I normally wouldn't reply but this is way off. If there is prior art
then the patent can be thrown out. This is what PubPat is doing and
what was attempted with the Microsoft FAT patent (and succeeded in
Germany).
If Microsoft took out a patent on something that was implemented
previously in
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 23:20 +0100, Carlo Trimarchi wrote:
Have you looked to see if there isn't already an application in
development that could suit your needs? You might even be able to help
in the development of something like Rosegarden or Muse or Ardour.
Well, I need to do it for
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 16:56 +0200, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 13:15 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
Heh, I'm only a novice programmer, and I'm already lazy :)
Ah, the sign of a good programmer. :)
KDE and Gnome both appear greedy to me. They both want me to use their
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 19:19 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:25 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:23 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 06:14 +, peter wrote:
i have a question for you though, would you take widespread copyright
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 06:14 +, peter wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:03 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
But why do you consider it stealing?
I just can't resist this. Please send me a copy of your latest
song, novel
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:23 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 06:14 +, peter wrote:
i have a question for you though, would you take widespread copyright
infringement over pervasive DRM (and it's associated outcomes)?
This is a false dichotomy.
it's a moot
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:27 +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Why don't you want to distinct between copyright violation
(which is
a gray area, different from country to country) and stealing?
First, because I
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:21 +, Immanuel Litzroth wrote:
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just can't resist this. Please send me a copy of your latest
song, novel, whatever. I'll post it on the internet with my name as
author then we'll come back to this discussion of why Lee
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 14:39 +, Immanuel Litzroth wrote:
Arnold Krille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chiming in, altough i didn't want to...
2006/2/22, Immanuel Litzroth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just can't resist this. Please send me a copy
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 16:16 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:01 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
But please, IMO, don't pay for any non-open source software. There are
lots of excellent p2p tools you can use to get the software you need.
Please don't support makers of
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 22:28 +0100, Björn Lindström wrote:
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How can we expect people to abide by the GPL if we don't respect
their licensing terms? Stealing proprietary software is exactly as
immoral as proprietary vendors ripping off GPL'ed code.
While you
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:41 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
fons adriaensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:01:10PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By this logic, locking my doors is immoral because it diminishes
people's freedom
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 00:43 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 23:41 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
If I want Excel running on GNU/Linux, I can just shoot myself. I
am not paying for such crippled software. If that means that I
have
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:23 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:57 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Lee Revell:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:08 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Who is talking about not paying?
This whole
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 14:55 -0500, Pete Bessman wrote:
This email is way, way longer than I intended it to be, and for that I
apologize. Remember that I'm not looking to stir up any hostilities, I
just want to hear where people stand on The Issues and get a sense of
the community. I predict
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 11:29 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
Check out Qt - it's just keypress event handling.
Hi Jan, thanks for replying!
Qt needs X to run, doesn't it? I would like to use something that will
run on the console.
Yeah, sorry, I missed that part.
--
Jan 'Evil
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 12:31 +0100, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
Hi,
new to this list and knowing absolutely nothing about C++ audio
programming I would like to ask for a little bit of help.
I want to create a console keyboard to MIDI application and for this I
would like to read the physical
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 08:38, Richard Smith wrote:
I'm going to convert my fathers record collection over to CD. Doing
some google research.
According to http://www.tracertek.com/newway.htm they claim the new
and best way to do LP to CD is to use a flat preamp, record at 24bit,
96kHz and
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 12:06, Jan Depner wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 08:38, Richard Smith wrote:
I'm going to convert my fathers record collection over to CD. Doing
some google research.
According to http://www.tracertek.com/newway.htm they claim the new
and best way to do LP to CD
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:47, Doug McLain wrote:
There appears to be a serious problem with tap eq and ardour. Given a
session with 8 mono tracks, and 6 of them running thru tap eq, I get
near total gui freeze and/or jack disconnection when I stop rolling or
when moving the playhead.
This
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:20, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:45 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 23:53, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-06 at 05:14 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 08:08, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 20:15, David Cournapeau wrote:
Good answer. I've often wondered why anyone would use vectors.
Because you don't need to worry about their deletion ? Granted that for
pure audio processing programming, it is not really useful, and a bit
dangerous.
I
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 23:53, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-06 at 05:14 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 08:08, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C++ is very simple: I use it as 'C with classes'. No
streams, no
STL, no other nonsense. Gives me the best
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 10:38, Fred Gleason wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2005 10:37, Mario Lang wrote:
Heh, thats a Redmond argument I'd say :-).
There is nothing wrong (ok, not that much) with accidentally
wasting CPU time, but if you are aware of where are you
wasting it, I dont buy the
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 08:08, fons adriaensen wrote:
My aproach to C++ is very simple: I use it as 'C with classes'. No streams, no
STL, no other nonsense. Gives me the best of both worlds - clean objects and
low level.
Good answer. I've often wondered why anyone would use vectors. I
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 21:46, Shayne O'Connor wrote:
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
If someone sets up this forum, and more than twice of us sign
up, that should show those arrogant lklm-people that there are really
_a lot_ of us, and that we are strong, and very angry. Hah!
First, please
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:37, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 06:24 -0700, nobin matthew wrote:
I am porting pxa audio driver to rtlinux (rtlinux
pro). I am mainly using pxa-ac97.c
pxa-audio.c(eliminated sound_core.c). I will try to
register to two devices /dev/dsp and
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:30, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 09:24 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
Personally I think you're wasting your time. Ingo's RT preempt patches
let you do hard realtime with Linux using the existing driver base.
I'm not sure why he's trying to do
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:50, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:37, Lee Revell wrote:
Personally I think you're wasting your time. Ingo's RT preempt patches
let you do hard realtime with Linux using the existing driver base.
I'm
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:51, Paul Davis wrote:
I'm not sure why he's trying to do this because for audio the latest
patched kernels appear to be more than adequate. That said, I don't
think you can get a guaranteed 15 microsecond interrupt response with
anyone's patches to the standard
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:47, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:39 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
Please, don't think I was being disparaging. I am absolutely
thrilled with the kernel work that has been going on. This thing
rocks! The last I heard (from contractors working for us
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:25, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:04:29AM -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
IIRC part of it was servicing IRIG-B interrupts.
The easiest way to input IRIG-B is as an audio signal via a
soundcard, and use a software decoder. That was one my first
jobs
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:56, Shane wrote:
Jan,
Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of
an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the
company issuing the NDA that may or may not be valid or legal...
First of all, the (hypothetical)
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 18:18, Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 14:56 -0500, Shane wrote:
Jan,
Thank you for your comments. I should clarify from the perspective of
an independent software developer with no previous relationship to the
company issuing the NDA that may or may not
-03-29 at 10:38, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
From: Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, imho one of the main advantages is Qt's Signal/Slot mechanism
sigc++
How to implement signal/slot mechanism in simplest terms with C?
In my opinion, sometimes it is unnecessary to link to a massive
code
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 17:24, Paul Davis wrote:
No, imho one of the main advantages is Qt's Signal/Slot mechanism and my=20
current implementation has come so far that I can send and receive OSC=20
messages with one argument (of type QVariant) via signals and slots.
i don't want to get into a
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 21:03, ben racher wrote:
Hello,
I'm starting a student radio station at IUPUI in Indianapolis, Indiana
and I want our entire audio infrastructure to be based on Linux. I've
got a rough sense of all the apps we need and what apps to setup on
which computers, but I
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 06:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan, 2005 at 10:36AM -0600, Jan Depner spake thus:
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 08:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan, 2005 at 05:09PM -0600, Jan Depner spake thus:
Next up... a plugin that plays your instrument
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 11:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you should try cheesetracker. I find trackers to be a very
intuitive interface, but maybe that's because I come from a computer
science background.
Me too. It's just that I am not familiar with what those things
do. I'll
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:05, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 10:39 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
Don't worry about speed with an instrument - it's way overrated.
Less is definitely more in that department.
Anyone who tells you this has obviously never heard Yngwie Malmsteen's
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:14, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 05:11:12PM -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
If you're actually going to do this (argh)
I'm not. It's an interesting problem, but I'd agree that if you can't
sing in tune, then just don't.
take a look at Tom's TAP
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 08:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan, 2005 at 05:09PM -0600, Jan Depner spake thus:
Next up... a plugin that plays your instrument for you. Why deal
with the tedious hassle of having to tune your instrument or actually
learn how to play it? Can't sing
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 06:44, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:03:52AM +0100, Tom Szilagyi wrote:
void
fractal(LADSPA_Data * v, int N, float H) {
...
}
That's a classic one. For large N, the output will approach
some form of filtered Gaussian noise. What makes this
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 10:48, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:43:37AM -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 06:44, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
That's a classic one. For large N, the output will approach
some form of filtered Gaussian noise. What makes this fractal
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 02:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan, 2005 at 04:00PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki spake thus:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 08:18:02PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi peeps.
Just looking for some quick advice about a new soundcard.
I'm looking at getting
Now, if you could just do the same with outboard reverbs... ;-)
Jan
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 03:52, Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:06:29 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM05/Content/Waves/PR/Q-Clone.html
Hmmm... I suspect thats rather easy to do,
Next up... a plugin that plays your instrument for you. Why deal
with the tedious hassle of having to tune your instrument or actually
learn how to play it? Can't sing... not a problem! I can see Micro$oft
coming out with something like that ;-)
Sorry, but this goes against the grain
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 09:52, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:57:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I haven't been able to replace so far is the Oberheim
OB-Tune plug-in. This was an amazingly useful plug-in that would take
an audio input and make sure it
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 15:00, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
The audiophile, like all ice1712 cards, is very well supported by alsa.
The delta series (44, 66, 1010, 1010lt) all use this same chipset and
driver, as do several good cards by some other manufacturers.
envy24control is a great mixer
I've forwarded the message to them and I'll let you know what I get
back.
Jan
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 17:28, Jody McIntyre wrote:
Can you ask your contact if they can supply any information on the
PreSonus FIRESTATION? It uses Yamaha's mLAN protocol. I emailed various
addresses at Yamaha and
I was interested in the thread about firewire audio device support
in Linux a while back. Just the other day I noticed that Presonus is
just up the road from where I live so I thought I'd drop them a line and
ask about their two firewire interfaces and if they would consider
releasing specs
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 11:50, David Olofson wrote:
On Sunday 02 January 2005 18.53, Jan Depner wrote:
[...]
When recording on batteries they will
last longer using mp3 recording than WAV recording.
Weird. :-) Disk/flash I/O uses more power than mp3 encoding...?
Only with the disk
I think the Neuros II (http://www.neurosaudio.com/) is closer to what
you need. It includes a built in microphone as well as a mic in.
Records in mp3 or WAV (up o 48KHz). USB 2.0 interface. Mine works very
well with Linux. You can get one with 256MB of memory for $140 or one
with a 20GB hard
Neuros is very nice but a bit more expensive depending on how much
storage you need. It will record in mp3 or wav (up to 15/48KHz).
Jan
On Sun, 2004-12-26 at 16:19, Ian Howard wrote:
Hey all,
We are looking for some portable digital recording devices with the
following criteria:
- very
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 19:58, Dave Robillard wrote:
Your initial reply to me, which was not about the issue at hand
whatsoever - you called me obnoxious and insulting. That counts as a
personal attack in my books, and immediately forced the discussion in a
useless direction. Point is you
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 10:57, Dave Robillard wrote:
All this mentioning of belief and church to degrade open source
people is no better than me calling you and RME Nazis. Seems to be a
recurring theme that the person who presents the open source position
makes no personal attacks whatsoever,
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:37, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-30-11 at 17:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
No one said they were good. I just said it was better than no support
at all, and whatever RME decides to do, they designed the hardware, it's
THEIR CHOICE.
No, it's not better than
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:13, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-12 at 03:38 +0100, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 00:09, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 05:32:30PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
I'd rather not have people with this ignorant 'closed drivers
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:07, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-30-11 at 17:51 -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:32, Dave Robillard wrote:
Ditto. A closed driver is not fine at all. It's worse than no driver
at all, since it sets a /very/ dangerous precedent. (If you
That's the word of the day. Tomorrow we'll try obsequious ;-)
Jan
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 18:18, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:12:40PM -0600, Jan Depner wrote:
I also asked you to not be so obstreperous in your posts.
^
I really love
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 00:29, Jan Depner wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:37, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Tue, 2004-30-11 at 17:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
No one said they were good. I just said it was better than no support
at all
That was a joke Marek. That's why it had the little smiley thingy on the
end ;-) As opposed to Dave's talking about people's ignorant ideas.
Jan
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:27, Marek Peteraj wrote:
I also
asked you to not be so obstreperous in your posts. You'll get more
respect and
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:37, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 03:27, Marek Peteraj wrote:
I also
asked you to not be so obstreperous in your posts. You'll get more
respect and attention by being polite.
Jan, i think Daves posts were pretty ok in that respect and pretty
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:48, Paul Davis wrote:
The point is not that someone might reverse engineer and do a
worse/better oss driver. The point is that nvidia, ati, xgi, matrox
*should* do open source drivers.
The point is that nobody has persuaded them of this, and in the matrox
case, they
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 06:52, Dave Phillips wrote:
Hey John:
I'll chime in with some kudos for the tune, but I agree with your own
assessment re: the vocal, it does need to come forward. No point in
singing words if they can't be heard or understood, yes ?
Vocals are often a problem
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 10:15, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 14:50, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Marek Peteraj]
RME has provided
Pro grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it
in order to become a legitimate alternative to
proprietary solutions.
Not really. It was Paul,
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:36, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
Did this happen?
Maybe not to them but look at Mackie and Behringer.
Just to save people some googling here is a thread that documents the
long and colorful history of pro audio
I like the tune. I'd certainly like to hear the finished product. If I
were you I wouldn't add drums, just percussion. Congas, bongos, guiro,
cabasa, claves, vibraslap...
Jan
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 13:36, John Check wrote:
I haven't posted anything in a while, but I'm sure some of you
certainly share my money with other companies. Any companies listening
out there?
Regards
Jan Depner
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 19:14, Marek Peteraj wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for crossposting, just wanted to let everybody know:
The official statement is that there will be no support for ALSA (Linux
That is a damn good rant! I agree completely. Unfortunately I only do
software :-/
Jan
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 14:16, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:09 +0100, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
No, it's not hard because there are a lot of skilled people around, but
the card would be
That's great Dave! It's nice to hear some really clean playing.
Jan
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 06:37, Dave Phillips wrote:
Greetings:
I've added another recording to my music made with Ardour page, a
guitar duet this time. It's a performance of an old Jimmy Dorsey tune
called Maria Elena,
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 02:23, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
LINUX AS A STANDARD
I feel that considering linux as a standard is on one hand a kind of a
paradox as it is built on the premise that individual truly can tweak it to
heart's content and therefore it is relatively unlikely that any two
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 06:37, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Jan Depner hat gesagt: // Jan Depner wrote:
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 18:13, Frank Barknecht wrote:
It's similar to the fact, that everyone should learn at least one
scripting language like Python, Bash or Perl. It's good
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 08:43, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Jan Depner hat gesagt: // Jan Depner wrote:
Geez Frank, you went and got serious on me ;-)
I just took it as a cheap excuse to do some more propaganda, sorry. ;)
There's nothing wrong with a little good propaganda
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 18:13, Frank Barknecht wrote:
It's similar to the fact, that everyone should learn at least one
scripting language like Python, Bash or Perl. It's good for the mind
and it enables you to create little custom applications instead of
waiting for the C developers to write
That's pretty cool. I had no idea they were supporting anything GPL.
Jan
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:45, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
Hello.
When this happened?? What a great move.
http://www.roland.com/support/gpl/
Regards,
Juhana
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 11:09, Jennifer Dillon wrote:
I have been experimenting with psychoacoustic mehods and enhancement in both
hardware and software for the last 20 years and there already is quite a lot
of information in the Public Domain. Do the new patent laws allow somebody to
patent
Damn. That was all perfectly lucid. I must be missing something ;-)
Seriously though, it all makes sense to me. (Sorry for top-posting but
I'm lazy).
Jan
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 06:17, John Check wrote:
Good Morning,
Here's the position paper I drafted up. As usual I'll request that
Is this problem strictly with reiserfs in 2.6 or is it also a problem
with 2.4. I actually experienced fewer xruns with reiserfs vs ext3 on
2.4 (preempt/ll) but I have no hard numbers to back that up.
Jan
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 19:17, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 19:31, Andrew Morton
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 07:43, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Tim Blechmann]
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:38:24 -0500
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 13:49, Tim Blechmann wrote:
I have a denormal fix without a branch but you probably don't want
to see it ;-)
It's pretty
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 08:30, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Simon Jenkins]
Tim Goetze wrote:
8-bit exponent and no assumption about its value made, 8 binary
'shift', 7 'or' and 1 'and' statement if i'm not badly mistaken. and
if i'm not, a branch will probably hurt less.
Three shifts, three copys,
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 18:22, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Going back to our original point: if a user is too lazy to read
a manual, I can't be bothered with his problem. And if someone
proclaims that aversion to reading documentation is 'normal', I
will disagree, and now you all know why.
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 02:36, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I made the observation that educated people usually do not mind having
to learn something. So if there is a widespread aversion to having to
learn and read a manual, that seems to indicate that education levels
have gone down.
I
vocals, acoustic/electric guitars, bass and just about
any other instrument. The effect is created by applying small
changes to the pitch and timing of the incoming signal. The changes
are created by a one-dimensional random fractal line producing pink
noise. Special thanks to Jan Depner
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 16:20, Dave Robillard wrote:
I all seriousness though, maybe it would be a good idea to create a
centralized list of apps that need to be written? Kind of a global
linux audio TODO list.
We could even put enhancements to existing software there as well (ie
add LASH
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 03:42, Tim Orford wrote:
i dont mean to be aggressive, i'm just really intrigued to
know how people get any music done. There is never any talk on
this list or LAU about real software usage or workflows etc.
Most of that talk is on ardour-dev. Ask Ron Parker
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 06:21, Tim Orford wrote:
The other thing that makes linux more productive for me is the windowmanager I
am using: ion, a tabbed/tiled window manager which I would like to promote
here as one of the most productivity enhancing piece of software I know.
i am
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:39, Steve Harris wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 07:15:24AM -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
Also, being one of those bedroom hackers, I just want to point out that
I've been a professional programmer for 26 years. I've done mostly
scientific graphical editing and data
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 09:03, Tim Orford wrote:
yeh you guys are lucky, not only do you get to work with real
instruments but your software requirements are much more easily satisfied:-)
Yeah, it is much easier than dealing with MIDI and synths. I get a
headache just thinking about
I like this idea, however, in JAMin, we were trying to save real
estate. The status bar is used for JACK status. It would be very easy
to implement this since I've already built focus change detection in for
context sensitive help (shift-F1 over any widget). I don't think I have
enough room to
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 17:00, Steve Harris wrote:
Yup, but I dont think we got consensus on the metadata format, which is
kinda fundamnetal. For the record, I (still) think we should use a
restricted subset of RDF/N3.
As long as you never, ever have to look at it. I could actually
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 03:10, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On tis, 2004-06-08 at 20:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Colors must always be configurable. The percentage of color blind people is
much higher than most people think.
I think the percentage of colorblind males are about 10%
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 04:37, Steve Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:11:54 -0500, Jan Depner wrote:
Sorry for my ignorance -- but is there someone who can present me
the german term for affordance? The web-dicts I searched, don't
know this word -- and the wikipedia entry doesn't
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 04:49, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:06:00AM +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 21:15, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
- When I saw the collection of VST plugins that Paul Davis used
to show his VST hosting in Karlsruhe, I asked myself
Don't feel bad. I got mine right and then thought it was wrong :) Go
figure.
Jan
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 06:52, Paul Davis wrote:
Ardour: default value ctrl-button2 click
context menu = button3 click
chris - heh, i am as bad as you! i got ardour's wrong :) default value
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 07:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, you are correct. In JAMin it's center click. Jeez, I wrote it, I should
know these things :-\
Jan
But obviously I don't...Doh! It's right click to go to default in all
sliders that have a default. The compressors, crossovers,
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 06:17, Dave Griffiths wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 21:11, Marek Peteraj wrote:
What linux audio offers is
technology. No comfort at all. Right now it's all just academic
software.
This, and the lack of marketing departments is exactly why I am here.
I don't want
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 17:26, Marek Peteraj wrote:
But you guys *are* following proprietary software in general. Ardour is
a DAW just like cubase is, while SSM resembles reaktor in its
philosophy. LADSPAs are plugins like VSTs are, etc etc etc. There's
nothing which is perfectly original.
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 19:27, Marek Peteraj wrote:
If you want to organize something go ahead and organize it, but
please don't tell me that I have to conform to some consumer driven
vision of the great commercial future of Linux Audio.
Sorry to criticize still, but you're participating
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 18:08, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Most probably you will find out (when/if other developers care to speak
out) that this view is shared by many, if not all, developers, and not
just in the audio world. Great projects in the open source community
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
