add --raw, --si, --iec, --kbytes, --mbytes, --gbytes, --tbytes options
make columns which show sizes align to right. Others aligned to left.
example:
qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child
-- -
0/5 37.90MiB
The following test case hangs as of now, but as I remember Fujitsu
had sent a patch to fix this, a long time back. Can't find now,
any idea. ?
Test case:
add a spout device
replace seed / sprout device
hangs at:
(btrfs_reada_wait+0x4d/0xb0)
Thanks, Anand
--
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com wrote:
The following test case hangs as of now, but as I remember Fujitsu
had sent a patch to fix this, a long time back. Can't find now,
any idea. ?
Test case:
add a spout device
replace seed / sprout device
On 01/22/2015 02:16 PM, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hello,
When removing a subvol, if the related qgroup has no child qgroup, we should
destroy
it at the same time. Also remove the TODO entry in qgroup.c.
My two cents here:
Take a quick look at this, i am not sure whether this is right way to do
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Fan Chengniang wrote:
v3:
- remove --human-readable option
- add --raw, --si, --iec, --kbytes, --mbytes, --gbytes, --tbytes options
- by default, sizes are shown in human readable format
- make columns which show sizes align to right. Others aligned
What are the chances that splitting all the large files up into sub
gig pieces, finish convert, then recombine them all will work?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Gareth Pye gar...@cerberos.id.au wrote:
Yeah, we don't
PS: the only snapshots are of apt-mirror, which doesn't have large files.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Gareth Pye gar...@cerberos.id.au wrote:
What are the chances that splitting all the large files up into sub
gig pieces, finish convert, then recombine them all will work?
On Wed, Jan 21,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:40:53PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
We were incorrectly detecting when the target key didn't exist anymore
after releasing the path and re-searching the tree. This could make
us split or duplicate (btrfs_split_item() and btrfs_duplicate_item()
are its only callers at
Gareth Pye posted on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:58:08 +1100 as excerpted:
What are the chances that splitting all the large files up into sub gig
pieces, finish convert, then recombine them all will work?
[Further context removed due to the hassle of trying to sort the
top-posting into proper order
在 2015年01月23日 00:24, David Sterba 写道:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Fan Chengniang wrote:
v3:
- remove --human-readable option
- add --raw, --si, --iec, --kbytes, --mbytes, --gbytes, --tbytes options
- by default, sizes are shown in human readable format
- make columns which show
@@ -5729,6 +5744,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_inode_ref *ref;
struct btrfs_key key[2];
+ struct timespec current_time;
u32 sizes[2];
int nitems = name ? 2 : 1;
From: chandan r chandanrm...@gmail.com
This patch adds a new member to the 'struct btrfs_inode' structure to hold
the file creation time.
Signed-off-by: chandan chandanrm...@gmail.com
[refreshed, removed btrfs_inode_otime]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
This is based on top of
Regression test for a btrfs issue of resizing 'thread_pool' when
remount the fs.
This regression was introduced by the following linux kernel commit:
btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered
execution based on kernel workqueue
08a9ff3264181986d1d692a4e6fce3669700c9f8
Am Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:34:19 + (UTC)
schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net:
Gareth Pye posted on Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:58:08 +1100 as excerpted:
What are the chances that splitting all the large files up into sub gig
pieces, finish convert, then recombine them all will work?
[...]
Hi All,
Just wondering how 'btrfs recovery' operates, when the source device given is
one of many in an MD array - I can't find anything documentation beyond a
single device use case.
Does it automatically include all devices in the relevant MD array as occurs
when mounting, or does it only
15 matches
Mail list logo
