Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about
btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write
up since the scope of the problem is not clear yet. But since there's
definitely reproduced problems that have been going on for some time
now maybe it'd be a
There appears to be some regressions in btrfs-convert that are in the
list archive over the last month in particular - but I think the
problems particularly started to surface about 6ish months ago. When I
filed the bugs I was seeing with converted ext4 file systems, they
were completely
Good day,
This might be something you are already aware of, but I thought I should
inform someone of what happened to my sytem.
I was running ArchLinux with kernel 4.1.3-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT x86_64
GNU/Linux and executed btrfs-convert /mnt from an ArchLinux live disk to
convert my ext4
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 01 Aug 2015 19:14:13 -0600 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
1) If this fs was created with btrfs-progs v4.1.1, get what you need to
retrieve off of it immediately, then blow it away and start over, as
the thing
Quoting John Ettedgui at 2015-07-30-21:10:27(-0700):
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for the trace output.
You are welcome, thank you for looking at it!
But it seems that, your root partition is also btrfs, causing a lot of
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
The Balance went through.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
btrfs balance start
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
The Balance went through. But now:
Label: none uuid: a8af3832-48c7-4568-861f-e80380dd7e0b
Chris Murphy posted on Sat, 01 Aug 2015 14:44:52 -0600 as excerpted:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:09:35PM +0200, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
Hugo Mills posted on Sat, 01 Aug 2015 22:34:13 + as excerpted:
Yes and that also puts it in the realm of kernels that weren't
releasing/deallocating empty chunks; although I don't know if that's a
factor, if dconvert forcibly deals with this..
It does -- you only have to look at the
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Hendrik Friedel hend...@friedels.name wrote:
Hello,
I converted an array to raid5 by
btrfs device add /dev/sdd /mnt/new_storage
btrfs device add /dev/sdc /mnt/new_storage
btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid5 -mconvert=raid5 /mnt/new_storage/
The Balance went
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 11:29:40AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about
btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write
up since the scope of
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Does fi usage deal with raid5 yet?
Now that you mention it, I think it doesn't. But if it did, it would
show this problem better than df I think.
But, somewhere along the line he got 6 GiB of raid1 metadata. Either he
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 04:26:25PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Does fi usage deal with raid5 yet?
Now that you mention it, I think it doesn't. But if it did, it would
show this problem better than df I think.
But,
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 11:29:40AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Does someone with wiki edit capability want to put up a warning about
btrfs-convert problems? I don't think it needs to be a lengthy write
up since the scope of the problem is not clear yet. But since there's
definitely reproduced
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
1) If this fs was created with btrfs-progs v4.1.1, get what you need to
retrieve off of it immediately, then blow it away and start over, as the
thing isn't stable and all data is at risk.
Agreed. But I'd go so far as to say
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 02:35:39 PM John Ettedgui wrote:
It seems that you're using Chromium while doing the dump. :)
If no CD drive, I'll recommend to use Archlinux installation iso to make
a bootable USB stick and do the dump.
(just download and dd would do the trick)
As its kernel and
17 matches
Mail list logo
