On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
[...]
I like it, thanks. Could you please update btrfs fi df to show this
instead of adding a new command though?
Hi Chris,
no problem to update the patches, however I have one suggestion:
- leave btrfs fi df as is to
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:22:06 +0200
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
[...]
I like it, thanks. Could you please update btrfs fi df to show this
instead of adding a new command though?
Hi Chris,
no
Hi,
Thanks for this patch.
Personally, i don't mind any of the propositions as the developpement
is still in progress and may be adapted.
Furthermore, as Roman said, df is more well known for unix users.
Thanks to your work on that, i've started developing a bunch of
scripts for
Am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2012 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:22:06 +0200
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Chris Mason
chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote: [...]
I like it, thanks. Could you please update btrfs fi df to show
CC'in akpm.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
mar...@oberhumer.com wrote:
Hi all,
is there some official maintainer who feels responsible for
pushing the LZO update to Linus?
Otherwise I also could issue a pull-request on github, but somehow I
don't think that this
Hi all,
is there some official maintainer who feels responsible for
pushing the LZO update to Linus?
Otherwise I also could issue a pull-request on github, but somehow I
don't think that this is the preferred workflow.
Cheers,
Markus
On 2012-08-21 17:21, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
Hi all,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:22:06AM -0600, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote:
[...]
I like it, thanks. Could you please update btrfs fi df to show this
instead of adding a new command though?
Hi Chris,
no problem to
---
man/btrfs.8.in | 94
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/btrfs.8.in b/man/btrfs.8.in
index 4b0a9f9..ed20448 100644
--- a/man/btrfs.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfs.8.in
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ btrfs \- control a btrfs filesystem
.PP
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used by
the chunks, how many space are available in the chunks, and an
estimation of the free space of the filesystem.
---
cmds-filesystem.c | 264
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df --help
usage: btrfs filesystem disk-usage [-d][-s][-k] path [path..]
Show space usage information for a mount point(s).
-k Set KB (1024 bytes)
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:57:26AM -0600, Alex Lyakas wrote:
Hi Josef,
in send code, in full_send_tree() there is code like this:
key.objectid = found_key.objectid;
key.type = found_key.type;
key.offset = found_key.offset + 1;
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 07:07:53PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
On 09/26/2012 01:39 AM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
The
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This serie of patches updated the command btrfs filesystem
df. I update this command because it is not so easy to get
the information about the disk usage from the command fi df and fi show.
From the man page (see 2nd
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:15PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used by
the chunks, how many space are available in the chunks, and an
estimation of the free space of the
Hello David,
I compared the source code and found that I did have a merge conflict.
This is now resolved and now builds fine.
Thanks,
Gordon
On 3 October 2012 00:14, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:50:26PM +1000, Gordon Ng wrote:
Hello Josef,
FYI build failure
On 10/03/2012 01:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df --help
usage: btrfs filesystem disk-usage [-d][-s][-k]path [path..]
Show space usage information for a
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 01:56 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Looks good. Only a few comments, inline.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[snip]
Also, use kB, MB, GB, TB for powers-of-ten based units,
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a break down of Disk_allocated from the summary
section. If so, why not call it Disk_allocated to avoid confusion?
On 10/03/2012 05:02 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
+static int cmd_disk_free(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+
+ int flags=DF_SHOW_SUMMARY|DF_SHOW_DETAIL|DF_HUMAN_UNIT;
+ int i, more_than_one=0;
+
+ if (check_argc_min(argc, 2))
+ usage(cmd_disk_free_usage);
+
+ for(i=1; i
Hi!
I have a broken btrfs unable to mount because it is unable to find the
tree root. Using find-root I find the following:
Well block 14102764707840 seems great, but generation doesn't match,
have=109268, want=109269
Because the filesystem was last in use with a pre 3.2-kernel I am unable
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:02 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:43:15PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are
From the man page (see 2nd patch):
[...]
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used by
the chunks, how many space are available in the chunks, and an
estimation of the free space of the filesystem.
[...]
$ ./btrfs
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used by
the chunks, how many space are available in the chunks, and an
estimation of the free space of the filesystem.
---
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
man/btrfs.8.in | 94
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/btrfs.8.in b/man/btrfs.8.in
index 4b0a9f9..0db588f 100644
--- a/man/btrfs.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfs.8.in
@@ -27,6 +27,8
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Øystein Sættem Middelthun
oyst...@middelthun.no wrote:
Hi!
I have a broken btrfs unable to mount because it is unable to find the tree
root. Using find-root I find the following:
Well block 14102764707840 seems great, but generation doesn't match,
Hi,
On 10/03/2012 07:20 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
filesystem_cmd_group_usage, NULL, {
- { df, cmd_df, cmd_df_usage, NULL, 0 },
+ { df, cmd_disk_free, cmd_disk_free_usage, NULL, 0 },
If this command is going to replace df, you should change the function
name back
On 10/02/2012 02:08 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:02:22PM -0700, Wade Cline wrote:
Hello Theodore Ts'o,
Is there a function similar to ext2fs_dir_iterate2() that will call a hook
function on an ext2_dir_entry_2 structure and not an ext2_dir_entry
structure?
The reason I
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a break down of Disk_allocated from the summary
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:39:55AM -0700, Wade Cline wrote:
I would think that using (name_len 0xFF) is a much simpler solution,
and my suggestion is to not depend on the file type in the directory
entry (since there might be some very old ext2 file systems that don't
set the file type), and
On 10/03/2012 10:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
To clarify, the EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE flag indicates that
there _may_ be file type information in the directory entry (and so
only the low 8 bits of name_len should be considered part of the name
length), but it does not guarantee that it
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:22:30PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df /
Path: /
Summary:
Disk_size: 72.57GB
Disk_allocated:25.10GB
Disk_unallocated: 47.48GB
Logical_size: 23.06GB
Used:
On 10/03/2012 09:32 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:22:30PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
$ ./btrfs filesystem df /
Path: /
Summary:
Disk_size: 72.57GB
Disk_allocated:25.10GB
Disk_unallocated: 47.48GB
Logical_size:
On 10/03/2012 07:46 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 07:46 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Type for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:22:31PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
From: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
The command btrfs filesystem df is used to query the
status of the chunks, how many space on the disk(s) are used by
the chunks, how many space are available in the
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:34:00PM +0300, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:22:31PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[snip]
+static const char * const cmd_disk_free_usage[] = {
+ btrfs filesystem df [-d|-s][-k] path [path..],
+ Show space usage information for a mount
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:25:11AM -0600, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
I don't know how to diagnose the problem, but now it is the second
time. After starting a VM in VirtualBox and filling the memory, Chrome
stopped loading any pages. After logging out and on, it still wasn't
working, reboot fixed
On 10/03/2012 10:38 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
+ if( !(flags (DF_SHOW_SUMMARY|DF_SHOW_DETAIL)) ){
+ fprintf(stderr, btrfs filesystem df: it is not possible to
specify -s AND -d\n);
This doesn't look right at all. You are adding two switches and
specifying both of them is
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:48:46 +0200
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
CC'in akpm.
Thanks.
Hi all,
I finally have prepared a small package that updates the LZO version
in the Linux kernel. Please get it from:
Hi,
I've been testing what I believe to be the btrfs patches being queued
up for 3.7, and have been having trouble with stalled writes.
(See, e.g., http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg19171.html)
With CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y I was able to collect the following
lockdep splat, which I hope
On 10/03/2012 07:29 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
If you do not have a suitable backup for these files, please make an
effort to do what you can with restore. Some of the repair methods
out there have a possibility to make the situation worse.
We are talking about something like 50TB, so there is
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Øystein Sættem Middelthun
oyst...@middelthun.no wrote:
On 10/03/2012 07:29 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
If you do not have a suitable backup for these files, please make an
effort to do what you can with restore. Some of the repair methods
out there have a
- Post the entire patch series to lkml for review (I'd like a cc please)
Already happened, multiple people reviewed and tested.
um, I would not consider Looks ok to me from a quick look. and I
couldn't tell from the github view, but I assume you follow standard
coding style. to
43 matches
Mail list logo
