> A Dilluns 02 Febrer 2004 20:53, Juhana Sadeharju va
> escriure:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have partially lost the track on the latest
> audio and graphics
> > development. Even I'm on 50+ mailing lists, the
> whole picture is
> > blurry.
> >
> > So, I'm making a list of software which comes with
> sou
More for your list, The CLAM family:
CLAM - A library for Audio and Music processing and transformation
CLAM Network Editor - A tool to graphically create CLAM based system
SMS Tools - Transformation using Spectral Modelling: sound morphing, voice
genere changes, pitch shifting...
Salto - A Realt
RTcmix is a signal-processing/synthesis environment, open source etc.
We're getting a new release ready soon, also a max/msp [rtcmix~] object.
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/RTcmix/
brad
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-audio-dev-
> > [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:06:12 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote
> (I'm moving this to linux-audio-user where the rest of this
> discussion has been held. Please direct replies there)
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > At the risk of being pedantic, what is wrong with the
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 21:57, Paul Davis wrote:
> >In YOUR opinion. In MY opinion, proprietary software is "not good for
> >Linux in general". Our opinions differ, deal with it.
> >
> >At no point did I say you shouldn't have the right to release your
> >software under whatever license you want.
>In YOUR opinion. In MY opinion, proprietary software is "not good for
>Linux in general". Our opinions differ, deal with it.
>
>At no point did I say you shouldn't have the right to release your
>software under whatever license you want. I said I personally consider
>it "garbage", and I do.
Yo
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 01:53 pm, Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> Its not my intention to blame Linux or the Linux-Community but it is
> in consequence the only way to prevent such postings in the future.
It would seem to me that your behavior will *encourage* such postings in
the future. The
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:53:49 +
"Stefan Nitschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its not my intention to blame Linux or the Linux-Community but it is
> in consequence the only way to prevent such postings in the future.
> As such postings are not good for Linux in general... I still have
> the pa
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 14:53, Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> >Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> >
> > > >I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
> > > >proprietary garbage won't happen, *ahemRTSynth/digeridooahem*).
> > > >
> > > No problem, I canceled any support for Linux from now until e
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 13:14, Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> >I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
> >proprietary garbage won't happen, *ahemRTSynth/digeridooahem*).
> >
> No problem, I canceled any support for Linux from now until ever.
>
> bye,
> Stefan
Because I personally
Dave Phillips wrote:
Hi Stefan :
You would let one person's opinion deny the rest of us the pleasure of
your software ? Doesn't really seem fair ...
Sometimes I think we should rename the list "Developers of Linux sound
and music software that may or may not be free, might or might not
inclu
(I'm moving this to linux-audio-user where the rest of this
discussion has been held. Please direct replies there)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> At the risk of being pedantic, what is wrong with the sound/audio section of
> freshmeat?
A good question. At first
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:16:47PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:35 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> > It would be nice to provide app authors or packagers with a trivial way
> > to update the page when they release packages.
> > A lot of the information we want (release d
CTED]>
Reply-To: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing
List"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stefan Nitschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing
List"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Software with source co
From: "Andreas Kuckartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing
List"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stefan Nitschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing
List"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefan Nitschke wrote:
> >I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
> >proprietary garbage won't happen, *ahemRTSynth/digeridooahem*).
> >
> No problem, I canceled any support for Linux from now until ever.
I would understand if you "canceled any support" for the author of t
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:05:35 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:53:06PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:32:36PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> > >Er, yes. I think this can be left up to the submitters discression.
> > >eg. http://freshmeat.net/projects/
I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
proprietary garbage won't happen, *ahemRTSynth/digeridooahem*).
No problem, I canceled any support for Linux from now until ever.
bye,
Stefan
_
Tired of spam? Get advanc
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:35 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> It would be nice to provide app authors or packagers with a trivial way
> to update the page when they release packages.
> A lot of the information we want (release date,
> version, dependencies...) is already in RPM spec files,
> debi
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:53:06PM +0100, Vincent Touquet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:32:36PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> >Er, yes. I think this can be left up to the submitters discression.
> >eg. http://freshmeat.net/projects/sweep/
> >looking at that I guess you would want
> >required-p
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:32:36PM +, Steve Harris wrote:
>Er, yes. I think this can be left up to the submitters discression.
>eg. http://freshmeat.net/projects/sweep/
>looking at that I guess you would want
>required-package and recommended-package being sub-properties of depends-on
I know t
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:20:13 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> > The nacent linux audio apps site could do this as well (freshmeat does
> > IIRC).
> >
> > *cough*appA depends-on appB . :)
>
> Indeed. Although I don't know how user-friendly it is to list
> *everything* ... "oh, it depends on g
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 10:09:50AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:55:10 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > One suggestion: I think it'd be useful to list what interfaces the app
> > > supports, I know at least for me if it d
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:55:10 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One suggestion: I think it'd be useful to list what interfaces the app
> > supports, I know at least for me if it doesn't use jack it's basically
> > useless (and I'd rather find this out
RTMix is (although being a fringe audio-related app) also open source. ;-)
Description:
Interactive Multimedia Art Script-base Performance Interface
Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor
http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linu
On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:55 am, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One suggestion: I think it'd be useful to list what interfaces the app
> > supports, I know at least for me if it doesn't use jack it's basically
> > useless (and I'd rather find this out before downl
Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One suggestion: I think it'd be useful to list what interfaces the app
> supports, I know at least for me if it doesn't use jack it's basically
> useless (and I'd rather find this out before downloading the whole
> thing!)
The audio distributions (suc
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 14:53, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have partially lost the track on the latest audio and graphics
> development. Even I'm on 50+ mailing lists, the whole picture is
> blurry.
I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
proprietary garbage won't
28 matches
Mail list logo
