I wonder whether there's a scientific-audio-list.
> Perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] (oriented toward
> audition rather than dsp-stuff). This address may be out-of-date
> now.
The address, the website (auditory.org) and the address of the maintainer of
the webpage that menti
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:48:02AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
(cut)
>This is of course a gross abuse of the rights of the purchaser to "fair
>use", and I hope that people, especially readers of this list, would no
>more think of buying them than they would of supporting, e.g., the
>Microsoft mon
Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>Most probably I will check the software coming to editor side, but
>somebody else should look at cdparanoia. Has anyone tested how those
>new "do not work on CD-ROM devices" audio CDs works with cdparanoia?
>
>They put uncorrectable digital errors to those new audio CDs
28 matches
Mail list logo
